Psychology is not just common sense

1270 Words3 Pages

Psychology is not just common sense. Discuss.

The statement of psychology not being just common sense is parallel with the ideologies of most psychologists in the field. Although some aspects and examples of psychology might be simplistic and clear, it also involves substantial critical thinking skills, reasoning and an extensive amount of research. Psychology is defined as the study of the mind and behaviour. (American Psychological Association, 2014), thus affirming the view expressed above. Furthermore, a psychologist has to undertake three phases of critical assessment before coming to a conclusion, whereas the layman will use his or her common sense to make an assumption about a topic. These three stages are commonly described as analysing ideas, keenly reflecting on ideas and then producing alternate conclusions (Paul & Elder, 2007). This allows higher level of accuracy in a study and evaluation. This essay will cover two main ideas, the topic that will be instrumental in proving that psychology is not just common sense, and how such psychological methods will work to disprove misconceptions and theories conceived out of said common sense.
The majority of laymen believe that if an infant is not securely attached to its caregiver, it must have no sense of attachment at all. Moreover, they assume blindly that there will be no in-betweens. However, psychology shows that there is much more to it when it comes to attachment styles. There are in fact, three main types of attachment styles that make up the crux of the Attachment Theory, which will be explored in further detail.
Attachment is defined as a lasting psychological connectedness between human beings. It was believed that the most primiti...

... middle of paper ...

...ng them. Thus, the value of psychology far exceeds the basics, the use of common sense, and draws upon one’s higher order thinking skills to conceive or substantiate a theory.

Works Cited

American Psychological Association. (2014). https://www.apa.org/support/about/apa/psychology.aspx#answer

Ainsworth, M. D. S., & Bell, S. M. (1970). Attachment, exploration, and separation: Illustrated by the behavior of one-year-olds in a strange situation. Child Development, 41, 49-67.

Bowlby J. (1969). Attachment. Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Loss. New York: Basic Books.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2007). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking. California: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.

Main, M., & Solomon, J. (1986). Discovery of an insecure-disorganized/ disoriented attachment pattern: Procedures, findings and implications for the classification of behavior.

Open Document