Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Harmful side effects of animal testing
Harmful side effects of animal testing
Harms of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Harmful side effects of animal testing
Animal Testing Animal testing is the act of conducting experiments using non-human animals to control variables in investigations. The variables may affect biological systems or behaviors in experiments. It is research done to test drugs, medicine, cosmetics, food additives and pesticides for the benefit of humanity. Every year, up to 100 million animals may be experimented on for animal research. Animals range from mice to chimpanzees, but most frequently used are guinea pigs, hamsters, amphibians, fish, rats and mice. Examples Skin Corrosion: When an animal is exposed to the chemicals that are found inside a specific product it can lead to skin irritation from skin burns. Irritant substances can cause a reversible local inflammatory reaction that comes from the immune system of the affected tissue. Corrosive materials cause damage …show more content…
Animals are given doses orally, through the skin or through inhalation, based upon the type of human exposure is expected. This can cause DNA to be directly damaged, causing either malignant or benign tumors. Disadvantages of Animal Testing To begin, a key concept to the cons of animal testing is that they may not offer liable results. Since the structure of animal bodies are incredibly different than that of a human, the research done on animals may not translate equally onto humans and even other animals. Then we move onto the reverse case of this. Some products we have now on the market cause damage to animals, but help humans significantly. For example, aspirin is an extremely dangerous product for animals but has improved the lives of many humans. The animal can go through physical suffering, but also suffering from separation. When an animal is prematurely separated from his or her parents, there is a loss of normal social bonds, the inability to show behaviors that are typically natural, and stressors that are associated with transportation and
Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.
Albert Sabin, the developer of the polio vaccine once said, “Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Polio is a deadly disease caused by a virus that spreads from person to person. This infectious disease renders the brain and spinal cord helpless while also ensuring a permanent case of paralysis to the victim. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “…13,000 to 20,000 para-lytic cases were reported annually,” before the 18th century. After the introduction of the polio vaccine, “…a total of 2,525 paralytic cases were reported, compared with 61 in 1965.” This dramatic decrease in the prominence of the polio disease can only be attributed to the success of animal testing. Animal experimentation is used in the research of genetics, drug testing, biology, toxicity testing, cosmetic testing, and many other fields. Despite all of its beneficial traits, animal testing has been wildly controversial over the past decades because of its perceived unethical treatment towards animals. Although animal testing may be deemed unethical by many, it is a form of medical testing that has not only saved lives but has also greatly revolutionized the medical world.
Stokes, W.S. “Animals and the 3 R’s on Toxicology Research and Testing.” Human and Experimental Toxicology December 2015: 7. Academic Search Premier. Web. 14 February
Sophisticated methods of testing are now being applied to human cells in petri dishes. Human volunteers are also being used and micro-dose with samples so small that they do not cause adverse reactions. The argument exists that these alternative testing methods are not only more cost effective but also more relevant because they are conducted using human cells and specimens; a method that isn’t hindered by species differences. In addition, computer generated models are being used to produce virtual reconstructions in order to test toxicity.
level for mice, dogs, rabbits, cats and chimpanzees, but not for young or old men and women. Some animals die in the test as a result of the volume of material, not the toxicity of the material. Most important, is the number of animals that suffer unnecessarily: why pour drain cleaner down the throats of animals, when humans would never do such a thing?
The first pro to animal testing is that it has helped us create lifesaving cures and treatments. The California Biomedical Research Association released a statement saying almost every single medical breakthrough has resulted in the direct use of animals in the last 100 years. Can you believe this? Taking out dogs pancreases helped us discover insulin, chimpanzees helped us get a vaccine for Hepatitis B, and even the polio vaccine was tested on animals. Animal testing has also helped us treat and understand conditions like brain injury, breast cancer, cystic fibrosis, childhood leukemia, tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, malaria, and many others. It even helped us develop anesthetics, pacemakers, and cardiac value substitutes. Almost every cure for any condition is due to animal testing. Without animal testing, we may not have been able to find many of these cures and find cures for other conditions in the future.
Approximately 60 million animals are used each year in the laboratories of the United States. Whether or not animal testing is cruel or acceptable is an issue many argue over today. Although most acknowledge the negative effects of animals in laboratories, there are many pros in the scientific research.
One word comes to mind when I think of animal testing: cruel. Animal testing has been a subject of debate for many years. While most people think that using animals to test products is a reasonable approach, in reality the outcome does not always show how the products will react on humans, and the animals suffer unnecessarily. The United States needs to ban all animal testing like the European Union did because testing on animals is cruel and animals should not be dying from it.
companies must not be able to test on animals without knowing that the product will be successful. Scientists and researchers use animals to test human products on. Animal testing is harmful and ineffective for humans.
Animal Testing is one of the most horrible things you could do to an animal. When an animal is tested you could cause it to become crippled for the rest of its life whether they make it blind or even making it to become paralyzed you could even cause extreme pain or death.
Millions of animals are used to test consumer products, but they also become victims of experiments for medical research. In The Ethics of Animal Research (2007) both authors state that there have been many medical advances with the development of medicines and treatments as a result of research conducted on animals (para 1). These medical improvements have helped many people be able to enjoy life, but some people still believe that animal research is mean and avoidable .... ... middle of paper ... ...
Today, millions of animals are being tested on for the use of human products, causing them to fall ill and die, leaving them no choice but to be experimented on. Animal abuse can be more than what meets the eye. Specifically, animal testing is a form of animal abuse and usually ends in death of a harmless animal. Some might say that there is no other way to test products, but due to the harm that is done and our advancements in science, animal testing should not be tolerated.
Animal testing is the use of non-human animals for scientific experimentation. There are estimates that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals worldwide, from zebra fish to on-human primates, are used annually. Much larger numbers of invertebrates are used even flies and worms are used as model organisms are very important, experiments on invertebrates are largely unregulated and not included in statistics. Animals are euthanized after being used in an experiment. Some of these animals are purpose-bred and others are caught in the wild or they are supplied by dealers who obtain them from auctions and pounds.
Imagine your sweet cat locked in a cage inside a laboratory with other various animals. Millions of animals every year are locked up in labs for testing. Animals are used to test medications, cosmetics, biology lessons, and for medical training. Thousands of mice, rats, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are used for testing. Most of these animals will die in cruel testing experiments. Animal testing is tortures to the animals, an unreliable option for medication, and there are better safer options for testing.
If it is not the right food for humans to eat or to use for medications, then the animals would probably die or they would get an illness from the toxic food. Also, to make sure the food is ok, the farmers or scientists see if that animal dies or lives. According to Sally Driscoll from, “Animal Experimentation,” “One controversial test commonly employed is the LD50, which measures the amount if toxicity something has or had.” According to Laura Finley also from, “Animal Experimentation,” “ Mice or rats could carry an illness while the scientists are experimenting on them. So, the scientists can skip over their illness and possibly put it into medicine.” Another way animals could die from this is if they have the medicine before we do, they could possibly get the illness. Luckily, the farmers or scientists would know what to do if the medicine kills