Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How biological and psychological relate to crime
How biological and psychological relate to crime
Factors that lead to committing crime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How biological and psychological relate to crime
Rational Choice Theory
Introduction
The purpose of this paper is to discuss and analyze one of the six theories of Criminology. I have chosen to write about the Rational Choice Theory which also known as Choice Theory, because most people would ask themselves how could someone commit a crime!
Is crime rational? Or it is more likely to be random acts of criminal opportunity than well-thought-out conspiracies for an economic gain! Was the criminal forced due certain circumstances to do commit a crime or he wanted to do this unlawful act? Was he aware of this crime’s aftermath on him and the victim? Is human nature is that selfish and self-interested so that people would harm others to maximize their own benefits!
I will try to answer these questions in this paper by discussing this theory, its applications and suggestions to prevent crimes. I will also talk about the development of this theory.
Rational Choice Theory
Rational Choice Theory has been a hot topic and most influential and discussed in economy, sociology, political science and criminology. This theory emphasizes the role of enlightened self-interest in individual
…show more content…
However the theory promotes two concepts, Offense and offender. Offense-specific crime is the idea that offenders react selectively to the characteristics of an individual criminal act. Burglary is an example where they consider evaluating the target, police patrol, mobility, guard dogs, escape routes and the presence of occupants.
The other concept is offender-specific crime, which is the idea, that offenders must decide whether they have the prerequisites to commit a successful criminal act. Such as evaluating the necessary skills required to commit the crime, their need for money or other valuables, whether legitimate financial alternatives to crime exist or not, their fears of expected punishment, Physical ability and health and
Pratt, T. C. (2008). Rational Choice theory, criminal control policy, and criminology relevance. Policy essay, 43-52.
Kody Scott, later known as Shanyika Shakur, was born in Los Angeles in 1963. Before last imprisonment he committed various crimes, such as, robbery, assault, and murder. Kody’s childhood was pretty rough. He grew up as the fifth of six children in a broken home. His mother, Birdy Scott, worked odd jobs and long hours to support her children. While his father, Ernest Scott, left the family in 1970 and was completely out of Kody’s life by 1975. Shortly after completing sixth grade at Horace Mann, Kody joined a subgroup of the infamous L.A. Crips on June 15th, 1975. Kody committed his first murder on the night of his initiation. This would be the start of Kody’s descent into becoming “Monster Kody”. It was two years after his initiation that Kody first donned the name Monster. Scott had beaten a robbery victim so bad that the police said it was “The work of a
Situational crime prevention is an idea criminologists use in order to reduce the chances of crime initially taking place. This theory does not aim to punish criminals after the crime has taken place like the criminal justice system does, but however the opposite, it aims to reduce the chances of the crime taking place to start with. Ron Clarke (2005) describes this theory as an approach that aims to reduce the opportunities out there for crime, involving rational choice theory. Clark focuses on three methods within this theory, directing at specific crimes, altering the environment we live in and aiming to reduce the benefits of committing crimes.
Rational choice theorist says that social emotions such as guilt, shame, and anxiety are feelings or thoughts that prevent us from doing things and giving in to our temptations. These social cues helps us to place boundaries on what is right and what is wrong and what the outcome of negative delinquent behaviors may be. Not everyone has the same idea of what behavior is rational versus
Crime causation is looking at why people commit crimes. There are many theories that have been developed to explain this. The theories can be grouped into eight general categories of which one is the Classical theory (Schmallegar, 2011, p. 79). A subset of this theory, rational choice theory, will be specifically looked at to explain the crime of burglary. Just as no one causation theory explains all crimes committed, the rational choice theory itself does not completely explain why all burglars commit their crimes. Therefore, the pros and cons of the rational choice theory will be discussed in relation to the crime topic of burglary.
...ifferent crime patterns and thought processes of criminals. The reasons can only come from these theories and will help the justice systems become more prepared to react towards different crimes. However, with adding some enhancements, projects and experiments these two theories have the potential to change the criminology realm forever.
The second example of when this case study involves the rational choice perspective is when Danny lied to Laura about having the job at GM. Danny used his rational thinking that if he told Laura he had a good job, that she would stay with Danny. Danny was desperate at this point and attempted to make Laura and the children stay. In his mind, he had to lie in order to gain his reward. He believed that the benefit of him saying he had a job would make his marriage
Crime exists everywhere. It is exists in our country, in the big cities, the small towns, schools, and even in homes. Crime is defined as “any action that is a violation of law”. These violations may be pending, but in order to at least lower the crime rate, an understanding of why the crimes are committed must first be sought. There are many theories that are able to explain crimes, but three very important ones are rational choice theory, social disorganization theory and strain theory.
What are theories of crime? Why are they important? In this paper, will discuss two crime theories. Social learning theory and the labeling theory. We will compare both crime theories. It will also explain how these theories are related to specific crimes. The two theories discussed will also explain the policy implications. Finally, we will address what types of programs can be created to mitigate specific crimes related to the causation theories.
The objective of this paper is to provide insight into Rational Choice Theory. This theory, highly relied upon by many disciplines, is also used to calculate and determine crime and criminal behavior. Through definition, examples and techniques utilized by criminologists, the reader will have a better understanding of the subject. By definition, criminology is the study of crime, criminal behavior, and how it pertains to the law. Criminology is considered a scientific technique.
Unfortunately some crimes are driven by needs of survival; despite the consequences one can infer that once given little options a person will do whatever means necessary in order to survive it’s instinctive.
When criminals think that the benefit of committing the crime will outweigh the cost if they get caught, they make a choice to commit the crime. There are two varieties of rational choice theory. One, situational choice theory, which is an extension of rational choice theory and two, routine activities theory or RAT, which states that the daily routine or patterns in ones’ activities make it much easier for an individual to become a victim of crime. The theory is, crime is more likely to happen when a criminal and their victim come together in the absence of authority (Schmalleger). A situation made easier to come by when the criminal knows the victim’s daily routines or patterns.
In today’s society, one will find that there are many different factors that go into the development of a criminal mind, and it is impossible to single out one particular cause of criminal behavior. Criminal behavior often stems from both biological and environmental factors. In many cases criminals share similar physical traits which the general population do not usually have. For example criminals have smaller brains than properly adjusted individuals. However biological reasons cannot solely be the cause of criminal behavior. Therefore, one must look to other sources as to how a criminal mind is developed. Social and environmental factors also are at fault for developing a person to the point at which they are lead to committing a criminal act. Often, someone who has committed a violent crime shows evidence of a poorly developed childhood, or the unsuitable current conditions in which the subject lives. In addition if one studies victimology which is the role that the victim plays in the crime, it is apparent that there are many different causes for criminal behavior. Through the examination of biological factors, in addition to the social and environmental factors which make up a criminal mind, one can conclude that a criminal often is born with traits common to those of criminals, it is the environment that exist around them that brings out the criminal within them to commit indecent acts of crime.
This assessment determines the offender’s susceptibility in terms of reoffending, dangerousness to the public, readiness to be integrated back into society as well as readiness to be a law abiding citizen and probability of escaping supervision or parole (Guay Quimet & Proulx, 2004:330-331; Simourd 2004:306-307). Furthermore, a pre-parole assessment refers to the assessment of an individual’s program dedication, intervention progress as well as risk of reoffending which is used to accommodate the Parole Board and probation officers (Alexander, 2000:118-119). 2.3. Criminal analysis Criminal analysis can be defined as a law enforcement function which is used by criminologists to systematically analyse patterns and trends used by an offender (Boba, 2005:5). A criminal analysis is primarily compiled by making use of specific crime scene characteristics in order to identify possible personality, behavioral traits as well as characteristics of an offender (Kocsis, 2007:89).
Different schools of thought propose varying theoretical models of criminality. It is agreeable that criminal behaviour is deep rooted in societies and screams for attention. Biological, Social ecological and psychological model theories are key to helping researchers gain deeper comprehension of criminal behaviour and ways to avert them before they become a menace to society. All these theories put forward a multitude of factors on the outlooks on crime. All these theories have valid relevancy to continuous research on criminal behaviour.