Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gambling psychology essay
Gambling psychology essay
Gambling psychology essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gambling psychology essay
To the casual eye of most, winning the lottery is an ongoing fantasy for many. To envision the idea that in a sudden moment you could be an instant millionaire, a risk that many are willing to take. Statistics have shown that the chances of someone winning is 1 in 175 million. Although, winning the lottery is not likely for those who do win are they really that much better off ("What Are Your Odds")? For most people it’s the possibility of winning big that has brought continual hope throughout the years for a better future (Smith, Jacque Wilson). However, is there a limit of happiness to this fortune and is it actually healthier to lose the lottery then to win? Multiple scholars examine the psychological, behavioral, and social effects of winning the lottery; how it could be beneficial toward individual situations, and in other …show more content…
... Our pleasure of living is not only based on our current situation, but what could be, what we can imagine our situation could become (Dahl, Melissa)." Northwestern University and the University of Massachusetts tested the theory of pleasure in relation to money by gathering a collection of people to do a survey (Dahl, Melissa). Some were victims that were involved in disastrous accidents and others were winners of the Illinois state lottery that claimed the fortune anywhere from 50 thousand-1 million dollars (Dahl, Melissa). The survey reveals that thoughts who were involved in a traumatic event were actually happier then the lottery winners, and overall both groups that regarded everyday pleasures were closely relatable in there score (Dahl, Melissa). Dahl then references the idea of the “Hedonic adaptation,” which remarks human’s adaptation to even the simplest of things, like new pair of shoes (Dahl, Melissa). However, Quentin Futtrell mentions a counter argument, in regards to financial expert’s assertion about wealth, and how happier money can make you (Fottrell,
In the short story “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, the reader is introduced to a utopian community who practice the tradition of a lottery every year. At first glance, it seems like a nice day and the kids are just collecting rocks while waiting for their parents to arrive. All of the citizens show some excitement over the upcoming the lottery. The text states,
We see a very disturbing ending in the Shirley Jackson’s, The Lottery where the reader believes that the lottery in mention is solely a monetary game of chance, like in our lives presently. However,
“Why We Keep Playing the Lottery”, by freelance journalist Adam Piore takes a very in depth look as to what drives millions of Americans to continually play the lottery when their chances of winning are virtually non-existent. He believes that because the odds of winning the lottery are so small that Americans lose the ability to conceptualize how unlikely it is that they are going to win, and therefore the risk of playing has less to do with the outcome, and more to do with hope that they are feeling when they decide to play. It 's essentially, "a game where reason and logic are rendered obsolete, and hope and dreams are on sale." (Piore 700) He also states that many Americans would rather play the lottery thinking ,"boy, I could win $100 million" (705) as opposed to thinking about all of the money they could lose over time.
Abcarian, Richard, and Marvin Klotz. "The Lottery." Literature: the Human Experience. 9th ed. Boston: Bedford/St Martin's, 2006. 350-56. Print.
Winning the lottery is something practically everyone dreams of. Similarly, the novel, The Pearl, by John Steinbeck, and the articles “Does Money Equal Happiness?” by Jennifer Davidson and “Winning the Lottery: Does it Guarantee Happiness?” by Elizabeth Landau, all show what happens to people when they become wealthy. With the collection of many circumstances, it has become clear that money cannot buy happiness, because instead, it causes a person to fear, neglect their religion, and be filled with misfortune.
Is happiness for sale? It is true that with enough money one can enjoy everything luxurious, and live a life of comfort and security. A little more money make us a little happier. However, happiness involves more than financial fitness; it encompasses emotional fulfillment as well, thus there are various ways to pursue happiness. In “Immune to Reality”, Daniel Gilbert examines the operation of the “psychological immune system,” which protects us when we suffer wrenching setbacks but not when we try to cope with minor ones, imparting a surprising complacency in the face of significant blows but often leaving us quite helpless when we deal with trivial irritations. In the course of a detailed investigation of the food industry,
The article “High Incomes Don’t Bring You Happiness” verbatimly states, “Beyond $75,000, money is important for life evaluation, but does nothing for happiness, enjoyment, sadness, or stress” (Kenney 4). Those who spend prodigal amounts of money disdain plebeians because they claim that money is the foundation to living a great life. However, money only helps one meet certain needs and does not contribute in instigating true happiness within oneself. Happiness comes naturally by one’s actions and accomplishments. Although, money helps buy the commodities which satisfy one’s life, it is not the direct source for obtaining glee within a
“the Official California Lottery Financial Report, of the total $59.25 billion the lottery took in from people buying tickets, about $30.54 billion was given back in prizes”(Chen, Yang, & Chen, 2010). When the Lottery is more
Winning the lottery is a dream most people have; it is magical thinking, believing that you, the ticket buyer will be the one defying all the odds. The only ones, from the hedonistic utilitarian standpoint whosehappiness will increase are those who actually win the lottery, a very small number from among all the players. The hedonistic utilitarian standpoint is not ethically recommendable because the lottery is only selling the dream of winning it while filling the state coffers with people’s hard earned money. (Brusseau, J. 2012)
Typically, when someone thinks of a lottery they think of something positive and exciting but contrary to this idea in Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery”, the connotation has an entirely different meaning. As the story begins, readers lean towards the belief that the town in which Jackson depicts is filled with happiness and joy. “The morning of June 27th was clear and sunny, with the fresh warmth of a full summer day; the flowers were blossoming profusely and the grass was richly green” (Jackson 247) We soon realize that this notion is far from the truth. As the townspeople gather in the square for the annual lottery, which sole purpose is to stone someone to death by randomly pulling a paper out of a black box with a black dot on it, it is learned
“The Lottery” was quite disturbing to read. It is an very unusual story that has an ending that will have you baffled. You will want to reread certain parts to see if there is anything thing that you could have missed. The title of the short story is also misleading. In most cases the lottery is a good thing. People don’t win punishment and lotteries don’t hurt them. But in this story it does just that. The author did a great job of telling how anyone and everyone can follow tradition blindly. It is dangerous not to have a mind of your own and to just follow the crowd even if you don’t understand on agree on why something is happening.
He further shows us that the people of today are richer than their grandparents but are not happier in their lives (from National Statistics of social pathology). Even with these facts, people in the United States still believe if they had more money all of their problems would be solved, but once they reach that next income bracket they are not satisfied and try to reach the next one. Myers et al tells us, "even if being rich and famous is rewarding, no one ever claimed material success alone makes us happy. Other conditions like - family- friends- free time - have been shown to increase happiness" (Csikszentmihaly 145). therefore we must find balance in our own lives, and not just focus on making money. Instead we need friends, family and even free time, as aforementioned doing an activity you enjoy such as listening to music or
According to Freud’s conclusion based on decades of experimentation and theoretical work in the field of psychotherapy, humans cannot be happy because a satisfaction of needs creates only a momentary phase of happiness which expires after some time. Therefore, the focus of life should not be obtaining happiness, and people should focus on avoiding suffering instead (Bullock, n.d.). However, several paradigms about well-being exist, and individual cognitive patterns and paradigms define the emotional responses to social influences. From an objective viewpoint, well-being is a state of consciousness that arises from a combination of internal and external factors, and money is an unstable external influence in defining subjective well-being.
The lottery is something everyone wants to win no matter what the prize. People buy their tickets and await their fates. Some people win the lottery and many more lose. Losing the lottery causes something inside of us to die, but it is almost impossible to quit playing. The gambling becomes an addiction. The reason why people are constantly drawn to these lotteries is because deep down, the people who play them are convinced they can win.
From the survey psychologists made, it seems that what makes us happy may not always bring more meaning, and vice versa. Feeling happy was strongly correlated with seeing life as easy, pleasant and free from difficult or troubling events, while none of these things were correlated with a greater sense of meaning. They also find that money is positively correlated with greater levels of happiness. However, having enough money seems to make little difference in life’s sense of meaning. Therefore, perhaps instead of saying that “Money doesn’t buy happiness,” we ought to say that “Money doesn’t buy meaning.” Additionally, in Baumeister’s study, “givers” reported higher levels of meaning in their lives compared to the “takers”. The researchers also point out