Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of FERPA Act on families privacy rights
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of FERPA Act on families privacy rights
“FERPA [Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act] essentially means you have no right, as a parent, to know what or how your children are doing in school.” Michele Willens says this in her article, “College Students Have Too Much Privacy” about the FERPA act that was passed in 1974. It was originally put in place to protect the privacy of students, but it also keeps information private from the student’s parents, or current gauardians. Because so many parents waste money on college students that might miss classes or even drop out without them knowing, the FERPA act needs to be reformed.
If the FERPA act is not reformed soon, students all over the United States will continue to miss classes or just completely withdraw from school without their parent’s knowledge. This is brought out very well by a story shared in the article, which tells about a girl’s parents who were under the impression that their daughter had graduated from the college that she had supposedly been attending. When their daughter’s former roommate called them and told them that she hadn’t been at school for over two years, they were furious. By law they had no right to know whether or not their daughter had graduated from school. The
…show more content…
article also states that “roughly forty-five percent of students who enter college will not even graduate at all.” If students are protected by law from their own parents, that number will easily climb to sixty or maybe seventy percent. In addition to students not graduating, if FERPA is not reformed, millions of parents, who pay their students tuition, will be losing thousands of dollars because they didn’t have the right to know if their child was even attending school.
An excerpt from the act, states “universities consider students as adults, regardless of age or financial dependence”. The article goes on to say, “there is a special kind of pain associated with discovering that your kid took a gap year while still enrolled, if it so happens that you are coughing up sixty thousand dollars per year”. Just this minor little flaw in the act makes millions of parent’s waste money that could have been put toward other useful things. This could easily be changed with a reform of the FERPA
act. To reform the FERPA act, there should be very strict guidelines as to who gets to see the student’s information, but not so strict that the students own parents cannot see what they are doing. If the person is not currently living with the student or are not the current guardian of the student, then they should not be allowed to see their information. In addition, if a student is financially dependent on someone other than themselves to pay their tuition, then that person should have full rights to see anything they do in school. This is such an easy solution to the hole that was left in the FERPA act. The FERPA act was put in place to protect student’s privacy, It not only keeps it private from strangers but from their own parents. It is very important that parents know how their student is doing in school, whether they are missing class, getting bad grades, or just plain aren’t attending the school that their parents are paying for. The need for a reform of the FERPA act is very apparent. Parents all over the United States will be able to save thousands of dollars and countless hours if this happens.
The DREAM Act is an Act that targets children under the age of fifteen who have lived in the Unites States for at least five years since the Act was made to receive higher education. This Act allows these children to receive temporary legal status and go through a rigorous process to eventually become fully legal in the United States. The DREAM Act allows these individuals to go to college or join the military if they please. In order to receive full legal status these individuals must have either served our country for two years or graduated a two year college or at least studied for two years working towards a bachelors degree. This Act allows these children who are faced against the odds of having a dead end job to do something great
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001’s main purpose was to enhance the education system and hold schools accountable in its attempt to bring equality in the fight against poverty for poor and minority groups. Once this Act was signed into law the American public expected an overhaul of the education system with only good outcomes. The public assumed our children would be receiving the best education available and the economic issues that plagued schools would no longer be a problem. In the beginning of its implementation No Child Left Behind was expected to bring America up to standards with other nations, this was something that America has struggled to do for many years. Our children were now being put first according to Act and the public and many political figures were ecstatic over the possibilities.
Privacy was once taken for granted in public education, but now through the 1974 law, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act it is pushed to the forefront of the minds of every educator in the United States (Cossler, 2010). This law has paved the way for many lawsuits regarding privacy of student’s records, which have left teachers scared, undereducated and unaware of certain regulations of the law. FERPA laws provide protections for students, but also allow access of all student records to the student’s custodial parents, which in some situations has cause problems and in some cases have specifically brought clarifications of the law. Has the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act provided the much needed privacy for students or created an overboard policies?
Rachel Canning was an 18 year old, high school honor student who sued her parents to pay for her schooling and living costs even though she no longer lives under their house. Canning claims that her parents kicked her out of the house; however, the parents claim that she moved out since she refused to listen to rules, do chores, or end her relationship with her boyfriend. This was a controversial case since it challenged the parent’s right to exert rules and discipline their child. The public now fears that parents will live in hear of establishing house rules. The judge ruled that the parents will not be required to pay for Canning’s high school tuition, provide a weekly allowance, or additional financial support. Recently, Canning has been in the news again for accusing her now ex-boyfriend of assaulting her and both have set a restraining order on one another. However, the charges were later dropped to clear both records for college. Canning eventually reconciled with her parents, withdrew her lawsuit, and moved back into their home. She will not be attending New England University as a biomedical engineering major.
In order to have an amendment ratified, you must have a total of 38 states. The ratification process can be very long, each amendment is given seven years to try and get all 38 states to ratify it. If ratification does not happen during this time, then the amendment will die. The child labor amendment only had 28 states ratify it. While the Equal Rights Amendment had 35 states ratify it. The ERA was actually extended to ten years but still did not make the cut. It was ratified by 30 states, just in one year. It slowed down very quickly. People were afraid of the things that could happen. Some women even thought that they were suppose to work at home, so why try to be like men? These things caused the ERA not to get passed.
this hurts single-parent families who are trying to go back to college to get a degree to get
In many schools, women who became pregnant were often relegated to "alternative" educational programs, the participation in which was mandatory. After Title IX, schools could no longer force the student to go to an alternative school, which often was substandard. These students could not be sin...
Voss, Kate. "23 Years after the Clery Act, Are Schools Any Safer?" The College Fix RSS. N.p., 22 Oct. 2013. Web. 28 Nov. 2013. .
X-raying shoes at the airports is one thing, but tracking and compiling information on college students seems a little much to some. Before SEVIS, the records of all students, including international ones, have been kept private under the protection of FERPA, the Family Education Records Protection Act. But now, FERPA protection has been waived for international student records, allowing the Federal Government to request information on topics such as "student misconduct," which includes criticism of the government and non-violent civil disobedience, and a student's field of study, red flagging some "sensitive" research work and majors for their potential to be used in weapons
Ideally schools in the United States are considered by both parents and students alike to be “safe-havens” where parents can trust their children to learn and remain safe during the day and where students can feel safe in a well-maintained learning environment. However within this fully regulated government service, there are often debates over proper classroom environments, teaching tactics, and privacy issues. Today the main privacy issue in public schools is where to draw the line between keeping the school safe and maintaining the privacy of the students (Boomer par. 19). Searches and seizures in schools are not recent issues; however they are becoming more public now than in recent years.
Walker, T. "Nine Ways Title IX Has Helped Girls and Women in Education." NEA Today RSS
At a time of wide public concern about the state of education, the legislation sets in place requirements that reach into virtually every public school in America. The law emphasizes accountability, teacher quality, parent choice, improved teaching methods, and flexibility. (Correa) Strict requirements and deadlines have been set for states to expand the scope and frequency of student testing, revamp their accountability system and guarantee that every classroom is staffed by a ?highly qualified? teacher in his or her own subject area. (I ed) The plan also mandates annual student testing in reading and math by 2005, and requires all school districts to allow students in consistently low-performing schools to transfer to higher performing schools, at the districts expense. (Hull) From year to year, states are required to improve the quality of their schools. No Child Left Behind has expanded the federal ...
The federal government should change its financial aid policies to take several more factors, such as the percentage of educational expenses paid by the student, into account. Under the current system, all students applying for federal aid file a form called the Free Application for Federal Student Aid (FAFSA). This form is meant to figure out the amount of money a family is able to shell out for an education, or the Expected Family Contribution (EFC). Assuming the student does not qualify for independent status, both the expected contributions from the student and the parents are included in the EFC. In order for a student to get independent status, you have to be married or over the age of twenty-four.
Fees and loans are too big of a load for young people to carry. A lot of students drop out do to the pressure of having to worry about all the loans they have to pay back after they are done with college. This should not be an issue to the student. According Iatham Emmmons, “Even worse, a large portion of students never receive funding at all due to the multitude of stipulations that must be adhered to in order to qualify for assistance. A major flaw in the current federal educational assistance programs is that the students’ parents’ income is used to calculate financial need” (Emmons 3). Even citizens who try to get help by applying for funding never end up getting it because they do not meet the needs required for the funding. Education should be p...
An opposition brought up about students taking a gap year after high school is that they will fall behind and get stressed trying to play catch up after a long