Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Learning
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Learning
Michel Skidmore, who is the plaintiff in this case, is a trustee in the Randy Craig Wolfe Trust. Randy Craig Wolfe, a guitarist, started a band named Spirit with four other musicians: Mark Andes (bass), John “Jay” Ferguson (vocals), John Locke (keyboard), and Ed Cassidy (drums) in the year 1967. Spirit released its self-titled debut album Spirit in January 1968, which broke Billboard’s Top 40. On Spirit’s self-titled album was a unique 2 minute and 37 second instrumental titled “Taurus” which was written by Randy Craig Wolfe in the summer of 1967. The song has an ethereal, distinct plucked-guitar line and melody. Michael Skidmore claims that Led Zeppelin was greatly inspired from Spirit. He claims that Jimmy Patrick Page, guitarist of Led Zeppelin …show more content…
said in an interview in 1972 that Spirit’s performances were “very good” and struck him on an “emotional level”. According to Michael Skidmore ‘Stairway to Heaven’ was greatly inspired from Spirit’s Taurus and parts of ‘Stairway to Heaven’ are identical to Taurus. Michael Skidmore filled a copyright infringement suit against Led Zeppelin on 31/May/2014 and demanded share of profit and right of attribution for Randy Craig Wolfe in the song ‘Stairway to Heaven’. Issues : 1. Weather Randy Craig Wolfe has copyright over Taurus or not- The plaintiff claimed that “Taurus” was registered with the Copyright Office on 02/05/1968 (Reg. No. EU0000035222), and renewed on 01/11/1996 (Reg. No. RE0000725888. Copyright registration of “Taurus” lists Randy Craig Wolfe as the author and copyright claimant. He further claimed that since after the death of Randy in 2002, the rights have passed on to the randy Craig Wolfe trust, he as a trustee becomes beneficial owner of the royalty rights and has a locus standi in this case. Defendants claimed that the copyright of this song was owned by a non-party, Hollenback Music. Holeenback entered into a contract with Randy where he assigned the rights of the composition to Hollenback in return for a royalty. The defendants further claimed that the copyright of Taurus was registered under the 1909 copyright act. The 1909 Act required deposit of one complete copy of the musical work which had to be the sheet music and not the sound recording. Therefore sheet music of Taurus is deemed to define the scope of copyrighted composition. Issue 2-Whether the defendant had access to plaintiff’s work- The plaintiff claimed that Led Zeppelin had access to Spirit’s Taurus because Led Zeppelin started touring United States in 1968, opening for Spirit. It was this time that they grew familiar with Taurus and other compositions of Spirit. Issue 3-Whether the defendant’s work is substantially similar to that of the plaintiff’s work The plaintiff tried to establish substantial similarity by claiming that an ordinary person would recognize ‘Stairway to Heaven’ as to have been taken away from Taurus.
He also claimed that there are similarities between ‘Taurus’ and the iconic notes, melody, chord progression, structure, tempo, instrumentation, and feel of ‘Stairway to Heaven’. Further the plaintiff said that the question of substantial similarity will be decided by the jury. The defendants said that substantial similarity is established both an expert under the extrinsic test and by an ordinary person under the intrinsic test. According to the defendant, under the intrinsic test while musicologists( Skidmore’s expert) can testify as to the analytical dissection of the song but he or she has no objective, scientific or reliable basis to testify as to whether an ordinary person would find it substantially similar or not. Further, the similarity in concept and feel in an intrinsic test cannot be taken into account because it threatens the essence of copyright that is the protection for original …show more content…
expressions. Fig. 1 Fig.2 Under the extrinsic test the defendants rebutted the claim of substantial similarity by claiming that a tone progression is not a protectable expression.
The tone progression was not identical in this case (as is clear in fig.1 and fig. 2) and even if it was, it would not have been an infringement. The tone progression in the case of Taurus is only downscaling but in the case of Stairway to heaven it is both down-scaling and up-scaling which further establishes that substantial similarity cannot be established. Lastly, this tone progression is commonly used in the songs of blues tradition and hence would count as Scènes à
faire Judgment of the jury: The verdict of the jury went in favor of Led Zeppelin, defendant. The jury dismissed the claims of the Michael Skidmore, plaintiff. V. Conclusion In the case of musical works copyright infringement can only be decided after separating out the protectable and un-protectable elements of a work. This activity requires both the knowledge of an expert and the judgment of an ordinary man. What on the face of it appears to be a copyright infringement might not actually be so as seen in the recent and the famous case of Skidmore v. Led Zeppelin. While dealing with the cases of copyright infringement in musical works, the most important thing that needs to be remembered is that this protection should extend only to those things which can pass the test of originality and creativity. This is because of a simple reason that the jurisprudence behind copyright extends to both promotion
(3 points) What kind of defenses has the defendant raised? Or, if the case is over, what defenses did the defendant raise? If not clear in the article, what are the likely defenses?
Counsel of the appellant sought a certificate from the judge to bring an interlocutory appeal to the Court of Appeal against the admissibility of the coincidence evidence. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, ruling the coincidence evidence inadmissible. It adopted a different approach than that in NSW in reviewing the ruling of the Evidence.
Steve Miller was born October 5, 1943 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Steve’s family was very involved with music. His mother was a jazz-influenced singer, and his father was a pathologist that very interested in the world of music. Dr. Miller was friends with many musicians which greatly aided in young Steve’s development in music. One of his father’s friends included Les Paul, who showed Steve some chords on a guitar at the age of five. Les Paul proved to be a very valuable mentor to Steve, and he became a good friend of the family. When Steve was seven his family moved to Dallas, where he was exposed to a different type of artists that usually did not visit Milwaukee. His father took him to see greats such as Hank Williams, Chuck Berry, and Carl Perkins. Steve was particularly drawn to T-Bone Walker, the father of Texas-style electric blues. This proved to be very influential in Steve’s life, and it is evident by the blues-sound that he exhibited in his guitar playing.
One similarity is that Dally and Johnny do not have very great homelives. For example, Dally parents do not seem to care for him. Dally does not live with his parents and stays anywhere he can. Dally was arrested at the age of ten, which shows that no one was looking for him. Dally says to Johnny, “‘Shoot, my old man don’t give a hang whether I’m in jail or dead in a car wreck
In Night and Life Is Beautiful there are similarities that obvious like how they are both
Two very influential artists of their time were Jimi Hendrix and Ritchie Valens. Many people wouldn’t consider these two artists to be similar nor have achieved the same success, however they’re paths were quite similar. Both these artists began their careers very early in their lives and were able to influence others artists along the way. Many of their songs also made the top charts. Although both their careers were short lived, both these artists left a mark in the world of music.
Along with the development of a file format (MP3) to store digital audio recordings, came one of the new millennium’s most continuous debates – peer-to-peer piracy – file sharing. Internet companies such as Napster and Grokster became involved in notable legal cases in regards to copyright laws in cyberspace. These two cases are similar in nature, yet decidedly different. In order to understand the differences and similarities, one should have an understanding of each case as well as the court’s ruling.
sides, opinions, and conditions to explore and debate that it could take one a lifetime to discover a suitable answer that would satisfy both sides. So, rather than attempt to fit it all into a single essay, I will focus on one facet of the debate; Is John Williams use of other music scores
Although the harmonies were similar to those of the blues or hymns in that they shared the
Over the past decade the societal view of creative society has greatly changed due to advances in computer technology and the Internet. In 1995, aware of the beginning of this change, two authors wrote articles in Wired Magazine expressing diametrically opposed views on how this technological change would take form, and how it would affect copyright law. In the article "The Emperor's Clothes Still Fit Just Fine" Lance Rose hypothesized that the criminal nature of copyright infringement would prevent it from developing into a socially acceptable practice. Thus, he wrote, we would not need to revise copyright law to prevent copyright infringement. In another article, Entitled "Intellectual Value", Esther Dyson presented a completely different view of the copyright issue. She based many her arguments on the belief that mainstream copyright infringement would proliferate in the following years, causing a radical revision of American ideas and laws towards intellectual property. What has happened since then? Who was right? This paper analyzes the situation then and now, with the knowledge that these trends are still in a state of transformation. As new software and hardware innovations make it easier to create, copy, alter, and disseminate original digital content, this discussion will be come even more critical.
In all his years of touring he managed to touch and inspire other people into following his footsteps to become a performer. One of the most known for inspiring Freddie Mercury is the late lead singer of Nirvana, Kurt Cobain. Cobain stated in an interview how Mercury inspired him. “I used to take naps in the van and listen to Queen. Over and over again and drain the battery on the van, then we’d be stuck.
Norman Greenbaum’s beautifully sung and wonderfully composed “Spirit in the Sky” obtained the praise that it deserved in the year of 1970 when it went gold, selling two million copies. Norman Greenbaum’s song “Spirit in the Sky” even reached number three on the top 100 in April of 1970, it managed to stay in the top 100 rock songs for 15 weeks.
Most people have preconceptions about what influenced the popular genre of Rock and Roll. Many think that Rock and Roll was heavily influenced by either Jazz or Blues music, but there are a few scholars who agree or disagree with this thought. Writer Craig Mosher argues the point that pentecostalism was the biggest influence on Rock and Roll. Not only does Mosher think that pentecostalism was the heaviest influence on Rock and Roll, but Randall Stephens also attests that pentecostalism had a large impact on Rock and Roll. Writer Russell Roberts takes the stand that blues is what influenced rock and roll the most; he even claims that blues is what rock n roll was morphed into. Also, penman Mike Daley stakes to the position that blues is what
(Schwartz, 1) The name of their band was actually inspired by a Muddy Waters Song, “Rollin Stone”. Their first single was “Come On”, released in 1963. Andrew Loog Oldham was the band’s first official
...ts new and old artist from having their original forms of expression stolen. A performing artist or songwriter should have a good understanding of the factors of the copyright law. An artist always wants to protect their work so the wrong people can not abuse it. By having a deep knowledge about the copyright law, the artists can save themselves from paying endless unnecessary legal fees.