Tanking has been one of the most serious issues in National Basketball Association (NBA) for last couple decades. In every sport league, there are always some teams cannot win games and become jokes sticks for others. No one wants to be a joke stick, or in other words, a tanker. However, in NBA, there is a different story. Unlike other sport leagues, in NBA, the difference between good teams and bad teams is extremely huge. They are either so good that can content in the playoffs and take a shot on the champion trophy, or they are so bad that even local fans would boo loud on their own team. There is no “okay” or “mediocre” teams or at least there are not many of them in the National Basketball Association. Instead, there are many tankers. …show more content…
Maybe those teams are just being patient with the team development or having a long time plan for the team, or they are going through a franchise rebuilding process. Therefore, many people argue that tanking is just an objective point of view, and those people are mostly management staffs of tanking teams and members of the commissioner’s team. However, whether a team is being patient or being tanked is obvious. Although some fans and reporters are not as professional, it is still easy to tell whether a team is trying hard or not. Patient teams will raise the intensity of the game in the last quarter of the game; patient coaches will called thousands of timeouts and yell at their players about the next play; patient players will stay both active on defense and offense throughout a game. In the other hand, tanking teams would give up right the way when they play against a better team; tanking coaches would stay quiet and mute when the team need a timeout to organize the execution; tanking players would just play no defense or foul intentionally and try to get off the court as soon as possible. The differences are obvious, very …show more content…
First, they do not want to create a bad impression for people who are new for NBA. Second, they still want fans’ supports. Last, they still want people buy tickets and fill the arena. Moreover, many sport website such as Fox, Bleacher Report, and ESPN, and even NBA.com itself, writers write articles about NBA’s tanking problem. Apparently tanking is subjective. Second, why do teams tank? Teams tank for mainly one reason--- the lottery draft picks. Like many other sports such as NHL, NFL, and MBL, NBA has a draft system that let the bad teams to have higher possibilities to receive the top picks in NBA draft. Overall, there are 14 Ping-Pong balls numbered from one to fourteen, and they are placed in a lottery machine. The orders of picks are determined by complicated number sets of permutations and combinations. Generally, the worst team has 25.0 % of receiving the number 1 pick, the second worst has 19.9 % chance, the third worst has 15.6 % chance and etc. The bottom six teams all have relatively big chances to win the number 1 pick from the draft, and the chance would be smaller than 4.3 % for rest of the teams in the league. Hence, the system directly caused the birth of tanking. In other words, the harder you tank, the better you
For the 2017-2018, Mark Cuban’s NBA team currently has a record of (19-45), without question one of the worst in the league this year. In the ‘inverse analytics,’ the Mavericks coaching staff is given data on what lineups will not be successful as a means to lose games and improve their chances in the draft lottery to receive a high pick (Koyette, 2018). It has been described as “player development,” in which the younger less-developed players receive more playing time than veteran players.
Cause A. Over the past few years inflation of player contracts has made it hard for the smaller market teams to play competitively w...
On the other hand, there are those who feel as if the effects of the lockout will be suppressed due to the strength of the league and its progression towards a new style of play. According to a recent article in the Los Angeles Times, proponents of the National Basketball Association rest their faith for the league on four basic fundamentals: popularity, being hip, demographics, and marketing savvy. Basketball has an advantage over all sports due to its ease of being played. All you need is a basketball and a hoop. As long as this holds true, proponents feel basketball will always remain popular. During the NBA's resurgence during the 1980's and '90's they, "tapped into the rhythm and mentality among younger sports fans that hadn't been touched yet.
Although the first sight of tanking was in 1985 by the Rockets to draft Hakeem Olajuwon, tanking has never been at such a high rate then right now. It causes problems to fans, coaches, and players by lowering moral, and wins. The question is really should it be legal? In recent discussions, and Op-Eds people have expressed their opinions that talent shouldn’t be wasted for a year. On the other hand people make the argument that being bad for one year in exchange for being a playoff caliber team for up to 10 years is worth it. Hopefully the NBA discusses the matter with all its general mangers and figures out a solution that everybody can abide by. For now tanking is going to continue until somebody changes the rules.
biggest one, if a player is very good say in high school, then they will think that they are
It is becoming more and more a trend for high school and underclassmen basketball players to forgo their college eligibility to enter the NBA draft. Most professional sports have restrictions to limit mentally and physically immature players from throwing away their college education to be unsuccessful in the professional ranks. In the National Football League, NCAA football players are not allowed to declare for the pro draft unless they have been in the school’s program for at least three years. In professional baseball and hockey, although they do draft players straight from high school, they have a minor league system set up. These minor leagues allow players the time to develop and still play against an excellent level of competition. This helps their growth process so that when they get into the real big leagues, they are somewhat ready to play and be a factor.
The early age entry rule, has been blamed for taking away the talent that made NCAA basketball popular over the last 40 years (Hughes, 2013). Recently many of the most talented basketball players have entered the NCAA with no intention of playing a second, third, or fourth year. The NBA permits players to be drafted at an age that many have considered is too young to live the lavish lifestyle of a professional player. This has been cause for the big debate of should the NBA change the eligibility to 20 years of age and two years removed from high school.
Sports teams play to win so they will play their best players. The better players on that sports team will usually produce better results than the worst players on that same
Second, market growth, which is measured by attendance at NBA games, has leveled recently, so increasing competition among teams for a fixed number of fans.
Most players that enter the NBA draft early are 19 or 20 years-old. They are going to end up playing against 25-year-olds that are stronger, faster, and that have had more experience than they have. Along with more experience, they will not be as physically fit because one or two years of college will not do it, and high school will not do it. For example, Lebron James. He is considered one of the best to have played the game, and he went straight out of high school. Imagine if he had gone to college, he would be so much better. So if they leave after the freshman or sophomore year, they will be about five or six years behind and that will make it harder to get a spot on the bench. If they do not make it to the bench, then they will be in the D league for 2 or 3 years to help develop their skills. “The D-League uses a tiered compensation system that's based on experience. Players with ample NBA
A proper coaching philosophy contains principles which improve character development, teach step by step tactical and technical skills, form proper progressive physical training regimens, and carefully utilize team management to handle and control problems with administrative issues. A coach with a sound philosophy should mold a team with strong cohesion, and he should treat players not only as teammates, but as family and friends who are encouraged to develop communication and lifelong learning of skills through positive support and role modeling from the coach (Mergelsberg, 14-15). The philosophy should also contain written documents of implemented strategies and techniques, so that the coach will know what to improve upon season by season
First, college basketball has paid off by losing its most talented players to the NBA as many as three years early. This has resulted in not only an overall lessening of the game, but in certain circumstances caused the downfall of once great basketball programs. This is how it happens, as colleges recruit players based on what their needs are or what they will need shortly in the future. So let us say that one school has a great core of sophomore and junior players for the upcoming season. The coaches do not have the need or the room for many new top-notch players.
Weaknesses Poor management of player relations. Deteriorating brand image of certain players. Little to no control of the players off the court. The goal of creating a fair playing field among big and small market teams has led to too many regulations. Few superstar talents to draw fan attention/loyalty.
In order to fix the tanking problem, Adam Silver and the NBA needs to improve the draft lottery. Getting rid of all the draft protections is the first issue that needs to be fixed. A draft protection is when a team trades a draft pick, but if it falls below a certain place in the draft order, then they will get the draft pick back. Honestly, in my opinion, if a team trades a draft pick and it turns out to be a worth more than it was at the time, then they lost the trade. As Dieter Kurtenbach said, “it has to go because it’s the part of a system that encourages the worst type of losing-specific losing” (Kurtenbach).
in the league agrees to the rules set by the NBA from the beginning. The rules