Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Environment effect people essay
Effect of environmental change
Effect of environmental change
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Environment effect people essay
Validity: The experiment was valid since it tested the aim which was to demonstrate the effect of the environment on phenotype utilising radish seeds and comparing their height in different environmental conditions. The aim was tested as the amount of light was changed, three were put in the shade and the other three in direct sunlight and their heights were recorded. Further, the experiment was valid as it tested the hypothesis which was: radish seeds placed in the shade will be taller than the radish seeds placed in direct sunlight, it was looking at the height of the plants in the shade and the height of the plants in direct sunlight, however, it was proven to be wrong since at the end of the experiment the plants in shade were shorter than the ones in direct sunlight. Also, the variables were controlled such as …show more content…
Further, there was a control variable which also made it valid, the control variable for the plants in shade were the plants in direct sunlight and vice versa. However, the experiment was not valid as certain variables for instance the amount of soil put in each pot was not measured, therefore this could have altered the results since if it had a lot of soil it would have had more room to grow its roots down in the pot whereas another plant with less soil inside the pot would have had less space to grow its roots down the soil. Another variable that was not kept controlled was the covering of the seeds with soil, the holes had the same depth but when covering them more soil could have been put on some seeds more than others, therefore, the ones with less soil germinated first than the ones with more soil on. Another variable that was not controlled and made the experiment invalid was amount of wind received by the plants in direct sunlight and the ones
Two members of the group were instructed to visit the laboratory each day of the experiment to water and measure the plants (Handout 1). The measurements that were preformed were to be precise and accurate by the group by organizing a standardized way to measure the plants. The plants were measured from the level of the soil, which was flat throughout all the cups, to the tip of the apical meristems. The leaves were not considered. The watering of the plants took place nearly everyday, except for the times the lab was closed. Respective of cup label, the appropriate drop of solution was added to the plant, at the very tip of the apical meristems.
The beet Lab experiment was tested to examine bio-membranes and the amount of betacyanin extracted from the beets. The betacyanin is a reddish color because it transmits wavelengths in red color and absorbs most other colors. The membrane is composed of a phospholipid bilayer with proteins embedded in it. The phospholipid bilayer forms a barrier that is impermeable to many substances like large hydrophilic molecules. The cells of beets are red and have large vacuoles that play a big role for the reddish pigment. This experiment aimed to answer the question, “How do cell membranes work?” The hypothesis we aim to test is: Cell membranes work as a fluid mosaic bilayer of phospholipids with many embedded proteins. We predicted that the 50% Acetone will break down the most betacyanin. Our hypothesis was proven wrong by our data collected. We could test our predictions by doing the experiment multiple times and compare the
The experiment was designed to test the hypothesis by planting an increasing number of genus Helianthus (sunflower) seeds in pots to see how they respond to increased density in limited space. Two replicates each of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, and 128 seeds were planted in similar size pots containing an equal mix of potting soil and perlite. All plants were kept in greenhouse conditions exposed to similar light and temperatures settings and were watered at equivalent intervals. At the end of the time period each pot was evaluated for number of seeds that had germinated as well as number of stems with blooms. Stems and blooms were cut and weighed.
We used wheatgrass were 40 wheatgrass seeds, two empty pots, soil, and water. We first added soil for both pots and 20 wheatgrass seeds in each pot. My partner and I decided that we label pot one experiment which is “sugar and water” and pot two control which is “water” only. The experiment was for almost four weeks we had to make sure both get the same room temperature and water, so we can see the results after this amount of time. Both pots had same room temperature so both can have the same amount of sunlight also, the same amount of water which is a glass of water from the sink once a week. In the experiment pot we added a glass of water with one teaspoon of sugar and the control pot glass of water. Every week we used to see both pots grow almost the same. At the end of the experiment, my partner and I measured the length for both plants and we recorded the average for each plant, so we can know the rate of growth
The germinating seeds consumed almost no oxygen throughout the experiment in the 10-degree C water bath. I think that this is because when an organism cools down, all of its cellular functions slow down.
The purpose of our experiment was to test whether or not the Wisconsin Fast Plants, or Brassica rapa, followed the Mendelian genetics and its law of inheritance. First, after we crossed the heterozygous F1 generation, we created an F2 generation which we used to analyze. After analyzing our results, we conducted a chi-square test for for both the F1 and F2 generations to test their “goodness of fit”. For the F1 generation we calculated an x2 value of 6.97, which was greater than the value on the chi-square table at a p-value of 0.05 and 1 degree of freedom (6.97 > 3.84). This meant that we had to reject our hypothesis that stated there would be no difference between the observed and expected values. This showed us that the F1
Every student in a lab section planted eight seeds, two in each cell in a quad, to make sure that we had at least one plant for each week for 4 weeks. After planting the seeds we put the plants on a water mat tray to make
The fair testing will be carefully checked so the results do not come out to be void. The light intensity will be changed for it is the only variable used in the experiment. Though the temperature, watt of the bulb, amount of water, size of the plant and posit...
Investigating the Effect of Light Intensity on the Size of a Plantain Leaf Title: To investigate the effect of light intensity on the size of a plantain leaf. Hypothesis: I predict that the size of the plantain leaves would increase as the light intensity decreases. Therefore, plantain leaves found in the shade will have larger surface areas than leaves found in an open area. Theory: Sunlight is an essential factor need to complete the process of photosynthesis.
Going into details of the article, I realized that the necessary information needed to evaluate the experimental procedures were not included. However, when conducting an experiment, the independent and dependent variable are to be studied before giving a final conclusion.
the effect light has on the growth of pea plants. It will take place in an environment with controlled light, with equal amounts of plants being grown in the light and in the dark. All elements of the experiment other than light will be kept the same, such as amount of seeds in each pot, amount of soil in each pot and amount of water given to each plant each day. This will ensure a fair experiment. Prediction: I predict that in general, the plants grown in the light will grow better than those grown in the dark.
The reason light intensity is being used compared to whether or not a plant needs light. It is because The experiment wants to show that the rates of photosynthesis will vary according to how much light from a light bulb will be trapped in. the chloroplasts, in the leaf. The more energy trapped the more efficient a chemical reaction can take place and the speed of photosynthesis will increase. There are many things which can affect the photosynthesis of a plant such as light intensity, temperature and carbon dioxide levels.
A grow light was positioned in the air so that its light covered each system Each reservoir was filled with 12 liters of water 2.5 mL of MaxiGro fertilizer were added to each water tank 13.2 mL of pH Down were added to one reservoir, 13.2 mL of pH Up to another, and the last one was left untouched The basil plants were divided into 3 groups of 6 and put into slots in the hydroponic setups The grow light was turned on for [] hours and then shut off for [] hours each day At the end of the week, plants’ heights were measured in cm and recorded Steps 6 through 8 were repeated each week, after the reservoir tanks were dumped out and
Photosynthesis Investigation Research Question How does the concentration of glucose affects the photosynthesis rate of a spinach leaf when exposed to a LED light source? Hypothesis My hypothesis is that when the concentration of glucose is glucose increasing the faster the rate of photosynthesis will occur.
I chose to test the effect light has on plants because it is very interesting to test that light is a very important factor, and as the earth gets hotter it will be interesting to see what will happen at the end while sunlight is important at the moment and is a core ingredient for photosynthesis, it will also be very interesting to see what would happen if the plants had no exposure to sun at all, and if they would adapt.