Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Roles of women in combat civil war
The role of gender in the military
The role of gender in the military
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Roles of women in combat civil war
Women and war have always been considered to have nothing in common. As the more sympathetic gender, women are usually associated with caring and creating life rather than fighting alongside men. Even though women today do have the opportunity to enter the army, they are not officially allowed to enter combat and fight alongside their male companions. In both “The Sirens of the Pentagon” by Kathleen Parker and “From Women in Combat to Top Brass” by Jena McGregor, the various dangers and advantages of women in combat are defined. The dangers to women in combat are outweighed by advantages such as empowerment to young women and promotion in rank.
There are many dangers to having women in combat. One is that they are at a greater risk for capture.“... Females have only half the upper body strength as males…”(Parker,110). Individuals who hold this belief clearly agree that women lack the body strength
…show more content…
that is necessary to perform in combat. They would have problems with operating heavy military equipment used on the field, such as the guns, and since it'll be harder for them to handle, pulling them out will take longer, giving the enemy time to shoot first. In addition, they would also have problems with carrying a wounded soldiers to safety if needed. On the other hand, an advantage of allowing women into combat is that it offers empowerment to other young women.
It gives them a mindset that they are capable of doing what men can do. As McGregor writes, when it was announced “... that the military would be lifting the policy against women in combat… {it}was met with cheers and applause by politicians, female soldiers, and the president” (McGregor,114). Clearly this reaction had a powerful effect on younger females, giving them the ability and authority, to make decisions and implement change in their own lives and the lives of other people, including young and old. Also, McGregor wrote that “... Linda Bray led military police officers during … the invasion of Panama…”(114). Women have served in the military for hundreds of years. They've worked hard and have been dedicated to the troops and their country. Although the argument still stands that women should not be allowed in combat, the empowerment aspect identifies with several young women who want to make choices and turn them into desired actions and
outcomes. Another advantage of allowing women into combat is that it provides an opportunity for promotion in rank. On war grounds, or in our everyday jobs, allowing women into combat shows that we, as females, can and will put our hearts and minds to the task at hand anywhere we tend to go. McGregor states that “... allowing more women to take on combat roles will clear the way for more women in the military's top brass”(115). This is a guaranteed advantage because women weren't allowed such higher positions that men were. Men were the dominant gender, but allowing women into combat offers promotion in rank which leads to gender equality. McGregor enhances the idea of promotion when she talks about the increased leadership roles that will be provided to females after policy changes and training. She also discusses how the role that combat provides with experience “...stand out when it comes to nominations to higher posts”(114). Although it remains that women can experience many dangers in combat, as well as men, the advantages of allowing women into combat clearly outweigh these dangers. Being that giving women this opportunity, they become role models and inspire other women to go and fight for what they believe in. Women in combat also gives other women the opportunity of knowing they can be allowed promotions. Both empowerment to young women and promotion in rank allow women to think with a powerful mindset.
Within Megan H. Mackenzie’s essay, “Let Women Fight” she points out many facts about women serving in the U.S. military. She emphasizes the three central arguments that people have brought up about women fighting in the military. The arguments she states are that women cannot meet the physical requirements necessary to fight, they simply don’t belong in combat, and that their inclusion in fighting units would disrupt those units’ cohesion and battle readiness. The 1948 Women’s Armed Services Integration Act built a permanent corps of women in all the military departments, which was a big step forward at that time. Although there were many restrictions that were put on women, an increase of women in the U.S. armed forces happened during
Men have always been looked upon as the leading sex. Looking back through history women have been the ones who take care of the home and children, while men are the ones who work and go to war. However in recent years there’s no doubt that women have become much more equal in the work force. Nevertheless men are still the ones who are forced to fight our wars when the time calls for it. Many think that women should be entirely equal to men having their choice to be drafted taken away but the fact is that they are physically at a disadvantage, too emotionally oriented, and the increase of female presence would have a more negative impact in the military in the way of social interactions.
Since the resolution of World War II, the United States has been involved in over fifteen extensive military wars. Recent wars between Iraq and Afghanistan are being fought over several issues which affect women in both the United States and the other nations. While the military is often thought of a male dominated institution, women are present and affected all throughout the system as soldiers, caretakers, partners, and victims. Transnational feminists often fight against war due to the vulnerability that is placed on women during times of war. Despite often being overlooked, there is no doubt that women are heavily included in the devastating consequences of war.
"From Home Front to Front Line." Women in War. Ed. Cecilia Lee and Paul Edward Strong. N.p.: n.p., n.d. N. pag. The Churchill Centre. Web. 23 Apr. 2014.
History tends to applaud the heroics of men in war, but there are few examples that cite the courage women displayed. We need to be vigilant when we remember that women deliberately made the choice to fear for their personal safety and even risk their lives t...
When it comes to combat assignments and the needs of the military, men take precedence over all other considerations, including career prospects of female service members. Female military members have been encouraged to pursue opportunities and career enhancement within the armed forces, which limit them only to the needs and good of the service due to women being not as “similarly situated” as their male counterparts when it comes to strength or aggressiveness, and are not able to handle combat situations.
...nto a situation of high testosterone, women are not considered to be a threat. Military research now however, has shown that women have the physical stamina to endure battle and do not disrupt the cohesion in the male units and can also be mentally tough without breaking when under fire. Women are not only discriminated against in the military, they are also discriminated against in Philosophy, religion, and Popular Culture.
During WWII, the initial acceptance of woman in the military was controversial because they were deciding whether just needed more people, whether they should be an official part of the services, and whether they could perform the jobs. Most people were concerned that women would obstruct the view of American culture because they would be considered “masculine”. By 1944, women proved to be effective in helping during the war. Some were even trained to shoot guns next to the men. In 1994 the DOD (Department of Defense) created a policy that prevented women from combat with their male colleagues. They also could not be assigned to units below the brigade level, whose number one objective is combat on ground. Over the years women have showed that they are physically, mentally, and emotionally able to keep up with men in the military.
The problem of women fighting in combat along with their male counterparts is not a one-sided problem. Elizabeth Hoisington has earned the rank of Brigadier General in the U.S. Army, leads the Women’s Army Corps and believes that women should not serve in combat because they are not as physically, mentally, or emotionally qualified as a male is and that ...
Ruby, J. (2005, November 1). Women in Combat Roles: Is That the Question?. Off Our Backs,35, 36.
Both men and women fought on the battlefield. Hundreds of women served as nurses, laundresses, cooks and companions to the male soldiers in the Continental Army.6 In addition, there were some that actually engaged in battle. Seeing "no reason to believe that any consideration foreign to the purest patriotism,"7 Deborah Sampson put on men's clothing and called herself Robert Shirtliffe in order to enlist in the Army. "Robert Shirtliffe" fought courageously; "his" company defeated marauding Indians north of Ticonderoga.8 There is also the valiancy of the water carrier Mary Hays, otherwise known as Molly Pitcher, who took up arms after her husband fell.9 As a six-foot tall woman, Nancy Hart was considered an Amazon Warrior. Living in the Georgia frontier, this "War Woman" aimed and, with deadly accuracy, shot British soldiers who invaded the area.10 Mentioned in the beginning of this essay was Margaret Corbin, another woman on the battlefield.
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.
With so many men abroad fighting, women were needed in the workforce. Thousands of women flocked to munitions factories, farms and public services around the country. Actually around two million women replaced men in employment during the war. This newfound independence had a significant impact on their lives. It made them confident with themselves and confident with standing up for their rights.
The story of America’s military woman can be traced to the birth of our nation. During the American Revolutionary War, the 18th and 19th centuries, where women served informally as nurses, seamstresses, cooks, and even as spies and were subject to Army’s rules of Conduct. Though not in uniform, these women shared soldier’s hardships including inadequate housing and little compensation. Women have formally been part of the U.S Armed Forces since the Inception of the Army Nurse Corps in 1901. In 1973 the transition to the All-Volunteer Force marked a dramatic increase in the opportunities available for women to serve in the military. As of September 30, 2009, the total number of active duty women in the U.S was 203, 375, and women made up 14.3 percent of the U.s armed forces (Robinson). Women are a crucial role in c...
Women soldiers are now expected to do what the men can do and sometimes that affects their minds and their health. Research on women’s health can help prevent injuries as well as making sure they do not develop illnesses. Women in combat are some of the strongest women out there. When you are in a foreign area of the world there are many concerns about how you will be treated by th men and women of that country as well as what will happen if you get