Pros And Cons Of The Utilization Of Police Body Cameras

Within recent years there has been much controversy encompassing police officers and regardless of whether they ought to wear body cameras to document all their daily activities. While the utilization of body cameras may appear to invade the public or police privacy, police should wear body cameras. By wearing body cameras, they could enhance people's perspective of police by demonstrating their compassion, protect the public from police misconduct and protect law enforcement from dealing with false allegations that can discredit their reputation. Additionally, it can help to provide evidence when individuals may not be able to, which are all vital parts of policing. Police body cameras are an indispensable device for cops and our communities

since they proposition unquestionable proof in court, confirms officers are upholding the law, and increase general well-being and adequacy of officers.
In the article "Cops and body-worn cameras: lessons gained from Phoenix's organization of body-worn cameras" the Phoenix law enforcement specified that their officers wear body cameras. The results indicated "BWCs appear to have produced greater arrest activity, and substantial decreases in aggressions against officers (23 percent decrease) when contrasted with officers in a correlation squad zone that did not have cameras (10 percent increase)" (Elliot, and Kurtenbach, 2015, pg. 3). That is a significant drop in protests against officers, now think how immense the numbers would be in other enormous cities like New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, or Houston.
There are more positive outcomes from the utilization of body-worn cameras like recordings can be utilized as training aids for future cops, and presumably, the most critical issue, that the videos protect the truth.

The usage of old footages can be crucial to new cops since it can show them how to manage various circumstances effectively that way they don't put their profession at risk or the lives of their accomplices in danger. Everybody realizes that there are always three sides to a story: what one individual says happens, what the other individual says happened, and what happened. With the execution of body-worn cameras, it would eliminate, he said she said argument and offer an honest and genuine account of events in question. South Carolina Representative Gerald Malloy states in an article that "body cameras protect police, protects the general population and protects the truth." Also, he goes on to say, "from their experience, I know citizen complaints have gone down, utilization of force has gone down, and the footage offers great apparatuses to training" (Williams, 2015, pg. 1). With state government officials concurring with results of body-worn cameras they can find a way to actualizing them in their

states.
As Rich Williams discusses in his article Police body cams: is a video worth more than a thousand words?”, He brought up how much citizen dissensions go down and how there is potential to go keep decreasing. Being equipped with body cameras is the means to help protect the cops themselves and the public. There is the capacity to invalidate allegations of brutality when no type of viciousness has occurred. As mentioned in the same article "Malloy, in the wake of observing nationwide challenges over disputable deaths in police encounters knew the open deliberation needed to swing from the street to the Statehouse." We must change the way of life in policing. We realize that civilians and officers die in these encounters, and we understand that the requirements need resolving, and these recordings can enable us (2015, pg. 1). The goal is that general society is to be protected by utilizing the footage to guarantee cops are not exceeding their boundaries consistently.
Everybody has heard about the disputable cases where, allegedly that cops might have mishandled their power, with the Michael Dark colored case from Ferguson, Missouri being one of the latest incidents with a considerable amount of media scope. The result of the accusation was Officer Darren Wilson charges was dropped. Even though the case was over, many individuals were angry with the result. One thing that could have enhanced this decision dramatically is if the officer was wearing a body camera. On the off chance that Officer Darren Wilson was wearing body camera the video would have demonstrated everything that let up to the situation in question and what occurred after. With that snippet of data, regardless of whether it showed his honesty or blame, it would have made the result of the trial even more tolerating. The reasoning is, everybody would have been able to perceive what indeed happened with no predisposition, that is the reason body-worn cameras convey an essential thing to the table, and that will be that it protects the truth.
The public's perspective of cops has undoubtedly declined through the years, to enhance this the officers ought to be outfitted with body cameras to display the positive that cops perform, not only the terrible preferably, exhibiting their compassion while policing.

The perspective of police has gone down given all the negative attention they have received as of late. Some people believed that there is a great deal of division between the two, and uniting the law enforcement and the public will change that perception. “Equipping a body camera gives the people the ability to realize the greatness that cops do (Arnett, 2015).” The unfortunate truth is that there have been cases, which have made all police officers appeared awful, while that is not the situation. There are many occasions that cops make an extraordinary effort to help individuals, for example, when two cops chose to step up and assist a father that was down on his luck with three small kids and no car seats. "Perceiving the family was down on their luck, Gower and Hawkins chose to purchase the young girls; ages one, three, and four; car seats as opposed to ticketing the father. "Giving him three tickets, it would not do any good," Gower told KVUE. "Those children were all the while must be driven some place, some way or another with no car seats." Said Hawkins: "We just ventured off to the side and said we have to make the best choice and get this family some car seats." (Blossom, 2015 section 4) These are the

occurrences that the general population does not observe, and indeed it gets overlooked when the negative occurs these encouraging situations do not get remembered. Body cameras can convey these events to the spotlight and demonstrate the compassion of policing, more regularly while still portraying the crucial role that is required.
Although the thought of the law enforcement using cameras seems to be a concern over violating a person's privacy, there is a more significant struggle to protect the police and public in environments that can turn violent. While officers are cameras are recording; it is no different than someone else that documents them and post it on social media; while on the job the people, in general, it is no different than any store, eatery, or even a traffic light documenting their day to day activities. The insight of this is, there is no more of an invasion of privacy that we perceived on a day to day basis. Recordings are happening while driving, heading off to the supermarket, or even having dinner and it does not seem to be an issue, so body cameras are no more of a privacy violation than anything else that police body cameras would encounter daily.
There are repeatedly going to be positives and negatives to any and all circumstances, and that is even genuine when taking a gander at the issue concerning whether cops ought to wear body cameras. Many individuals end up noticeably worried about the violation of privacy, however, while considering the significance of displaying compassion of policing, offering evidence when an individual may be unable to, and being able to protect the officers and additionally the people, in general, these critical components all exceed that concern. With the ability to protect the public and officers while having a responsibility too, this is an excellent helping factor in the ability for police to be more efficient and the ultimate objective of eliminating wrongdoing by way of the utilization of body cameras.
Like I articulated before, body cameras protect the truth. It could save the city money by not paying for a judge, legal advisors, jurors, and whatever staff that needs to be there for a trial since the footage from the camera will give an incontestable proof if something happened or not; so most cases won't have to go to trial. In the wake of analyzing numerous facts, it is safe to say that implementing the utilization of body cameras in police departments all over the nation would undoubtedly set the general population at ease. If we, as a community, select to reject the considerable thought of cops wearing body cameras there will consistently be a violated connection between law enforcement and the public.