Pros And Cons Of American Soldiers

1512 Words4 Pages

A mercenary is a person, usually a former soldier, who gives up his services to foreign nations for money. Over centuries of fighting, mercenaries have been used by nations to fight their wars. The Ancient Greeks, Romans, Medieval kingdoms, Papal States, and all the way up to the modern United States. Mercenaries are the key to war for many nations, around the world. That is why United States and other nations who are fighting against terrorism are better off using mercenaries.
Many nations in the past have used mercenaries one point in their time to fight a war for them, where their armies can not. This caused a new type of job to be founded for men to do and earn money, “Being a mercenary was once considered an honest albeit bloody trade, …show more content…

People of nations are becoming more unreliable to help in wars, “But these countries wade into new conflicts - whether in Yemen, Syria or Libya - with militaries that are unused to sustained warfare and populations with generally little interest in military service,” ( Hager and Mazzetti). After so many wars that happened during the 1900s, like World War I, World War II, Vietnam War, Korean War, Gulf War, and many others. Almost all of the people who live in nations do not really look towards military service, they just want to live a peaceful life. But there are still some people who still want to fight for their nations. Nonetheless mercenaries are becoming the biggest part of fighting wars. Nations who use mercenaries, can do it in secret, “In theory, armed forces for hire give private actors the option to wage wars where governments can’t, or won’t,” (Gilsinan). Mercenaries help nations fight in other spots of the world, where they can not. Due to other nations threatening war, if that nation’s army goes to that spot. But mercenaries can be used at those spots, because no one would know who hired them. Making it easier for governments to go after targets and terrorist groups. This is because, mercenary groups which are hired by nations would keep their contractor’s name a secret and would not tell anyone. This is why nations should use mercenaries, because it allows them to …show more content…

There have been more mercenary deaths than military personnel in the Middle East, “Though the Pentagon claims not to keep records on mercenary fatalities, over 1,000 mercenaries are estimated to have been killed in Iraq and another 2,500 in Afghanistan, including eight who worked for the CIA, with thousands more wounded,” (Kuzmarov). Even if there are more mercenary deaths in the wars, where we use mercenaries more. At least we are saving our own troops’ lives, we are letting them go home and see their families again. While mercenaries do this job for money and not that much for their country needs, like our military are made up of volunteers who do not want to die. “I do this job for the opportunity to kill the enemies of my country and also to get that boat I always wanted. . . . When engaged I lay waste to everything around me,” (Contractor slogan/Kuzmarov). We can still keep these mercenaries alive, if we just train them better, “He would see the shocking behaviour of other PMcs, particularly Americans, and think that at least he wasn’t like them. But it still comes down to money,” (Saner). Another problem for mercenaries are that they basically can do anything they want in foreign countries. The mercenaries could maybe end up shooting a whole town in the Middle East, where it is believed that there are terrorist or there are terrorist targets there. While they would probably get away with the crime and still get

Open Document