Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The Importance Of Communication For Police
Concealed carry in the united states essay
Stop and frisk introduction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The Importance Of Communication For Police
Opposing There are some that don’t want police training to be reformed. In the recent election Trump is enforcing stop and frisk and conceal carry. Stop and frisk is when a police suspect a person is dangerous, they can stop and pat down a person. This can be inhumane since officer can discriminate the minority. Spending will go up. When extending the police training program, the cost would increase as well. Adding new course for police would take much longer and this will reduce the number of police officer in the streets. In Europe, Llana says in “Germany, for example, police train for at least 130 weeks.” 130 weeks is close to 3 years. Officer would have to train for about 3 years to being able to patrol the streets. A problem that would …show more content…
European countries should be a guideline the US should meet in the near future. In England knife violence is a big problem but Llama’s research says “British police have fatally shot only one person wielding a knife since 2008. US police have fatally shot more than 575 people allegedly wielding blades and other such weapons just in the years since 2013.” Many lives can be saved if the US can reform and extend police training. A suggestion to reform training is by adding new course to teach communication skills and de-escalating situations. A police’s role should be to serve and protect the citizens in the community. It can be achieve by treating people with dignity and respect. Another suggestion should be intense recruiting practices to insure the police department has the most trusted officer in the force. It may increase the budget to complete the reform but it will be well worth it to improve the lives of people and bring back trust with the police departments. The police academy is struggling to properly train officers due the short amount of training. Hopefully in the near future, a reform would be implicated to improve the law
According to the website killedbypolice.net, they have been keeping track of deaths by police since 2013 and that number is a whopping 2,966 casualties. That is only in three years time, compared to the deaths of terrorism it is still less but this website is only look at three years of deaths. According to an article on cnn.com the deaths of American lives since 2001 by terrorism is at 3,380, while that is high that is information that has been taken over 14 years while the 2,966 deaths by police has only occurred in 3 years time. This shows that we should pay more attention to the policies that are being used by our police departments and officers and make sure the procedures and policies they are going to enforce are better suited than the ones they are using now because things must change and I hope they do for the betterment of everyone in the United
Stop and Frisk is a procedure put into use by the New York Police Department that allows an officer to stop and search a “suspicious character” if they consider her or him to be. The NYPD don’t need a warrant, or see you commit a crime. Officers solely need to regard you as “suspicious” to violate your fourth amendment rights without consequences. Since its Beginning, New York City’s stop and frisk program has brought in much controversy originating from the excessive rate of arrest. While the argument that Stop and Frisk violates an individual’s fourth amendment rights of protection from unreasonable search and seizure could definitely be said, that argument it’s similar to the argument of discrimination. An unfair number of Hispanics and
“From 2005 to mid-2008, approximately eighty percent of total stops made were of Blacks and Latinos, who comprise twenty-five percent and twenty-eight percent of New York City’s total population, respectively. During this same time period, only about ten percent of stops were of Whites, who comprise forty-four percent of the city’s population” (“Restoring a National Consensus”). Ray Kelly, appointed Police Commissioner by Mayor Michael Bloomberg, of New York in 2013, has not only accepted stop-and-frisk, a program that allows law enforcers to stop individuals and search them, but has multiplied its use. Kelly argued that New Yorkers of color, who have been unevenly targeted un...
One of the biggest reason stop-and-frisk should be abolished is in hopes to decrease such blatant racial profiling that has been going on under the name of “stop-and-frisk”. In 2007, 55% of the people stopped in New York were blacks and 30% were Hispanic (“Update: Crime and Race”). When checked again in 2011 a total of 685,000 people were stopped by the police of that 685,000, 52.9% were African Americans, 33.7% were Latino, and 9.3% were white (“Racial Profiling”). There is a story of an innocent victim of the stop-and-frisk policy, a man by the name of Robert Taylor. Police in Torrance stopped the elderly man and claimed he fit the description of a suspect that was linked to a robbery. But there was one simple problem; Taylor is a light complexioned, tall, 60 year-old man and the suspect was believed to be a short, dark complexioned, stocky man in his thirties; nothing like Taylor at all (Hutchinson). His shows that the police do not always stop people based on the right reasons, they tend to stop people based on the color of thei...
Law Enforcement policy is designed to help law enforcement agencies cut down on the amount of crime in communities and give structure to the agency. It also helps lessen the number of certain cases in certain areas, as well as from a certain group of people. There are several policies that I disagree with, but there is one policy I will be discussing. Law enforcement officers sometimes stop and frisk people based on gender, race, financial status, and social ranking. It is a very controversial issue because anything dealing with race and ethnicity can cause a lot of disagreement and discord. According to a New York judge on dealing with the stop and frisk laws, "If you got proof of inappropriate racial profiling in a good constitutional case, why don't you bring a lawsuit? You can certainly mark it as related . . . . I am sure I am going to get in trouble for saying it, for $65 you can bring that lawsuit" (Carter, 2013, pp.4). The stop and frisk law is one reason I do not believe in law enforcement profiling. Even though some law enforcement officers allow personal feelings and power to allow them to not follow policy, some policies are not followed morally because I do not feel that officers should be allowed to frisk someone who is innocent and has not committed a crime because it takes the focus off real criminals and onto innocent people; it causes emotional stress. I know because I have been through this several times.
By teaching police officers alternatives to shooting to kill, they experience higher risks with their lives. Police Commissioner, Ray Kelly, said, “It would be "very difficult" to train officers to shoot to wound” (Jacobo, 2016). Police officers are viewed as “predators” and “an occupying army” rather than allies (Valey, 2016). This is a perception that needs to change because it counteracts the mission of police officers
If people choose to stand behind the police force, an understanding between the public and police force will occur, reducing tensions. In order to resolve the tension between citizens and the police force, America must be optimistic that change is possible. Police must get involved with the communities they are protecting in order to build trust and reduce the crime. The public has to understand that the police force is truly trying to do their job and may make mistakes on occasion. These mistakes can be prevented through endless support and honor from America. If people choose to respect the police force and the ideals that they protect everyday, police brutality will surely
Police reform should start by giving proper training to the new recruits and veterans in the force. During their training, “Law enforcement agencies should adopt and enforce policies prohibiting discrimination based on race, ethnicity immigration status, etc.” (Cops, p.90). It is apparent
Police misconduct is as rampant as ever in America, and it has become a fixture of the news cycle. Police brutality is the use of any force exceeding that reasonably necessary to accomplish a lawful police purpose. The media is inevitably drawn toward tales of conflict, hence why there are so many crime and police stories on the news. Despite the increasing frequency of misbehaving cops, many Americans still maintain a high respect for the man in uniform. Still, police misconduct is a systemic problem, not just an anecdotal one. Here are some reasons why it is a problem. First, many departments don’t provide adequate training in nonviolent solutions. With this, police are unfamiliar with what to do in a non-violent situation, often resorting
According to The Global Research News, in the last decade alone the number of people murdered by police has reached 5,000. This humanitarian crisis in the United States has become an alarming reality. Police officers have the capability to arrest, confiscate property, and use deadly force. Yet, many have abused their powers. Police brutality is on the rise whether society believes it or not because of the advancement in technology, low education and experience, racial profiling, and people’s refusal to obey.
Police officers are trained to protect us, and themselves through their intensive training. They are also trained to know when they should be permitted to use deadly force, or when the time is not appropriate to use such force. But, police today seem to be using more deadly force than they did 10 years ago, which makes it seem as if police are only trained to use deadly force.
Looking back at the most controversial police shooting incidents, sometimes finding that while the shooting may be legally justified, there were missed opportunities to ratchet down the encounter, to slow things down, to call in additional resources, in the minutes before the shooting occurred. (Wexler, 2015)” Our government initiative is to revamp police training once again. Many cases have influenced a change in police training such as Michael Brown Ferguson shooting case and the New York City death of Eric Garner. Our CEO and Chairman have sat down and came up with a blueprint to take police officers back to their essence of protecting and serving. This blueprint will teach officers to use force when it is necessary and to ask questions and make human decisions before jumping the gun. In certain states they are also raising the pay of police officers to spike recruitment. In different states their training consist on what they need to work on the most, For example, Missouri is getting more tactical training, Los Angeles is getting life preservation training, New York is going to use minimum force and more de-escalating by communication. In conclusion police force has gotten way out of control and if we are unable to contain it now then no one will have trust in our police officers. Revamping the training to use more communication and less force is a great idea. Many times conflicts gets resolved faster by understand a person instead of using force to create a bigger issue. The use of force in police training is insufficient because they are training the officer to use more force to subdue a suspect. Leaving room for a lot of civilians are ending up hurt or deceased in police custody. The plummet in police recruitment is due to the bad name they have been receiving because of unreasonable actions. Due to the rise of police
The lack of training police officers is causing unnecessary incidents, is it true? Does the lack of Critical thinking, values, Ethics and Understanding the role as a police officer contribute to hire number of incidents? There is a chance that answer to this questions might always be divided, why? Well because officers will tend to defend their side and how the view the problem and the public will also defend their side and how they view the problem, for example most officers would probably say that people do not comply with their orders or the public might outcry because of the use of excessive force, it is most certain that there will never be an agreement on who is wright or wrong. Regardless of the outcome of who is wright
Since 1829, police officers have been adverted to as peace keepers. However, as of now the reference has become invalid and they are only law enforcement officers. Many still do their jobs to Serve and Protect, while others are more worried about arresting innocent civilians for suspicious conduct. As submitted by Patricia Williams, “We must not tolerate a policy that makes walking down the street or pausing on a street corner or just sitting in a car an inherently suspicious activity.” It has become a nuisance, and it seems like law enforcement officers are beginning to misemploy their power. Major officials recommend more training, but what if more training is not the answer, then what is? To start with, the knowledge of police brutality must first be present.
In our times, the police have become the criminals. Some police are using their power to do bad things, and society has come to fear police. The law enforcement system needs change. The courts have failed the police, and the police have turn to other means of justice. We must stop the corruption in the police force.