Introduction: What is Personality?
Allport defines personality as ‘the dynamic organisation within the individual of those psychological systems that determine his unique adjustment to his environment’ (Allport, 1937). An individual’s unique personality traits and attributes are a powerful indicator of how he/she will interact with the work environment. The difference between average and outstanding employees can often be solely personality related. As the employee is the most valuable asset to the company, ‘selecting the right employee during the process is critical’ (Carbery and Cross, 2013, pp. 41-53)
Traditional Theory Vs Cognitive Theory
When we speak about personality, we must consider the two prominent schools of thought: traditional and cognitive theories. Traditional theorists believe that personality is static and not likely to change, irrespective of education (Holland and Rayman et al., 1986, pp. 55--82). To suggest that a person’s personality and behaviour are consistent over time is a more unitary view that fails to incorporate the effects of interaction with others. Traditional theorists believe we have little or no control over the type of personality we transmit. This personality theory is now considered obsolete and has been overshadowed by the more modern cognitive personality theory. The cognitive model views ‘people as complex and sophisticated information processors’ (Pervin, 1993). Cognitive theorists see personality as more flexible as it provides predictions that are situation specific. This theory is more applicable to understanding personality in the workplace as it is largely based on how people react to certain situations and contexts. Cognitive theorists believe that ‘people do have a choice about ...
... middle of paper ...
...of psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton.
Holland, Rayman, J., Walsh, W. and Osipow, S. 1986. The self-directed search. Advances in vocational psychology, 1 pp. 55--82.
Loue, S. and Sajatovic, M. 2007. Encyclopedia of aging and public health. New York: Springer.
Mccrae, R. R. and Costa Jr, P. T. 1997. Personality trait structure as a human universal. American psychologist, 52 (5), p. 509.
Mccrae, R. R. and Costa, P. T. 1989. Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator From the Perspective of the Five-Factor Model of Personality. Journal of personality, 57 (1), pp. 17--40.
Morley, M., Moore, S., Heraty, N., Linehan, M. and Maccurtain, S. 2004. Principals of Organisational Behavior: An Irish Text. 2nd ed. Dublin: Gill and Macmillan.
Pervin, L. A. 1993. Personality. New York: Wiley.
Rogers, C. R. 1961. On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2013). Theories of personality (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth.
Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2013). Theories of personality (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage/Wadsworth.
Feist, J., & Feist, G. J. (2009). Theories of Personality (7th ed.). New York, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Cervone, D., Pervin, L. A. (2008). Personality: Theory and research (10th Ed.). New York: Wiley.
Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T. A. (2009). Theories of personality. New York:
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Journal of personality and social psychology and. Retrieved from http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~broberts/Hazan & Shaver, 1987.pdf
Kroeger, O., Thuesen, J. M., & Rutledge, H. (2002). Type talk at work: How the 16 personality types determine your success on the job. New York, NY: Dell Publishing.
The purpose of this research report is to investigate the personality of Beyoncé Knowles in terms of humanistic and trait conceptions of personality.
Raymond B. Cattell (1906-1998) studied the personality traits of large groups of people, calling the visible features of their personalities “surface traits.” During his studies, Cattell observed that certain “surface traits” would appear simultaneously in individuals. When Cattell noticed this trend occurring frequently he renamed the group of “surface traits” “source traits”. At the conclusion of his research Cattell identified sixteen “source traits.”
Matthews, G., Deary, I. J., & Whiteman, M. C. (2009). Personality traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Discussed below are different researchers’ arguments and explanations on how personality predicts employee performance. This essay will explore both negative and positive ways in which personality can predict the performance, as well as explaining what personality is. Past research has “demonstrated that personality constructs are associated with work performance, with some traits like conscientiousness predicting success around jobs. Other linked with specific occupations e.g. extraversion correlates with success in sales and management as well as training performance supporting”, (Barrick et al., 2002, 87: p.43).
Costa, P. r., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 55(2), 258-265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.258
Friedman, H. S., & Schustack, M. W. (2012). Personality: Classic theories and modern research (5th ed). Boston , MA, USA: Pearson
The Five-Factor Model of Personality gives an insight to psychologists when dealing with patients and test subjects. Due to this theory, research psychologist are able to research personality more accurately and uphold a better understanding when discussing the reasoning behind certain pre-disposed tendencies. Also, counselors which practice different types of therapy are enabled to learn details concerning their patient that can assist in the treatment of that specific patient. There have been multiple disputes in regards to the validity of the Five-Factor Model of Personality theory. Many skeptics believe that there are too many variations that come into play when dealing with personality in order to accurately depict and diagnose a 100% accurate declaration of ones’ characteristics (McCrae, 1991). The issue with relying on the model in order to declare one’s characteristics is that there is often overlap between the degrees of high and low (Popkins, 1998). Although this is a valid statement, the model is a significant role in sorting through the variations to achieve a probable consensus. Therefore, the model cannot achieve a result without any probable cause for doubt but generally will provide a clear depiction of ones’ traits and
The concept of personality has numerous definitions (Fatahi, Moradi, & Kashani-Vahid, 2016). Schultz and Schultz (2009), define personality in its broad sense as the manner of an individual’s behaviour in different situations. This essay explores the nature of personality, with the intention of highlighting its flexibility. The results of numerous empirical research studies are examined in order to investigate if, and how personality changes over time. It will be argued that an individual’s personality has the ability to change throughout their life.