Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What role did olaudah equianos faith play in his life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The discussion of the role of providence in one’s life permeates the works of Phillis Wheatley and Olaudah Equiano, as they both attempt to convey how God interacts with humans. This relationship brings up questions of salvation both in the immediate and the eternal. In Equiano’s narrative and Wheatley’s “Thoughts on the Works of Providence,” providence is a saving presence, but it is viewed from different theological perspectives, specifically that of humanity’s weakness and the unchanging realities of the natural world respectively. These perspectives are determined by the authors’ lives and how they differ. In both works, the authors attempt to convey their perception of who God is to the reader. For the purposes of this paper, the authors’ …show more content…
As an educated woman, she is fascinated by natural philosophy and, throughout her poem, discusses how she finds the glory of God in the world around her. She describes the solar system as a calculated entity, in which God has a hand in directing. She likens the earth to a “vast machine” and “adore[s] the God that whirls surrounding spheres” (Wheatley 12,14). This view of God as a tinkerer of the machinery of the universe was prevalent at that time, especially in the deist view of God as someone like a watchmaker. Central to this idea of God is the understanding that he is predictable and in …show more content…
He began to view “every extraordinary escape, or single deliverance, either of myself or others” as “the interposition of providence” (Equiano). Even though he believed in this instance that God was saving him from harm, this created in Equiano a sense of “fear and reverence,” because he believed that “the hand of God” was directly deciding whether or not men would live or die, just like it determined when a sparrow would fall (Equiano). From this point on, Equiano begins to experience more and more stress concerning his eventual eternal destination, because he is focusing only on mankind’s frailty and “meanes[s]” (Equiano). Equiano does not feel as though he can have the assurance of salvation, unlike Wheatley, and this creates in him much
On July 8th 1741, Jonathan Edwards preached the sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” in Enfield, Connecticut. Edwards states to his listeners that God does not lack in power, and that people have yet not fallen to destruction because his mercy. God is so forgiving that he gives his people an opportunity to repent and change their ways before it was too late. Edwards urges that the possibility of damnation is immanent. Also that it urgently requires the considerations of the sinner before time runs out. He does not only preach about the ways that make God so omnipotent, but the ways that he is more superior to us. In his sermon, Edwards uses strong, powerful, and influential words to clearly point out his message that we must amend our ways or else destruction invincible. Edwards appeals to the spectators though the various usages of rhetorical devices. This includes diction, imagery, language/tone and syntax. Through the use of these rhetoric devices, Edwards‘s purpose is to remind the speculators that life is given by God and so they must live according to him. This include...
Olaudah Equiano was a freed slave living in London who made it his life person to abolish the British slave trade. His knowledge and training of the English language allowed him to grow into one of the key figures in the movement to abolish the slave trade in England. Although many scholars acknowledge his incredible talent, there has been evidence in the recent years that may question his reliability as a first-hand account. There is evidence to support that Equiano may have been born in South Carolina. This evidence does not make him a valid source of information about the slave trade and leads his audience to question his statements.
Equiano is amazed at seeing and hearing the service and to hear that God made everyone and all things. As the years past, Equiano goes through numerous hardships but considers himself fortunate to have a kind master. However, one day, Equiano is told that he cannot go to Heaven unless he is baptized. Thus, Equiano ends up expressing his uneasiness of the idea to Miss Guerin, who insists on him doing so which leads him to be baptized in St. Margaret’s Church. Equiano’s baptism is equivalent to his soul being set free, essentially his freedom because from the moment he is baptized, no man could own him as he belong... ...
Equiano later explains his religious beliefs in chapter 10 of the Narrative. This has often been interpreted as a plot for Equiano to gain the trust of readers, who at this point in time placed high value in religion, however Professor Eileen Elrod views this as interpretation as dismissal of Equiano’s Christianity as a result of assimilation to the Western world. Elrod notes, “if we take the facile view that he is simply using religion to manipulate readers, or we see him as simply manipulated by religion, we ignore the earnest and consistent piety that sets the tone and establishes the purpose of the narrative” (Elrod, p.409). This purpose was to protest the violent treatment of captured and enslaved Africans. Equiano prompts readers to confront their hypocrisy, questioning how Christians could approve of violent, abusive behavior toward their fellow man. “…by the way of the authority of biblical texts, [Equiano] establishes a set of touchstones that allow him to condemn the Christianity of his experience and affirm in its stead an idealized Christianity, a biblical reality in which justice and compassion triumph” (Elrod, p.
The narrative of Olaudah Equiano is truly a magnificent one. Not only does the reader get to see the world through Equiano's own personal experiences, we get to read a major autobiography that combined the form of a slave narrative with that of a spiritual conversion autobiography. Religion may be viewed as at the heart of the matter in Equiano's long, remarkable journey. Through Equiano's own experiences, the reader uncovers just how massive a role religion played in the part of his Narrative and in that of his own life. More specifically, we learn of how his religious conversion meant a type of freedom as momentous as his own independence from slavery. As one reads his tale, one learns just how dedicated he his to that of his Christian faith; from his constant narration of the scriptures to the way that Equiano feels a growing sense of empowerment from the biblical texts for the oppressed community. However, at the same time, one may question Equiano's own Christian piety. Did Equiano really seek to tell the tale of his soul's spiritual journey, did he really believe God would set him free or was he simply using religion as a ways of manipulating British and American readers to accept him as a credible narrator. Regardless of which of these facts is true, religion is quite possibly the defining feature of his life story.
Today, cultures generally recognize the irrefutable humanity of all people, no matter how well they assimilate into new cultures. However, for white society in the 1700’s, the instances where blacks assimilated into the cultures and customs of the New World and Europe were the only instances when whites attempted to recognize their humanity. Olaudah Equiano wrote of his own assimilation into European culture in his autobiography, The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa. The ability of an African to seamlessly join European society held weight in the debate over whether or not blacks were human or not. The humanity of Africans was demonstrated to white society through Olaudah Equiano’s assimilation into European
Clearly, he sees the evils that he has suffered as part of a larger plan; furthermore, he attributes good fortune and punishment to the work of God and in my opinion, he sees God using him for a much greater purpose.
Here, Taylor envisions a different kind of God, not one who waved his hand, uttered some magic words, and pulled the universe from his Godly top hat (p.151). Taylor’s God is a working God surrounded by wood and iron, soot
During the late seventeen hundreds former slave, Olaudah Equiano, began his autobiography. In the introduction he clarifies his reason for writing the account; informing his audience that he does not seek fame and fortune and is merely a humble man who wishes to persuade the audience to promote the abolition of slavery and to articulate the horrors of enslavement. Equiano provides a voice for those who were not allowed to advocate for themselves and their rights. He aims to eradicate the idea that slaves are second class versions of a human beings that are treated as objects, diminishing their worth and personal value. Equiano pursues this goal by blending his belief of religion, slavery, and personal adventure with a complexity that appeals
La Due describes Moltmann’s eschatology in that God wants to save everyone, is able to save everyone, and in fact, will save everyone. And it is through Jesus Christ’s death and ressurection, including suffering through the torrments of hell, that in the end nothing will be lost. One of the most compelling arguments that La Due discusses of Moltmann’s work is “Moltman advises us, ‘If the double outcome of justice is proclaimed, the question is then: why did God create human beings if he is going to damn most of th...
"The Life of Olaudah Equiano” is a captivating story in which Equiano, the author, reflects on his life from becoming a slave to a freeman during the 19th century. Through his experiences and writing, Equiano paints a vivid picture of the atrocities and cruelties of European slavery. Ultimately through his narrative, Equiano intends to persuade his audience, the British government, to abolish the Atlantic slave trade as well as alert them of the harsh treatment of slaves. He successfully accomplishes his goal by subtly making arguments through the use of character, action, and setting.
St. Augustine is a man with a rational mind. As a philosopher, scholar, and teacher of rhetoric, he is trained in and practices the art of logical thought and coherent reasoning. The pursuits of his life guide him to seek concrete answers to specific questions. Religion, the practice of which relies primarily on faith—occasionally blind faith—presents itself as unable to be penetrated by any sort of scientific study or inquiry. Yet, like a true scientist and philosopher, one of the first questions St. Augustine poses in his Confessions is: “What, then, is the God I worship” (23)? For a long time, Augustine searches for knowledge about God as a physical body, a particular entity—almost as if the Lord were merely a human being, given the divine right to become the active figurehead of the Christian religion.
Thus, because she perceives grace as the central need of human experience and redemption as the essential aim of life itself, she also insists on the reality of sin and the inevitability of judgment. Unlike many modernists who complain that God has turned His back on the world, she contends that it is man who now shuns God (35).
Throughout the history of metaphysics the question, What is? has always been answered in an incomplete,unsatisfactory or complicated manner, but Spinoza tried to answer this question in an exceptional way simply by describing God and His essence. Based on Spinoza’s views, God’s qualities can be referred to as attributes and modes are merely affections of a substance. This paper will provide a detailed view of Spinoza’s key ontological definition of God as the only substance, his attributes, and their co-relations. The study goes further to explore the major scholarly argument between Spinoza and Descartes, in regard to their view of substance, and its attributes.
Through out history there have been questions of where we come from and how we got here. It all comes down to the question of God’s existence. God’s existence has never been questioned during the times of when Christianity, Judaism and Islam were born. The question of God’s existence comes from our new way of thinking after these religions. Science has made us think of how things work in our world and brings Gods existence into question. There were no scientific studies done during the days of Jesus to prove that God exists, so where did the people in history get this idea of God from? Many philosophers have been questioning and giving their ideas of God and his existence. The ideas that we may have of God is usually connected with religion and our beliefs. One philosopher that touches on this topic is Descartes. Descartes gives his ideas on God’s existence and his out look on our selves compared to God. Most religions believe that there is a God and that he has created everything around us. Everyone has a different answer to this question that they think is the right one. Throughout this paper, I will be discussing God’s existence, while looking at Descartes ideas and through different perspectives of whether or not God exist as well.