Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Challenges with racial profiling
Challenges with racial profiling
What is racial profiling in airports
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Challenges with racial profiling
According to the Encarta Dictionary, Racial Profiling is the assumption of criminality among ethnic groups without probable cause. Since the September 11, 2001, Al Qaeda attack on the World Trade Center, racial profiling has been the temporary tactic used to stop terrorism. After more than ten years since implementing this practice, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has made little progress. Some American citizens are still skeptical of Middle Eastern and Muslim people even though TSA has caught no terrorists through racial profiling. Although racial profiling has the potential to catch terrorists, it should not be used because racial profiling can justify terrorist acts, it will not improve airport and airline security, and it is discrimination. Those in favor of racial profiling, like Clifford S. Fishman, believe the potential to catch terrorists exists. They believe this because it is careless not to single out a class since it takes too long for TSA to scrutinize everyone and all terrorists are all Middle Eastern or Muslim. According to the opposition, it is irresponsible not to practice racial profiling since security cannot “properly scrutinize” every person and item that is on a plane (527). TSA does not have resources to check every person that is in an airport. How is it, there are enough resources to have extreme security checks for all people of a certain ethnic group, but not enough for more thorough checks of everyone? It takes too long for TSA to check every person who walks through the security check point. Selecting a stereotypical race makes security lines move much faster. If the security equipment is incapable of checking everyone, shouldn’t better security systems be used? Fishman believes all ... ... middle of paper ... ...Q Researcher 14 Dec. 2001: n. pag. Rpt. in Current Issues and Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/ St. Martin’s, 2011. 527-528. Print. “Racial Profiling.” Encarta Dictionary: English (North American). Electronic. “Amendment 14.” The Constitution of the United States. N.p., 1787. Military and Government Collection. Web. 7 Mar. 2012. . Civil Rights Act of 1964. N.p.: n.p., 1964. Military and Government Collection. Web. 7 Mar. 2012. .
Opponents will argue that racial profiling is based on suspicious behavior and not on race. They feel as though racial profiling can potentially stop certain crimes befor...
“The US Constitution: 14th Amendment.” The 14th Amendment. N.p., n.d. . Rpt. in The U.S. Constitution. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. The 14th Amendment. Web. 18 Mar. 2010. .
Introduction Terrorism and racial profiling is nothing new in our society. Although some people would like to believe that it is nonexistent, it is still a major issue in today’s world. With that being said, my view on the subject is that racial profiling is going to continue to happen, whether we like it or not. I believe profiling isn’t necessarily meant to intentionally harm anyone, but is used as a tool to prevent terrorism. Past terroristic attacks have led to the many stereotypes and prejudices that our country has today.
Racial profiling is a wide spread term in the American justice system today, but what does it really mean? Is racial profiling just a term cooked up by criminals looking for a way to get out of trouble and have a scapegoat for their crimes? Is it really occurring in our justice system, and if so is it done intentionally? Most importantly, if racial profiling exists what steps do we take to correct it? The answer to these questions are almost impossible to find, racial profiling is one of many things within our justice system that can be disputed from any angle and has no clear cut answers. All that can be done is to study it from different views and sources and come up with one’s own conclusion on the issue.
Before any argument can be made against racial profiling, it is important to understand what racial profiling is. The American Civil Liberties Union, defines racial profiling as "the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion or national origin"(Racial Profiling: Definition). Using this definition we can determine that racial profiling excludes any evidence of wrong-doing and relies solely on the characteristics listed above. We can also see that racial profiling is different from criminal profiling, which uses evidence of wrong-doing and facts which can include information obtained from outside sources and evidence gathered from investigation. Based on these definitions, I will show that racial profiling is unfair and ineffective because it relies on stereotyping, encourages discrimination, and in many cases can be circumvented.
According to the American Civil Liberties Union, Racial Profiling refers to the discriminatory practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual's race, ethnicity, religion, national origin, social economic class, sexual orientation, and so on. (American Civil Liberties Union) It is to say that authorities in charge of providing security and justice have taken this power to an extent in which discriminate people, especially the ones who are in disempowered groups.
Every day you see and hear about minorities groups complain about cops and their tactics against them stopping them while in traffic taking them in to custody or even getting kill over nothing. Racial Profiling is a common thing in this community and it is causing a lot of trouble. According to Minnesota House of Representatives analyst Jim Cleary, "there appear to be at least two clearly distinguishable definitions of the term 'racial profiling ': a narrow definition and a broad definition... Under the narrow definition, racial profiling occurs when a police officer stops, questions, arrests, and/or searches someone solely on the basis of the person 's race or ethnicity... Some ways to stop it is find out who is guilty of it, look at their
Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument, with Readings. 5th ed. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 1998. 475-479.
Racial Profiling usually occurs when a combination of safety, public protection and stereotype are involve to judge a person. Racial profiling needs to be separated from criminal profiling which is based on actual behavior by a person and not a stereotype. The thing about stereotypes is that anyone can do it even people who are good and not bias. When examining ourselves and really look at our first judgment of people, it is noticed that our own assumptions and biases would lead many of us to realize that we have stereotyped people m...
Have you ever been followed by store officials or security while shopping in a department store? At first, all of the attention can be flattering but quickly becomes insulting once you realize they’re not following you to offer any assistance. Instead because of how you look you fit a certain profile that causes store officials to think you’ve come to their store to steal. This type of behavior is called racial profiling. According to the American Civil Liberties Union, racial profiling refers to the discrimination practice by law enforcement officials of targeting individuals for suspicion of crime based on the individual’s race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. Citizens need to be more aware of racial profiling and make laws that racial profiling should be illegal. Racial profiling is carried out by law enforcement airport security, and other security personnel that look to profile the minorities for no reason. Heather Sally Newton Driscoll ebscohost.com stated “The practice of profiling is rooted in centuries of discrimination and is based on stereotypes that have long been disproved. Profiling holds on entire population accountable for the committed by a small minority”.
Racial profiling is defined as “The practice of substituting skin color for evidence as grounds for suspicion.” In Layman’s terms, racial profiling is when police officers stop, search, and arrest more people of one minority race that a majority race. Typically, American Latinos and African-Americans are among the main targets of racial profiling, mainly caused by decades of stereotypical beliefs that most “gangsters” and other criminals are of one of these two races. Since the disaster of 9/11 and the wars in the Middle East, Arabs and South Asians have become much more likely targets of racial profiling, especially with airport security and in major cities. The act ...
Racial profiling occurs because people are scared. The Department of Transportation’s sub-committee Air Traffic Control could be at fault here as well because three people were detained, which threw off the flight plan, times of landing and departure for other fights and inconvenientince the other passengers on board. The Department of Home Land Security let’s immigrants in without proper back round cheeks, but the department lets good people get treated like dirt like in the airline case here because said persons skin color is suspicious looking. The department has a priority to the American people, but I think they forgot that they have a priority for immigrants as
When we were children we were told to not judge its book by its cover. Racial profiling is seen all over the United States whether it's in sports,streets or airlines.People are being discriminated by the color of their skin even by their nationality.
Passenger profiling was initiated in the late 1960s as a response to counteract terrorist threats to aviation security. It refers to the identification of potential hijacker and separating them from the general public (Sweet, 2009). By this definition, profiling allows aviation security authorities to segregate individuals that could be a potential threat and take countermeasures against them. Initially passengers were profiled using the behavioural methodology where behavioural characteristics were analysed to identify whether or not an individual posed a threat or not. Later systems such as CAPPS, CAPPS II and Secure Flight were established in an endeavour to better counteract terrorist threats than the early rudimentary behavioural profiling system. All these systems presented inherent flaws such as violation of passenger privacy, inaccuracies in data, cost-ineffectiveness and inefficiencies for passengers and airlines. Currently, the Screening Passengers by Observation Techniques profiling methodology is being widely used in an attempt to mitigate threats. This methodology has sparked much controversy among the public regarding passengers being profiled based on race. Passengers from South Asia and Middle East are greatly subjected to racial profiling. An unbiased experiment by a researcher further exemplifies this. Profiling has received much negative criticism that will be addressed in this essay.
People of different ethnicity, such as Muslims and even Blacks, are the ones being subjective to the racism within the air lines. But why? Simple answer, were playing along with our fears. With the new media giving us over exaggerated perspective on current events, our minds feed into those emotions, which causes us to adapt those perceptions in a negative way, thus giving us our racist stereotype views. New laws and regulations post nine eleven are actually encouraging these behaviors. For people being racially profiled are mainly men of the Muslim region, they feel embarrassed when they have to get a pat down because the TSA agent are giving into their fears. But think about this, the United States has only had two terrorist threats since nine eleven, the underwear bomber and the shoe bomber, neither of whom were Muslim. With recent trends for terrorist groups trying to recruit non- Arab of any gender race and religion for plots, the airlines still continue to harass males of the Muslim region (Schneier). In fact according to a static published in Barbara Mantel article “Far- right extremism”, seventy -three percent of threats being made are from anti-government activates and only thirty six are inspired from Al Qaeda . Banning the no flight list as Chapman descried, may not be the best answer. If anything it would cause more mayhem, think about it, getting rid of a plan, that is intended to recognize terrorist, would be giving those people a free pass. Might as well put out a sign that says, “Terrorist you are now welcome to travel with our husbands, wives, sons and