Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Public and private hospitals arguements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Public and private hospitals arguements
Why do people generally prefer public hospitals instead of private hospitals?
Public hospitals are run by government’s annual budget through Medicare. This public system is run by taxes paid by the people living in the area. In most of the countries, health care is in the top five services to be considered. Public hospitals can be afforded by anyone. Government hospitals are alot advantageous to poor people who can’t afford private treatment. People can have free treatment when they are sick. Like x-rays, blood tests, taking prescription from doctors for medicines and some other test and services are provided for free. People are bound to choose the doctor they want them to examine. Medicare sometimes doesn’t cover some part of doctor’s visit as they have highly qualified doctors and people have to pay some money towards cost of these little things. The cost and expenses vary accordingly in government hospitals.
Whereas private hospitals are made privately and are not run under the government’s budget. These can cost people a lot. Private hospitals cannot be afforded by everyone but can only be afforded by rich citizens. Most of the rich citizens claim to prefer private hospitals because they provide treatments of various diseases and illness that a government hospital cannot provide as government’s annual budget cannot afford to handle expenses for some serious diseases. Private hospital provides space to treat patients perfectly. A private hospital is equipped with new equipment which makes the treatment more costly. Private hospitals usually have fixed costs for every treatment. Students in economics study that every economic enterprise has a fixed, variable, and increment costs.
Public hospitals need to face much more challen...
... middle of paper ...
...e profit. In the following year of 2014, price of tin is again about to rose as Indonesia introduced new transaction rules and had cut off about 90% of tin supply (Melanie & Michael, 2013).
Decrease in price
During the year 2008, the demand of tin from the electronic firms were decreasing. During the months of July to December there was about 50% decrease in price of tin. Possibly the reason behind it is lower demand and excess supply of tin. This caused surplus and as the total demand falls, the price and the output falls correspondingly. When the price of tin fell, most of the buyers tried to secure metal for later purposes. They secured metal from everywhere including LME warehouses (London Metal Exchange). So that they can sell it to consumers on higher prices in following years.
These reasons caused severe fluctuations in the price of tin in last five years.
There were many economic effects due to the global flow of silver. One of these
...t them attain the services easily and at lower costs. In addition, these hospitals have the potential of managing effectively their cash flow. A fixed and proper payment system to the workers of the small health centers can m motivates them to avail quality services to the medical beneficiaries. Small hospitals can be able to have bonus payment in case they provide care in areas short of professional health. Hence, small hospital can implicate appropriately their method of payment. Conversely, there might be a risk possibility when it comes to accessing low amount due to the nature of the illness of the patients, the involvement of high cost of treatment amongst many other factors. In the vent that the overall health care costs are more than earlier anticipated, the hospital and the doctor shall receive less profits. This can have a negative impact on the hospital.
Describe the differences between nonprofit and for-profit hospitals. William & Torres provided a table to reflect hospital ownership, and noted that some hospitals, while owned by one type of entity, may be operating under a contract by another entity, such as a hospital management company (Williams & Torres, page 185). Some of the largest groups of hospitals in the nation are nonprofit community hospitals (Williams & Torrens, page 185). Nonprofit entities, including hospitals, function under special provisions of corporation law in each state, and under federal and state tax provisions that recognize their community service function (Williams & Torrens, page 185).
Being a Canadian citizen, it is hard for me to think of life without any health insurance. I have had public health insurance all my life growing up and have been free to go to any hospital at any time and get some form of health care. Residing in the United States off and for the last 7 years I have experienced health care from both sides. I feel that private health care has huge advantages over public health care. In the following essay I will explain in three points why I feel strongly about private health care as opposed to public. What is better is always subjective, and I will not try to argue the point of health for all, but instead for the individual who is seeking the best health care possible, and is willing to put the resources into obtaining that. I will be addressing efficiency and quality, not inclusion of everyone (free health care), I will be addressing the root of this and not just that one argument, which would detract from my focus. I will not be getting into the political debate of socialism vs. capitalism, as that is a separate argument in itself, and this country is currently running under capitalism. Again coming from living in both a socialist and then a capitalist society, I feel I can do so in an unbiased manner.
American health care system does cater to all its citizens. These are publicly funded. Medicare is one of the most important schemes in the healthcare scene of United States. It supports the senior citizens. It is funded by a special payroll tax under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act. Medicaid, for low-income earners, is administered by the individual states; and the State Children's Health Insurance Program (S-Chip) is intended to provide insurance co...
Individuals experience different access to health-care depending on their social location. “A lack of access is illustrated by a person who has had an unmet health-care need for which he or she felt he or she had needed, but had not received, a health-care service in the past year” (Ives, Denov, & Sussman, 2015, p. 170). Health-care access in Canada is often unequally distributed, leaving vulnerable individuals unable to secure sufficient assistance. Changes in health-care delivery in Canada have affected individuals’ access to services. Vulnerable groups such as low-income, rural, and immigrant families experience pronounced difficulty adjusting to Canada’s health-care system.
Privatizing healthcare will impact those who can afford full coverage, and those who can only afford minimal coverage. It will also affect small businesses who won’t be forced to provide healthcare to their employees, a huge expense that would save money, and allow for the hiring of new staff. Overall, better treatment will be provided if the government is removed from the equation. By allowing healthcare businesses to compete with each other, limits will be pushed to accommodate patients. Providers will work to find new cures and new methods of treatment, in order to draw more customers to them. The private healthcare system will compensate doctors and medical professionals for their skill and abilities, and the better they treat their patients, the
First of all government should take the control in its own hands instead of giving full power to the private insurance companies. Insurance and pharmaceuticals companies fix and control all the medical system government should have a regular check. Secondly patients have to pay for every single visit instead of paying a fee for each visit there should be a fixed cost. Pharmaceuticals companies, insurance companies and other agencies should to fix the prices of the drugs government should fix the prices at lower cost so that every patient can afford them easily. Surgical treatment should be of moderate cost it should be in the reach of common man. The charges of the indoor patients should be curtailed down so that they can be able to pay the bills
6. The special characteristics of the U.S. health care market are Ethical and equity considerations, asymmetric information, spillover benefits, and third-party payments: insurance. Each one of these characteristics affects health care in some way. For example, ethical and equity considerations affect health care in the way that society does not consider unjust for people to be denied to health care access. Society believes that it is the same thing as not owning a car or a computer. Asymmetric information also gives health care a boost in prices. People who buy health care have no information on what procedures and diagnostics are involved, but on the other hand sellers do. This creates an unusual situation in which the doctor (seller) tells the patient(buyer) what services he or she should consume. It seems like the patient has to buy what the doctor tells him. The topic of spillover benefits also cause a rise in prices. This meaning that immunizations for diseases benefit not only the person who buys it but the whole community as well. It reduces the risk of the whole population getting infected. And the last characteristic is third-party insurance. Which involves all the insurance money people have to pay. This causes a distortion which results in excess consumption of health care services.
In order to provide affordable health care, government should have huge amount of money to be invested in the hospitals, for arranging doctors and for financing.
In many other countries the health care is government controlled and all citizens are provided government assisted health care. Most systems over in Europe are indeed government controlled and are taxed my wages. The United States government does not pay for most of its citizens healthcare in contrast. If you are fournate enough to afford insurance it's usually through your employer. In comparssion almost all government operated insurances provide better care for babies and pregant mothers than the United States system of health care. The United States system are more flexible than government aided systems though.
Historically (before 1880s), only few hospitals were originated in some big cities of U.S. Initially, the hospital system mainly run by religious organization and it served a primary purpose of palliation. According to Shi and Singh (2010), the function of hospitals at that time was more of “social welfare” (such as taking care of homeless people and helping those without families) than practicing medicine (p.56). Over the years, the functionality and the services offered by the hospitals has changed dramatically. However, it’s primary function to treat sick individuals has remained the same. Nowadays, hospitals also function as a research center, a medical educational institution, and is a major source of employment in the community (Sultz
There are major differences between the Canadian and American Health Care Systems. The Canadian Health Care is publicly based which means it is governed by the Canada Health Act. It was created to ensure all Canadian citizens have access to health services. Costs are paid through funding from income tax where virtually all essential basic care is covered. Several practices like psychology, chiropractic, physiotherapy and medication (services not deemed critical) are not covered by the government but can be insured by private companies issued through employers or purchased individually. If the patient lacks private insurance, they have to pay out of their own pocket. The United States health care system is privatized and is profit based. Americans do not automatically have health coverage. They pay out of their own pocket for all services which means people may go untreated if treatment is unaffordable. For many Americans health insurance is a perk given by an employer to help cover the cost of basic health services. Americans can also purchase health insurance individually at an astronomical price (Parente and Bragdon). When it comes to looking at the fundamentals of both private and public systems, I of...
Hospitals, long term care facilities, and mental health all serve as healthcare arenas serving the population in various ways. The hospital provides the most critical type of care, for the seriously ill. Hospitals originally served the poor and ill, but over time with the progression of technology and medical service specialties, they have grown to become healthcare meccas with many outlets. Over the past 30 years the degree of rigor of clinical practice and the scope of scientific knowledge has escalated greatly, and the hospital has become a center of high standards, scientific applications, and advanced technological capability (Williams & Torrens, 2008). The increasing shift of services to an ambulatory care arena facilitated by technological advancement itself has left the hospital with an evermore complex base of patient care, higher acuity, and higher costs (Williams & Torrens, 2008). Markets have changed, pricing pressures have increased, and consumer and payer expectations have evolved for hospitals, changes are constant in the medical arena, and hospitals are no exception.
For commodity price, the demand and supply are directly contributing to the price volatility. The changes in interest rates and exchange rates are significant influence for commodity output and it also has impact on the commodity prices (Dornbusch 1976). For example, based on the equation of AD=C+I+G+NX. If the government expenditure increases, it will tend to