Pros And Cons Of Jensen

655 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Bias in election

1- The election couldn’t have been fair; I don’t know anyone who voted for the winner. Being doesn’t know any one voted for the winner doesn’t mean the election hasn’t been fair. Comparing the number of people who you know that didn’t vote for the winner with the total number of voted people in the election, you will figure out that you based your statement on insufficient number of cases. Another reason, sometimes you will find the fans for one candidate concentrated in specific area or region. Your statement will be right if it has been based on wide range of people from different area with different culture and races. 2- It would be wrong to prosecute Allied for age discrimination; allied has always been a great corporate neighbor. The …show more content…

It put some restriction in public place but It doesn’t prevent it also smoker can freely smoke in other places except public. The logical flaw happens when the writer uses wrong information. 4- Bill Jensen’s proposal to create an on-site day care center is just the latest of his harebrained schemes. The logical flaw occurred when the writer attacked Jensen not his proposal. If he against the proposal, he should criticizes the proposal. If the writer want to persuade his reader, he should mention why he consider the proposal as harebrained schemes. It considers ‘’Ad hominem argument’’ Markel in technical communication 5- Since the introduction of cola drinks at the start of the 20th century, cancer has become the second-greatest killer in the United States. Cola drinks should be outlawed. The writer introduced two statement is not related to each other or he doesn’t prove the relation between them. . Cancer may is the second – greatest killer in USA, also Cola has introduced at the start of the 20th century. These are two statement may are right but he should prove that cola is causing cancer. The appearance of both in the same times doesn’t persuade the reader that they are related. It considers “an argument from ignorance” Markel in technical

Show More
Related

  • Stanley Scott Smokers Get A Raw Deal Analysis

    110 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article, “Smokers Get a Raw Deal” by Stanley S. Scott argued that smokers are not safe anymore to smoke publicly. One piece of evidence Scott’ utilize to back up his claim are giving examples. One type of example was a real event from a local incident in New York which gives his argument a great deal of weight which simply can’t be brushed of by the reader. The incident was a young man with his friend at restaurant was sprayed by an aerosol spray can by a man that was belonged to anti-smoker organization. This evidence really shows that smokers aren’t safe to smoke in public place anymore.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Fat Acceptance By Cynara Geissler

    772 Words  | 2 Pages

    The use of a highly debated topic give good reason for someone to give the essay a read without prior knowledge of the underlining message within the essay. As a result of this, one can understand why this eassy was published in this magazine and has received limited

    Read More

  • Report on Winner-Take-All

    695 Words  | 2 Pages

    Report on Winner-Take-All "Winner-take-all” is a term used to describe single member district and at large election systems that award seats to the highest vote getters without ensuring fair representation for minority groups. In the United States, these are typically single-member district schemes or at-large, block-voting systems. Under winner-take-all rules, a slim majority of voters can control 100% of seats, leaving everyone else effectively without representation. There's something else troubling about the way we elect presidents--something beyond the personal attacks, the derelict voters and the influence of big money. It is the fact that so many of those who do vote don't have their votes counted.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The New York Soda Ban

    443 Words  | 1 Pages

    The New York Soda Ban is a step in the wrong direction and efforts should be put towards making life better, rather than focusing on a movement that will have little to no effect. Realize that I am not stating the soda should be drank, because even I know that soda is harmful towards the body and is one of the leading causes of obesity. However, I believe that the soda ban will have little effect and that time and money should be applied somewhere where the act would have an effect of making life better. The reason I do not believe this ban will do as much good as stated, is because the ban is flawed. This brings me to my first point, which is, one cup of boysenberry juice has 256 grams of sugar, equaling to 225 calories. One cup of Cola only

    Read More

  • Unfairness in the Electoral College

    798 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even though there was a difference of a quarter million popular votes, the same number of votes were provided. Thus, this system discriminates against people who live in states with high turnout. Rather than having statewide electoral vote distribution, vote distribution in congressional districts could be a little more effective in representing people’s will. Upon this defectiveness of electoral system, current system is failure the way it mislead results and misrepresent population.

    Read More

  • Homosexual and Religion

    1058 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...back� writing style allows the reader to follow his point closely without forcing it upon them. Mr. Gomes provides valid evidence to support his thesis statement in this argument. Overall, this argument essay is well stated and well written.

    Read More

  • Malaise Of The 1970s Case Study

    1060 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bush. The election of this race would proceed to be a “Florida Fiasco” controversy. Many Americans felt that the election was not legitimate because Al Gore should have won the 2000 Presidential Election. He had 500,000 more votes than Bush. He won the popular vote. The electoral vote gave Bush a small margin of winning. They believed the machine had counted the ballots incorrectly because the votes were too close. Florida law decided to recount the ballots. The percentage of black voters were inaccurate. Florida’s voting system misread non-felons as felons and appeared on the “Felon’s List” so they could not vote. Millions were restricted to vote at the voting polls. Democrats demanded a manual count on ballots. Most of the Republican were voting officials and they eliminated overseas ballots due to deadline date. This disqualified their ballots which reduced the votes for Al Gore. It narrowed his chances of winning the 2000 Presidential Election. The votes finally resulted in a victory of 537 votes for Bush. This election was the first in U.S. history for the Supreme Court to be the ultimate deciding

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Electoral College

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another reason citizens do not agree with the Electoral College is the national polls versus Electoral College votes. Some believe the Electoral College falsely depicts who the citizens of the United States desire as their next president. The most recent instance of a president losing the popular vote was Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. Clinton commanded a lead over Trump by almost three million votes. However, Trump defeated Hillary Clinton with seventy-seven votes Electoral College votes. Ultimately, there are valid claims citizens of the United States can state to show that the Electoral College is a flaw in

    Read More

  • The Controversy Over the Electoral College System

    1487 Words  | 3 Pages

    Each state held a close percentage ranging from an average 2-6 percent difference in votes between candidates. Florida had been anticipated as a Republican victory, which led to disappointment among Republican voters when its electoral votes were awarded to Al Gore. I continued to watch as each state was announced and electoral votes were awarded to either candidate. About an hour later, Florida became “too close to call” and CNN among other st...

    Read More

  • 2000 Election Of 2000 Research Paper

    249 Words  | 1 Pages

    The presidential election between George W. Bush and Al Gore is the closest race in modern political history. The election could possibly be seen as, “endless” because it took 36 days, over 5 weeks to recount and determine the winner of the state Florida. Determining whether or not the election was legitimate because of this issue is hard to say. However, it is clear that the votes were tampered with and it took too long to figure out who won the state. Al Gore received 540,000 more votes in the popular vote in that nation than Bush, which in this election particularly is a significant number more. The decision allowed Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris's previous certification of George W. Bush as the winner of Florida's 25 electoral

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Vaping And Cigarettes

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    It was produced to be inhalable smoke, harming anyone who smokes them, making it a defect because in the past the tobacco was too harsh to be inhaled. The policy would help cigarette smokers, especially since they don’t even like the habit of smoking cigarettes, knowing it harms them. Banning vaping products from the public would cause many questions on why cigarettes aren’t banned in public. In addition, vapers would think cigarette companies paid the government to ban vaping outdoors, or banning products made after 2007 because they are losing money and business from vape products.

    Read More

  • Coca Cola Cost Of Production Case Study

    902 Words  | 2 Pages

    Considering individuals are becoming more health conscious it would be beneficial for Coca Cola to continue producing even more healthy products. Producing healthier drinks could potentially get their products back in schools. Researching into cheaper materials as well as environmentally friendly alternatives to plastic would be another recommendation. The main concern for Coca Cola is water supply. Without water Coca Cola would not be able to stay in business. It is recommended for Coca Cola to reduce the amount of water it uses. They have already begun a goal to improve water use. “Our 2020 goal is aggressive and builds on the 21.4% water efficiency improvement we’ve made since 2004. We expect to increasingly assess not just the quantity of the water used to grow our product ingredients, but the impact of that use as well” (Improving,

    Read More

  • Smoking Should be Banned in Public Places

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many restaurant and bar owners think that the ban will decrease business, but a counter-argument to this is that only twenty percent of the city's population are smokers, and when the smoking ban is in place, the other eighty percent will go out to bars and restaurants, dramatically increasing business. There are many different opposing arguments to banning smoking, and the debate will probably never end. Smoking should be banned in public places because, although some may argue that it infringes on their freedom, smoking is replete with harmful substances. People should be able to frequent bars and restaurants without the fear of experiencing an asthma attack or developing lung disease. Everyone deserves the freedom to live and breathe without restriction.

    Read More

  • Smoking Should NOT Be Banned in Public Places

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the perfect situation, smoking policy would be set by bar or restaurant owners, and customers would patronize the establishments with the policy they prefer. Customers would decide-without the government's help-if they want to avoid smoke-filled rooms or enter them. They might even choose to sit in an area sectioned off for smokers or non-smokers, but the ultimate issue is choice (Ruwart 1). When the government starts telling restaurant owners what their customers can and cannot do, the government is overstepping its boundaries.

    Read More

  • The Ban on Smoking in Public Places

    444 Words  | 1 Pages

    Those opposing a smoking ban say that freedom of choice would be affected by such legislation. Some people against a ban say that smoking bans damage business. A smoking ban could lead to a significant fall in earnings from bars, restaurants and casinos. Another argument is that the smoker has a basic human right to smoke in public places, and the ban is a limitation for smokers’ rights. Businesses, smokers, publicans, tobacco industries, stars, and some of the non-smokers oppose public smoking ban. Smokers light a cigarette because they need to smoke, not because they want it, because nicotine is physically addictive. Therefore, some smokers think that the public smoking ban is oppressiveness. They see the ban as a treatment to smokers as second-class citizens. Smokers agree that the smoking ban benefits the world, but cannot support the ban, because effects of nicotine obstruct them.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Jensen

Open Document