Henry VIII, a man known throughout history for his multitude of marriages and disregard for women, his separation from the RCC which sparked the beginning of the Reformation, and his favor for public executions. Although his negative actions are what he is most commonly known for, it is not all that defines who Henry VIII was. Henry VIII, King of England from 21 April 1509 to his death, January 28, 1547, was married to six women over his lifetime and he ruled for 37 years. Even though Henry VIII caused some prosperity in England during his rule, that does not make him a good leader. The methods for his progression, whether is be good or bad, as a leader were unethical, immoral and above all in complete ignorance for the wishes of his people. …show more content…
Henry VIII’s rule came without opposition strong enough to usurp him, and one of the most steadfast believers in the unadulterated power of kingship was Bishop Jacques-Bénigne Bossuet.
He believed that social, political and economical harmony could occur when only one man had complete power. In his mind, much of the discord and strife happening in Europe could only be solved by one, all powerful leader. To him, and many others who obtain their political beliefs from the Holy Scripture, similar to the Divine Right of Kings, stating that a king's rule is sacred and that the ruler should use their power for the people and not abuse it, and most importantly, put the people’s needs and desires above his own. To summarize, a ruler must use his absolute power for the good of his people, and act only with them in mind. In order for an absolute leader to be considered a good leader, they must possess at the minimum, the three IB learner traits caring, thinker and principled. The reason why it is so crucial for a leader to possess these traits is because being a benevolent, moral and selfless ruler will make the land they live is devoid of fear for internal destruction and unwarranted persecution. King Henry VIII did not use his unobstructed power for good; he abused
it. King Henry VIII not only ignored the wellbeing of his people during his reign by living a lavish and costly lifestyle, but he also ignored the livelihoods and happiness of his wives as well. Not only was he a selfish ruler and a bad husband, he was also unnecessarily cruel and harsh, demonstrated by his haste to hand out executions to his own people and advisors, even some of his wives. He did not use his power for good, as he also used the fear of execution to get what he wanted from people around him. His abuse of power was also demonstrated by Henry VIII splitting from the papacy for his own personal reasons, wanting to annul his marriage with Catherine of Aragon, completely disregarding the fact that many of his people were protestants, and also him generally being unkind to those when they were in a position of weakness. King Henry VIII, does not in any way meet the requirements to be considered a good leader, because despite the fact that some of his actions had a positive effect, that positivity was greatly overshadowed by the terror and overall negative impact that his rule had.
Passage Analysis - Act 5 Scene 1, lines 115-138. Shakespeare’s ‘King Henry IV Part I’ centres on a core theme: the conflict between order and disorder. Such conflict is brought to light by the use of many vehicles, including Hal’s inner conflict, the country’s political and social conflict, the conflict between the court world and the tavern world, and the conflicting moral values of characters from each of these worlds. This juxtaposition of certain values exists on many levels, and so is both a strikingly present and an underlying theme throughout the play.
training when he came to power in 1485, had managed in the time he was
After many failed attempts to obtain a divorce from his first wife Catherine of Aragon, King Henry VIII took momentous steps that led to "The Reformation," a significant occurrence in the history of religion. Prior to the reformation, all of England's inhabitants including King Henry VIII prescribed to Catholicism. In fact, King Henry VIII was such a strong supporter that he was given the title "Defender of the Faith" by the pope for his efforts in protecting Catholicism against the Protestants. However, all these changed upon the pope's denial of Henry's request for a divorce.
Henry implemented many methods in order to control the nobility with varying success. Henry sought to limit the power of the nobles as he was acutely aware the dangers of over mighty subjects with too much power and little love for the crown or just wanted a change like Richard Neville, Earl of Warwick who deposed two kings to replace them. Also Henry’s own rise to the throne was helped by nobles dislike towards Richard III. By restricting the nobles Henry wanted to reduce the power of the nobles and possible threats against him and return the nobles from their quasi king status to leaders in their local areas but under the power of the crown.
I really enjoyed this video. It's crazy the amount of informaton that gets packed into a three minute video. I think the cartoon and music that accompanies it helps because you're being entertained as well as informed. I think it's easier for me to remember a fun fact from the video versus reading a whole chapter from a book.
Henry VI had a lot of weaknesses with foreign policy, his inability to make decisions, patronage, Richard duke of York, finance and evil council. With foreign policy he showed weakness in defending his country, after his father Henry VII had conquered land in France, he lost it. He lost Normandy and Gascony in 1451 due to defeat in France. This affected morale and the incomes of nobles because they had lost, reducing their reputation, especially as they had lost some of their own land, and the incomes went down because money was spent on war, so less money was available to give as income. This could have been a reason for the outbreak of conflict because the people would not have been happy with their situation. Henry's next weakness was his inability to make decisions.
...tect his right to the throne. Ultimately, he stabilized the nation by settling the civil wars, the Wars of Roses, by marrying the apposing York family, to unite the two feuding families, the Yorks and the Lancasters. All together, King Henry VII is a new monarch for displaying all of the required traits.
In the play Henry V written by Shakespeare. Henry was presented as the ideal Christian king. His mercy, wisdom, and other characteristics demonstrated the behavior of a Christian king. Yet at the same time he is shown to be man like any other. The way he behaves in his past is just like an ordinary man.
Peace of London in 1518, the Field of the Cloth of Gold and the Calais
honorble ruler. Henry IV was king of France between 1589 and 1610. He was supported
For hundreds of years, those who have read Henry V, or have seen the play performed, have admired Henry V's skills and decisions as a leader. Some assert that Henry V should be glorified and seen as an "ideal Christian king". Rejecting that idea completely, I would like to argue that Henry V should not be seen as the "ideal Christian king", but rather as a classic example of a Machiavellian ruler. If looking at the play superficially, Henry V may seem to be a religious, moral, and merciful ruler; however it was Niccolo Machiavelli himself that stated in his book, The Prince, that a ruler must "appear all mercy, all faith, all honesty, all humanity, [and] all religion" in order to keep control over his subjects (70). In the second act of the play, Henry V very convincingly acts as if he has no clue as to what the conspirators are planning behind his back, only to seconds later reveal he knew about their treacherous plans all along. If he can act as though he knows nothing of the conspirators' plans, what is to say that he acting elsewhere in the play, and only appearing to be a certain way? By delving deeper into the characteristics and behaviors of Henry V, I hope to reveal him to be a true Machiavellian ruler, rather than an "ideal king".
The father and son relationship is one of the most important aspects through the youth of a young man. In Shakespeare’s play Henry IV, he portrays the concept of having "two fathers". King Henry is Hal’s natural father, and Falstaff is Hal’s moral father. Hal must weigh the pros and cons of each father to decide which model he will emulate. Falstaff, who is actually Hal’s close friend, attempts to pull Hal into the life of crime, but he refuses.
Henry V is not a simple one as it has many aspects. By looking into
King Henry VIII was one of the most powerful rulers in the fifteenth century, who had a very captivating life many people are not aware of. Most people know Henry VIII as a berserk king with too many wives, but there is more to Henry VIII than that. Many few people know about his life and what he truly contributed to our world. Henry VIII was an almighty leader in England who won’t soon be forgotten.
When one thinks of Henry the eighth the first thing that comes up is fat, wife-killer, meat eater, old, mean and overall horrendous. But almost no one refers to him as misunderstood, manipulated or young man who was not meant to be King of England. This is how Suzannah Lipscomb portrays Henry VIII in her book, 1536: The Year that Changed Henry VIII, King Henry faces many tribulations in 1536 that shaped the rest of his reign; from his marriages, injuries, heirs, to his influence in the European spectrum.