Quinn Bill Shortcomings

1054 Words3 Pages

Introduction
Reform movements in public policy are utilized to address shortcomings or make a change in certain aspects of society. One such reform was in the form of a bill passed by the Massachusetts legislature in 1970 to address shortcomings of Massachusetts police officers (Morreale, 2013). The legislature passed the Quinn Bill Establishing The Police Career Incentive Pay Program which paid Massachusetts police officers for earning college degrees (Paynich, 2009). This incentive program became commonly known as the Quinn Bill and was in effect where nearly 40 years before being gutted in 2009 because of public scrutiny and current economic crisis.
Quinn Bill
A number of Supreme Court rulings in the 1960s highlighted the need to change …show more content…

The timing of eliminating the Quinn Bill is most certainly due to the 2008 financial crisis as lawmakers search for ways to reduce spending. Unfortunately, the lack of funding at the state level placed an enormous burden on some towns and communities throughout the state to fund Quinn Bill benefits guaranteed in some union contracts. In 2012, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that communities do not automatically have to fund the state’s share of the cost of the Quinn Bill and the Legislature stopped paying any money for the education benefit (Fernandes, 2012). The high court’s ruling frees communities from paying the state's portion of the Quinn Bill unless these funds are guaranteed by collective bargaining agreements. However, some communities have chosen to continue the education benefits to police officers despite the lack of funding from the state because they see value in an educated police force. It is doubtful that the financing or the purpose of the Quinn Bill would have ever come into question without the economic hardships and downturn that started in …show more content…

Michael Widmer, the president of the Massachusetts Taxpayer Foundation, feels that the Quinn Bill is an “outdated benefit” and he feels that “it should be a basic requirement for a police officer” to have a bachelor degree (Fernandes, 2012, p. A1). However, the primary stakeholders surrounding the Quinn Bill are the legislators that passed the bill and continued to fund the incentive until it was eliminated in 2009. Apparently, the legislator's position has changed due to the financial pressure of the economic crisis of 2008. The governing boards of each community that supported the pay incentive also had to equally match funds from the state and are responsible for payment to the police officers eligible for the incentive. Each community’s position has dramatically changed with the loss of state funding. Each community that relied on state funds now must decide how to pay the incentive to their police officers or dissolve the program altogether. The colleges and universities are also key stakeholders in the Quinn Bill as criminal justice, and law degrees became big business for these learning institutions; more degrees handed out meant more money generated. During the life of the Quinn Bill, higher education institutions came under fire for their curriculum and teaching practices and were once referred to as diploma mills (Fernandes, 2012). Of

Open Document