Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial injustice in the justice system
History of drug prohibition in the US
Racial injustice in the justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial injustice in the justice system
Racial Discrimination: Drug Laws and Sentence Disparities The crime this essay will be on is racial injustice. The main point I want to focus on is how drugs laws came into effect because of certain races. With specific races being linked to different drugs, laws also came into effect. The movie “The House I live In” by Eugene Jarecki, was my inspiration for this essay. It depicted racial discrimination, and how certain drugs over time became associated with certain races. Many drugs that are illegal today, have not always been. Almost all of these drugs were sold commercially and used by many upper-class whites during the early to mid nineteenth century. Drugs were only an issue for the upper-class because they were the only ones able to …show more content…
Smoking opium was a custom for the Chinese workers after a day of work, comparable to workers today that go out for a drink after a day of work. With opium smoking came opium dens; this was where people would culminate to smoke opium, gamble, and prostitution took place there as well. Opium was now considered to be a harmful drug by the public, and they began to associate opium with the Chinese, “Public opinion toward opium was primarily based on ‘racial hatred’ by mainstream society toward Chinese immigrants. Newspapers of the time carried lurid tales of crime and debauchery in opium dens. All these accounts portrayed the Chinese in a negative light” (Hogan 40). The public became fearful of the effects of opium and the Chinese, “In 1875, the San Francisco municipal authority passed a city ordinance forbidding the smoking of opium. However, the actual importing and selling of the drug were not included in the ordinance as criminal acts” (Hogan 41). They prohibited individuals to not smoke opium but did nothing to the individuals producing and importing the drug. This clearly did not end the problem, opium was still allowed to be produced and imported wherever. This only …show more content…
Cocaine’s effect provided its users with energy and it became popular among African American workers. Cocaine’s effect was widely known by many, “Some southern labor bosses were even known to provide their black laborers with cocaine to increase their endurance and productivity” (Morgan). Even though cocaine was widely used, there was still a double standard, “Cocaine provided by whites to blacks under the pretense of increased economic productivity was seen as forgivable; however, cocaine used by blacks for recreational purposes was an indication of moral depravity” (Hogan 44). During this time period, racial tension between Caucasians and African Americans was at an all time high. During this time, African American families worked on plantations as slaves for Caucasian landowners. Many whites began to fear black men that used cocaine because of it’s side effects; they viewed blacks on cocaine as more dangerous and harmful. Rumors of black men on cocaine began to spread, “Anecdotal accounts often told of superhuman strength, violent criminal acts, and ghastly sexual offenses perpetrated by blacks against their white counterparts. Cocaine became associated with aggression, murder, rape, and African American males” (Booth). Whites were spreading false stories of black men on cocaine inducing fear in others. Due to this fear, many people began to take
This book will give you an understanding of how structural racism among blacks is installed throughout history. The system is created to make sure the subject matter, blacks, in this case, are subjected to fail. The crack epidemic in a Chicago neighborhood was only the beginning. Since the first day of this course the terms, drugs and crime have been introduced as not only enemies to society but good friends for the government.
The Chinese would run the opium trade; cocaine would come from South America. The impact of this conspiracy, she asserted, could as of now been seen in the city of Edmonton, where Murphy was a police court officer (Mark Bourrie, 2015). In her book through various illustrations she mentioned about the “The Ring Victims.” Through her book “The Black Candle” she likewise specified that how the white race especially white girls and women were trapped by Chinamen in order to secure their services administration as sellers of opiates (Kulba, 85). She further discussed that it is not true that girls go to Chinamen because of the drug habit they learnt and request to satisfy their drug needs (Kulba, 85). Yet, “they are trapped and hunted like a game stalked to windwand and trapped by the Chinamen in order that she may be bent to his criminal purpose such as Libidinous desire” (233). Emily Murphy, in her book “the Black Candle” opposite to page 30 there is a photo of a white woman with an opium pipe; the caption stated as “An open-eyed insensate in the dread Valley of the Shadow of the Drug,” (Murphy, 1922). Below, another picture demonstrates the natural progression of The Ring’s victims: a completely dressed white lady leans back with shirtless black man (Kalunta-Crumpton, 333). The subtitle pursues: "When she procures the propensity, she doesn 't comprehend what lies before her; later she couldn 't care less." Opposite page 49, there’s a picture of a dark-skinned man and white woman, postured together, with opium paraphernalia in front of them. The caption says: “Once a woman has started on the trail of the poppy, the sledding is very easy and downgrade all the way.” The Ring was said to have its claws into Saskatoon, Calgary, Montreal and other Canadian cities where young women —
The final chapter of The New Jim Crow reviews the manner in which the Black community might respond to the racism that exists today. Some research implies that we in America have reached a point of attrition as to incarceration and the positive effects outweighing the negative effects of marginalization and collateral damage to the community. By some research, the "War on Drugs" procreates poverty, joblessness, family breakdown, and crime.
“The House I Live” by Eugene Jarecki is a documentary that sheds a light on America’s ongoing battle with drug abuse by encompassing multiple viewpoints from all walks of life ranging from both sides of the law and everything in between: the police officers, politicians, drug dealers, inmates, grieving parents, authors and journalists about how the war of drugs affect their lives and the lives of others. The overall purpose of the documentary was to show the war on drugs and how it has failed in the United States.
Hart discusses the article he read from the 1980s. These articles were designed to elicit fear in white Americans. The articles stated fallacies like black men became homicidal and were not affected by bullets. These types of stories are still heard today. The most recent example would be the reporting on the Michael Brown case, the media played on the fact that he was on THC and that he was invincible to the bullets, further feeding into the stereotype that black men are violent on drugs and bulletproof.
“Just Say No!” A statement that takes us deep into yet another decade in the history of the United States which was excited by controversies, social issues, and drug abuse. The topic of this statement is fueled by the growing abuse of cocaine in the mid 1980s. I shall discuss the effects of the crack cocaine epidemic of the mid 1980s from a cultural and social stand point because on that decade this country moved to the rhythms and the pace of this uncanny drug. Cocaine took its told on American society by in the 1980s; it ravaged with every social group, race, class, etc. It reigned over the United States without any prejudices. Crack cocaine was the way into urban society, because of its affordability in contrast to the powdered form. In society the minorities were the ones most affected by the growing excess of crime and drug abuse, especially African Americans; so the question was “Why was nearly everybody convicted in California federal court of crack cocaine trafficking black?” (Webb: Day 3). The growing hysteria brought forth many questions which might seem to have concrete answers, but the fact of the matter is they are all but conspiracy in the end, even though it does not take away the ambiguity and doubt. I will take on only a few topics from the vast array of events and effects this period in time had tended to. Where and who this epidemic seemed to affect more notably, and perhaps how the drugs came about such territories and people. What actions this countries authority took to restore moral sanity, and how it affected people gender wise.
Human Rights Watch. (2000, May). United States Punishment and Prejudice: Racial Disparities in the War on Drugs (Vol.12, No.2 (G)). New York: Human Rights Watch. Retrieved April 12, 2005, from Human Rights Watch Web site: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2000/usa/Rcedrg00-01.htm
This research essay discusses racial disparities in the sentencing policies and process, which is one of the major factors contributing to the current overrepresentation of minorities in the judicial system, further threatening the African American and Latino communities. This is also evident from the fact that Blacks are almost 7 times more likely to be incarcerated than are Whites (Kartz, 2000). The argument presented in the essay is that how the laws that have been established for sentencing tend to target the people of color more and therefore their chances of ending up on prison are higher than the whites. The essay further goes on to talk about the judges and the prosecutors who due to different factors, tend to make their decisions
“Most modem sentencing systems in the United States express an explicit commitment to ensuring that a defendant 's sentence is not affected by the defendant 's race or gender (Hessick, 2010).” Even though individuals are protected through the Bill of Rights and Sentencing Reform Acts, there are still disparities in sentencing within the criminal justice systems. Often, race and gender bias negatively affects sentencing.
Racial Disparities in the Criminal Justice System “We simply cannot say we live in a country that offers equal justice to all Americans when racial disparities plague the system by which our society imposes the ultimate punishment,” stated Senator Russ Feingold. Even though racism has always been a problem since the beginning of time, recently in the United States, there has been a rise in discrimination and violence has been directed towards the African American minority primarily from those in the white majority who believe they are more superior, especially in our criminal justice system. There are many different reasons for the ethnic disparities in the criminal justice system between the majority and the minority, but some key reasons are differential involvement, individual racism, and institutional racism to why racial disparities exist in Institutional racism is racism that is shown through government organizations and political institutions. In a report done by David Baldus in 1998, he discovered that when it comes to the death penalty, blacks are more likely sentenced to death than whites, and those who kill whites are more likely to be given the death penalty than the killing of blacks (Touré).
Turner, Billy. 1986. “Race and Peremptory Challenges During Voir Dire: Do Prosecution and Defense Agree?” Journal of Criminal Justice 14: 61-69.
Many inequalities exist within the justice system that need to be brought to light and addressed. Statistics show that African American men are arrested more often than females and people of other races. There are some measures that can and need to be taken to reduce the racial disparity in the justice system.
In the United States, the rate of incarceration has increased shockingly over the past few years. In 2008, it was said that one in 100 U.S. adults were behind bars, meaning more than 2.3 million people. Even more surprising than this high rate is the fact that African Americans have been disproportionately incarcerated, especially low-income and lowly educated blacks. This is racialized mass incarceration. There are a few reasons why racialized mass incarceration occurs and how it negatively affects poor black communities.
One, the drug war is aimed at eliminating big-time drug dealers. Two, the war on drugs is eradicating dangerous drugs. Throughout the book, Alexander refuted both of these common misconceptions about the war on drugs. According to study conducted by Ryan King and Marc Meur, they found 80 percent of drug arrest in the 1990s was for marijuana. While it is arguable marijuana is far less harmful than tobacco and alcohol, is it is illegal and people should not do it. However, what is interesting about marijuana is the stigma associated with it. According to Alexander, marijuana was seen as a fearsome drug when associated with African-Americans and Latinos but was less stigmatizing when associated with Caucasians. According to book titled Unequal Under Law: Race and the War on Drugs, author Doris Marie Provine said “punishment becomes more severe when drug use is associated with people of color but softens when it is associated with whites.” An example of crime that becomes “softer” when associated with whites is drunk driving. According to The Crack Attack: America’s Latest Scare, drunk drivers accounted for 22,000 deaths in 1989. In addition to that, about 100,000 alcohol-related deaths occurred that same year. The author, Craig Reinarman, compared that statistic to the number of deaths from AIDS, drug overdose and violence associated with illegal drug trade and all three accounted for only 21,000 deaths. Drunk driving crimes are usually committed primarily by white males. According to the book, The Crack Attack: America’s Latest Scare, 78 percent of drunk drivers during 1990 were white males. During 1990, new mandatory minimums charges were created where drivers could either receive fines, license suspension, complete community service or sentenced to only two days in jail for their first offense. While on the other hand individuals who had crack cocaine, which is seen as a
Marijuana has been illegal for less than 1% of the time that it’s been in use (Guither, 2014). Going back to 1619, the Virginia Assembly passed legislation requiring every farmer to grow hemp. Hemp was allowed to be exchanged as legal tender in Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Maryland (Block, 2014). It was actually a crime in some states to refuse to grow hemp in the 1700's. In the late 19th century, marijuana was a popular ingredient in many medicinal products and was sold openly in public pharmacies (PBS, 2014). However, in the early 1900’s things changed, a prejudice and fear began to develop around marijuana because it was being used and associated with Mexican immigrants. In the 1930’s, the massive unemployment rates increased public resentment and disgust of Mexican immigrants, which escalated public and governmental concern (PBS, 2014). In 1930 a new federal law enforcement agency, the Federal Bureau of Narcotics (FBN) was created. Harry J. Anslinger was appointed the first commissioner of the FBN in 1930 (...