Introduction
This statement raises two questions, such as: Does knowledge always produce both meaning and purpose? Are there any cases where knowledge diminishes either meaning or purpose in our lives?; which I will analyze in terms of ethics and natural sciences.
In this essay I shall attempt to show that I only partly agree with this statement, show the limitation and the weakness of this statement using some examples gained through my empirical knowledge.
Development
In order to fully understand this statement, which is going to be discussed further along, it is useful to make clear how I personally interpret the key terms within the statement. Key terms are whole, knowledge, meaning, purpose and personal life.
My interpretation of ‘the
…show more content…
Knowledge is something intangible. What makes it different from emotions though? It is said that for example love is just a chain of chemical reactions in the brain, but knowledge is just the same.
I believe that the key thing that makes it different is its necessity. I think that in order to be able to maintain some kind of a system within the society, knowledge is needed. The point of knowledge is to provide us a tool to reach further goals in life. Knowledge is something that makes us different from all the other organisms on the planet.
I prefer to define knowledge as a process of learning rather than an outcome. I think that the process of learning, the personal experience is what shapes the person rather than the knowledge itself.
I interpret ‘our personal lives’ as referring to all the experience gained through the course of an individual’s life rather than on a more generalized level.
Finally, I interpret ‘meaning’ as a value personally significant to an individual and ‘purpose’ as aim/direction in an individual’s
…show more content…
They went against social expectation and said their honest opinion. I believe this was a way of easing their mental discomfort. While promoting honesty, they actually fulfilled their mission of showing us a more honest and healthy way of living. The whole concept is very paradoxical.
Through this example it was demonstrated that knowledge does not always add to our personal lives. On the contrary, sometimes it diminishes the meaning of our life.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, I do agree with the statement to an extent that most of the time knowledge produces both meaning and purpose in our lives. As I emphasized earlier, the key words in the statement make the trueness of the statement arguable, therefore I do not fully agree. As shown through examples throughout the whole essay, I believe that there is another point of knowledge, that there are some cases when it does not produce both meaning and purpose, and that sometimes it even leads to the diminishment of either meaning or
Knowledge can be the key to success and can lead people to happier life. However, there are some instances that you can not gain any more knowledge because of how it would change your whole life. The drive of wanting more and more knowledge is best portrayed through two well -known books. In Mary Shelley’s, Frankenstein, and in Daniel Keyes, Flowers for Algernon, both the creature and Charlie are ostracized by society because they are different from everyone else but this distinction gave way for distinct fallouts because of their quest for knowledge beyond their reach to achieve happiness.
it is seen that knowledge can hurt. It is also shown that sometimes one can know
Our knowledge is a key to our success and happiness in our life to give us personal satisfaction. Knowledge is power but not always. Sometimes our self-awareness and growth as an individual gives us negative thoughts that make us want to go back to undo it. Everyone wants to unlearn a part in our life that brought us pain and problems. Good or bad experiences brought by true wisdom can be used for our self-acceptance, self-fulfillment and these experiences would make us stronger as we walk to the road of our so called “life”, but Douglas’s and my experience about knowledge confirmed his belief that “Knowledge is a curse”. Both of us felt frustrated and sad from learning knowledge.
Knowledge, its source and truthfulness have been under question for a long time. People have always wondered what exactly constitutes facts and if there are any defining laws that can be attributed to all knowledge or information available in the world. Many philosophers speculated on how information can be interpreted according to its falsity or truthfulness, but have not come to definite conclusions. Edmund Gettier has provided one of the key pieces in understanding and trying to figure out what knowledge really is.
So to say, knowledge can either make or break a person. It can act as a benefit, for power, or loss, for ignorance. “Do not take for granted what you know. Ask yourself how you know what you know; ask yourself whom it benefits, whom it hurts and why.” (Blackboard: Knowledge is Power)
...ns of human purpose.” Obviously, these insights didn’t appear outside the cultural context, as an individualistic researcher might suggest.
The pursuit of knowledge can lead to a humans destruction and awareness. The pursuit of
...ers of life are what make it so unique for each person. In this way, one could say that this is a part of one’s spirituality and one’s ongoing search for the meaning in life.
Knowledge is of two different kinds: what we know or where we can go find the information upon it. The face of knowing something is sometimes gained through experience. With knowledge or the thought that you know something there are many possible and equally definitions of knowledge. People saying that they know something is a justification that they believe it, but facts could be proven and shown that what they believe is not true. It shouldn’t have to be a good reason for anyone to say they know such things and believe in it. If you know something, you know something. No feedback to test my knowledge. We all don’t think or act the same so the knowledge is different upon each human.
Knowledge is something that can change day to day, which can be learned through both the natural and human sciences. Knowledge changes in the natural sciences when an experiment is conducted and more data has been gathered. Knowledge changes in human sciences when patterns are recognized in society and further tests have been conducted. Does our knowledge of things in the natural and human sciences change every day? I think that our knowledge grows everyday but does not necessarily change every day. The areas of knowledge that will be discussed in this essay are natural and human sciences. In History we can see that at one point something that was considered knowledge then transformed into different knowledge, especially in the natural sciences. However, in the past, due to lack of technology, it might have been more of a lack of knowledge that then turned into knowledge on the topic.
Knowledge has always been a parameter through which human progress has been measured, Knowledge could be an aspect gained from a fact or a situation present. The production of knowledge relies on different ways of knowing, sense perception, emotion, reason and language. The production of knowledge differs from each human being leading to acquiring of personal knowledge and contributing to the shared knowledge. Society also plays a role in influencing the production of knowledge through various judgments that it passes on the manner in which knowledge is produced. Ethics is a set of principles which are morally right and are used to govern people’s actions and on the basis of that judgments are passed, rules made and norms are established. This leads us to the issue : to what extent does compromising ethical judgement lead to useful knowledge in natural science and arts.
Knowledge is rarely considered permanent, because it is constantly changing and adapting as time passes and new discoveries are made. This title roughly translates into the question: to what extent is knowledge provisional? In other words, to what extent does knowledge exist for the present, possibly to be changed in the future? At first glance, one’s mind would immediately stray to the natural sciences, and how theories are constantly being challenged, disproven, and discarded. Because of this, one might be under the impression that knowledge is always provisional because there is always room for improvement; however, there are some cases in which this is not true. There are plenty of ideas and theories that have withstood the test of time, but on the other end of the spectrum there are many that have not. This essay will evaluate the extent to which knowledge is provisional in the areas of the human sciences and history.
When I think about knowledge the first thing that comes to my mind is education. I believe that knowledge comes to people by their experiences in life. In other words, life is an instrument that leads me to gain knowledge. Many people consider that old people are wise because they have learned from good and bad experiences throughout their lives. Education requires work, dedication and faith to gain knowledge. We acquired knowledge through the guidance of from parents, role models, college/University teachers and life experiences.
Passive observation or active experimentation is not the only way to produce knowledge, they cannot be used per se; and they require other additional ways of knowing such as imagination and faith. “There are only two ways in which humankind can produce knowledge”. Just from this statement, numerous questions already arise. First of all, how do we define knowledge? Knowledge, at its core, is information we acquire through experience and education. But the “production” of knowledge is arguable, can knowledge really be produced by humans, or is it discovered?
4. “Without application in the real world, the value of knowledge is greatly diminished.” Consider this claim with respect to two areas of knowledge.