Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Balanced budget
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Balanced budget
"The government has no source of revenue, except the taxes paid by the producers. To free itself - for a while - from the limits set by reality, the government initiates a credit con game on a scale which the private manipulator could not dream of. It borrows money from you today, which is to be repaid with money it will borrow from you tomorrow, which is to be repaid with money it will borrow from you day after tomorrow, and so on. This is known as 'deficit financing.'" -Ayn Rand
PART ONE
In 1936, Republican Representative Harold Knuston of Minnesota proposed what would be the
first constitutional amendment to balance the federal budget. The Knutson resolution would
have established a per capita limit on all federal debt. The proposal stalled and was quashed by
the Judiciary Committee. During the decades that have followed, legislators and economists
have been irresistibly drawn to the lure of a Federal Balanced Budget Amendment (BBA) to the
U.S.Constitution. In September 1995, two economists, (Charles Schultze and Nobel Laureate
James Buchanan) published separate and conflicting articles on the recurring BBA policy issue
in the National Tax Journal. The more convincing argument regarding the BBA would seem to
have been advanced by Charles Schultze. Schultze opines “Balancing the budget over the
medium-term future and on average maintaining long-run balance (at least) thereafter is
desirable and that the amendment should be judged on its utility as a means to desirable end.
Judged that way, however, the proposal is seriously flawed in several ways.” Schultze first
highlights a major concern with the implementation of a balanced budget amendment into an
economy with an existing sub...
... middle of paper ...
...any other agency or individual. This debt cannot be sold or
exchanged at auction or on the secondary market. The concern about borrowing from non-
marketable sources is the ability to pay back the trust fund when the debt becomes due for
redemption. If a large amount of debt to the trust fund was to be redeemed it could potentially
require a tax hike or cutting expenditures to pay the debt. While non-marketable debt does not
create the difficulties of marketable debt in redemption or level of concern, this type of debt still
stands as an outstanding obligation on the Treasury.
Works Cited
Schultze, C. (1995) “The Balanced Budget Amendment: Needed? Effective? Efficient? National Tax Journal, Vol 48
Buchanan,J. (1995) “Clarifying Confusion about the Balanced Budget Amendment” National Tax Journal,Vol 48
Rosen H,Gayer T(2010) “Public Finance, 9th
This deficit has to do with having responsible leader who are willing to increase awareness and make beneficial changes in the nation. In my opinion, the federal debt is a serious threat to the US that must be politically address whenever possible. I believe that the candidates of the 2016 presidential election should make this issue one of the top priorities to discuss and to dictate a considerable amount of work to fix it. That is because the worse the federal debt is, the worse the future would be to the nation. Also, voters must be well educated about this issue in order to shape their decision in voting for the candidate that seems most powerful and confident about this problem. Solving this problem may be difficult and would take time and so much effort. Therefore, the changes and solution must be on both a national and individual levels as
The United State’s Constitution, the shortest written Constitution in the world, only has twenty-seven amendments, and now it is time to add another. The power of a presidential line-item veto was denied to the Clinton Administration in 1998, but with this last Congress being the least productive Congress ever, it is time to re-think the power distribution in the legislative process. In Congress, on average, only 10% of the bills proposed make their way through, and ever reach the President’s desk. In this modern day and age a bill, on average, is 3,105 words. When Congress was first created the idea was that each proposed legislation would be contained in one bill, now bills are comprised of various provisions. Which is why the power of the line-item veto would be beneficial to expand presidential authority. This line-item veto authority is the ability to cross out certain provisions while still being able to sign in to law the entire bill. This would be beneficial to the United States government, as an amendment that would allow the president to cut out unnecessary spending to in turn lower the national deficit. The United States government needs to pass an amendment to allow Presidents to use the line item veto.
Many argue that Reagan “enacted irresponsible tax giveaways for the rich…[starving] the federal government of revenue [which] led to unprecedented deficits.” There is no doubt that “today’s budget deficits [can] impoverish our descendants.”1
...vailable for stimulus programs to boost the economy out of the 2008 financial crisis. This caused fewer jobs to be created, which meant less tax revenue and more debt.
The US has been in and out of debt countless times throughout history, going as far back as the Civil War. However, debt did not become a truly relevant problem until much later, in the 1980s (Budget Deficits). Up to that point, large budget deficits were generally only allowed during wartime, but this pattern ended after the Great Depression. Roosevelt’s New Deal meant that the government spent much more than it previously did, even after the economy improved (Budget De...
The national debt is usually a frightening topic citizens of any country, however, in the United States, twenty trillion dollars of national debt is one of the major fears of the economy. Along with this fear comes every politician claiming to be the person to lower this astronomical debt to ease concerns in the modern American economy. In Hamilton’s Blessing, John Steele Gordon tries to alleviate these concerns by showing a plethora of benefits and good the debt has been able to do throughout the history of the United States. The central premise of the book and the main guideline for John Steele Gordon’s thinking is that the debt was used to save the Union in the 1860’s, the American economy in the 1930’s, and the wellbeing of mankind during
In general, an increase in government spending and decrease in the collection of government taxes and other receipts, increases the debt held by the local government. Government taxes and receipts fluctuate annually, and are frequently less than government spending. In the past, the U.S. public debt has increased for the duration of wars and recessions. When the government consumes more than what it accumulates in taxes, there is a budget deficit and the government then borrows from the private sector or from foreign governments to protect their spending. The compilation of historical borrowing is what materializes the government debt.
When a company builds a toll road and turns a profit, then the government funds a public road; the toll road becomes less profitable and the private sector is less willing to provide that service. I think currently the best reason to increase deficit spending would be in infrastructure. We hear all the time that our bridges are crumbling, and are far past their life expectancy. We also could use some significant upgrades to our power grid, as well as our internet networks, although those are both controlled solely by private firms.
U.S Federal Deficit and Debts:Understanding the history and context. (2011, November 1). Utah Foundation. Retrieved January 25, 2014, from http://www.utahfoundation.org/img/pdfs/rr7
It seems Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan beat the Treasury secretary to it. Greenspan could not wait for the economy to fix itself by paying of the debt. The United States economy is roaring ahead at about 5% annual growth rate, much faster then the federal reserve considers safe. In an attempt to keep inflation under wraps and fix the imbalance of the economy, the Federal Reserve raised federal fund rates half a point, overnight, to 6.5%, the highest in nine years. However the fed is not sure this wil...
ability of the public to exercise that right. We will make an exploration of the unintended
NERSISYAN, Yeva and L. Randall Wray (2010). Deficit Hysteria Redux? Why We Should Stop Worrying About U.S. Government Deficits. Nova York: The Levy Economics Institute, Public Policy Brief, Nº. 111. http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/ppb_111.pdf.
Peter Morici, an economist and business professor at the university of Maryland, and a national columnist stated, in an article published at the Washington times, that “The Treasury could easily refinance the existing federal debt — sell new federal government bonds to replace those that mature each month — if it keeps paying the interest on the total debt — $276 billion. It simply can’t add to the debt by selling even more bonds.” He further commented that “The bonds outstanding cover past spending. Raising the debt ceiling only permits Uncle Sam to spend more than it collects in taxes in the future. Essentially, if the federal bureaucracy is put on a diet and compelled to get along on the $3.5 trillion it collects in taxes, pays the interest on the debt and sends out in Social Security checks, it would have $2.2 trillion left to fund remaining planned spending of $2.8 trillion.