Why handicap people to be average with everyone else, why not use genetic engineering or biotechnological enhancements to make everyone great? The answer is not to bring your whole team down when you are losing, but instead train your weakest link to be your greatest asset. In Harrison Bergeron, all the people are handicapped to be the same as everybody else. Kurt Vonnegut portrayed equality in his book but what about equality to more athletic, intelligent, and beautiful people? This is the idea in some Utopian Governments, but what about the negative aspects that it can bring up.
The pros of everyone being equal are seemingly endless, if the people are enhanced and engineered to be perfect that is. All the people in the world would be good at their jobs and nothing would go unfinished. Laziness and obesity could be wiped out completely. There would be no more ugly people because everyone would be upgraded in a sense to be beautiful and look like models. Depression and suicide because of
…show more content…
bullying or people being outcasts would be at a low. Diseases and things like the flu would be extinct. Sports and competitive shows would be extraordinary with the superb skills of genetically engineered people. The average person would be a breathtaking sight and new born babies would not be so repulsive. It would seem with all the things equal human perfection has to offer, nothing can go wrong or be bad.
That is untrue, in my opinion there are more negative aspects to trying to make everyone perfect. Eventually people would feel like they did not have to do work the same as everyone and rebels would come out of it. Laziness would still be a factor because of how good everyone would be treated they would develop laziness in the prosperous life they live. Relationships would be more troubled because everywhere you go there would be a sexier person and the natural instinct would be to try to get with them. Everyone being the same and equal would cause people to be depressed because they would not stand out or have their own individual traits. Diseases may be gone and sickness but there would still be failures with surgeries and enhancements. Sports would get boring because everyone would be on an equal level of athleticism and competitive events would not be so competitive
anymore. No matter what happens whether everyone is equal or not there will always be people that appose change and hold back the modifications of society as a whole. There will be good things and bad things that come with all decisions. I do not believe a Utopia could ever really be established because no matter how good things may look or how they are there is always disadvantages to "perfection".
Living in a space ship would be cool, and living in a more equal world would be beneficial, but when portrayed in “Wall-E” and “Harrison Bergerson,” only pain and suffering can come of it. The two societies compare because they are set off in the distant future; filled with advance technology of robots and intricate machinery involved in day to day lives. Both of these tales have the same back bone of their different types of dystopia: break down.
Kurt Vonnegut, a modern American writer, composed stories about fictional situations that occurred in futuristic versions of today’s world. His stories included violence, both upon oneself and one another, and characters who sought out revenge. In “2BR02B” and “Harrison Bergeron”, Vonnegut conveys physical violence most likely experienced while a prisoner of World War 2, as a way to show how war brings pain and destruction.
In all aspects a utopian society is a society that is place to achieve perfection, and that is the society that both the “Uglies”, by Scott Westfield and “Harrison Bergeron”, by Kurt Vonnegut, was striving for. In both of these stories, the government had control over the people’s choices, freedoms, and their natural abilities. Yet both government strive for a perfect society, the methods they use to achieve this goal were different from each other.
Harrison Bergeron is a short story that has a deep meaning to it. To begin with, the short story Harrison Bergeron was made in 1961 and is written by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. The whole short story is set in the far future of 2081. 2081 is a time where everybody is finally equal and when the government finally has full control over everyone. If you aren't equal you would have to wear handicaps to limit your extraordinary strength and smarts. As the story progresses, Harrison Bergeron is trying to send a message about society.
What would happen to the world if everyone in our society was equal in every aspect? Would this create utopia or hell? In this short story "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. America has finally achieved full social equality, and living up to the first amendment fully. In this futuristic society, handicaps force this equality, the strong, the beautiful, the intelligent are forced to wear weights, masks, and headphones. These constraints force equality among the American people from beauty and brains, to strength. Harrison is the symbol of defiance and individuality, and represents the aspects of the American people that still want to try hard, out do their peers, and show off their attributes. The story criticizes the policy of equality
An impartial society: Utopia or Hell? What would happen to the world if the people were literally equal in every aspect of their lives? In the futuristic short story, “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr., the world is finally living up to America’s first amendment of everyone being created equal. In this society, the gifted, strong, and beautiful are required to wear handicaps of earphones, heavy weights, and hideous masks, respectively. Thus, these constraints leave the world equal from brains to brawn to beauty. With the world constantly pushing for equality among people, Vonnegut reveals a world that society is diligently working toward. Through this foreshadowing of the future, Vonnegut attempts to use Diana Moon Glampers and
Kurt Vonnegurt’s short story, “Harrison Bergeron” is set in 2081, where everyone is equal. No one is smarter than anyone else, better looking than anyone else, or better in any way than anyone else. If you were smarter than someone, you would have a handicap to make you average to everyone else. If you were strong, you would have a handicap to make you weak. In this world, equality is everything. The government does this because they don’t want others to become envious of their peers. One lesson that can be taught through this story is, people will always be jealous of what makes you different from them because, everyone wants to be better than the person sitting next to them.
Have you ever wondered what life would be if everyone was equal? Well, in the year 2081, the government made everyone equal with handicaps. In the story “Harrison Bergeron”, the government makes people with special talents or abilities wear handicaps. I agree with the claim,”Everyone was not truly equal in “Harrison Bergeron”. Some reasons why I believe that this statement wasn’t true is that the handicaps don’t take away your abilities, handicaps are not useful, and it is not fair for the people with abilities to wear handicaps. Everyone is truly equal in “Harrison Bergeron” because it made average people and below average people feel equal to the higher and better people.
A problem that could arise is a repeat of history. Inequality. Our society would be divided into two groups, the “valids” or “perfect humans” and the “in-valids” or “non perfect humans.” This is just another form of discrimination, whereby people are judged because of the circumstances of they were born, something that they have no control over. "I belong to a new underclass, no longer determined by social status or the colour of your skin. We now have discrimination down to a science." -Vincent. In the film “in-valids were granted less rights than the “valids.” Sounds familiar? In the 1960’s many protests occurred because of the inequality and brutality against African-Americans, who had their rights taken away from them based on the colour of their skin. Introducing the practice of genetically modifying humans to live up to the ideology of perfection could cause protests, violence, chaos and possibly a repeat of the Civil Rights Movement. For many years our society has been attempting to eliminate inequality, but this practice could just as easily re-create
Harrison Bergeron is a hero to society. He is a hero because he was the only person willing to take off his handicap. Bergeron was a brave person. No one else was brave enough to try to be unique. Everyone was following what they were told to never questioning it, but Bergeron wasn't. He wants to discover new things. Yes he might have been scaring people, but they had no reason to be scared. They could have been helping and joining instead of being scared and rebelling from him.
Although the comparisons are well hidden, both today’s society and the story ‘Harrison Bergeron’ share similar qualities. They both deal with equality, which leads to problems and consequences. A second similarity is the struggle of competition and trying to prevent it from occurring, which also leads to problems. Lastly, both struggle with normality, and the fact that it’s hard to accept that different is okay now.
What makes someone a threat to society, what makes someone a hero of society? Society is a way of life that a country follows. The short story "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut, takes place in an inane society where no one was allowed to be better than anyone else and individuality was oppressed. He was a pulchritude, strong boy of fourteen that could not be cultivated into the society so he resisted publicly. It cost him his life. Harrison Bergeron is a hero because he stood up for what he believed, he tried to fix what was wrong, and we can prove he is a hero by definition.
Would a regular citizen enjoy being as skilled of a dancer as a ballerina? Or as intelligent as the next guy? In Kurt Vonnegut, Jr.’s story of Harrison Bergeron, handicaps, such as small radio’s that blast sharp sounds are used to prevent individuals from having more intellectual thoughts than others. The year is 2081 and everyone is equal in every which way. Handicapped George and his wife Hazel are watching a ballerina performance. The show is interrupted by an announcement to watch out for their son, Harrison Bergeron as he is under-handicapped and dangerous. The conflict begins when Harrison enters the studio and declares he is Emperor. He finds his ballerina Empress, and dances with her before being shot and killed by Handicapper General Diana, resolving the conflict. This event is a more specific account of Harrison’s conflict with the current society as a whole, which is reflected through the use of theme, symbolism, and point of view.
“The narrator of the story Harrison Bergeron definitions’ of America’s equality begins not by positing a future equality as much as exposing the misunderstanding of it in the past and the present” (Hattenhauer). The story Harrison Bergeron has two meanings: too much equality and too much inequality. Too much equality is expressed through the Handicap General, Diana Glampers, as she wants everyone to be equal because she envies the talented and beautiful. However, “it is not fair to the productive, the risk taking, or the hard working, to deprive them of what they have produced, merely to make them equal to others who have worked less, taken less risk, and produced less” (Moore). This society would never work because “no one who has lived very long can think that all men are equal in physical, prowess, mental capacity, willingness to work or save, to assume leadership, to design or invent new products or processes, to get votes, to preach sermons, to play the violin, or even to make love” (Even Fingerprints Differ). In any society one should not have the power to make people equal for each “were endowed by our creator” (Moore). In a society where there is too much inequality, or a potential dictatorship- Harrison Bergeron, society would fail as well. Kurt Vonnegut wrote Harrison Bergeron in order to show the world that we cannot take away talent or
“‘Two years in prison and two thousand dollars fine for every ball I took out’” wrote Vonnegut (103). This statement portraits the unjust punishment for being unhandicapped, but is this punishment better or worse than death? In the short story “Harrison Bergeron” and the movie “2081” there are many differences and similarities. One similarity is that both the short story “Harrison Bergeron” and the movie “2081” has Harrison Bergeron getting shoot. In contract with Harrison getting killed is that the short story and movie differ in the aspect on how they prove that Harrison is dead.