Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

627 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Capital punishment vs life imprisonment

The death penalty can be imposed under certain conditions. These conditions include, but are not limited to possession of foreign or dangerous objects, obstruction or destruction of a vehicle, be it an aircraft, motor vehicle, etc., violations of Civil Rights, murder of a member of Congress, unauthorized spying, genocide of any sort, unlicensed/unauthorized transportation of explosives, treason against the United States (this can only be committed in a time of war, according to the Constitution), destruction of government property, murder involving: firearms, federal prisoners, government facilities, an airport, a member of the immediate family of a government official (parents, siblings, spouse, children), kidnapping, or murder for-hire.

In 2005, in the Roper v. Simmons case, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that it is unconstitutional to impose the death penalty on a minor (a person of 17 years of age or younger) or to impose the death penalty on a person who committed a crime eligible for capital punishment when under the age of 17. In addition, in the Atkins v. Virginia case, the Supreme Court ruled that imposing the death penalty on a person who is mentally disadvantaged is cruel and unusual punishment, which is outlawed in the 8th amendment of the United States Constitution. …show more content…

Simmons case, a unique scenario had to be decided on. It is illegal to execute a minor in the United States, but Simmons was 17 at the time of the murder. The court sat on their decision until he turned 18, at which time he was sentenced to death. Then, after a series of appeals and petitions requesting that his sentence be repealed, reasoning that the Constitution prohibits the execution of a person who committed a capital crime while under the age of 18, as determined by the Atkins v. Virginia case, his sentence was repealed and was subsequently replaced by a sentence of natural life in prison with no chance of pardon or early

Show More
Related

  • Roper v. Simmons: An Examination of the Supreme Courts Role

    2549 Words  | 6 Pages

    Roper v. Simmons is a perfect example of the evolving role of the Supreme Court, the sources the Supreme Court used to reach the ruling in this case is quite questionable. While I agree with the Supreme Court about protecting the younger citizens of America the Supreme Court must have the law to back up their ruling. Though in this case they do not the Supreme Court used a combination of foreign policy, moral decency, and state laws as the legal foundation for this decision. None of these things are appropriate sources for deciding what is constitutional and what is not. The sources used for deciding the constitutionality of a case are the constitution and federal statues. While the case can be loosely tied in with the eighth amendment clause of “cruel and unusual punishment” there is no backing for the decision made. The Supreme Court with this case decided that it did not overturn the previous case of Stanford v. Kentucky, which ruled on this same issue fifteen years earlier. Yet the court stated that the prevailing moral code had altered therefore they changed their opinion. The truly shocking issue with this is that the neither law nor constitution had changed regarding this issue in the interceding fifteen years. The grave problem with this case is that the Supreme Court used the case of Roper V. Simmons to create law based of invalid sources.

    Read More

  • Roper V. Simmons Case Study

    1049 Words  | 3 Pages

    During this case, there was a lot of debate on whether or not the death sentence was considered a cruel and unusual punishment to give to a minor. Simmons had several appeals that went to state and federal courts. They lasted until 2002 but each appeal was rejected. These courts held that when someone commits a crime under the age of 18 and is sentenced to death, it violates the 8th and 14th amendment. Both amendments also prohibit the execution of a mentally retarded person.  Simmons was speculated to have mental illnesses. The Missouri Supreme Court agreed and set aside Simmons’ death sentence in favor of life imprisonment without eligibility for release. Before Roper v. Simmons could be sent to the Supreme Court, a petition had to be made. The arguments for the

    Read More

  • Roper V Simmons Case Study

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the United States Supreme Court case of Roper v. Simmons of 2005 the Supreme Court ruled in a five to four ruling that the death sentence for minors was considered “cruel and unusual punishment,” as stated by the Eighth Amendment, according to the Oyez Project online database. Christopher Simmons, the plaintiff, was only seventeen at the time of his conviction of murder. With the Roper v Simmons, 2005 Supreme Court ruling against applying the death penalty to minors, this also turned over a previous 1989 ruling of Stanford v. Kentucky that stated the death penalty was permissible for those over the age of sixteen who had committed a capital offense. The Roper v. Simmons is one of those landmark Supreme Court cases that impacted, and changed

    Read More

  • Roper V. Simmons Essay

    503 Words  | 2 Pages

    Donald P. Roper v. Simmons case was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that it is unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed while under the age of 18. The immediate consequence of Roper was that it saved the lives of 72 individuals who were condemned to die for crimes they committed as children. And as a consequence of murder he is now spending a long life time in prison. furthermore a consequence of Simmons actions, his family has to endure the imprisonment of there son or brother and he has to face trials for his freedom, whilst being in

    Read More

  • Roper v. Simmons: The Juvenile Death Penalty

    1055 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...s was a federal case and a federal ruling which means that this new law outlawing the execution of anyone under the age of eighteen at the time of the crime extended its reach over the entire United States. This also overruled all state laws allowing juvenile executions. The Roper v. Simmons ruling overturned the decision from Stanford v. Kentucky which allowed the death penalty for juvenile offenders over the age of sixteen.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Cruel And Unusual Punishment

    1318 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the precedent setting case Graham v. Florida the Supreme Court ruled that a sentence of life without punishment for non-homicidal juvenile offenders is a

    Read More

  • Making A Murderer Essay

    639 Words  | 2 Pages

    Since the ban, it has happened 22 times, 21 of them for 17 year olds who ended up turning 18 before the execution, and one much younger, who killed his family. Was it a right decision that the supreme court made? Minors have an entire life full of changing experiences ahead of them, and it seems “cruel and unusual” to take that from a child. Generally, it’s respected as a good decision to prevent the death sentence on a minor, but there are some questions to be asked. What if the minor is a mass murderer or commits treason? Those seem like good reasons to use the death sentence. However, children learn a lot better than adults and can easily change their ways or attitudes in prison. The minors could still contribute positively to the world, and the death sentence would prevent that completely.

    Read More

  • 8th amendment

    541 Words  | 2 Pages

    I think that it is unfair that a minor could be killed for something when they aren’t even allowed to vote. Those younger than 18 are not allowed to vote or be on juries, or enjoy any of the other responsibilities and privileges of adulthood because the government considers their judgment unformed. So why would you execute them if you think their judgment isn’t up to par? To the government their judgment isn’t up to par, so don’t tell minors that they should know right from wrong when the government believes that they can’t think right yet. A minor should know not to murder someone, but maybe their mind just hasn’t quite developed that sense of right or wrong yet.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

    1095 Words  | 3 Pages

    Introduction: Job David Guerrero lived in downtown San Diego when he was suspected of attacking five homeless men with serious upper-body injuries. Two of which were found dead with their bodies set on fire. Guerrero was linked to the murders form eyewitness testimony and video camera footage. Guerrero should deserve the death penalty under the act of which he commits a murder. This policy of action is morally justified through Lex Talionis, Kantian ethics, Gelernter and the social contract. Although arguments such as Jeffrey Reiman’s might oppose the death penalty and support lesser punishment, my position is a stronger alternative.

    Read More

  • Importance Of The 8th Amendment

    762 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... rape or treason was committed ("8th Amendment to the Constitution – U.S. Amendment VIII Summary"). However, there are some cases where the death penalty is unacceptable regardless of the crime. In the Supreme Court case of Roper v Simmons the court decided that the execution of someone for a crime they committed when they were a minor violated the eighth amendment . The court case of Atkins v Virginia established that the death penalty is not an acceptable punishment for mentally ill felons (Lemieux, "The Supreme Court's Empty Eighth Amendment Promise"). The Supreme Court has also ruled that executing anyone under the age of 18 is an act of cruel and unusual punishment ("8th Amendment to the Constitution – U.S. Amendment VIII Summary"). The death penalty is the worst punishment a person could get, and because of that there are many restrictions on when to use it.

    Read More

  • Life Without Parole for Juveniles

    958 Words  | 2 Pages

    Supreme Court ruling Graham v. Florida (2010) banned the use of life without parole for juveniles who committed non-homicide crimes, and Roper v. Simmons (2005) abolished the use of the death penalty for juvenile offenders. They both argued that these sentences violated the 8th Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. While these landmark cases made great strides for the rights of minors passing through the criminal justice system, they are just the first steps in creating a juvenile justice system that takes into consideration the vast differences between adolescents and adults. Using sociological (Butler, 2010) and legal (Harvard Law Review, 2010) documents, this essay will explicate why the next such step to be taken is entirely eliminating the use of the life without parole sentence for juveniles, regardless of the nature of the crime being charged.

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

    2104 Words  | 5 Pages

    This paper will examine the pros and cons of the death penalty. Is it a deterrent or is that a myth. Does it give the family of the victim peace or does it cause them to suffer waiting for appeal after appeal. What are the forms of execution and any evidence of them being cruel and usual punishment. Is the death penalty fair if there are glaring, disparities in sentencing depending on geographic location and the color of the offender and victim’s skin?

    Read More

  • Juveniles Should Not Be Sentenced To Life In Prison Essay

    1118 Words  | 3 Pages

    Is it fair to give juveniles life sentences? On June 25 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the Eighth Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. Justice Elena Kagan, writing for the majority, stated that “Mandatory life without parole for a juvenile precludes consideration of his chronological age and its hallmark features- among them, immaturity, impetuosity, and failure to appreciate the risks and consequences. It prevents taking into account the family and home environment that surrounds him and from which he cannot usually extricate himself no matter how brutal or dysfunctional.” Juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison or adult jail until legal age. Due to the facts that many are still young and aren’t over eighteen.

    Read More

  • Should Juveniles Be Prison For Life?

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    In June 2012, the Supreme Court of Justice ruled that juveniles cannot be sentenced to life in prison. In July 2014, in California, the death penalty was removed. The 8th amendment banned the use of cruel or punishments. The reason why this rule has been imposed or banned is because many believe that they deserve a second chance. There are many reasons why juveniles commit crimes such as murder.

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of Death Penalty

    623 Words  | 2 Pages

    The death penalty has been an issue of debate for several years. Whether or not we should murder murderer’s and basically commit the same crime that they are being killed for committing. People against the death penalty say that we should not use it because of that very reason. They also make claims that innocent people who were wrongly convicted could be killed. Other claims include it not working as a deterrent, it being morally wrong, and that it discriminates. Some even claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment. I would like to shed light on the issue and inform everyone as to why we should keep the death penalty and possibly even use it more than we do now.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

Open Document