Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alternative methods for animal testing
The rights of animal testing
The rights of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alternative methods for animal testing
The dawn of industrialization brought a profound change in the process of production of consumer goods. Commodities could be produced at unprecedented rates, at cheaper costs to producers and sold at affordable prices to consumers. This newfound availability of goods and ever-increasing production potential that continues today contributed greatly to the now commonplace prioritization of quantity over quality. The composition of goods and the presence of ethics in processes of production are held secondary to the pursuit of maximum production at minimal costs. The insatiable materialism so ingrained in our culture is often at the expense of environmental health and the welfare of its inhabitants. The use of animals for experimentation by …show more content…
Evils deemed “necessary” throughout history have been overturned and replaced upon investigation and critical analysis. If atrocious institutions were never questioned, societal progress would have been delayed and matters would look drastically different today. The practice of animal exploitation is worthy of intense scrutiny and is by no means necessary, not any longer, at least given the growing efforts to find alternative methods of testing or researching products. Some believe that alternatives to animal testing are ineffective, only in infancy or not to be considered as legitimate options. This is only because corporations are reluctant and even unwilling to put funds and efforts toward transitioning from cruel to cruelty-free. The unwillingness is thinly veiled greed and ignorance toward understanding the ramifications of mistreatment of living beings on the environment. There are companies that have already found success transitioning to cruelty-free and ecologically sound practices. Mindful companies are more likely to produce quality goods with the consumer’s best interest in mind. Investment in alternatives would be beneficial to the victimized animals, the environment, and the consumers that would no longer be complicit in unethical practices and could have a greater number of humane
Throughout history and into the present time, the topic and practice of animal experimentation/testing has been highly debated. Many people are for experimenting on animals, as it benefits the lives of humans, while others argue that testing on animals should be gotten rid of, with alternatives put in place. In this essay, my aim is to lay out the argument made by Robert Taylor in his article, “Testing drugs on animals: a test case for socially responsible investment”, argues as to why animal testing is beneficial and why companies engaged in testing and why investors in these companies should not be at fault, while then following up with my own counter argument as a response. Consequently, my plan in this essay is to lay out Taylor’s paper,
Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure, and the use of animals is highly ethical considering what could be the alternative, although there is progress being made to change these measures. This is how animal experimentation is of use to society for humans and animals.
Albert Sabin, the developer of the polio vaccine once said, “Without animal research, polio would still be claiming thousands of lives each year.” Polio is a deadly disease caused by a virus that spreads from person to person. This infectious disease renders the brain and spinal cord helpless while also ensuring a permanent case of paralysis to the victim. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “…13,000 to 20,000 para-lytic cases were reported annually,” before the 18th century. After the introduction of the polio vaccine, “…a total of 2,525 paralytic cases were reported, compared with 61 in 1965.” This dramatic decrease in the prominence of the polio disease can only be attributed to the success of animal testing. Animal experimentation is used in the research of genetics, drug testing, biology, toxicity testing, cosmetic testing, and many other fields. Despite all of its beneficial traits, animal testing has been wildly controversial over the past decades because of its perceived unethical treatment towards animals. Although animal testing may be deemed unethical by many, it is a form of medical testing that has not only saved lives but has also greatly revolutionized the medical world.
In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcasted their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of
Have you ever seen a stray animal on the side of the road and thought nothing of it? It is actions like that and others that continue to make this planet a cruel place for domestic animals to live. Many domestic animals are not created to destroy or harm anyone or anything. They are meant to be surrounded by loving caring humans who want to have a mutually beneficial relationship better them. Sadly, these animals are taken into shelters or pounds and if not claimed or adopted they are euthanized or become test subjects. According to PETA, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, “each year, more than 100 million animals are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity-driven experimentation, and chemical,
The first pro to animal testing is that it has helped us create lifesaving cures and treatments. The California Biomedical Research Association released a statement saying almost every single medical breakthrough has resulted in the direct use of animals in the last 100 years. Can you believe this? Taking out dogs pancreases helped us discover insulin, chimpanzees helped us get a vaccine for Hepatitis B, and even the polio vaccine was tested on animals. Animal testing has also helped us treat and understand conditions like brain injury, breast cancer, cystic fibrosis, childhood leukemia, tuberculosis, multiple sclerosis, malaria, and many others. It even helped us develop anesthetics, pacemakers, and cardiac value substitutes. Almost every cure for any condition is due to animal testing. Without animal testing, we may not have been able to find many of these cures and find cures for other conditions in the future.
Every year over 100 million animals die in the US; the cause for these deaths, animal testing. This injustice to animals involves testing products such as medical drugs or makeup, on poor imprisoned animals that don’t have the ability to stand for their own rights as most of us do. Animals used for testing are given products that may result in burning, poisoning, or death. These animals are forced to live in confined spaces where they wait until the next horrible experiment. They are, tortured beyond imagination as they are sometimes even cut open while they are alive (know as vivisection), either with expired analgesics or even without them.
Throughout history, beginning as early as 500 BC, animals have been used to test products that will later be utilized by humans (“Animal Testing” 4), what isn’t publicly discussed is the way it will leave the animals after the process is done. Many innocent rabbits, monkeys, mice, and even popular pets such as dogs are harmed during the testing application of cosmetics, medicine, perfumes, and many other consumer products (Donaldson 2). Nevertheless, there are many people whom support the scandal because "it is a legal requirement to carry out animal testing to ensure they are safe and effective” for human benefit (Drayson). The overall question here is should it even be an authorized form of experimentation in the United States, or anywhere else? The fact of the matter is that there are alternatives to remove animals out of the equation for good (“Alternatives” 1). They are cheaper, and less invasive than the maltreatment of the 26 million innocent animals that are subjected to the heartlessness of testing each year (“Animal Testing” 4). All in all, due to the harsh effects of animal testing, it should be treated as animal cruelty in today’s society.
According to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (2013) over one hundred million animals suffer and sometimes die from experiments to test chemicals, drugs, foods, and cosmetics (para 3). Although it is good that the companies are concerned that their products do not harm consumers, the law does not require most of these tests animals endure. Furthermore, these tests do not have accurate results, so the animals may suffer but the product is still sold to the people. While products that burnt bunnies’ eyes away are being marketed to consumers, government agencies are using taxpayers’ hard earned money to fund these horrible, pointless experiments.
Since experiments are cruel and expensive, “the world’s most forward-thinking scientists have moved on to develop and use methods for studying diseases and testing products that replace animals and are actually relevant to human health” (“Alternatives to Animals”). Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years, and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.
Simple household items such as lotions, shampoos and cosmetics aren’t very expensive and are within reach of the public, yet the public is not knowledgeable of the fact that the products that they use everyday are put through a series of tests which involve the use of harmless animals. Several large commercial companies do not make products for animals; they decide that using these harmless creatures for the testing of their products, could be harmful to animals, still go forward with these types of procedures on an everyday basis. Although these animals are unable to defend themselves or show signs of any form of consent for the near death procedures, these companies find this as a cheap solution for testing their products before placing them on the market. There are many other alternatives to testing animals, such as embryonic stem cell research. Animal experimentation is wrong and it can be avoided, but companies which are greedy for money choose not to.
Through many years, companies have tested animals to help prove that their products are safe for humans. This has become a very inhumane practice in which many animals are subjected to intolerable cruelty. Animals are treated cruelty because they are kept in cages with unhealthy conditions. Important aspects must be considered in the inhumane treatment of animals in research facilities. These aspects are focused in th...
As stated in the book, Invitation to Environmental Sociology, “it is mutual economic striving that keeps us always struggling to increase production, often with little regard for social and environmental consequences; in sum, the tendency of unfettered market forces is for increased growth, increased production, increased environmental consequences, and increased inequality” (Bell, 2012, p.60 & 63). Therefore, some of the main problems associated with this treadmill deals with the environment and it’s affects. As stated, the main environmental problems with this treadmill are over use of resources and waste. According to sociologist Michael Bell, “producers wind up robbing both from society and from the land through the destruction of overworked productive capacities,” such as: fisheries, farms, coal mines, oil and fossil fuel refineries, crops, water supplies, and this “extensive consumption leads more efficient production and increase in resources until in the end there is simply nothing left” (Bell, 2012, p.70-71). It is clear to see how overproduction can lead to destroying the environment through over use of resources but it also affects the environment through the over abundance of waste and pollution from factories. The more people consume the more waste and pollution is produced; therefore, this becomes a major issue because it begins to cause for human health to decline as well as the health of the plant it to decline. As waste and pollution builds, the more it causes for negative effects in a vicious cycle that would be hard to reverse after the damage is
Imagine your sweet cat locked in a cage inside a laboratory with other various animals. Millions of animals every year are locked up in labs for testing. Animals are used to test medications, cosmetics, biology lessons, and for medical training. Thousands of mice, rats, primates, cats, dogs, and other animals are used for testing. Most of these animals will die in cruel testing experiments. Animal testing is tortures to the animals, an unreliable option for medication, and there are better safer options for testing.
According to the Humane Society, the registration of a single pesticide requires more than 50 experiments and the use of nearly 12,000 animals. Currently, animals are being used for medical and product tests, where they are often seriously hurt and abused. The term “animal testing” refers to procedures performed on living animals for purposes of research into basic biology and diseases(About Animal Testing : Humane Society International). Putting animals through the tests that we put them through are supposed to be more beneficial to us, but in reality, it really is not worth the multiple billions of dollars it costs big companies just to make their product safe(Kanade). We depend on similarities between animals and humans to validate the results of animal research, yet we also depend on the differences between animals and humans to justify their use(Athanasiou, Thanos, Haile T. Debas, and Ara Darzi). The tests that are most often used on animals include them resulting in being maimed, blinded, scalded, force fed chemicals, genetically manipulated, and otherwise hurt or killed in the nature of science(Animal Testing Facts). In the field of cosmetic tests performed on animals, 50% of them die within 2-3 weeks after the initial experiment(Cook). That ratio is way too high to continue any cosmetic tests that we put animals through, yet we still continue to perform them like nothing is wrong. While all of this is happening, there are many alternatives that can be used, animals are too often mistreated, and