Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of citizen participation
Introduction to civil society protests from the 1950s to the 1970s. The civil rights movement in the USA
Influence of protest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Over 4,124,543 people in America have participated in protests. Since so many people across the country participate in these rallies, one may ask why they protest. They do it for many different reasons. People protest to end injustices, to support a cause, to make their views be heard, to be patriotic, and to help humanity. Protests are effective when many people come together and strike, forcing the government to take action.
Citizens of America protest to help humanity. This is supported by the number of people that care about the death rates of the Vietnam war. At the beginning of the war, 24% of people opposed it. Six years later, 60% of people opposed the war in Vietnam (Source A: Data Bank: Vietnam War status). This drastic change
…show more content…
in percentage was caused by the death rates of American troops. More Americans were being exposed to these death rates that the government had been so severely lying to them about and it lead them to protest. Another reason people protest to help humanity is the movement, Black Lives Matter. Citizens across the country are protesting to help end racial injustices. They are helping people from being wrongfully killed by police. A supporter of this cause states black Americans should “no longer be systematically targeted for demise”(Black Lives Matter). These supporters help humanity greatly. Overall, people protest to help mankind for the greater good. People also protest to make their views heard.
They can not reach the government easily unless they have a huge group of people marching and protesting with them. Citizens gather, posters and songs are made, even draft cards are burnt in protest (Fred Lonidier). To take a more dangerous and impactful route people went as far as bombing the Pentagon (Source C: Image Bank: Weather Underground). The American people solely want to be heard, and they can perfectly do this through protests. Protests are effective when people come together to be heard, they strike to force the government to listen. Many experts agree on this, "What we both realize is we're stronger when we operate together” (Kendall Fells). In conclusion, rallies help citizens of the United States to express their opinions and persuade people to join …show more content…
them. Individuals take place in protests to be more patriotic as well. These people believe that taking part in government actions is patriotic. They like making a change and participating. Martin Luther King Jr. states, “I speak as one who loves America, to the leaders of our own nation: The great initiative is ours”. He specifically states how loving of America he is and that everyone needs to take charge of our nation. One can connect these two to mean that patriotism lies within protesting. Being able to create change in America is powerful. People feel better when they know they are making an impact, so they do not only protest but create movements in protest. These movements are creating an even larger impact because they take action. If people were to “commit themselves to a movement wherever they are in whatever way they effectively can, would be, I’m convinced, enough”(Paul Potter). Paul states how if everyone takes action in a certain movement, a lot would be changed and could help to end the Vietnam War. As expressed, people participate in protests to be patriotic. Inhabitants of the United States also protest to support certain views. Many people marched in support of President Richard Nixon as well, “On May 20, 1970, between 60,000 to 150,000 construction workers paraded through downtown New York to show support of President Nixon’s war policies”(New York Times). These citizens wanted people to know that if they were in support of Nixon, they were not alone. They also believe they were being patriotic by supporting their nation, they said many things in support of the president. A lady marching with her kids states, “Were part of the silent majority that is finally speaking-and in answer to all the creeps and the bums that have been hollering and marching against the President. I think he’s doing the best he can to bring out an honorable peace”(New York Times). By saying this, the woman believes in the president’s views and feels very strongly against Anti-war protestors. She protested to support her views, just like many other Americans did. The movement Black Lives Matter protests to end injustices.
They make America a better place for black citizens. They march against police brutality and the general mistreatment of black Americans. Their movement has become extremely popular and through this power, they are able to spread their message. According to their website, BLM is working to create an “inclusive and spacious movement”(Black Lives Matter). They protest by creating posters, marches, etc. just like the Anti-war protesters. After the killing of her son by police, Andrea Irwin reflects on how her life was impacted. She states, “The life I had – everything is just gone,” she said. “Today, I’m a better person. But it was not like that for a long time. I went through a very dark place. I feel like I went to my definition of what a hell would be”. Irwin was highly affected by her son’s death and wants to help other people so the same thing doesn’t happen to them. She wants to end injustices, and that is why she
protests. In conclusion, protests are an immense part of our current government. They help us to create a better America for all. Protests are effective when many people come together for the greater good to solve a problem. This creates not only unity but a stronger country. Overall, people protest to end injustices, have their views heard, support a cause, be patriotic, and help humanity.
James A. Baldwin once said, “The most dangerous creation of any society is the man who has nothing to lose” (BrainyQuote.com). In the 1960s, “the man” was youth across the country. The Vietnam war was in full force, and students across the country were in an outrage. Society needed an excuse to rebel against the boring and safe way of life they were used to; Vietnam gave them the excuse they needed. Teenagers from different universities came together and formed various organizations that protested the Vietnam war for many reasons. These reasons included protesting weapons and different tactics used in the war, and the reason the U.S. entered the war in the first place. These get-togethers had such a monumental impact on their way of life that it was famously named the Anti-War Movement. When the Vietnam War ended, The United States did not have a real concrete reason why; there were a bunch of theories about why the war ended. Through negative media attention and rebellious youth culture, the Anti-War Movement made a monumental impact in the ending of the Vietnam War.
In the colonization period, the urge to conquer foreign territories was strong, and many lands in the Western Hemisphere were conquered. With the colonization of these areas, a mercantilist relationship was formed between the conquered civilization and the maternal country. A major part of this was the restriction of exportation of native resources only to the mother country as well as the banning of trading with colonies of other countries. In turn, there was an increasing in the number of smuggling activities during the time. According to a British sailor named William Taggart in 1760, the illegal smuggling of goods into these areas had a positive impact because it brought prosperity to the people in Monte Christi, as there were only one hundred poor families. Likewise, Dominica governor John Orde praised the trading because it created prices much lower than with its maternal country. However, British admiral David Tyrell, Roger Elletson, Dominica governor John Orde, and a 1790 Bahaman newspaper report all had similar views on the harmful effects and corruptness present in smuggling. Despite this, physician George Lipscomb and British Lieutenant Governor Thomas Bruce had neutral opinions on the matter, and only stated what they witnessed in the process.
Others protest that has had an effect on America since the Amendment was ratified are protest against war such as Vietnam and Desert Shield/Desert Storm, Civil Rights Movement, and more recently the protest of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in Seattle. Also the many strikes and pickets labor union have been involved in through out history. There are differences among these gatherings. The most striking difference is typically if the protest is violent or non-violent. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Henry David Thoreau referred to the use of civil disobedience. In the movie, ?Breaking the Spell? protesters felt they were not being violent since the items they damaged belong to big business.
There are times throughout the history of the United States when its citizens have felt the need to revolt against the government. There were such cases during the time of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, when there was unfair discrimination against the Afro-American community and Americans refusing to pay poll taxes to support the Mexican War. They used civil disobedience to eventually get legislation to stop the injustice brought against them and their nation. Civil disobedience is defined as refusal to obey civil laws or decrees, which usually takes the form of passive resistance. People practicing civil disobedience break a law because they consider the law unjust, and want to call attention to its injustice, hoping to bring about its withdrawal.
In the beginning, around 80% of the population supported the war and therefore they decided to fight for what they thought was right. This majority of the people thought that the positives outweighed the negatives, so the polls determined how supportive they were of the Vietnam War. However, after the war was supported through the polls, support eventually began to decline. People, who previously supported US intervention in the war, now see the consequences of participation. Despite support in the beginning, the polls quickly switched sides and showed that public opinion disapproved of the
Throughout Europe in the fifteenth, sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries, nations were filled with poor and less fortunate individuals. While the nobles of countries such as France and England ruled their lands, many forgot about the underprivileged that roamed the city streets begging for alms. As a result, the opinions towards these lower class people were very differentiated. However, three main opinions stood out. All in all, the views of the poor in fifteenth – eighteenth century Europe included those who believed individuals should help the poor because it is the right thing to do, those who believed individuals should help the poor for God, and those who believed the poor were just idlers
Throughout history, the American people have, for the most part, stood united during times of war. The people of America always seemed to rally behind each other. Most people were either willing to fight in the war or willing to take up the responsibilities of those who left for war. The majority of Americans supported the decisions of our nation’s government. This was not the case during the Vietnam War. For the first time in American history, widespread revolt against our nation’s decision to fight in the war influenced the outcome. This is what saved our country and the lives of soldiers who were fighting an unwinnable war.
Paul Potter, president of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), held his first anti-war rally that attracted 25,000 people. The movement occurred between 1960 and 1970. Paul Potter’s speech, “The Incredible War”, was established in hopes of ending the war by creating a social movement. The only way for people to end the war is by challenging the system, creating posters, and not by having a couple marches because that wasn’t going to benefit them. “This war was mainly fought mainly by Vietnamese Communists, who were strong in the north of Vietnam.” (Britannica) The goal of the movement was to end the Vietnam War because it was taking away the American’s freedom and destroying their peace in the world. The Americans and South Vietnam were mostly involved in the movement. The movement started because Vietnam wanted to become a communist government and until then, corruption occurred.
Engaging in the war in Vietnam brought a whole different set of "American Views" to the topic of war. This time the country did not support the war like we've seen in the past. Mostly by young people, the war effort was criticized and Americans staged massive protests. The Vietnam War's controversy spurred a great many sources of protest, against our government's use of power, how far we could stretch the rights of free expression, and primarily against the violence of the war itself.
In 1968, the United States of America was participating in a violent war that some of the general public greatly disapproved of. Tension between political parties was rising and this did not help efforts with the war. Anti-war sentiment was growing in popularity amongst the younger generation; they wanted to get their voices heard. Protests and riots were occurring more frequently and growing larger in size all throughout the United States. This was the case for eight Chicago men who protested peacefully.
Protests have long been a way for people to display their difference in opinion and gain support. One of the many protests against the war that had a powerful effect on public opini...
American is known for its rich culture and diversity. Black lives matter (BLM) is an international activist movement, originating in the African-American community, that campaigns against violence and systemic racism toward black people as defined by google. It was created in 2012 as a call to action for black people after seventeen year old Trayvon Martin was placed on trial for his own murder and the killer, George Zimmerman, was not held accountable for the crime that he had committed. It was a response for the anti-Black racism that still remains in our society and within the movement itself. It is a movement that goes beyond the killing of black people by police and vigilantes. It calls for the Black community to love each other, live
“Black Lives Matter (BLM) is a movement against police violence that is, as argued by BLM supporters, disproportionately and systematically directed at black people. The movement has highlighted incidents in which police have harassed and killed black men and women. BLM is considered one of the most visible and controversial civil rights movement of the last decades.” (Black Lives Matter. 2016) “Black Lives Matter” is an American social activist organization devoted to stopping violence and injustice against African Americans.
The Vietnam Antiwar Movement is one of the most prominent eras in American History. Throughout the Sixties and Seventies, people across the U.S., young and old, publicly opposed the Vietnam war. Opposers of the war expressed their antiwar opinions by organizing protests and mass demonstrations. Multiple anti-Vietnam war protests significantly effected North America. Despite being underestimated by the United States government and pro-war supporters, the Vietnam Antiwar Movement led to powerful and influential impacts.
When a person thinks about Black Lives Matter, he or she may visualize African Americans fighting for justice and equality. The movement Black Lives Matter was created to bring awareness to systematic racism, police brutality and social injustice that African Americans face on a daily basis. In contrary, All Lives Matter downplays the fact that black people are looked down upon in society. All Lives Matter may seem like an innocent title, but it emphasizes that justice for black people is not necessary. Black Lives Matter is not a movement that believes all lives do not matter; nevertheless, it highlights the fact that black lives are taken for granted by the judicial system.