Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Police misconduct and its impact
Unnecessary force by police
Police misconduct and its impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Police misconduct and its impact
Whether to arm the police is a contentious subject. While some supporters maintain that unarmed police are unable to protect law-abiding citizens, opponents reject this notion on the grounds that it could lead to a surge of violence in society.
At the outset, the primary concern on armed police is that it would increase the potential for miscarriages of justice and mistaken shooting of innocent civilians. Consequently, the legislation in many countries is supportive of this concern. From a legal standpoint, laws protect people not only from torture and cruel treatment, but also their legal right on arrest and detainment. If the police are armed, they will be less likely to think twice before pulling the trigger. Moreover, they can easily get
What do you think when you see a police car? Do you feel safer knowing there 's a police officer if anything happens or do you get nervous and think you might get pulled over. The majority of people get nervous when they see a police car. With all the cases in which police use excessive force to arrest or kill a suspect people are more worried and the armored vehicles don 't help. The whole world watched in the early days of the Ferguson protests the huge police response. Armored vehicles, gas masks, assault rifles all worn with a military like uniform, this is the police that exists today. Do small police departments like Fergusons really need mine resistant armored vehicles or drones? I don 't think they do and that 's why I think that the
Some people think that states that allow citizens to carry guns only raises the crime rate in that state. Studies have actually shown that states that allow citizens to carry guns actually have a lower crime rate. States that allow citizens to carry guns have actually shown to lower murder rates from 5.6 killings per 100,000 people to 4.2.
First of all article 7 is not respected: “ No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” It is clear that using physical violence and abusing the use of weapons is in fact, a vicious and ruthless way to treat innocent humans. No matter how much authority policemen have, it should not allow them to abuse of it. As an example, I will use the case of Orlando Bowen, a professional football player that played for the Canadian league. On March 26, 2004, Bowen was at a night club celebrating a contract he had just signed with the Toronto Argonauts. Two disguised police officers approached him to ask if he was carrying any drugs with him. The football player informed them that he did not have any drugs on him and after the policemen kept insisting, he decided to leave. He was threatened by the officers as they suggested that he stays with them or else they will shoot him and Bowen immediately obeyed. With no proof, Bowen was arrested for possession of cocaine after he was brutally beaten by the officers for no valuable reason. It is important to note that Bowen was not aware of what he was being charged for until he was put in jail and he assured that the drugs that were found on him did not belong to him. Bowen was charged with possession
As a result, “Nearly all agree that when an officer is facing a deadly threat, the proper response is to use deadly force”(Lind). Yes there are many people out there that can be a deadly threat to police officers because the way they are acting but, there are many innocent people that do not affect anyone and still have to be a part of the problem for no given reason. Although a police officer’s proper response is to use deadly force upon someone, there should be other alternatives or ways they can use before going into deadly force and possibly cause someone to lose their live. I certainly do understand that there are certain situations where a cop is coming across someone that is pointing a gun or knife at them and approaching towards them. So therefore them using deadly force would possibly be the right thing to do if they have too, but before using deadly force they should at least try deploying tasers or using bean bag guns to attempt in taking them
There's a problem in America. Children, defenseless are being shot one by one. They go to their school and the schools are a gun free zone. The shooters take advantage of it and take the children's lives. Teachers should be able to carry a handgun to protect their children. This is very important, to all teachers and students for their safety. Shooters wouldn't come in the school knowing that the teacher had a gun. Students would feel way safer. There would be a lot of safety that would go into this.there are a lot of facts that can help us make the decision.
The right to keep and bear arms for the purpose of the profession, such as police officers, should be further restricted so that the use of force of injuring or killing another person is reasonable and justified. Police departments should review how officers use force. Police officers everywhere have been criticized for being too aggressive in their use of force more than once.
Policing relies on the public trust, police legitimacy and accountability, which can be destroyed by unjustifiable police shootings (Squires and Kennninson, 2010). Within this country, there is a recognition that the police do not always adhere to the rule of law (Newburn and Reiner, 2012: 809), which has led to consistent public outrage at the lack of effectiveness and legitimacy the police has maintained. Therefore the deliberate decision to enforce police to attend to the streets unarmed was employed to reassure the public that the police were not to be feared (Waddington and Wright, 2010). Ultimately, concerns derive from the belief that the police are completely ineffective when dealing with gun crimes (Farrell, 1992: 20). However, whilst arming police with guns can act as a protector when on duty it can also cause an increase in police misconduct. This issue will be discussed throughout this essay.
Police shootings occur all over the world but are a huge problem within the United States. We continue to hear more and more about them. These shootings are making headlines. Front page news it seems almost weekly. All the shootings go one of two ways. Either a Police Officer has been shot or a Police Officer has shot a citizen, but either way the final result is death. Whether an Officer has been shot or an Officer has shot someone these cases seem to be related to one thing, fear. People in today’s society feel as though they can’t trust Police Officers as they are there to hurt and kill them. And Police Officers feel as though they are in danger of doing their everyday duties because people see them as the “bad guys” and want to hurt or kill them. Yes, police brutality and racism still exist, but not all cops are bad. Yes there are still bad citizens in this world that want to kill and harm others, but not all citizens are bad. People seem to react to these shootings by rioting quickly after a police officer has shot and killed someone without
It is sad to say that the killing of Walter Scott by Officer Slager is all too familiar. Every time we turn around there is a black man, black woman, black little girl, or a black little boy that is being gunned down by those who are supposed to protect us. I read somewhere online that in the past five years there have been two hundred police shootings in the state of South Carolina, seventy of them resulted in deaths, and none of the officers were found guilty. We must stop the violence of our people, especially by those who are supposed to protect and save us. We have to stop sitting and waiting on decisions, and go demand them ourselves. It is necessary that we keep our young black men and women out of the streets and prison systems and
Gun control is an awfully big issue in the United States today. Many people in America don’t agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns and freedom away from law-abiding citizens. Many citizens have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns aren’t very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection when used correctly. The second amendment states “the right to bear arms”; does this grant everyone the right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for the good guy average Joe to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea, and are taking part in the loss of our freedom that was given to us.
Police already have a tough enough job as it is. Making a decision in a split second could result in a life or death decision depending on the situation and an officer needs to be able to adapt quickly. But deadly force such as shooting to kill has become more common than before. Take for instance five years ago, a man who was unarmed and thirty five years old, was shot by a police officer who mistakenly took his garden hose as a gun. Deadly force was the wrong decision in this case. However the officer was adapting to his situation and acted quickly to a false alarm.
The debate over gun control in America has constantly brought up over the years due to gunmen killing large amounts of civilizations in shootings. From Columbine to Sandy Hook or the shootings of the two reporters in West Virginia, these public shootings are occurring everywhere. Lawmakers and civilians alike are pushing for increased gun control in hopes of preventing the same tragedies. Anybody that has been affected by the shootings have been pushing Congress and state governments to force new sanctions on government. With the past three years, Congress has shot down all the laws despite the large amounts of public support. Adding more gun control isn’t going to stop the mass shootings from happening.
For example, the Rodney King incident portrays the use of excessive force. In the early nineteen hundreds law enforcement starting to rethink the use of force policy and training. A poll done in nineteen ninety-one concerning the way officers treated people and the use of excessive force with the public. Surveys ask people if they have ever been abused or mistreated by police, five percent of poll and nine percent of minorities had either been abused or mistreated. Another twenty percent said they know someone who had been physically abused by the police (Alpert and Smith, 2001). Studies shown that people are mistreated by police and the use of excessive force. The use of force and training is applied to protect the public and police. Also, deadly force plays a role in this as well. Over the past year society has heard of a few cases that deadly force played a role in. For example, Michael Brown was an unarmed African American male who was resisting arrest, but had no weapon to harm anyone. Deadly force was used on Brown because of his size. Yet, that does not justify the fact that an officer should be able to use deadly force on anyone because of their size or even because they are resisting arrest. Without a sign of endangerment, a police officer should not be able to use deadly force. Some people may disagree on the fact that officers should be able to use deadly force no matter what the circumstance is, but if there is not an physical harm being done then police should not be able to use deadly force. However, some people might wonder when is force reasonable? This determination comes down to the officer before using any force. Generally, the use of force is usually necessary when someone is resisting arrest, detain a suspect, or to protect others. In the Brown case there was no reason for deadly force to be used than resisting arrest and that is not does not mean that Brown should
In the beginning the police were used in order to control free slaves and enforce Jim Crow laws. After that era was over, the police then moved on to control “dangerous classes” which were immigrants, the poor and African Americans .
Police Weaponry The police can use a variety of weapons to take down a suspect. The fact that they have so many non-lethal weapons, makes me wonder why they don’t use them. According to, Okayplayer.com, Barack Obama banned the use of military grade weapons from the police force in the United States.