Pros And Cons Of Eminent Domain

487 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Eminent domain is the power of government to argue essay

Having something taken away that is dear to one's heart and given to city, county, state, or nation for use of their own good to earn more money, is that what people want to keep happening around the United States? Eminent domain is the power of a state, provincial, or national government to take private property for public use. Eminent domain is stated in the constitution, is very controversial, and is affecting many individuals's lives. The Supreme Court ruled that eminent domain is constitutional. It is stated in the Fifth Amendment. This amendment states that "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." This part is known as the takings clause. It has always been an establishment historical rule that sovereign governments have the power and authority to appropriate land within their own borders for whatever use or uses that they see fit. If any kind of government sees the use of a certain piece of land more valuable than it is right now, they do have the right to ask the owners of that land to remove them and use it for public use. …show more content…

One of the big issues today is the pipeline. The government has been pushing through the Midwestern states to propose the oil pipeline. Though the project got quickly pushed back from environmentalists and some landowners. Many people thought it was a threat to their land and their property rights. The ligations that has led to court decisions limiting pipeline taking in several states. Pipeline has even become more controversial as a result of the Supreme Court ruling it was permissible for the government to take property from one private owner and give it to another in order to promote economic development. The controversy of eminent domain will stay intact because it is

Show More
Related

  • Hawaii Housing Authority versus Midkiff

    991 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Land Reform Act of 1967 permitted the state of Hawaii to redistribute land by condemning and acquiring private property from landlords (the lessors) in order to sell it to another private owner, in this case, their tenants (the lessees). The Hawaii State Legislature passed the Land Reform Act after discovering that nearly forty-seven percent (47%) of the state was owned by only seventy-two (72) private land owners. That meant that only forty-nine percent of Hawaii was owned by the State and Federal Govermnet.The contested statute gave lessees of single family homes the right to invoke the government's power of eminent domain to purchase the property that they leased, even if the landowner objected. The challengers of the statue (the land owners) claimed that such a condemnation was not a taking for public use because the property, once condemned by the state, was promptly turned over to the lessee (a private ...

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Texas Constitution

    1486 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Texas Constitution is a document that describes the structure and purpose of the government in Texas. It took effect in February 15, 1876 and is amongst the longest state constitutions in the United States. It is the sixth constitution since claiming their independence from Mexico in 1836. Texas joined the United States under the Constitution of 1845 with provisions. Those provisions included allowing Texas to enter the union and begin the first U.S. statehood constitution. In 1861 Texas amended to transfer their statehood to the Confederacy. After the Confederacy was defeated Texas was required to adopt a constitution if they wanted to rejoin the union. The 1866 Constitution Convention emerged with a document but it did not last very long.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The 10th Amendment

    822 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Tenth Amendment was added to the Constitution of 1787 by James Madison due to the problem with its predecessor, the Articles of Confederation. In Article 2 in the Articles of Confederation it states, “Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every Power, Jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled.” With states having too much sovereignty this caused an issue. Madison was a Federalist and believed that the federal government should have some control over states, therefore, he proposed the 10th Amendment. By the constitution getting rid of state sovereignty it meant Anti-Federalists fearing the possibility of a federal government with unlimited power. However, the states were able to compromise and ratify the Constitution under the agreement that powers not stated on it are reserved to the states or to the people. The 10th Amendment overall gives clarification that federal power is limited and that states or the have control on the issues not stated on the constitution. However, not everyone agreed to the 10th amendment. It was seen as

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Great Compromise

    676 Words  | 2 Pages

    Smaller states like Delaware and New Jersey objected to the Virginia Plan saying that the large states would easily outvote them in Congress if the number of votes were based on population. After weeks of debate, William Patterson of New Jersey put forth a plan that called for three branches including a legislature with only one house where each state would have one vote. The New Jersey Plan with a single house legislature and equal representation was more like Congress under the Articles.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Louisiana Purchase

    1007 Words  | 3 Pages

    If Jefferson bought the land thinking to do good, where would be the dilemma? The purchase crossed lines with his, quite strict, view of the rules of the constitution. He viewed the

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

    1110 Words  | 3 Pages

    After the Revolution, the country was left in an economic crisis and struggling for a cohesive path moving forward. The remaining financial obligations left some Founding Fathers searching for ways to create a stronger more centralized government to address concerns on a national level. The thought was that with a more centralized, concentrated governing body, the more efficient tensions and fiscal responsibilities could be addressed. With a central government manning these responsibilities, instead of the individual colonies, they would obtain consistent governing policies. However, as with many things in life, it was a difficult path with a lot of conflicting ideas and opponents. Much of the population was divided choosing either the

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Tenth Amendment

    1382 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Tenth Amendment was ratified along with the rest of the Bill of Rights on December 17th, 1791, as well, unlike most other amendments, it gave rights not only to the people, but also to the state governments. The Tenth Amendment was passed in order to delegate powers to the state governments and the people that the national government does not have, this amendment states, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”

    Read More

  • Sectionalism And The Breakup Of The U.s

    1030 Words  | 3 Pages

    By the end of the dispute, the opposition(Federalists) came out on top, and the road was never built, but it shows the first, strong, divergence in the populace of our. nation since its inception.      All of the above examples are all representative of issues of the time. which played a large role in sectionalism, and the breakup of the United States.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Louisiana Purchase

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Louisiana Purchase posed several significant moral dilemmas for President Thomas Jefferson, but violating his strict constructionist view of the Constitution was one of the many dilemmas faced over the Purchase from France that occurred on numerous occasions. Jefferson believed if a power couldn’t be found in the Constitution it didn’t exist and reverted to the interest of the states. According to the Constitution, there is no power granting the President to make land investments or expend funds. President Jefferson also disagreed with Alexander Hamilton’s loose interpretation of the presidential powers found in the Constitution and the creation of the National Bank. American farmers and tradesmen used the port of New Orleans to ship their

    Read More

  • Farmers Discontent Dbq

    658 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... farmers. They was losing land for the production of railroads. To solve this solution the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887 was put in place. The Supreme Court would rules that individual states could not regulate interstate commerce and discriminate against out of state business. Also, President Cleveland was forces to give out land to the public.

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of the Equal Rights Amendment

    1284 Words  | 3 Pages

    Pros and Cons of the Equal Rights Amendment. The Equal Rights Amendment began its earliest discussions in 1920. These discussions took place immediately after two-thirds of the states approved women's suffrage. The nineteenth century was intertwined with several feminist movements such as abortion, temperance, birth control and equality.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of The Fourteenth Amendment

    715 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia met between May and September of 1787 to address the problems of the weak central government that existed under the Articles of Confederation. The Antifederalists were extremely concerned that the national government would trample their rights. Rhode Island and North Carolina refused to ratify until the framers added the Bill of Rights. These first ten amendments outlined things that the government could not do to its people. They are as such:

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Habeas Corpus

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    Even in this modern day, your rights are not always secured. During wartime, the government can suspend Habeas Corpus, which prevents unfair arrests and punishments. Suspending Habeas Corpus is taking your rights to a fair trial, and throwing them in the trash. As you are probably assuming, the suspension of habeas corpus has been a controversial topic. You must also be asking yourself, “why take away the people's’ rights, wasn’t the United States built on the rights of citizens?”. Some people see that suspending Habeas Corpus could be useful during a war because it allows someone to quickly be prosecuted, with only the need for probable cause, while other people see it as an unnecessary check on American citizens’ rights.

    Read More

  • Treaty Of Guadalupe Hidalgo Essay

    755 Words  | 2 Pages

    The finding of gold rapidly spread, and quickly attracted thousands of Anglo-American and other settlers. In just the amount of two years, California became to what is now our thirty-fifth state. The opponents that were against the ratification of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo called Alta California “our priceless flower” and also “our inestimable jewel” (Cameron). As stated by the Supreme Court, Congress, “to fulfill its obligations” to Mexican property holders, and to provide for “an orderly settlement of Mexican land claims,” passed the California Land Act of 1851. This established to decide and determine the rights of each and every person who claimed lands in the state of California by any right title derived from the Spanish or Mexican government. They were to present their claim within two years, which was later extended to five years, or never have the right to claiming it (Cameron). According to Cameron, the California Land Act to reclamationists was considered “in reality a violation of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo,” “an instrument of evil,” and the foundation for “needless persecution of the grant holders”

    Read More

  • The Homestead Act

    1405 Words  | 3 Pages

    The expansion of the United States is such a vital part of American history, yet some often forget how it all happened. Many thriving settlers were given an extraordinary opportunity starting on January 1, 1863 that would end up laying the floor work for many Midwestern and Western citizens today. The rights and responsibilities to live on and maintain 160 acres of land may seem like a lot to take in for a student learning about an Act about land from the 1860s. However, think about all the people the Homestead Act of 1862 affected. There was a lot of pressure on the original homesteaders to make good use of their newfound land, the government was giving out land that wasn’t exactly theirs, and the Native American would have some their rights stolen.

    Read More

More about Pros And Cons Of Eminent Domain

Open Document