Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of technology on mankind
Effects of technology on mankind
Effects of technology on mankind
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of technology on mankind
"The distance between Mars and Earth varies, from as little as 34 million miles (55 million km) to as much as 249 million miles (401 million km) " (Mars Facts). Nasa, Elon Musk, and many other agencies have been and are still trying to develop technology and ways to have people in Mars by the 2030's. There are many people for and against this idea and have their own reasons why such as, people shouldn't be sent to mars because of physical and Mental health problems. Also because of the lack of resources and having too much of certain resources. It is also believed that humans already have the right technology to go to Mars even though some people think the technology humans have today still does not allows us to. Nor Nasa or Elon Musk Should …show more content…
Ed Regis in his article "Let's Not Move to Mars", sates, "Your bone mass wastes away, your teeth become more susceptible to cavities . . . "(Regis). This quote shows how the human body will become more susceptible for health problems to occur to it such as cavities and the bone mass wastes away. This quote also shows how humans can put themselves in danger by going to Mars because there are many different health problems that can occur to them. As well as creating physical health, going to Mars also creates mental health dangers. Regis also states, " Every source of interpersonal conflict, and emotional and psychological stress that we experience in ordinary, day-to-day life on earth will be magnified exponentially by restriction to a tiny, hermetically sealed, pressure-cooker capsule hurtling through deep space" (Regis). This quote shows how people are more commonly to feel emotional and psychological problems and more than what they go through here up in Mars and on the way there. It will also be less likely to get over those things because people will be more vulnerable to it. This is one big reason why people should not be sent to Mars but there are also many other reasons such as the lack of resources and having too much of …show more content…
According to Extreme Tech "Other potential modes of death are: starvation (the current Mars One plan simply doesn't contain enough calories for the colonists); . . ." (Extreme Tech). This quote shows how one of the bigger risks when people go to Mars is the lack of food. It can become a big problem to the point where people that take the risk to go to Mars can lose their life. Even though the lack of resources is a big problem having too much of something such as oxygen can also be bad. According to Extreme Tech "The problem is, plants produce a lot of oxygen – and in a closed environment, too much oxygen is a bad thing (things start to spontaneously explode)" (Extreme Tech). Mars is a closed environment in which if you have too much oxygen that can become a problem. That problem should be looked at and contemplated very well before taking people to Mars and have that issue happen to them. While people shouldn’t be sent to mars because of lack and too much of resources, others believe people should be sent to Mars because the technology we have today already allows us
NASA helped usher in a promising new future in the 1960s and it was rewarded with a rapidly-eroding budget. The U.S. should invest more money in NASA and less on unnecessary health care and military. Budget cuts are affecting our technology development. Evidently, increasing NASA’s budget to 1 percent of the federal budget will not hurt the economy. But instead it would benefit by creating jobs here on earth, especially for the next generation of American scientists and engineers.
Space has lots of radiation. Exposure to space radiation can have a bad effect on a person’s health. Support C: Travelling and exploring space can actually endanger the life of an astronaut. THIRD POINT:
... are not ready to do so. These companies need to work with NASA to begin the knowledge transfer and get the ball rolling. Also, unlike NASA, these private companies explore space primarily for financial gain, not to learn and improve the lives of mankind. NASA explores for information to be shared, to be taught in schools, and to uncover the mysteries of space.
Would you want to live on Mars? Some would say yes, others no, I am against going to Mars and think that we should stick to Earth and put our time, money, and energy into fixing this planet. I will show you all the reason why we can not go to that red planet.
Also, if they are going to even consider sending people into space they need to double check and triple check everything on that spacecraft. They should, also, test the spacecraft, spaces suits, hab, etc. before they go and send LIVE people into outer space. It is not fair that families have to worry if their loved ones will even come home after traveling into space. It is not fair that the space crew has to worry if they will even make it back to the ship alive because they are traveling to a place that is not even relevant to anyone or anything that we do on
Think about NASA and all it's done for the better of humanity. Without it being funded, there is hardly anything to fuel any future interest in the space program nor would our world learn anymore about itself. NASA needs this funding to stay alive, to answer the world’s questions, and show everyone how it important it is to keep NASA
The big question is should we go to Mars, I think that we should not go because it’s eight months to get to Mars each way. You could get so bored and lonely that your mind goes crazy and drives you to death. The short story Danger! This Mission to Mars Could Bore You to Death! says, “...Crew members also struggled with the mental stress of being isolated from society for months on end.”
...egular people, believing that if someone was to go to Mars they might have been able to survive A variety of organic compounds present may mean a life is probable. Also, if the trip to Mars in 2023 turns out to be a positive one, then it will prove to everyone that in the future more and more people will move to this other planet. A lot of people will find it unnecessary to stay on Earth if they can start a new life somewhere else in the galaxy. Even though the trip will have America paying billions and billions of dollars, it truly is worth it. A life on Mars could mean living to an older age and being healthier. The point of going to the Red Planet is to find out if there is a better life somewhere other than on Earth. Just like NASA astronaut, Buzz Aldrin said, humans will most likely reach Mars and when they do humans will turn into a two-planet species.
Mars is our next best hope in life on another planet. Because of science mankind can grow and harvest plants in the modified mars soil, make a thick warm atmosphere, and drink no frozen mars water. Mankind can grow and flourish more as a species with this idea of colonizing mars. With more scientific advancements we can colonize mars and we will colonize mars.
Motherboard, 24 June 2015, motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/ae3pee/darpa-we-are- Engineering-the-organisms-that-will-terraform-mars. The article mentions the advantages of terraforming Mars and the process of it. DARPA and other research teams are currently working on an genetic engineering project for varieties of organisms. With the synthetic biology projects life can be created in planet Mars.
Living in space has been man’s dream for a very long time, we are slowly getting closer every day, company such as NASA now how a huge budget, over 20million (Table 2 Full yearly NASA spending) and are researching new ways to get to space. With advances such as the mars rover which is currently collecting information on mars, and the first man on the moon in a few decades we might be able to send a man to mars.
PROCESSING OF FINDINGS Although psychological and psychosocial stressors are almost the same, there is a difference: psychological stressors are stressors that relate strictly to the person, although the results may affect other people. Psychosocial stressors originate not only from the person, but also from the people around him. In this discussion of the findings, I will discuss the results mostly in the context of the proposed Mars mission.
(Source I) Lin, Patrick. “Space Ethics: Look Before Taking Another Leap for Mankind.” Editorial. Nanoethics. N.p., 7 May 2006. Web. 11 Mar. 2012. .
Humans can expect to face some major challenges on an expedition to Mars. It has been proven that humanity can travel in space for over two years. Cumulatively, Sergei Constantinovich Krikalev, a Russian cosmonaut, has spent over eight-hundred and three days in Earth orbit (Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 2005). The expedition to Mars would require the crew to endure a six month journey to the planet, a year of living on the planet, and a six months journey back to Earth. Russian cosmonaut, Valery V. Polyakoz, clocking in at four-hundred and thirty-eight days for just one stay in Earth orbit, shows humanity is capable of a twelve month round trip to Mars (Schwirtz, 2009). Earth's orbit has provided some benefits to space exploration, like the magnetic field from cosmic radiation, and the proximity to Earth if an emergency were to arise (Jones, 2009). The further humans travel away from Earth the greater the risks become. The major risks to human health on a flight to Mars, living on Mars, and returning to Earth are: radiation exposure, biological problems induced by weightlessness, spacecraft malfunctions, and psychological problems brought on by isolation.
There are many reasons that space exploration should continue. If Earth ever becomes too overpopulated or over polluted, then perhaps people can move to Mars. The world population in 1970 was approximately 4 billion people, and is currently nearly 6 billion people. The world population in 2015 is estimated to be 7 billion people. There is a possibility that there are useful resources on Mars. Scientists have found ice and some other clues, such as craters, volcanoes, and valleys, that have led them to believe that there was once life on Mars, and they believe that sometime in the future, should planet Earth need to be evacuated, humans will be able to live there (Jakosky 142). Many of the rocks on Mars appear to have been formed by gasses, breathable by humans and other creatures. A process called terraforming will allow astronauts to make use of the resources that are on the planet and create an atmosphere that will support life. One method for terraforming is that scientists would convert the gaseous rocks back into gasses, and use gas-eating organisms to eat the gas, which results in the formation of other gasses. If these organisms continue the cycle, then Mars would have a stable atmosphere for humans to live in (Getz 39).