1906 Pure Drug and Food Act • This act was the first time that there were regulations on food and drugs, and resulted from the unsanitary methods used in the food industry that were revealed by Upton Sinclair in his book “The Jungle”. The purpose of this act was to prohibit: interstate transportation and sale of contaminated food, the transportation and sale of deceptive medicines, and exaggerated claims of effectiveness for medicines. It also prevented contamination of food and drugs, as well as the mislabeling of foods and drugs (Alchin, 2015). • The impact that this act had on drug control at the time of its enactment was important to the health of individuals within society. The act created protection from unscrupulous manufacturers …show more content…
In layman terms, it outlawed opiates and cocaine. • This act was designed to address the distribution of cocaine and opiates; however, physicians were still able to prescribe these narcotics to patients with a medical need, but were not able to prescribe them to addicts. One remaining effect of this act is a warning that states “Warning: May be habit forming” that can be found on the label or package insert that is affiliated with opioids, barbiturates, medicinal formulations of cocaine, and chloral hydrate. • The effect of the act was lower rates of use of cocaine and opiates. These facts lead to a demand for stricter laws, and in order to drum up support, newspapers published articles of addiction related crimes. Sadly, this act also marked the beginning of criminal addicts as well as a black market for …show more content…
It created the dependence of seeking out a physician in order to obtain prescriptions, and put the control of medications in the hands of the physicians. Kefauver-Harris Amendments of 1962 • Changed the world of drugs. This amendment insured that consumers would be safe, and not the victims of unsafe medications. This act requires that medications not only be proven to be safe, but to also be proven to be effective. This amendment was the result of the devastating use of Thalidomide to treat morning sickness in pregnant women, sadly, the use of this drug caused birth defects in Europe, Canada, and other countries. • The impact that this amendment had on drug control cannot be emphasized enough. It required manufacturers to scientifically prove that a drug was safe and effective. Not only did this create safe medications, but it mandated truthfulness in advertising and labeling (FDA, 2015). • Public reaction to this amendment was welcomed. After the horrifying, and tragic results of the Thalidomide tragedy, consumers needed reassurance that this type of horror would not happen again. This amendment guaranteed that no individual, even the most helpless, would not fall victim to dangerous and ineffective
However, that was not the case. When The Jungle was presented to the public, readers were astonished by the disgusting and unsanitary state in which the meat was being processed in. The community was more concerned with the meat conditions than they were with the horrific conditions the workers were faced with. So while the popularity of Sinclair’s work was not his original intentions, it still accomplished stages of reform. It can be assumed that Roosevelts initial reluctance to accept Sinclair’s novel was in part, directly connected to his disbelief that the Federal government had become so disconnected and oblivious to American industry and the complete lack of Federal oversight. This “disconnect” did not last long as The Pure Food and Drug Act, as well as, the Meat Inspection Act were both directly set in to place mere months after Upton Sinclair’s novel, The Jungle was published. This type of reform supported progressive philosophy by preventing corporate owners from remaining above government regulation and started a trend in the way government regulators began to deal with corporate monopolies and trusts. The Jungle, along with other “muckrakers” began a series of Federal oversight reforms and regulatory guidance that soon began to take hold in other industries. Big industry would soon realize that they were not above the
From respectable authorities on the subject, and the 1906 Food and Drugs Act itself, gave paticual understanding of the events effecting that time period, a understanding of certain points in the novel “The Jungle”, and how the government went about solving the nation’s going problem, has lead myself to agree that Upton Sinclairs’s
In 1906, socialist Upton Sinclair published The Jungle, a book he hoped would awaken the American people to the deplorable conditions of workers in the meat packing industry. Instead, the book sent the country reeling with its description of filthy, rat infested plants, suspect meats processed and sold to consumers, and corrupt government inspectors. President Roosevelt became seriously concerned by the charges brought forth by Mr. Sinclair and determined the only way to protect consumers from unscrupulous business and unsafe food was to enforce regulation.
Before the mid 1900’s the Harrison Narcotics Tax Act was formed to tax those making, importing or selling any derivative of opium or coca leaves. In the 1920s, doctors became aware of the highly addictive nature of opioids and started to avoid treating patients with them (Center, 2004). In 1924 heroin became illegal. However according to a history published in the Journal of the American Medical Association in 2003, anesthesiologists opened "nerve block clinics" in the 1950s and 1960s to manage pain without having to resort to surgery (Meldrum, 2003). This push for treating pain without surgery was a major factor in the opioid epidemic we see today. In 2008 the overdose death rate was almost four times the rate in 1999, and the sales of prescription pain relievers in 2010 were four times higher than in 1999 (Paulozzi et al, 2011). The substance use disorder treatment admission rate is also greater than in 1999, with it having been six times higher in 2009. Chasing Heroin’s claims surrounding the fear of prescribing pain medications is accurate as you see an increase in public policies surrounding opiate use in the early 1900’s. The climbing rates of overdose deaths and the increased amount of people seeking addiction treatment suggests that the fear of prescription opiates was
... government inspection of meat products. The Pure Food and Drug act also passed after the Meat inspection Act of 1906. The packers denied the charges and opposed the bills to no avail. These bills protected the publics right to safe sanitary meat.
"Pure Food and Drug Act: A Muckraking Triumph." Food and Drug Act. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Feb. 2014.
No Author. "Pure food and drug act." wikipedia 23 March 2005. 4 oct. 2007 .
originally called this, started in 1906 with the approval of the Pure Food and Drugs Act. This act
Overall, the ruling in this case was a perfect interpretation of the Constitution. Despite opposition claiming that it is not addressed in the Constitution, too few rights are ever addressed in the Constitution of the United States. That is why there is a thing called Judicial Review. By utilizing judicial review, the interpreters of the law –Supreme Court, may make changes to policies and laws. Abortion, medicinal marijuana, and marriage fall under the umbrella of Equal Protection since they correspond to the rights and liberties of US citizens.
The wonder-drug of the early nineteenth century was finally being recognised as a dangerously addictive substance, although the interests of imperial traders kept it legal for another five decades, until the Dangerous Drugs Act was passed in 1920. This Act made it illegal to possess opiates without a doctor’s prescription.
"Regulatory Information." Federal Food and Drugs Act of 1906. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 20 May 2009. Web. 14 Apr. 2014. .
People fought and argued for several years in an attempt to get all alcoholic beverages banned from the public of the United States, claiming that doing so would create a safer nation, however when this bill was passed by Congress in 1920, the crime rate doubled and no one could have foresaw the future corruption of the nation that this seemingly great bill had caused. These unintended consequences wreaked havoc for over a decade and it wasn’t until the repeal of prohibition in 1933 that the United States recovered from a horribly devastating era and became a better and improved place to live. The 21st amendment truly shows the power and impact the public actually has on the government, because the public during the prohibition era exercised their right to fight for their freedom to drink when the government got too involved and tried to restrict those rights, their fight ended in a victory and they even had a previous amendment to the Constitution repealed which has, still to this day, never happened in the history of the United States.
for drugs that helps lead to problems with prostitution, gambling, and even human organs. Society is suffering from the unsuccessful and costly results of prohibition. Although drug regulation has steadily been increasing, drug use and drug related deaths have increased steadily. Even though spending to combat the...
...ade decided that a woman’s privacy, entailed in the fourteenth amendment, made it acceptable for woman to have more discretion on the status of their pregnancy and whether or not to have an abortion. However, abortions were only acceptable when it involved “defending prenatal life and protecting the health of the mother” (Roe v. Wade, Morality and Moral Controversies, 209). Although this case took a step in the right direction by giving women some direction with abortion, I feel it could have done a better job by making abortion legal under all circumstances seeing how it is morally justifiable from every aspect from the motivations to the process itself.
The Uniform State Narcotic Act, final-drafted in 1932, was a result of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. It was argued that the traffic in narcotic drugs should have the same regulations in all of the states. The committee at the convention took into consideration the fact that the federal government had already passed laws regarding this issue. Many people assume that these laws were necessary, however, they were revenue producing and did not give the states the authority to exercise police power in regard to seizure of drugs. As a result of this act, the FBN was able to encourage state governments to have some regulation of