Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of Stalin in Russia
Stalin's influence on Russia
Impact of Stalin in Russia
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of Stalin in Russia
Fernando Madison
Mrs. Martel
English IV Honors, 3rd period
30 April 2017 Governmental scapegoats were exploited and mishandled throughout history. First off, Emmanuel Goldstein in 1984. Then, Leon Trotsky verses Joseph Stalin. Finally, the Nazi’s taking advantage of the Jews. These are three good examples showing how scapegoating the government is a bad idea! For instance, in 1984, Emmanuel was hated and opposed, “The hate had started. The face of Emmanuel Goldstein, the enemy of the people, had flashed on the screen,” (Orwell 25). Goldstein was once one of the leading figures of the party and was almost on the same level as Big Brother. Society described Goldstein as, “the commander of a vast shadowy army, an underground network
…show more content…
Trotsky was a Marxist revolutionary and theorist, and a Soviet politician who built the exchange of all political energy to the Soviets. When Lenin died, Trotsky and Stalin had to compete for the leading spot. In the end, Stalin came out on top by using propaganda techniques making it seem like Trotsky was a spy. After Stalin won, he kept Trotsky alive for a whole year just to blame social and economic problems on him. Joseph didn’t realize “The biggest problem with scapegoating a government is that it makes it much harder to solve social and economic problems,” (Douglas, governmentisgood.com). Trotsky was a very disliked person and was kicked out of multiple states, he even survived a machine gun attack on his home. Eventually, Stalin banished him from the USSR and had him assassinated by a Spanish communist, Ramon Mercader, in Coyoacan, Mexico on the 21st of August, 1940. Just like how Goldstein was demonized in society, Trotsky was …show more content…
For example, Emmanuel Goldstein in 1984, Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin, and the Nazi’s blaming the Jews. To conclude with, in the future, don’t scapegoat the government you’re just hurting yourself at the end! Works Cited
Douglas J., Amy. “Why government becomes the scapegoat.” Government is good. www.governmentisgood.com/article.php?aid=22&p=1 Fullerton, Dave. “Scapegoating by a corrupt government.” Displacement and refugees. www.rwandanstories.org/origins/refugees_and_scapegoating.html Hull, Gary. “Scapegoats: How Politicians pass the blame.” December 6th, 2012. www.thefiscaltimes.com/columns/2012/12/06/scapegoats-How-Politicians-Pass-the-Blame%3Famp Orwell, George. 1984. Secker, Harvill, June 8th, 1949.
Boothe, Lisa. “The Democrats’ newest scapegoat: The Russians”, December 16th, 2016.
Conover inferred many times that when something bad happens there will always be another person pointing the finger at another o...
Why is it that we as human beings feel the need to blame someone for every negative situation, which occurs? If we really look at the situation with any great depth, we may discover that an almost endless amount of things may be 'blamed' for the tragedy blaming an individual is pointless - only fate can really be blamed.
Unfortunately, corruption is government is a phenomenon far too prevalent in today’s world. In the movie V for Vendetta, V is attempting to exact revenge for the many homosexuals who were taken and murdered by the government. As one of the few survivors of this genocide, V devotes his life to pursuing those responsible. It is V’s belief that the government has misappropriated too much power from the citizenry and as a result destroyed the nation’s democratic framework. He says, “People must not be afraid of their government. Government should be afraid of their people.” The power should be in the people’s hands, not the government. V uses violence to get his revenge and causes a great deal of chaos and rebellion against the government. He says, “Violence can be used for good.” It is ironic that the only way to fight against this government is through violence, rather than protests. Our government is democratic, but their government, in Britain, is a repressive dictatorship. Finch, a government agent, says, “If our government was responsible for deaths of almost a hundred thousand people…would you really want to know?...
The book 1984, by George Orwell is based on the theory of “Big Brother” and how he is always watching you. In the book, the Oceania government controls their citizens by saying and ordering them into not doing certain things. Which then forced their citizens to deceive their government by going in to hiding. When Pearl Harbor was attacked in 1941, Japanese-Americans were ordered to do certain things as well. Both of these two events prove that the government can force their citizens to do anything under their power. I think some parts of the government abuse the right of their power and manipulate their citizens into doing unlawful events.
The novel 1984, by George Orwell, made me paranoid. It made me suspicious of our government's power and intentions. I became aware of the potential manipulation which the government could impose upon us. I came to see that the people I believe to be wholly dedicated to the well-being of society, the people I rely so heavily on to provide protection and security have the power to betray us at any given time. I realised that in my naivety I had gravely overlooked the powerful grip government has over society, and what it can do with that power.
Joseph Stalin was a realist dictator of the early 20th century in Russia. Before he rose to power and became the leader of Soviet Union, he joined the Bolsheviks and was part of many illegal activities that got him convicted and he was sent to Siberia (Wood, 5, 10). In the late 1920s, Stalin was determined to take over the Soviet Union (Wiener & Arnold 199). The main aspects of his worldview was “socialism
On top of the failure of the government, we also see the failure to act correctly in humans as well. For example, in World War Z, there were illegal organ trafficking actions being taken in China. These actions were carried out by Fernando Oliveira, a heart surgeon in China. Although his actions were selfish and unjust, one could trace the problem back to the government for not warning the public about the beginning of a plague. Dr. Oliveira saw no true harm in the human trafficking business as it was such a profit. This lead to the demise of the population when the disease was transported through the heart of an infected man. Once the doctors completed the heart t...
While government as an institution can be used for benevolent purposes, George Orwell’s novel 1984 contends that when taken to an excess in the form of totalitarianism, government becomes dangerously self-serving.
Scapegoats appear abundant in the world today. Political parties and businesses consistently seem to find a person or small group that takes the blame for serious issues. This can cause problems and arguments that sometimes lead to something serious like wars. Scapegoats are just a way of passing blame off of oneself and on to others, just so reputations can remain intact. This sort of attitude shows how lethargic the world has become, where people don’t even take responsibility for their actions. Many people from older generations complain about how all the new generations become too comatose and unwilling to take on their own actions and indiscretions. With attitudes like this, peace will never be found and will inevitably lead to conflict. Something must be done to stem the flow of scapegoats which have been utilized far too much over time.
The outbreak of revolution in Russia lured Trotsky back into action, but he was soon arrested. While in jail, Trotsky joined the Bolsheviks (“Leon Trotsky”). After his release, Trotsky allied with Vladimir Lenin as he gained control of the Russian government. Trotsky was made commissar of war and was charged with the formation of the Red Army to defend communism (“Leon Trotsky”). Although the Red Army proved successful in its endeavor, its Red Terror campaign caused “thousands of people, many of whom were only suspected of being anti-communist, [to be] slaughtered in unthinkably cruel ways” (Asnes, Tania. Kissel, Adam ed). Soon after, Lenin's death left Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky to battle to be Russia's leader. Although Trotsky had the skills and the intellect that should have made him the clear choice, jealousy among his colleagues prompted them to side with Stalin (“Leon Trotsky”). Soon after Stalin gained power, he exiled Trotsky. His role in Russian history had come to an abrupt
¨When societies come under stress these kinds of things happen. People start looking around for essentially human sacrifices. They start looking around for somebody they can blame.” Margaret Atwood proposes this in an interview with Bill Moyers. The kinds of things she is speaking of is exactly what we observe in The Crucible by Arthur Miller which tells the story of the Salem witchcraft trials where many were punished and killed. In Arthur Miller’s ¨Why I Wrote The Crucible¨ we witness innocent people being blacklisted for conspiring with communists. All of these defend what Margaret Atwood declared in her interview. When a society comes under stress, we always find someone to blame.
that America tries to find a scapegoat to use as a justification of why they are
Stalin was able to damage Trotsky’s reputation and political prestige, by tricking Trotsky for not showing up at Lenins funeral. After Lenins death, on the 21st of January 1924, on over three days, about three and a half million people queued to see Lenins body. Although many people felt hatred towards the regime, many felt a bona fide affection towards Lenin, which was comparable with the affection the people had to the Romanov dynasty, before the October Revolution. Throughout Lenins funeral, Stalin hoped that he could strengthen his position in the Party and remove Trotsky from his powerful position, which he was in. Trotsky turned ill just before Lenin’s death, and had settled in the south of Russia, to recover. Stalin contacted Trotsky about Lenins death and meant that Trotsky would not make it to the funeral. For Trotsky not attending the funeral, caused his reputation and political prestige, within the party, to be damaged. During Lenins funeral, Stalin made a speech referring t...
After the death of Lenin, his chief lieutenant Leon Trotsky and Joseph Stalin fought for control of the country. Stalin was able to win out over Trotsky and gain control of the Russian government. He felt that Lenin and Trotsky’s socialistic ideas were flawed in that they were to wait for other countries to revolt and become socialistic as well. Staling believed that a single country could make socialism .
Unethical leadership in areas of political, industrial, religious, and public safety by just a few in upper management have caused international devastation such as the oil pollution in the Gulf of Mexico, the New Zealand mining disaster, and law enforcement leaders ignoring the unprecedented violence in jail systems. All of these are unethical activities of leadership are contributing to the loss of public trust of leadership. Some of the reasons given by (Perez and Normore 2015) for the loss of confidence were “no leading financier or politician was held legally accountable for his or her unscrupulous role in causing the economic collapse that saw millions of people around the world lose their homes, employment, lifestyle, and dignity” because of this reason I feel in itself is another example of unethical leadership in that the court system for not making these leader accountable for their unethical