Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should animals be used for research
Should animals be used for research
Pros and cons of using animals in research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should animals be used for research
Should we protect the rights of guilty humans or innocent animals? A commonly debated topic in America today is whether we should use death row inmates or animals as test subjects for products that could potentially cause harm to the subject. There are many good points why both are wrong, but if one life can benefit the entire population, then surely we can all agree that taking that life is worth the risk. Using death row inmates as test subjects could be a bigger help to the human race instead of using animals. Death row inmates should be used as test subjects instead of animals because they forfeited their rights, and using humans gives a better idea of how the product will affect other humans.
When a human kills another human being, they forfeit all of their basic human rights. We kill, burn, cripple, or poison over 100 million animals each year in the United States alone. These animals are innocent, but are having their quality of life either ruined or taken from them for the benefit of humans. Ninety-two percent of the drugs that were found to be safe on animals after experiments, ended up failing in human trials because they were not safe for humans (11 Facts About Animal Testing). There is an easy way to find out what drugs will work on humans without making innocent animals suffer through the torture of being tested on. The solution to this would be to use inmates who are sitting on death row, waiting to die, as test subjects for products instead of animals. These inmates are going to die anyway, so humankind might as well get some benefit from them before they die. The average death row inmate sits on death row for at least a decade, but some can sit on death row for over twenty years (Babcock, Sandra). It makes no sen...
... middle of paper ...
...ulation it should, especially if that someone forfeited their rights.
Works Cited
Babcock, Sandra.“Time on Death Row.” Death Penalty Information Center. Death Penalty Information Center. 6 August 2014. Web. 8 May 2014.
Cunningham, Mark D., Thomas J. Reidy, and Jon R. Sorensen. "Is Death Row Obsolete? A Decade Of Mainstreaming Death-Sentenced Inmates In Missouri." Behavioral Sciences & The Law 23.3 (2005): 307-320. Academic Search Premier. Print. 8 May 2014.
Sullivan, Dan. "Nation's Longest Serving Death-row Inmate Dies in Florida." Tampa Bay Times. Tampa Bay Times, 21 May 2013. Web. 08 May 2014.
“The Innocence List.” Death Penalty Information Center. Death Penalty Information Center. Web. 8 May 2014.
United States Constitution. Amendment VIII. 15 December 1791. Print. 8 May 2014
“11 Facts About Animal Testing.” Do Something. DoSomething.org. Web. 8 May 2014.
Death Penalty Information Center . (2013, Nov. 20). Retrieved from States With and Without the Death Penalty : http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/states-and-without-death-penalty
The death penalty today: Death sentences and executions for juvenile crimes January 1, 1973-June 30, 2000. Available: http://www.law.onu.edu/ faculty/streib/juvdeath.htm Whitman, L. (2000, June 20). Bush should halt Texas execution: Human Rights Watch letter to the Texas board of pardons and paroles. Available: http://www.hrw.org/press/ 2000/06/board-ltr.htm
Although the flaws of death penalty are lucid, they are often times over looked by society. Innocuous people have been ruled to death based upon mistaken eyewitness testimonies, mistaken identity, and false confessions through coercion. Former Governor of Illinois George Ryan was a staunch proponent o...
Prisons and correctional facilities in the United States have changed from rehabilitating people to housing inmates and creating breeding grounds for more violence. Many local, state, and federal prisons and correctional facilities are becoming more and more overcrowded each year. If the Department of Corrections (DOC) wants to stop having repeat offenders and decrease the volume of inmates entering the criminal justice system, current regulations and programs need to undergo alteration. Actions pushed by attorneys and judges, in conjunction current prison life (including solitary confinement), have intertwined to result in mass incarceration. However, prisoner reentry programs haven’t fully impacted positively to help the inmate assimilate back into society. These alterations can help save the Department of Corrections (DOC) money, decrease the inmate population, and most of all, help rehabilitate them. After inmates are charged with a crime, they go through the judicial system (Due Process) and meet with the prosecutor to discuss sentencing.
Dieter, Richard C. "Innocence and the Death Penalty: The Increasing Danger of Executing the Innocent." DPIC. Death Penalty Information Center, 1 July 1997. Web. 12 Dec. 2014. .
Radelet, Michael L., updated by the Death Penalty Information Center. Post-Furman Botched Executions. The Death Penalty Information Center
...ed United States. U.S. Government Accounting Office. Capital Punishment. Washington: GPO, 1994 Cheatwood, Derral and Keith Harries. The Geography of Execution: The Capital Punishment Quagmire in America. Rowman, 1996 NAACP Legal Defense Fund . Death Row. New York: Hein, 1996 "Ex-Death Row Inmate Cleared of Charges." USA Today 11 Mar. 1999: 2A "Fatal Flaws: Innocence and the Death Penalty." Amnesty International. 10 Oct. 1999 23 Oct. 1999 Gest, Ted. "House Without a Blue Print." US News and World Report 8 Jul. 1996: 41 Stevens, Michelle. "Unfairness in Life and Death." Chicago Sun-Times 7 Feb. 1999: 23A American Bar Association. The Task Ahead: Reconciling Justice with Politics. 1997 United States. Federal Bureau of Investigation. Uniform Crime Report. Washington: GPO, 1994 Wickham, DeWayne. "Call for a Death Penalty Moratorium." USA Today 8 Feb. 1999: 17A ILKMURPHY
"Mental Illness and the Death Penalty." Death Penalty Information Center. N.p., n.d. Web. 04 Dec. 2013.
“The case Against the Death Penalty.” aclu.org. American Civil Liberties Union, 2012. Web. 12 Feb. 2013
Hurting an animal is better than hurting a fellow human being right? Well imagine a child being ripped away from his mother in today’s society, for no reason. Would that be considered okay, or kidnapping? Imagine humans being forced to breed, just so their children can be tortured for makeup or a new facial wash. Would that be considered okay, or morally incorrect? People do not see animals as fellow living things, because they do not have the power to say no like a person can. They can’t stand up for themselves, leaving the people of the world to do it for them. Seeing that there are other ways to test out consumer products, why harm defenseless, breathing, loving, beings? With all things considered, animal testing “has no place in science today” (Goodall, 1).
Lowe, Wesley. “Pro Capital Punishment Page.” Wesleylowe.com. Wesley Lowe, 17 Jan 2011. Web. 7 Mar 2011.
“Since the reinstatement of the death penalty in the United States in 1976, 138 innocent men and women have been released from the death row, including some who came within minutes of execution. In Missouri, Texas and Virginia investigations have been opened to determine if those states executed innocent men. To execute an innocent person is morally reprehensible; this risk we cannot
The abuse that animals endure at human hands is heartbreaking, sickening, and infuriating. Animals are just as delicate as humans, so why not abuse us too? Animal lives should be just important as ours. No animals should be killed or abused for testing, entertaining, clothing, or hoarding. Every year, millions of animals are being killed and torture for testing.
Animals are used in research to develop new medicines and for scientists to test the safety of the medicines. This animal testing is called vivisection. Research is being carried out at universities, medical schools and even in primary and elementary schools as well as in commercial facilities which provide animal experiments to industry. (UK Parliament) In addition, animals are also used in cosmetic testing, toxicology tests, “defense research” and “xenotransplantation”. All around the world, a huge amount of animals are sentenced to life in a laboratory cage and they are obliged to feel loneliness and pain. In addition scientists causing pain, most drugs that pas successfully in animals fail in humans. It is qualified as a bad science. Above all, animals have rights not to be harmed even though the Animal Welfare Act does not provide them even with minimal protection. The law does not find it necessary to use current alternatives to animals, even if they are obtainable. Animal testing should be banned due to animal rights, ethical issues, alternative ways and the unreliability of test results in humans.
---- World Book Online Americas Edition. Ed. Franklin E. Zimring. Capital Punishment. 17 Apr 2002 14 Apr 2002.