Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contractualization essay
Contractualization essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contractualization essay
Contractualization is a system wherein a company hires temporary workers from an agency that will only last for less than 6 months. It is a system where they have to fulfill their tenure as they have agreed and signed a contract, and then it is either they will be rehired or they will completely lose their jobs and go find for a new one. The problem here is that temporary workers are being paid lower than the minimum wage and they are less likely to receive benefits or they do not have benefits at all. They do not have a chance to be a regular employee but they are doing the tasks that a regular employee would do. It is unfair because it is much in favor to the employer as it helps their company to earn more and be competitive in the industry …show more content…
It causes harm physically, when the workers are working overtime and they are abusing their bodies to keep on working even if they are not feeling well already. In terms of emotionally, it causes harm to the workers in a way that they are being degraded and they are disrespected. Another thing is that when they are not going to be rehired for their jobs. It violates the human and labor rights of the workers because of the set of rules applied in the contract/agreement. They are not given equal rights like the regular workers, they do not have benefits like overtime and holiday pay, they do not have job security, 13th month pay, their salaries are below the minimum wage, and when it comes to their health they are the ones shouldering it if something happens to them. It also prevents them from improving their skills. It contributes to the cycle of violence because the workers are deprived from their rights, its being taken away from them. They are the ones who are suffering for it because they need a job and there’s no other option rather to deal with it because they need an income for sustaining their …show more content…
Contractualization must end or change its rules because it does not possess the right treatment and benefits for the workers. The workers are sacrificing just to have an income to support their families but they deserve more than what they are getting. It does not value the hard work of the workers are doing for the company. It is unfair because the contractual workers are also employees but they are not enjoying their rights as a worker because their right is taken away from them. The Philippines should first have a stable economy before practicing labor contractualization; the government should not be in a hurry because we are still facing numerous problems, especially poverty that our country needs to solve. Another measure to address the issue is to open thousands of job opportunities that offers a regular position which has benefits that all of the workers will enjoy. Job openings is another useful way to address the issue because it offers a kind of job that will make the workers worries and doubts go away because they don’t need to think anymore if they are going to lose their jobs within a deadline. It will give them the opportunity to improve from time to time and prove that they have the skills and guts to be part of that company where they belong
Ten workers are assigned to a house that might otherwise accommodate a family of three or four. Furthermore, the houses are furnished to the bare minimum. Chairs are at a premium. You would be lucky to have a couple in the eating area. The abysmal living conditions are the least of the workers’ worries though. The conditions at work are even worse. There is no safety training, no instruction, no refusal of unsafe labour. There is a doctor, but they must obtain permission before they can be seen. Permission with which the grower is not very generous. This leads illnesses and injuries which should be negligible to scale into something extreme. There is also the possibility that the grower will send them back to Mexico if they get sick, robbing them of the ability to make the money they need to sustain their families. When told to do something, they are expected to get it done quickly and without question. Such a situation leads to managers with power complexes, managers that will get verbally and physically abusive if they believe their power is being subverted. In the hypothetical situation that one of the workers is assaulted, they have minimal recourse. If they have no witnesses, they would have to accuse the manager on their own. Such an accusation would most likely be swept aside, but not without consequences to the worker. The manager could begin to target the worker, making their life difficult. The worker might even be sent
Labor’s rights, this issue have been bothering many worker since the 19th century and can still be a problem today. As John L. Lewis has said in his speech “I repeat that labor seeks peace and guarantees its own loyalty, but the voice of labor, insistent upon its rights, should not be annoying to the ears of justice or offensive to the conscience of the American people” (John L. Lewis), which under his words meant that labor is something that can be done right and peacefully but it needs rules and benefits that come with those rules which labor asks for and when labor asks for those rules and benefits it shouldn’t be taken like some annoying kid’s demands but more as something that needs to be done and done with a right mind set. Labor today consists of a man or woman going to work, working their hours, and finally getting paid for those hours at the end of the week, at least a minimum of $7.50 an hour (United States Department of Labor), but before it wasn’t like that before many workers would get paid very poorly even thought they would work for a lot of hours and they wouldn’t get benefits from their work or safety when working such as in the mines like the mine workers, but one man stood up for them and his name was John L. Lewis (John Llewellyn Lewis, Encyclopedia).
The leaders of big business didn’t give workers the rights they deserved. In the text, Captains of Industry or Robber Barons?, it states, “Workers were often forbidden to strike, paid very low wages, and forced to work very long hours.” This evidence is a perfect example of the dehumanization of workers. The employers treated their workers like interchangeable parts, which were easily replaced. The big business leaders started paying less attention to the working conditions, and more to the production rates, and money. They didn’t care about worker’s family or the worker’s wellbeing. Due to the horrible working conditions, the workers were more likely to be injured, and sometimes, die. The capitalists didn’t give their employees the rights and respect they deserved, because to them they were just unskilled, cheap labor. If the workers were unhappy, they would easily replace them with other unskilled workers. That’s why they were considered interchangeable parts. This evidence shows the big business leaders only cared about money, and didn’t treat their workers
Unionism, Bad for America? Unionism is the concept that traditionally businesses, especially big businesses, are inherently going to exploit their employees. Therefore, in order to protect themselves, the workers form organizations called unions, in which all laborers who work at a certain craft, or in a certain industry band together. By this process of “joining forces”, the unions gain power in numbers. Unions traditionally try to protect employee interests by negotiating with employers for wages and benefits, working hours, and better working conditions.
In present lot of people are getting fire because they get involve in serious accident or the birth and care of newborn child. Most of people in this group cannot come back their position after the special period. I think this is really inhumanity. And government does not have the formal document to protect employee’s rights in this area which make the employer could fire them for their own benefit. As we got the information online we can see most of the benefits policy are only for the militaries which does not cover normal people. It also increase the jobless rate and unfair to those people. In my opinion government should come out some formal documents and the regulations for this type of situation. So that it would have the agreement between employee and employer. When employee can not come back in the certain time employer can hire another employee to filled her position. In this way people would have no confusion and complain. Also it would have the accurate time for employer to decided that when they can hire another employee so that it could also reduced their
In dealing with a person’s livelihood, and often, sense of self, it is of no surprise that ethical issues regarding employment practices are of great concern. The issues of employment at will and due process contracts in the workplace are among the most widely contentious in the realm of employment. Employment at will is the doctrine that employment may be ended, by either party, for good, bad or no cause at all.1 Due process, on the other hand, is the employment practice in which a person may appeal a decision as a means of receiving an explanation and the opportunity to argue against it.2 Employment at will is the standard in the majority of private corporations today and is argued for relentlessly by freedom of contract enthusiasts, however, it is becoming ever more apparent that employment at will contracts reflect the old corporate maxim where the single bottom line, profit, is accented and the well being of other stakeholders, in this case the employee, are of little or no influence. Due process should be accepted as the prevalent employment system as it shelters employees from the hostile actions of the more powerful employer, provides a stable, bilateral contract between both parties and portrays the growing ethical concerns of society.
The child laborer can work in different fields. Some are engaged in agricultural labor, manufacturing, mining, domestic service, types of construction and also begging on the streets. Some are engaged in more dangerous conditions such as armed conflicts, commercial sexual exploitation, drug trafficking and also organized begging. These forms deprive children from freedom and human rights. Moreover, they certainly engender harmful effects. Children may receive no payment; they just take advantage of being fed and having a place where to sleep. They don’t have any protection in case they get sick or injured.
One day the bosses abandoned the factory after they had cut pay and instead of just leaving, the workers just decided to keep it running. The workers run it with no one main owner but instead they are all the owner. This creates a system where every single worker is important and in one case where a worker needed money for medical bills, many workers came together and gave money out of their own pay to help this sick worker. They also hold elections in the factories so everyone as a say in who the main leaders of the factory will be and everyone has a chance in possibly being elected. This new system the workers have created has made it possible for workers to have a fair pay as well as a voice in what happens with the factory. All workers are valued and aren’t seen as just replaceable pawns. Even though these workers still face a possibility of being evicted from these factories without guaranteed protection, they still fight because they know they have the power to make a
Taco Bell in Portland was found guilty of exploitation of workers (violating their State’s Labour Laws). Exploiting workers is unethical behaviour, because businesses often choose to maximise their profits for the owners at the expense of their workers. Taco Bell faced charges of violating labour laws. They failed to pay employees for working overtime, they failed to pay their full payment after they were let go, some employees had to work through their lunch time etcetera (ALA Editor, 2010). Companies tend to do the above to keep their reputation and/or to maximise profits.
My first reason supporting the motion that workers should be allowed to strike is in order to bring to the fore poor safety conditions. For instance, in the nuclear power industry, any breaches of safety can have tragic consequences. If the employees are exposed to nuclear material, this could lead to serious illnesses such as cancer, leukaemia and radiation sickness. Radioactive material could also affect residents of the surrounding area, as in the case of the Chernobyl disaster. In the light of poor safety conditions, workers striking can be justified by the fact that the government and public would be informed.
The purpose of this research is to prove that the employment at will doctrine does not protect the employee population in the United States. The fact that if you look at the way the doctrine is written it protects the employers and firms, and this as a result creates discrimination. This in itself creates an unsafe and sometime unstable work environment because of the potential for high turnover, costly training, and low morale amongst employees. There are certain factors that must be considered within the employee at will doctrine such as union protection, the economy, contracting verses employment, discrimination and the economic stance on the United States is currently in.
The use of contingent workers is on the rise. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics defines contingent workers as anyone who "does not have an explicit or implicit contract for long-term employment" (Phillips & Gully, 2011 pg 51). This definition includes independent contractors, freelancers, consultants, and temporary workers who may or not work for an agency. In the past 50 years, temporary workers have been crucial to many businesses, and their role in business is growing. Companies must recognize potential problems and concerns brought about by employing temporary workers, and adjust their approach to staffing.
The term collective bargaining is quite common within organizational circles. The term captures the reality of the issues that exist in the relationship between employers and workers. Indeed, employers need employees to provide the necessary labor to achieve organizational goals. Irrespective of whether the employer is the government or from the private sector, collective bargaining is an important element for ensuring a better working relationship with employees. To understand this, it is prudent to provide a definition of collective bargaining because it captures its essence. Collective bargaining entails a negotiation process between employers and workers regarding better employment terms and working conditions. Often, employers and employees
Traditional literature in the field of labor relations has focused immensely on its benefit towards the employer and in the process equating it to working rules. This has been so despite the field being expected to cover the process of, labor management, union formation, and collective bargain; all which are anticipated to create a positive employer-employee relationship. This relationship is said to be positive if there exist a balance between employment functions and the rights of the laborer. Also important to note, is that this relation is equally important to the public sector as it is to the private one. Therefore, to ensure a mutually conducive labor environment exists, effective labor management process and inclusive negotiation program should be adopted (Mulve 2006; Walton, 2008).
...for to work for little amount of money, and they used them in industries and big factories cause for children to start working in early ages as ten years old. Keep them from attending school. Threatens children’s physical, mental, or emotional well-being, and violate the nation age worker law.