Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Criminal profiling as an investigative tool
Criminal profiling as an investigative tool
Criminal profiling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Criminal profiling as an investigative tool
At around eight thirty AM Queenie Trap, a rather small woman at five feet and six inches and one hundred and ten pounds, left her house after a fight with her husband Arthur Trap. Had she known this was the last time she would see him alive she wouldn’t have left, or maybe she already knew about his untimely demise. Queenie has her motive, her fights with her husband are more than enough, although Queenie is rather small she knew Arthur was drunk.The investigators should rule Arthur’s death as a murder because she had a motive, and although some would say that Queenie’s size means she couldn’t overpower him he was drunk, she also had ten minutes alone with the dead body of Arthur. Murder was on Queenie’s mind that fateful night and the entire
On May 7th 2000, fifteen year old Brenton Butler was accused of the murder of Mary Ann Stephens, who had been fatally shot in the head while walking down a breezeway of a hotel with her husband. Two and a half hours later, Butler is seen walking a mile away from where the incident occurred, and is picked up by the police because he fit the description of the individual who shot Mary Ann Stephens. However, the only characteristic of the description that Butler featured was the color of his skin. Police then brought Butler to the scene of the crime in order for Mary Ann Stephens’s husband, James Stephens, to confirm whether or not Butler was the individual who had shot his wife. Almost immediately, Stephens identifies Butler as his wife’s killer.
Mary Maloney is accused of murdering her husband with an unknown weapon for an unknown reason. Chief detective, Patrick Maloney was murdered last night at his own house, no suspects have been identified yet and the search for the murder weapon was futile. Apparently, the officer had come home exhausted from work and was waiting for his wife Mrs. Mary Maloney, who left to buy food across the street for their dinner. According to a statement, Mary arrives home from the grocery store to find her husband dead on the living room floor.
The first piece of evidence that proves Queenie is lying about her husband’s death is that the glass wasn’t broken, tilted or out of his hand from the impact of falling down the stairs. As a rule when a person falls down the stairs there instinct is
On a cold northern morning the body of a man lay still in his bed. His blood did not flow, his heart did not beat, and his chest didn’t fall with breath. His wife sits still downstairs in the gloomy house that she views as a cage. Her stare is blank and her hands move slowly as if she is in some trance that shows absolutely no remorse. Minne Foster is guilty of murdering her husband which becomes apparent through the evidence and details given by Susan Glaspell in “A Jury of Her Peers”. Glaspell gives evidence and shows the realization that both women in the story also know that Mrs. Foster is guilty. Minnie Foster is guilty of murdering her husband, but a defense could be made to protect her.
People of the court, we’re here today on behalf of our defendant, Mary Maloney. Our defendant is not guilty of first degree murder, which she has been charged with. After hearing Mary’s testimony it is obvious that Mary reacted under the influence of pregnancy hormones, past insanity, and extreme stressful anxiety.
Hamlet is a menagerie of confusion, and documents a bloody struggle to gain power in Denmark. Though certain characters, such as Hamlet or Claudius, are more involved in said struggle, lesser characters could have potentially play a vital role in the perpetuation of the action of the play, mainly the murder of King Hamlet. Large amounts of speculation surround this death, as little concrete evidence exists to shed light on the true identity of the killer. Said confusion allows one to explore the roles potentially played by various characters in this virulent homicide, especially those of more obscure characters, such as Queen Gertrude. Due to the confusion surrounding
On November 15, 2017, Horace Verbermockle was on the floor of his bathroom unconscious. His wife Minnie told the doctor, “My husband had a fall and he’s lying unconscious on the bathroom floor. I think he must have been taking a shower and slipped on a cake of soap. I did not move him. I threw a blanket over him and called you immediately. When the doctor arrived he check his body and said he died to a hit to the back of his skull. After the doctor examined the body he noticed the scene of the so called accident and called an investigator. After the investigator looked of the scene he can conclude that Minnie Verbermockle was the reason for his death.
The famous Marilyn Monroe was found dead in her bed but was it suicide? It was a murder that was unsolved at the time of the death and spread through the news to become one of the most talked about murder mysteries. Was it really a mystery? Through an enormous amount of research and the analysis and synthesis of the victim, crime scene, suspicious behavior, and evidence, it is clear that the murderer has been identified.
Victim 3 (Florence Genevieve Polillo) body was dismembered and head never found. Body found 2 to four days after death.
Late last night on July 17th, a woman of the name Myrtle Wilson was found dead in the middle of the street around midnight. It is pretty clear, based off of the scene that it happened because of the impact of a car moving at high speeds. The area where it happened had signs of skid marks going left and right, right before where Mrs. Wilson was hit. There were very few witnesses to what happened due to the time of night that this occurred but one witness stated “I was just closing up my store when I saw some woman who looked like she was crazy run into the street with several bruises and scars, she saw the car that was coming and seemed that she expected it to stop, but it didn’t. After she was hit, the mysterious car was gone in seconds like as if nothing happened”. Based off if this Witnesses words, police are now trying to look into the reasoning for the bruises that she had before the accident happened. Another Witness stated, “as I was walking home from my friend’s house I noticed a woman lying dead on the ground and it scared me to death, then the car that had hit her sped by me and I could see a man and woman in the car but I didn’t recognize them. They were gone within seconds”. Police have been detailing the scene for over 24 hours at this point but cannot pin point the car
Research the play your scene is from including; his/her place within the overall production, the history of the scene, the expected performance style, your character's relationship with the other character(s) in your scene.
On January 17, 1982, her body was found in the wardrobe of her bedroom by a neighbour, Jimmy Holloway. He had been given a key to her home by Mrs. Edwards. Mrs. Edwards had been wounded to death. Whether she had been sexually attacked would remain a subject of some difference (Berkeley Law School Death Penalty Clinic, 2012; Bonner, 2013; Grinberg, 2014; Law Book Review: Anatomy of Injustice: A Murder Case Gone Wrong by Raymond Bonner, 2012; Van Horne,
Those two heirs were Turtle Wexler and Judge Ford. Judge Ford thought this already and she figured out that Turtle thought the same when she was interviewing her about the fireworks. Turtle, then, had said that when she found the body in the Westing house, it looked like a wax dummy and not a real life dead body. J.J, earlier during the reading of the will, had thought the same thing, that the body did not look real. Following up on that fact, always if someone is murdered, especially someone of that importance, an autopsy is performed to figure out the murderer. This ALWAYS happens, the police should have been all over the case. But, the body did not get an autopsy, even the Judge thought it was not unlawful to have an autopsy, and the only reason the cops came was because of the bomb cases, but those came later. So, since the autopsy didn’t happen, the body must be fake!
Maloney testified that ‘ for me 5:00 pm was always a wonderful time of the day. I loved the warmth that came out of him when we were alone together.” with this testimony we know that she wasn’t planning to kill her husband. She was looking foward all day long for her husband to get home. We know of her plans to go out for dinner, it was a routine for them to go out every thursday. This woman could have not plan a murder. Talking about Ms.maloney not planning the murder we know that she went downstairs to the freezer, she put her hand aside and took hold of the first object she found. In this case it was a leg of a lamb, but the detectives found a variety of meat. The detective found beef, pork and several legs of chicken close to the place where the leg of lamb was. Ms. Maloney could of grab anything from the freezer, because she wasn't thinking of a murder weapon, she was thinking about
The idea of homicide by necessity must be furthered examined to properly understand the intent of their “ crime.” The murder of the young boy exemplifies the idea of “ necessity by murder,” considering the act was done out of desperation and total fright of life. The event occurred because the continual doubt facing the sailors prompted them to come to a consensus where the youngest would be sacrificed in an attempt to supply the already resourceless crew with food in hopes they soon reached land or were rescued.The murder of the child was not done to suffice personal malice or as a method of revenge, but rather an act of desperation by individuals who aspire to live past their present misfortunes. This idea supports Lord Bacon’s claim regarding the necessity to conserve life. He provides a written example that exemplifies whether homicide by necessity is justifiable. He states “ so if the divers be in dangers of drowning by the carting away of some boat or barge ,and one of them get to some plank, or on the boat’s side to keep himself above water, and another to save his life thrust from it, whereby he is drowned, this is neither se defendendo nor by misadventure, but justifiable,” (37). His claim follows the idea of homicide by necessity similarly found in The Queen v Dudley and Stephens considering in this instance the thrust was executed with the purpose of saving one’s life. It is, therefore, unfair to classify their actions as a homicide since such word carries a negative connotation and taints their ideas as cruel and malice. It is quintessential for the legal system to understand the motives and intent behind the actions occurred at sea by these men to properly determine their act was done to survive. Evidently, it is clear through their desperations that the crime executed in case