Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Universal healthcare for us essay
Universal healthcare for us essay
Universal healthcare for us essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Universal healthcare for us essay
Government Forced Health Care Should the United States government force its citizens to have health care? Health care or health insurance is a type of insurance coverage that covers the cost of an insured individual's medical and surgical expenses. A government forcing its citizens takes away from the free will of the people forcing them to pay for something they may, or may not want; therefore this is what many people conceder to be very socialistic. There are many factors in play when forcing health care on a nation, although there are pros, there are drastic cons, which can lead to a government becoming very socialistic by forcing what they think is best upon the people taking away freedoms, and rights. By the U.S. government forcing health
care it can cause an increase in the U.S. debt and deficit; studies have concluded that the forced health care will increase the federal deficit by $340-$700 billion in the first 10 years. Also forced health care could increase the wait time on medical services, such as in the United States, fewer than 10% of patients wait more than two months to see a specialist versus 41% in Canada, 34% in Norway, 31% in Sweden, and 28% in France, and all of these countries have some form of a universal right to health care. Implementing a right to health care could lead the United States towards socialism; socialism is defined as government control of the distribution of goods and services. Ronald Reagan stated “that one way of imposing socialism on a country is by way of medicine”. Another con to government enforced health care could mean a raise in taxes. In other countries in Europe where they have a forced health care system the tax percentage around 37% a lot high than the U.S. 15%. The forced health care could also mean a shortage of medical staff, because of there are too many people trying to receive medical attention then the doctors want be able to treat them all. This could altogether lead to the government rationalizing health care for the public. Heath care provided by the government also leads to the employed paying higher taxes to pay for the unemployed to have health care. The right to health care could also save lives, it could allow someone who is unable to receive healthcare or unable pay for health insure to be able receive medical treatment. The forced healthcare could also lead to greater public health by better access to necessary care particularly for the low income, or unemployed. The government forced health care could also benefit private business, because they would no longer have to provide health care for employees. The right to health care would also prevent most medical bankruptcies, because the individual wouldn’t have to concern them self with the bills. The forced right of health care is a very socialistic way of government thinking, it will cause many more problems than solutions, and in the end will lead to a socialism country. Health care should be a right for the people to choose whether or not they should pay for it, it is not something that should be forced upon citizens of the United States of America. Although there are pros to this health care system it will cause the U.S. to have major economic and government issues in the future.
is the wealthiest country in the world and yet it is the only major industrialized country in the world that does not guarantee health care as a right to its citizens. Around 45,000 uninsured Americans die each year(What The U.S.). As a nation built upon the ideals of “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” and the idea that the government is responsible for protecting it’s people’s basic rights, it is a great source of shame that the U.S. does not have universal health care. It is the government’s job to ensure it’s citizens’ rights, not make a profit off their suffering and the denial of one of their basic rights. Universal health care could save lives and ease suffering, physically, financially, and emotionally. It would take away a great financial burden off of each individual as well as the nation and government as a whole by not wasting all the per capita that we currently waste without universal health care. It would even be beneficial to capitalism because people would be more willing to take risks without the fear of having to go medically uninsured (Why The U.S.). By allowing its people to suffer and die, especially just to make a profit that will be needlessly wasted anyway, the U.S. government is committing a great immorality. Are not human lives more important than allowing greedy independent companies make a profit off of their suffering and deaths? As a country that is even willing to go to wars to protect the basic rights of foreign peoples,
The topic that I am choosing to do is on Obama Care. I chose this topic because the idea of the government forcing people to obtain insurance is wrong in my eyes. I am interested in analyzing the validity for what has been said about this topic in order to increase my understanding about Obama Care. I am not an expert when it comes to Obama Care. I know that this is an insurance that is being provided through the government for the general public. I have read that President Obama never initially read the whole bill itself. I also know that people who cannot afford it, but make too much money to qualify for Medicaid are being heavily encouraged to get this insurance. Some of the common knowledge that I have found that the general public has about this subject is that some people are for Obama Care and think that it is a wonderful idea and that there are some people that are dead set against Obama Care. Younger adults, specifically college age and individuals that are in their twenties tend to be for Obama Care. The insurance is being forced upon individuals that may or may not want it. It also seems as though that the insurance being offered is pretty generic in terms of coverage. Some of the questions that I have that I believe will aide me in writing this paper would be the following: What are the pros and cons of Obama Care? What are the thoughts of Obama Care with the people of the government? As well as what are the basics of Obama Care?
A Canadian Dermatologist who once worked in the United States breaks down the pros and cons of Canada’s health care system and explains why he thinks the Canadian system is superior to America’s. Canada runs a single payer health care system, which means that health care is controlled by the government rather than private insurance companies. One of the main pros of the Canadian health care system is that everyone is insured. He says that in the province of Ontario, the Ministry of Health insures all of its citizens, all important health needs such as physician visits, home nursing and physical therapy are covered. Since every resident is covered under the government plan the problem of patients being turned away due to lacking medical coverage
The U.S. Constitution is a good foundation for implementing health care for people all over the world and article 1 section 8 clause 1 explains the power of government when it comes to health care. According to the Enduring Democracy book, "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States..." (Dautrich, C-5). In other words, the government has the power to allow everyone the right to health care since our taxes are already being collect for the common defense and general welfare. General welfare refers to health care in which the government may provide.
America is known for democracy, freedom, and the American Dream. American citizens have the right to free speech, free press, the right to bear arms, and the right to religious freedom to name a few. The Declaration of Independence states that American citizens have the rights including “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” America promises equality and freedom and the protection of their rights as outlined in the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. But with all the rights and freedoms that American citizens enjoy, there is one particular area where the United States seems to be lacking. That area is health care. The United States is the only industrialized nation that doesn’t have some form of legal recognition of a right to health care (Yamin 1157). Health care reform in the United States has become a major controversy for politicians, health care professionals, businesses, and citizens. Those in opposition to reform claim that health care is not a human right, therefore the government should not be involved. Supporters of reform believe that health care is most definitely a human right and should be available to everyone in the United States instead of only those who can afford it, and that it is the government’s responsibility to uphold that right.
Should America make Healthcare less expansive, more affordable to have?It’s nothing new that our nation is always coming up with something in stirring up a plan to create ideas on how this will affect individuals. Well the chances that’s affecting this nation is our healthcare system where you have millions of Americans struggling in trying to keep up with the prices, is it really that serious that the healthcare companies are asking them to pay way more than what they should be originally paying for? It’s no wonder why so many families are losing money left and right and having to suffer bankruptcy in order to have the care they need for their loved ones and so forth. But have Americans reached a breaking point where something has to be done in order for us to save money for a rainy day absolutely because it doesn’t make any sense whatsoever for healthcare prices to be so high and off the track for instant around 70% of our healthcare dollars is being put on for treating chronic illnesses. Second, our nation spends about $765 a year on carless healthcare, which features unimportant medical tests and products.
Luckily under the new health care reform law, most people will receive help paying for their healthcare premiums and cost-sharing expenses that people with insurance have to pay out of pocket for doctor visits, and prescription medicine. Families and individuals will be able to receive this assistance with incomes between one hundred and four hundred percent of the federal poverty line. One hundred to four hundred percent makes up at about $23,000 to $94,000 a year assume this is for a family of four.
It is essential for the United States government to provide its entire citizen with a free health care. This system ensures that everyone has an access to medical services regardless to his or her social status. It is an important way of preserving life as free health care plan ensures free treatment to the entire citizen. In addition, it can play a big role of ensuring that there is an improved access to health services. Ensuring that all American citizens have an access to the right health care will in turn decrease health care costs. It can also help to stop medical bankruptcies in the entire nation. Lastly, it is one way of reducing poverty as it will lower the debt of the US which would then increase employment.
The implementation of a universal health care system in the United States is an important challenge that needs to be overcome. There are numerous amount of editorial that argue on both sides of the debate. Some people argue that a universal health care system would bring costs down and increase access to care while others argue that a universal health care system would be too expensive and reduce the quality of care. The correct answer requires intensive understanding and economics to overcome, the arguments must be examined for a proper answer.
What is managed care? According to the Oxford English Dictionary, managed care is “a system of health care in which patients agree to visit only certain doctors and hospitals, and in which the cost of treatment is monitored by a managing company.” Managed care is a variety of techniques designed to reduce the cost of providing health benefits and advance the quality of care. In the United States alone, there are various managed care programs, that are ranged from more restrictive to less restrictive. As stated in the National Institutes of Health, the future of managed care is uncertain. It is enthralling to note that in spite of the advances in healthcare systems, such as our hospital’s ability to provide patients with lower cost, managed
...ing in the U.S. The Affordable Care Act expands the affordability, quality, and availability of private and public health insurance through consumer protections, regulations, subsidies, taxes, insurance exchanges, and other reforms. I believe mandatory health coverage is a step in the right direction towards a future with universal health care. Although Obamacare may help americans to better afford quality health insurance, it is not a national healthcare program provided to the U.S citizens free of cost. The fact that citizens will be forced to purchase ObamaCare plans or be fined or penalized on their taxes for not doing so, further suggests that healthcare today is a priviledge not a right.
The United States passed bill that health insurance should be mandatory in the year 2014. Under the Patient Protection Affordable Care Act, each person is required to have at least a minimum level of health insurance failure to, the individual will face a penalty. The mandatory health insurance issue has faced reactions from both sides with some people supporting while others opposing. It is mandatory for every individual to purchase a health insurance depending on their earnings. The health care insurance is mandatory for all US citizens, and all legal residents in America. It is considered as an individual responsibility requirement, and those without this insurance are subject to a tax penalty of $750 per year up to a maximum of three times that amount ($2,250) per family. However, there are exemptions for financial hardships, incarcerated persons, religious objections, and undocumented immigrants. Mandatory health insurance is important, and should be applied in all states because, everyone gets ill and at one time, they have to visit a health care facility for medical services. In addition, it protects the health future of families, and protects people from unexpected high medical costs because they are covered.
What Are the Arguments In Favour Of Private Health Care? Privatisation is a word which is commonly used to describe the practice of medical patients 'going private' and paying for the services of GPs, hospital doctors or hospital provision, rather than using the NHS. Privatisation can also be used to describe the charge imposed for such health care services such as drugs, appliances, dentures and spectacles. There are many arguments which are in favour of private health care in Britain, such as that private treatment is not the luxury that most people seem to think it is.
One of the arguments for the implementation of social insurance programs is that the government will be able to provide some sort of safety net for citizens in the event of sudden unemployment, disability, or injury. Gruber (2013), on the other hand, proposes the idea of “social savings accounts” whereby citizens would be able to make contributions to their own fund, eliminating the need for social insurance programs such as workers’ compensation, unemployment and disability insurance. While Gruber’s social savings accounts idea is certainly plausible, his idea could have serious repercussions for a majority of recipients of these social insurance programs. For this reason, it is important to consider the pros and cons of his proposal, keeping in mind the interests of citizens and if Gruber’s idea is in fact, feasible.
There is a wide spectrum of views on what the extent governments should be responsible for mandating healthcare for its citizens. On one side there are people that believe that governments should supply one hundred percent of its citizens will full coverage for all health needs, using only the citizen's (higher) taxes. On the other end, there are the people that feel as if everyone should be able to provide for themselves and that their own personal tax money should not be going towards somebody else's care. There are also people in the middle who may believe that the government should give programs or offer services to help, yet people are still responsible for signing up for and paying for those programs themselves. In my opinion, the government