Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of tarantino
Analysis of tarantino
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of tarantino
Quentin Tarantino Study Quentin Tarantino is a legend among legends in Hollywood, I still remember the way I felt the first time I saw a Tarantino film. I was a young boy watching one of his trademark films Inglorious Basterds It was a beautiful mixture of action, suspense, uncertainty, eccentricity, and drama. I had no idea who Tarantino was before watching the film but I was immediately his number one fan. I’m always interested in learning more about my idols and so when I was given the prompt to cover a director study I knew exactly who to choose. I believe Tarantino has perfected his craft over the years and kept his distinct directing style and made it easier for audiences to enjoy his violent and gory movies. I'm going to be covering the films Reservoir Dogs, Inglorious Basterds, Django Unchained, and The Hateful Eight. Tarantino has certain characteristics and directing styles that make his films distinctly his. If you watch any number of his films you’d find that he is a master of dialogue and is able to write a lifelike conversation that flows between the characters seamlessly. The fluid natural dialogue makes it easier to connect to the characters, and …show more content…
An example that comes to mind is the very famous torture scene in Resovoir Dogs in which a innocent police officer is mauled for no reason other than the fact that one of the sadistic henchmen derives pleasure from the act. If you fast forward 15 some years to you find films that are more lighthearted and having violence that is well deserved. Such as in Django Unchained when Django massacres the racist slave owners who held and abused him and his wife for so long. The violence is directed at the bad guys and is much easier to swallow. I believe this is another example of how Tarantino kept his style of directing while making it easier for audiences to enjoy the violence and gore of his
2. According to Sobchack, contemporary screen violence greatly differs than portrayals of violence in years past. Today, violent scenes are careless and lack significance because we as audiences have become calloused and desensitized to any acts of violence. She states that there is “no grace or benediction attached to violence. Indeed, its very intensity seems diminished” (Sobchack 432). Senseless violence, gruesome acts, and profound amounts of gore are prevalent in movies today, and because even this is not enough, it must be accompanied by loud blasts and noise, constantly moving scenes to keep audiences stimulated and large quantities of violence for viewers to enjoy what they are watching. Decades ago, it was the story that was engaging to audiences and filmmaking was an art.
Indisputably, Tim Burton has one of the world’s most distinct styles when regarding film directing. His tone, mood, diction, imagery, organization, syntax, and point of view within his films sets him apart from other renowned directors. Burton’s style can be easily depicted in two of his most highly esteemed and critically acclaimed films, Edward Scissorhands and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Burton ingeniously incorporates effective cinematic techniques to convey a poignant underlying message to the audience. Such cinematic techniques are in the lighting and editing technique categories. High key and low key relationships plus editing variations evinces the director’s elaborate style. He utilizes these cinematic techniques to establish tone mood, and imagery in the films.
Though not a specified film genre within the list of twenty-three, violence can be seen within each and everyone. It can be seen within the very first James Bond film, Dr. No (1962), to the escalation of the 1970s within the hands of Martin Scorsese, Francis Ford Coppola, just to...
Spike Lee is considered to be one of the underrated directors of our time. He was born on March 20, 1957 in Atlanta. He grew up with a supportive family. He started making amateur films at the age of 20.After graduating NYU film school he was ready for the world. He already overcame the fact that African-American filmmakers were narrow. His big break started when he earned seven million in box office for a movie which priced at $175,000 to make. Also, the film was only shot in two weeks. This was only the beginning to a bright future. His vision shows no favoritism and spares no races. His use of interviews and social commentary gives different cultures an opportunity to look honestly into the hearts, minds, and conscience of their people. He also exposes hypocrisy and lies when he demonstrates the different stereotypes that remain in today’s society .Spike Lee creates amazing movies about provocative topics no else wanted to discuss. Who would know that small kid from Atlanta, Georgia could be considered an auteur? Shelton Jackson Lee is considered an auteur to extent by addressing provocative subjects, playing an acting role, unique traits, and being consistent.
His direction of the actors was executed extremely well. He knew exactly what he wanted from them, and did not give up until it was as he had expected. Some of his setbacks in Apocalypse Now support this opinion. He wanted every part to be performed perfectly.
Character development is an essential component to a successful film. This thorough and elaborate character development is a reason why diverse audiences are able to watch these films more than once. Joel and Ethan Coen, and Quentin Tarantino are all writers and directors that execute the theme of character driven films almost to perfection. The films O Brother, Where Art Thou, written and directed by the Coen Brothers, and Pulp Fiction, written and directed by Quentin Tarantino, exemplify this.
Quentin Tarantino has proven time and time again to be one of the most confusing directors to understand when attempting to unravel the personal ideologies in his films. Each of his films deals with race, sexuality, and gender to some extent, and it is often difficult to know whether or not Tarantino is making a commentary on these things or if he truly believes much of the problematic discourse found in his films. Kill Bill Vol. 1 and 2 are a testament to this understanding of Tarantino’s films, as they appear to be extremely feminist films at surface level yet, upon deeper inspection, have some very problematic qualities. Looking at Kill Bill Vol.’s 1 and 2 through both a feminist and anti feminist lens can allow the audience to better
The director I chose to do my Analysis/Research paper on is was David Cronenberg. After screening The Dead Zone, Cronenberg’s work impressed me. Prior to this class I had never heard his name, even though I had seen previous works such as The Fly. Since I had already viewed this movie I resorted to alternate movies he had directed. I was able to locate The Brood and Videodrome. The main reason I chose Cronenberg for my director had to do with his style. His movies are not the typical horror flick one has come used to today. When I was younger these movies were low budget and have a character such Jason from Friday the 13th running around with an ax and a hockey mask. Today the industry has progressed to Ben Wilson from I Know What You did Last Summer running around with a sharp hook for a hand. Somewhere between these two genres Mr. Cronenberg’s work fits in. He is not obsessed with the body count as many other horror directors are and is also able to develop a plot rather rare in this type of a film.
As stated, he has a clear use for violence in his film. He likes to incorporate an anti-hero that justifies his actions through a mental imbalance. In the Wolf of Wall Street you will see that the main character has a major drug and behavioral problem, however he is looked at as a hero throughout the movie. You will notice that it seems like he likes to stick with certain characters throughout his movies. He likes Leonardo Dicaprio. This is probably because the actors fit the character that he wants well. If it isn’t broke, why fix it? Martin has a way of making the violence in his films fit into the storytelling process. It is obvious that Martin likes to explore the immoral side of us. He tries to get us to follow characters that do not conform to society. The things about having immoral characters is that the audience can sometimes relate
Qualities like violence were extremely limited back then in the 1950s, but it is more widely accepted in today’s society in gruesome amounts. I remember reading about this one movie that had been banned because the audience believed that the horrific acts in it were realistic and that the actors were hurt or killed off in the making of the film, but it was just accurate representation of what would occur had the violent act had been done in real life. Another quality that caught the interests of the audience was indistinctive or abnormal characters. Characters like Heath Ledger’s Joker who have joy of torturing others for the sake of fun deviates from the typical person and is surprising that these type of people do exist in our world in silence. Interestingly enough, these characters catch our eye the most often because we wonder why they think differently from “normal” humans.
There are movies that make you laugh, that make you cry, that blow you away with jaw-dropping, ever-so-satisfying action sequences. And there is Pulp Fiction, Quentin Tarantino’s masterpiece, an homage to the old Pulp Magazines and crime novels popular in the 1950s. Known for their incredibly dense and complex dialogue and excessive violence, Tarantino adds his trademark nonlinear chronology and thorough character development to create a movie that celebrates the fact that chance governs all of our lives. The film consists of multiple stories that tell of the criminals, gangsters and outliers of Los Angeles, the underbelly of society. It follows Vincent Vega and Jules Winnfield as they embark on their mission to recovering a briefcase that
Ref. The cinema book 2nd edition p100 "Tarantinos films mix violence with intertextual homage. He wants an audience to notice the way his films relate to a history of earlier film, fiction, t.v., thus combining movie fiction and movie criticism by playfully referring to movie history and mini history contained in his stars. " I think Tarantinos style is evolving now he has the money to support his wishes but his storytelling and directing technique is still difinitively Tarantinos own.
Quentin Taratinos’ Django Unchained (2012), is a bloody, eccentric, and revenge filled western, which exploits the abdominal chapters in American history. A pre-civil war western that explores what slavery might have been like during the mid-1800. The movie is partially based on the films Django (1966) and Mandingo (1975). But Taratino incorporates his own style, with excruciating gore, action, wit, cinematography and eccentric characters. Incorporating it all into a solid plot makes the movie believable and makes it the most unique western every made.
One way that Tarantino uses pastiche is when he introduces very evocative settings, like for example the restaurant setting of Jackrabbit Slim’s Diner. The décor is flamboyantly 1950s style, which is not in keeping with the more modern sett...
Django Unchained is an US-American western movie written and directed by Quentin Tarantino in 2012. Although it deals with a dark subject matter and shows much brutal violence (the atrocious conditions of slaves in the 18th-century America are depicted in a relatively graphic way), the movie was a great success. It was nominated for many film industry awards, for example the Academy Awards, in categories including for Best Sound Editing, Cinematography and Best Picture. The Austrian actor Christoph Waltz, who plays Dr. King Schultz in the movie, won several awards for his performance, including the Golden Globe for Best Supporting Actor, the BAFTA (Award for Best Actor in a Supporting Role) and, additionally, his second Academy Award for Best Supporting Actor. Quentin Tarantino, the director of the movie, also won several awards: the Golden Globe, the BAFTA and the Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay.