Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Wiretapping in the united states
Wiretapping in the united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Wiretapping in the united states
Brendan Pataky
Mrs. Neve
English II Honors
29 April 2014
Wiretapping
To what lengths must a government go to protect its citizens from threats such as terrorism? This is a frequently debated and controversial topic. One of these so called measures is wiretapping without notice. The government should not randomly spy on its citizens because it is morally wrong and it violates basic human liberties such as but not limited to privacy.
There is a litany of problems with wiretapping, regardless if it is at a private or governmental level. One is the failure of the algorithms used to filter out potential threats while wiretapping. These can create false positives that incriminate someone who is otherwise innocent. In the ehow article “Cons of Wiretapping” by Tom Lutzenberger, one example is a criminal using someone’s Wi-Fi that is unrestricted to commit various cybercrimes via the internet. Obviously, that scenario could’ve been avoided if a simple password was set on that Wi-Fi. Also, “multiple communications can travel through the same monitoring point” (Cons of Wiretapping, ehow.com). This can lead to non-targets being unintentionally spied on. This shouldn’t be a problem to begin with. All communications should be secure and not vulnerable to prying eyes. It seems as privacy is slowly withering away in this new digital age, with governments spying freely, and everyone’s personal data being up for grabs and easily exploited.
In the case of wiretapping at a governmental level, there is a chance the government in question can misuse this omnipotence and exploit it for personal gain politically. In fact, “By allowing wiretapping, the party in power can spy on their opponents” (theshould.com). Far-fetched as it seems, governments will...
... middle of paper ...
...wever, terrorism is like software piracy or gun control, and people will eventually find a way to bypass any measures implemented to counteract such crimes. As we speak, devices and operating systems are being developed that block all surveillance from outside sources, so people are already catching on. Even casual home users want these devices just to have some peace of mind online. The second reason for wiretapping according to ehow is to stay on top of a digitalized world and give law enforcement a helping hand. Criminals are making thorough use of new and emerging technologies, why shouldn’t we? This makes sense on paper, but in the end the downsides vastly outnumber the so-called benefits. National security is still important though, don’t get me wrong. The U.S. simply needs to figure out a way to maintain national security without putting so much on the line.
The aftereffects of the September 11, 2001 attacks led to Congress passing sweeping legislation to improve the United States’ counterterrorism efforts. An example of a policy passed was Domestic Surveillance, which is the act of the government spying on citizens. This is an important issue because many people believe that Domestic Surveillance is unconstitutional and an invasion of privacy, while others believe that the government should do whatever is possible in order to keep the citizens safe. One act of Domestic Surveillance, the tracking of our phone calls, is constitutional because it helps fight terrorism, warns us against potential threats, and gives US citizens a feeling of security.
A short background on the laws concerning surveillance will help clear up some misconceptions on the NSA. Back in 1968, the Wiretap Act protected citizens from the government listening to their phone call...
Terrorism is very real, it has just recently happened again at Ohio State University. “He urged America "to stop interfering with other countries, especially the Muslim Ummah," a term for Muslim people at large. "By Allah, we will not let you sleep unless you give peace to the Muslims," he wrote. "You will not celebrate or enjoy any holiday" (CNN. Cable News Network). People like this will remain a problem no matter what ulterior motive the Domestic Surveillance has, and the only way to stop it is to simply monitor the people so when we find a threat we can abolish it as fast as
The NSA has been secretly ordered to eavesdrop by the Bush administration after the 9/11 terrorist attack. The base of where the NSA has been operating their wiretapping agenda is in Bluff Dale, Utah the building sprawls 1,500,000 square feet and possess the capacity to hold as much as five zeta bytes of data it has cost almost $2,000,000,000. The act of spying over the USA citizens even though they are suspicious is a threat to the people’s privacy and the privacy of other countries’ members are being infringed on by the NSA by the act of wiretapping. The action of wiretapping violates laws for privacy, like the Bill of Right’s Amendment Four which says “Every subject has a right to be secure from all unreasonable searches, and seizures of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his possessions”. The wiretapping controversy has caused the panic and hysteria of the citizens of the USA and USA’s allies. This panic and hysteria has troubled the government by resulting to mistrust and concern against them by both groups. The panic effect of the NSA wiretapping has caused many people such as journalist to have their freedom of speech to be restricted in fear of the NSA to stamp them as terrorist and according to the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights that is an infringement of the people’s right of freedom of expression consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief.
It transcends the line between public and private identity. When all of someone 's private information is being watched, then who are they as a person? Citizens cannot allow their identity to be confiscated for the protection of the unknown. Tamara Thompson states in her article Overview: What is Domestic Surveillance? that, the NSA has constructed a program that lets it hijack almost anything. Using this skill, most American 's information is automatically taken in, without a purpose. What is America 's deepest and darkest secret? Because what might be a secret, will be known to someone. With the hindsight of constantly being over watched, then how can America freely do what they please? Insecurities will consume the mind with the thought that the NSA, or someone like it is watching us. Not only is it hurting America emotionally, but it is hurting America physically with the economy. These government agencies are making numerous unnecessary purchases every day with the attempt at securing our homeland. Why is it necessary to live in constant paranoia if the majority of America is doing nothing wrong? There are other ways to stop terrorism, and spying on the public is not one of them. Domestic surveillance is not necessary by any
One of the most important drawbacks of domestic surveillance is that is violates our human
would be “exceptionally vulnerable” (Head of FBI, Robert Mueller). But referring to the previous arguments against government spying (i.e. being in violation of our privacy, being illegal, and trust issues) why should we then let the government keep spying on us? Since 2001 up until now, that’s 15 years, spying has not only been done illegally to supposedly expose suspected “terrorists” it has done us no good; The Justice Department’s inspector general said that the “FBI agent’s can’t point to any major terrorism cases, they’ve cracked thanks” to the aforementioned government digital intrusions. It is simply a violation of one 's privacy which what every man, woman, and child should be entitled to in this country famed for “freedom” but unfortunately, this is not the
We all call up friends and family members from time to time. It is such a common thing no one thinks anything of it. That is until such a time as when one finds out the government could have those conversations in a database with the times and topics of those conversations. For example if I said, in a harmless conversation, anything about I.S.I.S. When the government searches up I.S.I.S. my conversation could be pulled up on that database. For the reason that people’s fourth amendment rights are being disrupted by the act of wiretapping, there should be stricter laws regarding the governments access to wiretap.
Privacy is not just a fundamental right, it is also important to maintain a truly democratic society where all citizens are able to exist with relative comfort. Therefore, “[Monitoring citizens without their knowledge] is a major threat to democracies all around the world.” (William Binney.) This is a logical opinion because without freedom of expression and privacy, every dictatorship in history has implemented some form of surveillance upon its citizens as a method of control.
To first understand why we should have government wiretapping, we need to understand how wiretapping works and why it happens. According to Lee Adams, “Wiretapping first became a tool of U.S law enforcement in the 1890’s, but the Supreme Court didn’t establish its constitutionality until 1928, at the height of Prohibition.” (Adams) They would
Nearly every major international agreement on human rights protects the right of individuals to be free from unwarranted surveillance. This guarantee has trickled down into national constitutional or legal provisions, protecting the privacy of communications.
The United States government wiretapping citizens is not a new thing, in fact in 1940 ‘The Security Intelligence Section of U.S. Naval Communications famously intercepted communication directed to the Japanese embassy in Washington shortly before Pearl Harbor’ (Socolow). Again after September 11, the post 9/11 Patriot Act was put to use and citizen’s phone records were pulled for NSA surveillance. What I want to know is why, why do we as people wait until it’s too late to do what is best for our country?
The fact that there is such little benefit to what the NSA is doing one must beg the question, is the privacy of everyone on the internet worth the slim chance that all this collection of data could discover a terrorist plan before it happens and stop the plan from happening? We are unwillingly sacrificing our privacy for this endeavour, we have all of our data collected and stored, ranging from public statuses on Facebook to private e-mails you send, and even location data, such as where you are every minute of the day. It is akin to having someone follow you all day, every day, watching over your shoulder when you are on a computer or a phone, writing down everything you type and his only reason for doing this is because he can. The NSA has the resources to collect everything, find what is relevant later, and that is exactly what they do.
...horities cannot solely depend on technological surveillance, but use it as an assistance to filter pit useless information and data (Kelly). Every NSA decisions must be within full involvement of its legal office and reviewed by White House and the Department of Justice (Hayden). Cameras are apparatuses that can be used for good and enforce good laws, s should only be a single step to solving problems (Volokh and Kelly). For the future development of surveillance, the government must recognize that surveillance transcends the boundary between public and private, secret surveillance is illegitimate, total surveillance is illegitimate and that government should not record all internet activities and surveillance itself it harmful (Richards). Ultimately, surveillance is a vital aspect of modern society, but has too many faults which is more detrimental than beneficial.
There is unintended consequences for government surveillance of citizens. For example, the advances in technology to facilitate surveillance of people and terrorist. The government’s intentions is to protect citizens; however people feel their rights are being taken from them with the increase in surveillance. Technology has improved throughout the years which allows the government to facilitate surveillance of citizens. There has also been an increase in domestic and international mass surveillance of people. Although everyone is protected by the fourth amendment which prohibits unreasonable search and seizure, it is important that the Government has surveillance on citizens so they can investigate bombings, terrorist attacks, suspicious activities,