Q. Tarantino's Use of Different Film Elements in Kill Bill and Pulp Fiction

1656 Words4 Pages

Q. Tarantino's Use of Different Film Elements in Kill Bill and Pulp Fiction

Quentin Tarantino has used the lightning, colour, sound, camera, mise-en-scene,

iconography, speed of editing and special effects in Kill Bill and

Pulp Fiction to make the audience want to carry on watching. These

film elements have been used very effectively by the director in the

openings of both films to build audience interest.

The first aspect – lightning was very helpful in building interest in

Kill Bill. The opening scene of Kill Bill is in black and white. It

was originally coloured but the critics have decided that the blood

which appears in this scene is too offensive and have censored it. The

best way to make the blood ‘less visible’ without remaking the

beginning of the film was to use black and white. It has a dramatic

and disturbing effect on the audience because of the negative

atmosphere the scene gets them into – the audience feels danger,

suspense. In the opening scene lightning has been used to characterise

the woman. The light is natural; it comes from the windows in the

church where the scene is set. The woman’s face is half lit but the

other half is black. This was probably shown to symbolise her two

sides: good and bad. It gives the audience an insight into the woman’s

character – it tells them that she does have an evil side. At this

point the audience might have a good reason to keep on watching – to

find out those two sides of the woman they have just met.

The first scene of Kill Bill confronts the audience’s idea on what

wedding should look like. The woman, which is heavily beaten up is

wearing...

... middle of paper ...

... it interesting, full of iconography, dynamic effects, original sound

etc. the director built himself a great tool for keeping the audience

until the whole plot is justified. A non-linear plot is also ‘unique’

to films directed by Quentin Tarantino, by whom this style has been

developed.

If I was Quentin Tarantino, I would call my new film ‘Contradiction’.

I think that it would fit the ‘Tarantino style’ of things in the wrong

order. It links with the theme of paradox, for example one thing

denies another, but that other thing seems true. The same can be

spotted in Tarantino films – the end is at the beginning and the

beginning at the end, so what is the beginning and what is the end in

reality? Although the narrative is non-linear, in Tarantino’s films

there is always a clear key, consequence that justifies the plot.

Open Document