Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of federalism easy
The struggle between state and federal power
The significance of federalism
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of federalism easy
A key idea in the United States government is to have equally balanced powers. The separation of powers between the national governments and state governments and also the division of powers among the three branches of government support the equally balance powers concept. Federalism is the division of power between the national government and the state government. The form of government that we have today is a unitary government in which the ultimate power resides with the national government and the subnational governments have only the powers given to them by the national government. Copious people believe that unitary government is the best form of government because of its prevalence and popularity in societies. Although there are pros and cons of the federal form of government, federalism can serve to be an alternative to the unitary form of government that characterizes most democracies. …show more content…
There are arguments against the federal form of government, but they aren’t too appalling.
One of the disadvantages is that it allows state policies in which surrounding states may not agree with or comply with (Federalism: Pros and Cons). An example of this situation is the establishment of a casino close to a state that doesn’t allow people to approach a casino for gambling. State governments are vulnerable to fights and are more likely to have a country that’s split. It is also said that federal governments have internal power struggles or conflicts. Conflicts between national and state governments are common (Federalism). The federalism idea can result in war just like the reason the civil war begun. One of the issues that induced the civil war was the power struggle between the state and national government (federalism). Under the federal system, there will be areas in continue racial discrimination (Chapter 3:
Federalism). There are plentiful advantages of the federal form of government, thus it makes it more convincing. According to the Politics in America textbook, shielding freedom, distributing powers, boosting participation from the citizens, enhancing competence, advocating policy innovation, and making sure that people are following the policies that are set, are all of the benefits of federalism (politics in America). Federalism is a structured government that disperses power to national and local governments; therefore, one government isn’t stronger or powerful than the other. Regulations and rules are created to fit the demands of the states. Because there is an even balance of power, oppression and hardships can be prevented under the federal system. Federalism portrays two governments, one that is away from the people, and one that is near the people (federalism). Citizens like governments that are not a long distance away from them. State governments are better than national governments when dealing with policy issues since the state officials know more about the problems and disputes that are occurring in their local area (federalism: pros and cons). Federalism plays a role in public policy issues such as same-sex marriage and medical use of marijuana. A positive note is that a person can decide whether to abide to the policy or not. People are able to travel and settle in a different state if they didn’t like the policies that were established in their original state (Federalism: Pros and cons). The controversy of same sex marriage exists even today. State governments had to decide whether they wanted to legalize same sex marriages in their state. The California Supreme Court ruled that people who were of the same sex had the just to marry beneath their state constitutions. By 2008, more than forty different states weren’t up for same sex marriages (Politics in America). The use of medical marijuana is another public policy issue. States had to choose whether to allow the use of medical marijuana in their own state. California was the first state to legalize the use of marijuana for medical purposes. According to the federal rank, marijuana is a Schedule I drug that have negative impacts. A total of twenty-three states along with the District of Columbia allow the use of medical marijuana. An individual must be careful and not utilize medical marijuana if he/she is in a state that is against it (State Medical Marijuana Laws). The most convincing is the claim for the federal government because it portrays a balance of powers and a successful turn out. The dispersion of powers between the state and national governments is beneficial. If only one government has the charge or authority then there’s a higher chance of flaws. Federalism and the unitary system may not always be victorious, but federalism is a good fit for a country like the United States which is a nation that is unique from the rest. In the unitary system, the main power belongs to the national government whereas in the federal system the power is divided between the state and national government which creates a more secure and stabilized nation. There isn’t going to be a perfect system of government, at times there will be failures and dark sides, but overall there aren’t much reasons why the federal form of government can’t be a substitute for a unitary system.
Federalism is the federal principle or system of government. In the compound republic of America, the power surrendered the people is first divided between two distances government (states and federal), and the portion allotted to each subdivided among distance and separate departments. In their attempt to balance order with liberty, the founders
A divided government is when one party controls the White House and the other controls either or both parts of Congress. This type of government has not always existed in the United States and until recently, it has become the norm in the way that our government functions. In my opinion, I would say that a divided government is a healthy form of checks and balances in the American system. There are of course some pros and cons of a divided government but just like that old saying goes, “If the opposite of pro is con, then the opposite of progress must be Congress.”
Eric Foner claims the definition of Federalism refers to the relationship between the national government and the states. Unlike the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation came with many weaknesses. Some provided by our powerpoint include that the Federal government had no power to make the states obey the Articles and laws that were passed by the legislature. The states also had the power to tax, and the opportunity to print their own money. Our powerpoint focuses on the $10 million Congress owed to other countries, as well as the $40 million it owed to the American veterans. The Constitution differed. Foner states that not only did the Constitution enhance national authority, but it also permitted Congress to levy taxes, conduct commerce, confirm war, deal with the foreign nations and Indians, and rent and help the “general welfare”. According to the powerpoint, Federalists focused on the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.
One of the most important concerns of the Anti-Federalists were concerned that the new form of government would strip the states of their own power. The Anti-Federalists feared by combining the previously independent states. under one government that, ".the states, once sovereign. would retain but a shadow of their former power. "(Main 120).
Despite American government being characteristically dominated by cooperative feudalism, there is a persistence of national supremacy elements, state’s rights, and dual fideism. The current situation can, therefore, be regarded as balanced federalism. A cooperative relationship between state government and the national government is specifically rooted in a transfer of payments done from the national government to government in lower levels, which is referred to as fiscal feudalism (Bednar, 2009). There are mainly two types of grants which are block grants and categorical grants. This is a federal aid which is spent by states within a given policy area, although with much state discretion. General revenue sharing (GRS) was used back in the 1970s and 1980s. GRS awarded the state maximum control over policies, but gaining political support was difficult for them.
Anti-federalism would give the states the last remaining piece of power they need and desire to bring America to the brink of destruction. Because of the differences between each and every state anti-federalism would not work. Every state would have such different opinions that they would clash against each other simply because the neighboring state wouldn’t have the same opinion and or solution. It would cause havoc and
Federalism is the powers a country has, divided between the state and federal government. Federalism was not included in the articles of confederation which left the states with all of the power. Federalism was chosen in the United States because the U.S. wanted there to be more control in the National Government. The U.S State government wanted to keep some of the power, so federalism was a good system of government to choose because they got to split the powers between them. Federalism has many benefits in California. Federalism helps California by giving the state power. Each state is going to have a different diversity in which each state can govern. If California wanted to, they could establish a policy of their own. They could see how well the policy went, according to other states that have established them.
The Founding Fathers had multiple reasons on why they created a federalist government, the main reasons were avoiding a tyranny, more people participating in politics, and “experimenting” the states in order to find new government ideas and programs James Madison stated the Federalist Papers, The Federalist, No. 10, If "factious leaders kindle a flame within their particular states," the national, or federal government, can "conflagration through the other states." Federalism and the 10th amendment prevents one to take control of a state or the federal government, avoiding tyranny. The idea of having more people evolved in government came from the ideals of Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson believed having both local (state) and national (federal) officials would increase participation in government.The last concept with using states as “experiments” comes from this concept: let us say that a state disastrous new policy, it would not be a disaster for everyone. In contrast, if one state 's new programs or policies work well, other states can adopt them to their own
Some of the advantages of having a federal government are that the national level of government can work on the bigger picture tasks while the state government solve the local and specific issues, so that each departments time can be used wisely and efficiently. Furthermore, if citizens took their everyday problems to the national level, then the national government would be over worked and the citizen might have to travel far to even reach the states capital. Each side of the
Federalism is one of the ways that Constitution proposed to remove tyranny in 1788. Federalism is another word for the compound government where it separates powers between the central and state governments. Some powers are shared between the central and state governments. The central and state governments are divided into separate departments. Part of the power in each government both federal and state is given to these departments. Since the power is now divided among these multiple central and state departments, none has all the power. Examples of central government powers are trade
National, Local, and State governments work together cooperatively to solve common problems rather than making separate polices. They work more on an equal level to get things fixed. This type of federalism is hard to tell where one type of government ends and the next one begins. National and state governments are independent and interdependent with an overlap of functions and financial resources. It is difficult for one to accumulate absolute power with this type of federalism.
In conclusion, a system based on balanced federalism was originally envisioned by the founders and serves as the best option for an efficient government. It is essential for the powers to be distributed in a manner where states deal with state matters and the national government does not overstep its role as the organizational factor in the system. As for the recent shift towards a central government one can only hope that the nation takes caution as it proceeds and that power transfers back to equilibrium between the federal and state governments.
Federalism or “federal” ties around a system of government. It controls armies, declares wars, coins money, and regulate trade between states and foreign nations, and treaties (Mrs, Crouse’s powerpoint pg:3 num:9). Specifically this was created to organize the powers that exist in the system of government so everything can be organized. It also divides the power among a central government and several regional governments (Mrs, Crouse’s powerpoint pg:2 num:8). More ever Since everything passes through one system it had to be divided into 3 sections: delegated powers, implied powers, and inherited powers.
Federalism, by definition, is the division of government authority between at least two levels of government. In the United States, authority is divided between the state and national government. “Advocates of a strong federal system believe that the state and local governments do not have the sophistication to deal with the major problems facing the country” (Encarta.com).
I believe that the advantages that Federalism provides far outweigh those of the anti-federalist movement. Our founding fathers wisely perceived that the idea of a centralized government was a big concern for abuse of power. Federalism represents many of the values of modern Democracy and grants individual states the power to make decisions that best suit their needs. Local government understands local issues better than a centralized government that often sees the nation as one big piece of land instead of smaller areas, each with distinct demographics and problems. For instance, issues concerning illegal immigration in Texas would be best handled by local authorities rather than by someone in Kansas, a non border state. By the same token, representatives of communities with different aspirations, ethnicity and cultures should be handled locally as the federal government might overlook the needs of these groups. One perfect example of the above mentioned scenario is the public school system. In a federalist system the local government decides what kind of schools will operate. Therefore, they might make better decisions when it comes to opening schools among large immigrant populations, perhaps creating a few bi-lingual schools to fulfill the population’s needs.