Pros And Cons Of Oil Sands

For Or Against Oil Sands

Oil Sands are a type of bitumen deposit, the sands are naturally occurring mixtures of sand, clay, water, and an extremely dense and viscous form of petroleum called bitumen. They are found in large amounts in many countries throughout the world, but are found in extremely large quantities in Canada and Venezuela. Along with the local environmental and human-health impacts have contributed to the debate surrounding the resource. While many welcome it because it benefits the Canadian economy, Canada became U.S. and a curial energy source. To start off, a pro is that the oil sands have spurred massive economic growth in Alberta. Oil sands continue to generate huge profits to Canada and provide thousands of jobs for the residents including mining, research and

development, and environmental assessment. Also, the oil sands have made Canada the number one foreign supplier of oil to United States. This became a major factor in the close economic partnership shared by the two countries. Lastly, oil sands provide Canada with a secure source of energy. Although, the oil supply is not unlimited, Canadians have the second largest source on the planet.

Whereas, others question whether it results in carbon emission, habitat impact and the social impact.

A major argument against oil sands would be the carbon emissions. The extraction methods used are the most carbon intensive because the oil is too deep to be extracted using a traditional method, the greenhouse has emission is approximately five to fifteen percent higher due to the extraction method. Furthermore, another argument against oil sands is that it destroys habitats. The Athabasca Delta, where oil sands are located, is a breeding ground for various species of birds. Theses grounds have been destroyed to make clear land for oil production. Lastly, the social impact of the oil sands is similar to environmental impact, and the people of Alberta are the ones suffering most. Decrease in both living standards and services around the community result from an unmanageable increase in population without proper funding. Social services are collapsing in areas with drastic population increase, and a severe housing shortage, as well as run-down schools and healthcare, bad roads, higher crime rates, and a poor garbage removal system, are all stressful for both people and

politics.

In my opinion, I believe the two sides have very accurate points. The oil sands are great for Canada’s economy because it creates more jobs and a profit of billions of dollars towards Canada. Also, have made Canada one of United States biggest suppliers. Although, oil sands have ruined habitats for both species of birds and humans, as it decreased living standards and services to the community because of the large populations. Which caused shortages in housing, less care towards healthcare, roads and the society. Also, created greenhouses gasses in the environment. Oil sands are both have both positive and negative impacts towards Canada. Thus, putting me in a position where I am at the boarder line between the two sides because this issue does not affect me directly in terms of jobs, profit, or living conditions.