Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transgender issues in schools
Transgender issues in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
.
As a college student who attends a university that does not allow co-ed rooming I actually agree that colleges should allow men and women to live in the same building. Though it may sound surprising I feel as if having co-ed dorms would not cause any more distractions than being in single sex dorms. Arguments brought up against co-ed rooming is that students will indulge into sexual activities that could lead to them making huge mistakes, and though that is a very important thought I do not think the school should control students personal lives. As young adults who attend college many students are very capable of making the best decisions for their life, and having an institution of learning decide for the students can hinder the growth
…show more content…
As stated by John Garvey “But I believe that intellect and virtue are connected. They influence one another.” (Garvey). Garvey insists that the two genders feed off of each other during the learning process and that one cannot be effective without the other, In other words the same way we see men and women in relationships is the same way the two should be looked at when it comes to the dorms. Many schools worry about students dating and having sexual intercourse, but according to sociologist W. Bradford Wilcox who has done various studies on the matter says that “40%-64% of college students report doing it.” From the numbers we are given we are basically being told that students will find ways to get together if they truly want to, and a case can be made that enforcing such strict rules can make what you are fighting a lot harder to …show more content…
Though the numbers are not in favor of co-ed dorms citing Aristotle, “Garvey said it’s the educator’s responsibility to cultivate virtue, and from good ethics will come good learning.”(Aristotle, Garvey). From this quote we get the sense that having the same sexes in the same building does not create the environment. The instructors can determine what type of environment the students will live in while on campus. Too much stock is put into single sex dorms and behavior as stated in the article Coed vs. Non-Coed Dorms by Rudy Miller “One author said he proctored a single-sex residence hall at Garvey’s Catholic University where the male students set furniture on fire, broke windows and urinated everywhere.” (Miller). Some of the claims that binge drinking happens more in coed dorms is unfair according to Pulitzer Prize winner Laura Sessions Stepp who says “she sees no evidence that women in coed dorms are more prone to binge drink because they live in dorms with men.”(Miller, Stepp). Laura Stepp also contends that heredity, and family environment are stronger contributors to alcohol abuse. From this academic journal it brings up the thought that housing arrangements has little do with
In "Fraternities and Collegiate Rape Culture" Ayres Boswell and Joan Z. Spade analyze the social perspective of the gendered relations in male fraternities that add to the high rate of violence against women on many college campuses. They list a host of factors that distinguish higher-risk from lower-risk atmospheres discussing the rates of rape in colleges and state how "1 out of 4 college women say they were raped or experienced an attempted rape" (217). Additionally, "1 out of 12 college men say they forced a woman to have sexual intercourse against her will" (Boswell, Spade 217). In other words Boswell and Spade indicated that the rates were high when it came down to women getting raped in colleges by men who also attended those colleges. In addition, Boswell and Spade specify in how most people are aware of rape but know very little about rape culture (Boswell, Spade 217).
They base their findings on the National Health and Social Life Survey, which found that those born after 1942 were “more sexually active at younger ages” than those born from 1933-42, and the trend toward greater sexual activity among young people “appears to halt or reverse” among those born from 1963-72. In addition to these facts, an English survey of more than 14,000 students from 19 universities and colleges about their hookup, dating, and relationship experiences revealed that 72% of students experience a hookup at least once by their senior year in college, but hooking up hasn’t replaced committed relationships and is not a new concept to young adults. The evidence is convincing and shows that students often participate in both at different times during college (69% of heterosexual students participated in a relationship lasting at least 6 months by senior year as well.) Based on this, the amount of hookups and committed relationship by college students seems to even out over
As stated in the book, “college students have much to teach about sex” (8). That is because the values, ideologies, and worldviews of the students are representative of greater American culture. Although flawed, hookup culture on American campuses hold the possibility of accepting a culture of inclusivity, care, pleasure, and freedom while also rejecting predatory behavior, racism, classism, and abuse. Dismissing hookup culture all together is blind to the reality that young adults are going to have sex, and since sex is non-negotiable, one’s aim should be to foster open dialogue and critical thought onto a future where everyone enjoys the ability to freely explore sexuality, sex, and gender on their own
according to the article "Fraternities and Collegiate Rape Culture: Why Are Some Fraternities More Dangerous Places for Women?" written by A. Ayres Boswell and Joan Z. Spade.... ... middle of paper ... ... Colleges should hold clubs such as fraternities and sports to the same level as others and be harshly punished for crimes they commit so they don't feel superior and think they can get away with rape. When the penalties are harsher and people are made an example of, then fraternities and sports in college will become safer environments.
One student even said she would not stay friends with Marcus because people might start to think that she is gay, too. Situations like these stem from the way boys think they have to act at such a young age. They are brought up thinking they have to be strong, rowdy, and play manly sports. As they get older this sticks with them, so when a male tries to break outside of it, they get referred to as gay and homosexual. This continues all their life and it effects many situations, like the way men have hook-ups. In the chapter Orgasm in College Hookups and Relationships the authors discuss how 74 percent of their respondents had at least one hookup by their senior year of college. The data also showed that men are almost always at least twenty percent more likely to orgasm than women. However, this is not true when a girl and guy are in a relationship. I think reasons for this could come from how males learn at a young age how masculinity and sexual orientation correlate. This leads to men thinking that the more females they have sex with, the more masculine they are. Also, the women do not orgasm because it is just about the guy having one, then being
Look at the media and movies about college life. Most stem around getting drunk and having sex. This norm or perception about women going to college to be raped needs to be eliminated. Obviously there need to be programs, punishments, and awareness training to help eliminate the sexual assault on college campuses. However, campuses also need to get the college community involved to make sexual assault less of a norm and more of what it is; unacceptable!
Single sex classes may help to break down stereotypes that the coeducational classroom may inadvertently reinforce. While attending single sex schools, students are more likely to excel in any subject, rather than limit ...
The hookup culture has become deeply ingrained in the college experience, all across the country students are fulfilling their desires while preserving their autonomy. On the surface the hookup culture doesn’t sound so bad, however, I am going to argue that the hookup culture itself stems from and promulgates problematic societal inequalities. I will develop my claim by first discussing the dominance of the hookup culture and the societal pressure placed on those who don’t want to participate or are unsure about participating in what the culture has to offer. Then, I will illustrate why the general dynamic of the heterosexual hookup is an uneven playing field even for women who actively choose to participate in the hookup culture. Finally,
The single-sex format creates opportunities that do not exist in the coed classroom. (Edison 1) Researchers are unaware that both genders brains function differently. This lack of knowledge may be why the real truth about single-sex education being more efficient than co-ed education has not been discovered. Some say single-sex education may be the key for a brighter generation. It shows to improve test score dramatically. The number of public schools experimenting with single sex classes is now reported to be more than 350. (Silva 130) Some research also shows that single-sex classes have a more welcoming atmosphere. Single-sex education improves grades while coed educations keep an average pace.
Perlman, D., & Sprecher, S. (in press). Sex, Initimacy, and dating in college. In R. D. McAnulty (Ed.), Sex in college. New York, NY: Praeger.
The first all female schools began in the early 1800’s. These academies favored more traditional gender roles, women being the home makers and the men being the bread winners. The first generation of educated women was the result of single-sex colleges in 1873. Wendy Kaminer, an investigative journalist, states that “single-sex education was not exactly a choice; it was a cultural mandate at a time when sexual segregation was considered only natural” (1). Women of this time were technically not allowed to attend school with males. Feminists of this time worked hard to integrate the school system and by the early 1900’s, single sex classrooms were a thing of the past. In 1910, twenty-seven percent of colleges were for men only, fifteen percent were for women only and the remainders were coed. Today, women outnumber men among college graduates (Kaminer 1). After all the hard work of early feminists, there are thousands of people today who advocate bringing back the single sex classroom.
Some people think that single sex schools are good because girls and boys feel free to talk, ask and raise their hands without being made fun of, "The theoretical approach termed 'girl power' argues that girls lag behind boys in some subject in co-ed classrooms." (predit, 2014). However, Single sex schools are very bad because it affects children attitude, they will find difficulty in communicating with their colleagues in college as they were secluded and didn't interact with other sex in school. Boys and girls should know from a young age how to deal with the opposite sex, instead of facing that when they become adults, and don't have experience on what to do. Students in single-sex classrooms will one day live and work side-by-side with members of the opposite sex .Educating students in single-sex schools restrains their chance to work helpfully and cooperate effectively with parts of the inverse sex. "It is not long before the youth of today will be the parents, co-workers and leaders of tomorrow" (strauss, 2012). "Anything we organize along any variable, if we're saying boys he...
Coed schools are just as good or better than single sex education schools and should not be put in schools.
Finally, there is no one sex school is going to be right for every student. There are many advantages and disadvantages mentioned in that essay before. But it's thought all over the world that the coeducation is preferred worldwide. About 90 % of schools all over the world are stuck to co-education. Mixed-sex education has achieved higher success rate. They also graduate students who are settled emotionally and able to deal with the real society. "There are not any dominant blessings for single-sex schools on academic grounds. Studies all over the world have failed to expose any major variations.'' - Academician Alan Smothers, director of education and employment analysis at the University of Buckingham 2011.
I think the school is taking the “easy road” and doesn’t want to be liable for anything therefore they make all these rules that prohibit anyone on campus to have fun. The campus is becoming more and more unbearable by the moment. On the weekends it is so boring there is no one here except a whole lot of public safety. That is why people enjoy them selves and use substances, but the university doesn’t look at any of these aspects realistically. The university is living in the 1950’s and very ideal 1950’s at that. The policies are so dated it isn’t funny. Not being able to have a member of the opposite sex in your suite sounds like something out of a Mormon school. What is the university afraid of…………that the kids (I mean to say students but that how the university looks at them) are going to have sex? The students are all 18 and over who cares. It isn’t like the kids can’t have sex before 2 am and after 10 am. That’s such a weak rule and position. I cant even come up with a reason why they made that one other than to reign down on the students with a little life inhibiting catholic morality which in itself is rather foolish. But back to the alcohol rule…that’s just there because the university doesn’t feel like being responsible for students who are drunk. That’s college and there is no way they will stop it so I think the university should decriminalize it. It should be if you’re under 21 you should be written up. Why wait until your in graduate school to let someone drink. I will be a 21-year-old junior and your going to tell me I can’t drink. That’s not agreeing with me.