Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty Debate

876 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Biological and psychological theories both influence crime

There are many contradiction whether the death penalty should or should not be repealed. The death penalty should not be repealed because most who kill usually don 't change, people who kill don 't see prison as punishment, and no single individual should have the right to kill.

Firstly criminals have strong drives towards the crimes they commit. Someone can be influenced by the worst of the emotions, anger, it overshadows right and brings out an uncontrollable desire for harm. Anger leads to hate and hate leads to grudges and when an individual is misled by an emotion as strong as anger or hate, a criminal can rise out of even the most innocent. All humans have an inner conscience, a sort of voice in the back of their heads leading them …show more content…

The treatment of the prison system has become a form of relax for prisoners. Some criminals commit crimes just to get into prison. Prison offers a nice warm bed for convicts to sleep and most of the time they are treated even with a pillow. Criminals in prison are fed three times a day, some may say,“but yes it 's nothing like the comfort of a suburban home”, but most don 't realize that criminals outside of prison don 't have a place to sleep and food to eat. Prison offers a type of safe haven from the outside, giving them shelter, food, and a comfortable place to sleep won’t change a criminal, it just gives them more incentive to keep committing the same …show more content…

Opposers may say, ”isn 't the courts taking a life by putting a criminal to the death sentence”? Yes, matter of fact they are but as a jury they are keeping criminals from committing crimes that lead to sorrow and pain. It ultimately comes back to the golden rule, “treat others the way you would like to be treated”. If an individual doesn 't fancy being brutally murdered, they should reconsider the idea of murder in the first place. The Swedish believe in the golden rule, if one is caught stealing from another they settled it by cutting off an arm, or if an individual should take another 's life the life, it is only fair that the favor should be returned.
When an individual is blinded by such great emotional distress and commits brutal crimes towards others, they don 't stop to think that they may be tearing apart a family. When a family is faced with a situation such as losing one of their own the devastation is grievous, yet again the powerful emotion of anger and heat will engulf the individual and ultimately cause the innocent to transform into a criminal.

In Conclusion, the death sentence should not be repealed. The risk is too great to have criminals walking the streets. Most won’t take the chance to change mainly because the wonderful treatment of prison, and in the sense of mortality the golden rule should be enforced greatly to prevent further

Show More
Related

  • Nature versus Nurture: Criminal Behavior

    2165 Words  | 5 Pages

    The nurturing of individuals plays a role in the making of killers, as 94% of serial killers had experienced some form of abuse as children and 42% have suffered severe physical abuse (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2010). A child abuse is a determining factor, in which supports the idea that serial killers and psychopath, are influenced significantly by nurture (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2011). In most cases social, cultural and physiological determinants all play a role in influencing serial killers to grow into a mass murderer. It is important that physiological and social determinants can be identified, so they could be altered for the purpose of preventing the number of crime.

    Read More

  • Do Social Bonds Contribute To or Prevent Possible Criminal Acts?

    946 Words  | 2 Pages

    Evidently, the act of engaging in criminal activity is based on choice. However, according to the Bond Gone Wrong Theory, the decision can be affected by social bond and self-control. With a strong social bond, comes over protection. If something were to harm or interfere with the strong bond, it may cause an individual to retaliate. However, with self-control the results may differ. Nevertheless, the Bond Gone Wrong Theory can be used in the future as a theory to better understand why some people commit crime rather than just labeling them or assuming that they’re all the same, killing or stealing for no reason.

    Read More

  • Edwin Sutherland, Ronald Akers, And Robert Agnek's Theory Of Crime In Society

    1084 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many different views on the origins of criminal behaviors within societies. One possible reason for why people commit crimes could be because they learned it from others. Edwin Sutherland works to explain this tactic through his theory of differential association. His theory states that criminal behavior is learned in interaction with others in intimate, personal groups. The learning of criminal behavior depends on the strength of the relationship with those who commit deviant actions. This learning also depends on their definitions of legal codes. For example, some people in society rationalize traffic speeding if it is only a couple miles over the speed limit while others are strongly against speeding at any degree. When a person’s

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

    1013 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to oxforddictionaries.com capital punishment is defined as the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime. As of May 2, 2013 Maryland joined the 17 states that have abolished the death penalty,this means as of now 32 states still allow capital punishment. Death Penalty Facts stats that over two thirds of the world’s countries have rid themselves of this unconstitutional law in all practices. Death Penalty Facts goes on to say that 14 states without the death penalty had homicide rates at or near national rates (http://www.amnestyusa.org/pdfs/DeathPenaltyFactsMay2012.pdf). According to Natalie Leppard, PhD that in 2010, 46 people was sentenced the death penalty.Since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976 this

    Read More

  • We Do NOT Need the Death Penalty

    810 Words  | 2 Pages

    The death penalty should be abolished because mistakes can and have been made and sometimes a person is put to death who is innocent. The courts and legal branches of our government try to carry out their jobs with accuracy, fai...

    Read More

  • The Controversy of Death Penalty in the US

    1313 Words  | 3 Pages

    The death penalty, ever since it was established, has created a huge controversy all throughout the world. Ever since the death penalty was created, there have been people who supported the death penalty and those who wanted to destroy it. When the death penalty was first created the methods that were used were gruesome and painful, it goes against the Eighth Amendment that was put in place many years later. The methods they used were focused on torturing the people and putting them through as much pain as possible. In today’s society the death penalty is quick and painless, it follows the Eighth Amendment. Still there are many people who are against capital punishment. The line of whether to kill a man or women for murder or to let him or her spend the rest one’s life in prison forever will never be drawn in a staight.

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice

    2367 Words  | 5 Pages

    Criminal justice through “moral panic” is “a condition, episode, person or groups of person emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests; its nature is presented in a stylized and stereotypical fashion by the mass media; the moral barricades are managed by editors, bishops, politicians, and other right-thinking people; socially accredited experts pronounce their diagnoses and solutions; ways of coping are evolved or (more often) resorted to; the condition then disappears, submerges or deteriorates and become more visible.” (Kraska, 2004) Thus by creating this moral panic, which is an emotion, by involves media, government officials, public, politicians and interested parties that exaggerate the problem from how big the problem really is. “The idea of emotion as a kind of cognitive shortcut explains why jurors, like children are more likely to make emotional judgments than judges.” (Bandes, 311, 1999) Society alone has many emotions towards criminals and victims ranging from hate, anger, fear towards ...

    Read More

  • Juvenile Death Penalty: A Constitutional Dilemma

    1356 Words  | 3 Pages

    United States of America is the only country is the only country in the world were

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment And Death Penalty

    2563 Words  | 6 Pages

    ... execute should not be made lightly, and tests should be done to ensure the right person is being punished for the crime that was committed. Taking away the person’s life who is responsible for the death of another person cannot bring the victim back and does not solve anything. Various people all over the world believe that the death penalty should not be supported and that it should be abolished. Many reasons exist for the abolition of the death penalty to take place including cost issues, religious issues, whether or not it acts as a deterrent, executing innocents and the harshness of the execution. Some may say the people who committed the most heinous crimes deserve to have justice served to them. However, even murderers are humans and should be treated fairly and justly. All people, even the guilty have a right to live; regardless of the crimes they committed.

    Read More

  • Death Penalty Persuasive Essay

    797 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to deathpenatlyinfo.org, currently there are 32 states with the death penalty and 18 states without the death penalty. Society has always punished people that do unlawful actions. Being that murder is the most is in highest interest of preventing, the strongest punishment available, the death penalty, is used. People may think when states sentence murderers to death that it would prevent future murderers from doing the same actions seeing that they will receive the same punishment. Deathpenaltycurriculum.org reports, “Moreover, even if some studies regarding deterrence are inconclusive, that is only because the death penalty is rarely used and takes years before an execution is actually carried out”. Not only that but some states that don’t have the death penalty have lower crimes rates than those that do. In my opinion the death penalty should be abolished due to many purposeful reasons including: financial costs, the process slowing down the court system, life in prison being far more effective, possibility of convicting and killing an innocent person, and violating “cruel and unusual” punishment clause.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On The Death Penalty

    710 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the years the death penalty has been a very controversial aspect when it comes to punishment. Some groups of people believe that is should be abolished and other think that America should keep it. I’m here to say that I am not for the death penalty at all. To me the death penalty has a couple of flaws that I have an issue looking past. The death penalty is very unconstitutional for anyone who is put through it and it is very bias on who it chooses for the punishment.

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment: A Perspective from Death Row

    1036 Words  | 3 Pages

    Capital Punishment should NOT be abolished, because it is the only punishment that fits the

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty is Cruel and Unusual Punishment

    1325 Words  | 3 Pages

    The death penalty is racist, it punishes the poor, it causes the innocent to die, it is not a deterrent against violent crime, and it is cruel and unusual punishment. More than half of the countries in the world have already abolished the death penalty and the U.S should abolish it too. It is wrong and cruel. Some states in the U.S still hold the death penalty because they think it will keep U.S citizens safe, but we can just keep the murders in a separate patrolled jail. Abolish it and we may save the lives of the people that may have been executed innocent.

    Read More

  • The Death Penalty Should Be Abolished In The US

    767 Words  | 2 Pages

    “An eye for an eye will make the whole world go blind” (Mohanda Ghandi). The death penalty should be abolished in the U.S. It is inhumane and harsh. The idea of putting another human to death is hard to imagine. A decent society does not punish in such a gruesome way. If you act in the same manner as a killer, then what is the difference? You want to show that killing is wrong by killing? It is a contradiction that society must kill in order to teach against killing. The death penalty does not deter crime and costs more than life imprisonment.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay: The Fight For The Death Penalty

    737 Words  | 2 Pages

    The first reason why it should not be abolished is because the death penalty will reduce crime rate. Opposers say that the death penalty does not reduce the crime rate, but in my opinion it does reduce the crime rate. I believe if people actually think twice before committing a crime, and realize that they could hurt themselves or their family then they are going to slow their role and better themselves. The second reason

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty Debate

Open Document