Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Relevancy between drought situation and California economy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
My fellow senators I stand in the firmest negation to this resolution in regards to funding the california water transport tunnels for the following three contentions.
The Federal government should not be held accountable for funneling so much support to a CA problem
Money is aimed only at this plan which may not benefit those who are suffering from the drought
California cannot continue to be so reliable on federal government money
To begin with, According to Newsdeeply, after four years of historic water shortages, farm earnings in the state increased 16 percent, and total employment increased 5 percent. California’s farm economy is still continuing to grow overall, despite the worst drought ever recorded in the state. Particular crops
and counties have not increased in price at all well. But overall, the drought did not keep California agriculture down, reflecting great resilience among the state’s farmers. The data on income from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis show that total earnings on California farms were up about $2.6 billion, to $18.6 billion, from 2012 to 2014. This clearly shows how the economy of California is not entirely affected by the drought. In addition, other states such as oregon and nevada are in just as bad of a drought as California is so why shouldn't we fund their water programs as well? Wouldn’t this be unfair to just be funding California’s water tunnel plan? Next, if this bill is passed and california does receive the money, then the money can and only will be used on this project and cannot be used on any new alternatives we find in the future. According to county supervisors, the CA government has failed to investigate alternatives and therefore we are stuck with this plan. In the near future we could find a new and more efficient water plan that could reduce the drought even more but the money we receive would not be able to be used on these new projects we find. In addition, isnt 6 billion dollars far too much money that is being funded to a water project that isnt even going to guarantee a decrease in the drought. Lastly, The federal government already has a finite budget and can not continue to fund california billions of dollars over these projects. This water tunnel project carries no guarantees to decreasing the drought and money should only be funded to projects that are sure to work effectively. In conclusion, I stand in the firmest negation to this resolution in regards to funding the California Water transport tunnels. I am now open for cross examination and further clarification.
The California water drought has been declared a crisis by the governor of California. 2013 was the driest year on record, and California could be running out of water. Californians should be water wise, and their use, or no use, of water will have an enormous impact on this drought. They can use the techniques published in a recent Time article called, 5 Ways to Bust California’s Drought, to reduce their water use. Landscape techniques, alternate water sources, and the personal conservation of water can reduce the use of water, and can have a positive change on this water crisis.
Though not the only country plagued with this issue, some of the United States’ most well-known cities, like Philadelphia, Chicago, and Baltimore, are home to food deserts, which are “characterized by the combination of very few food outlets and high poverty in a given geographic area” (Kato, 2014). Detailed in the Baltimore Sun article, “Baltimore to Give Tax Break to Attract More Grocery Stores”, are the efforts to be rid of food deserts in the western part of the city of Baltimore in Maryland. By implementing a lowered tax incentive for grocery stores, grocers are encouraged to put stores in food deserts, like the Save-A-Lot that was instated in West Baltimore. More grocery stores in such areas is an aid to the elderly and disabled in the community, who have difficulty traveling long distance to get healthy food, and for the community as a whole, which has a large concentration of individuals who are low-income and have trouble paying for high food prices at most grocery stores and a twenty-year life expectancy difference from its wealthy counterpart (Wenger, 2015). This article relates to chapter two of the Tice/Perkins text, specifically the feudalistic views of the poor, namely
The Great Basin of North America and Wyoming specifically, is known for its arid and semi-arid environment, as well as prolonged and sometimes severe droughts. Drought is the prolonged and abnormal deficiency of moisture with the concomitant decline in runoff to a level significantly lower than usual (Guldin 1989). The history of droughts in Wyoming has been uncertain in the past, but recent studies of tree rings in the Big Horn Basin of Wyoming have given insight to droughts as far back as 1260A.D. (Gray et al. 2004). Looking at tree ring records in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and limber pine (Pinus flexilis) trees, Stephen Gray and his colleagues discovered that droughts which have been experienced in Wyoming since the 1750's, are weak in severity and length when compared to those since. The most severe drought period in Wyoming’s history occurred from 1262 to 1281. The droughts of the 1930’s and 1950’s, which have been used as benchmarks for all other droughts in the United States in recent times (Woodhouse et al. 2002), are ranked 149th and 28th respectively in comparison (Gray et al. 2004). The five top ranking droughts for 10, 15, and 20 year periods are all prior to the 1800’s, with the four driest single years being 1263, 1274, 1278, and 1280 (Gray et al. 2004). This indicates a change in precipitation patterns in the Big Horn Basin area of Wyoming since the 18th century, as all recent droughts have been mild when compared to those of Wyoming’s past.
Soil, climate and 118 different types of farms. California produced 300 different types of nuts, fruits, and vegetables and had specialization farms for canning or drying fruits. Farming in the 20th century started becoming
Zara Beadle METR 113 16 December 2015 Final paper California Drought The California drought has been extremely harmful to the states’ air quality. Since 2012, California has seen the worst drought conditions in 1,200 years and it is severely affecting air quality (California’s drought, 2015). As of 2015, the cities of Hanford, Merced, Modesto, Fresno, Yuba City, Lancaster-Palmdale, Chico, Sacramento, and Bakersfield have experienced exceptional drought coverage (Pestano, 2015).
I am not in favor of california seceding from the United States nor, do I think it can easily secede from the U.S than Catalonia can from Spain. First of all, California depends on the government way too much in order to say that they can easily cut ties off with the rest of the country. Also, california uses as much as 200 billion dollars worth, for school, transportation and other necessities just from the government. If california really wanted to secede from the U.S then go ahead but I don't think it will be as easy as they say. What will the U.S do now that they won't be receiving money from the
For about five years California has experienced above average temperatures and a lack of rain. This lack of rain and snowfall has caused California to become increasingly dry, starting arguments over whose right to water is more important and who needs to be more mindful with their use of water. Farming in California truly began during the gold rush when water was redirected to land where food was grown for those looking for gold (Siegler, 2015). The farmers that have stayed on that land now have senior water rights (“Water wars”, 2015). Farmers that settled their land before 1914 are those with senior water rights (Terrell, 2015). Governor Jerry Brown has called for a cut in water use by one-quarter percent to people living
The drought in California has seriously impacted California in a negative way and will continue to impact California negatively if it continues. Drought in California has always played a huge part in California’s geography and without action to help prevent the affects of long lasting droughts California will continue to suffer severe negative effects, which can lead to serious negative impact on the rest of the country as well.
Unfortunately there is the big issue of the politicians and their campaigning for funds and it’s going to be hard to control that too. I can understand why Congress isn’t closing the Nevada loophole or at least delaying it, but I still don’t agree with it.
Thesis: It is very important to know that California drought leaves many bad effects on our community and environment by causing the plants, animals, electricity, and we humans.
. Some cities, like San Francisco, had already been conserving water, which means it wasn’t much of a change for them. Other cities, like Beverly Hills, will be facing consequences if they don’t make the effort to save water. Water regulators are now able to fine people up to $500 if they take long showers, use a non-shutoff nozzle hose to wash their cars and sidewalk. After making changes like that, the state decided to focus on the smaller issues. For example, if you go to a restaurant, servers can’t bring you water unless you request. As you can see, many changes have been in made in the state of California to minimize the drought. There is a clear problem that California’s drought was caused at first by nature with “La Niña” but only
Due to the decreased rainfall in the past five years for the state of California, drastic measures have gone into effect to save every last drop of fresh water available to the population. According to 119 years of records, the average rainfall per year for the state has also been the worst ever recorded. With such a large decrease of rainfall, California has began community based projects to help save water by setting rules within households and schools for the amount of water that can be used daily. Water related uses also account for a sizeable amount of electricity, along with natural gas and fuels that are burnt each year. Besides the community based projects, California has began to turn towards major water sources and reservoirs with projects to decrease evaporation in those sources of water.
California is one of the most diverse and beautiful states in America with 223 different animal species and an estimated 6,300 native plants. Right now California is facing one of the most severe droughts ever to be recorded which is threatening not only all of us living in the Golden State but the plant and animals inhabiting it as well. Many say dams and reservoirs might be the answer to our problems. Being almost 35 years since the last dam was built in California, supporters are pushing for a new dam-building era. But, before moving ahead it's important to look to the past to see why California stopped building dams in the first place.
When people think about droughts they think about the short term effects that are playing roles on the economy, however, many people don’t think of the long term affects that droughts can have on the economy. Droughts are dangerous, they don’t only affect one area or thing but can disable or damage an entire food chain, which in the end can cause serious problems for people all over the U.S. over an extended amount of time. The focal point of this paper will be about the drought of 2012 and how it affected the U.S. agriculture including crops, livestock, and even food prices later on down the road.
Global warming is one of the main causes, which leads to the lack of water and drought. A drought-like condition exists in most of India’s part. Government of India states that 68% of the country is disposed to the drought, which (consequences are) leads to massive migration of people to more favorable places, famine, conflicts among inhabitants. India is known in the world as one of the biggest producers of water-intensive crops such as rice, sugarcane and wheat. According to a survey done by Grail Research, approximately 82% of total water is used for agricultural consumption and 90% of it is employed for irrigation of rice, wheat and sugarcane (Grail Research, LLC, 2009). There are several solutions which could lead to the decr...