Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The death penalty should be reformed
The negative effects of capital punishment
Reintroduction of death penalty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The death penalty should be reformed
Has it ever occurred to you that you can be executed for a crime that you didn’t commit, even though it’s method of killing is expensive and utterly unconstitutional? Connecticut made the right decision in abolishing the death penalty. It has since allowed many to release heart ache and heal as well as move on from the past. A dark past where capital punishment was allowed. Since the abolishment of it, our state has become better civilized.
In the average of 38 people executed a year in the United States it costs roughly 35 billion dollars a year (DPIC Staff). Contrary to the belief, the majority of the money for each execution comes pre-trial, jury selection, and incarceration. The lethal injection, commonly used today, is actually quite
…show more content…
This is due to the fact that the drugs being used in the lethal injection are not tested prior to the execution. Joseph R. Wood is a perfect example of these botched executions. According to a reporter he gasped at least 640 times before dying (Smith, 2014). The point of a lethal injection is to not cause pain so that we do not breach the 8th Amendment. However, on many occasions we have breached the 8th Amendment. Clayton Lockett’s execution in 2014 is one that won’t be forgotten. It took him 43 minutes to die and in that time he also experienced a heart attack according to Mariano Castillo a CNN reporter. Due to the fact that Lockett died from the execution drugs many believe that his execution was not botched. Yes, he died from the lethal injection but it also took him over 40 minutes to die and he experienced a heart attack. Not only was the heart attack in play but, “he started kicking, twitching, and writhing and moaning in agony” his lawyer described it as “torture” (Smith, 2014). If an execution, that is only supposed to take 10 minutes maximum, exceeds 15 minutes it would be declared botched just as Lockett’s was. Both men experienced a cruel and unusual capital punishment and although neither occurred in Connecticut it’s a relief that we don’t have to handle such mismanaged …show more content…
Families all over the country suffer because they realize that once they walk into that courtroom, they relive their family member’s death over and over again. Gail Rice, a woman who lost her brother says, “ ‘With the death penalty abolished, murder victims' family members will really be freed to get on with their life. They won't be going back and forth, carrying this false hope that can only be cured with this execution.’ ” (Brachear, 2011). Gail was once a full advocate for the death penalty until she realized that the death penalty gave people “false hope” (Brachear, 2011). She wanted revenge but then realized that every time she walked into that court it was like her brother, Bruce, was being murdered before her eyes (Brachear, 2011). With the death penalty, she wasn’t able to heal. She couldn’t accept the fact that her brother was gone and it made her carry so much hatred for the murderer that she was not herself (Brachear, 2011). You need to forgive to heal and that is what Rice did to finally remember her brother in peace (Brachear, 2011). Living with that false hope isn’t worth it. Your family member has died at the hands of another, but that doesn’t mean that their killer should die too. When they are given a lethal injection or even electrocuted they should be gone in a matter of minutes. But that isn’t enough, they are not suffering as the victim's
Additionally, capital punishment is absurdly expensive. In the article, “ Capital Punishment: Deterrent Effects & Capital costs” Jeffery A. Fagan discusses how expensive death penalty cases can be. He
As for the cost of the executions themselves, there are various options that don’t require a lot of funding and although the costs of the lethal injection are quite steep, there are new developments that are more affordable than the previous lethal
The topic of the death penalty is one that has been highly debated throughout history. In the Intelligence Squared debate, Barry Scheck and Diann Rust-Tierney argue for the notion of abolishing the death penalty while Robert Blecker and Kent Scheidegger argue against abolishing the death penalty. Diann Rust-Tierney and Barney Scheck uses logos and ethos to debate against Robert Blecker and Kent Scheidegger who masterfully manipulate ethos and pathos for their case.
Upon examination, one finds capital punishment to be economically weak and deficient. A common misconception of the death penalty is that the cost to execute a convicted criminal is cheaper than to place a convict in prison for life without parole. Due to the United States judicial system, the process of appeals, which is inevitable with cases involving death as the sentence, incurs an extreme cost and is very time consuming. The cost of a capital trial and execution can be two to six times greater than the amount of money needed to house and feed a prisoner for life. "Studies show incarceration costs roughly $20,000 per inmate per year ($800,000 if a person lives 40 years in prison). Research also shows a death-penalty ease costs roughly $2 million per execution," (Kaplan 2). Capital punishment is extremely expensive and depletes state governments of money that could be used for a wide range of programs that are beneficial. As Belolyn Wiliams-Harold, an author for the journal Black Enterprise, writes that county governments are typically responsible for the costs of prosecution and the costs of the criminal trial, including attorney's fees, and salaries for the members of the courtroom. All this money is spent at the expense of the corrections department and crime prevention programs, which are already is strapped for cash (Williams-Harlod 1). These "financial constraints," such as capital punishment, do not promote a healthy, commercial society, but actually cost and harm the public.
Costs vary ranging from an additional twenty-five thousand dollars to as high as One million dollars. This is astronomical coming from a nation in debt. We either need to figure out a way that allows the people save money on putting people to death who break society 's rules then leech money away or we need to stop it all together. This would be the only logical reason to prevent the death penalty from being implemented, but as shown above there are lackluster aspects to the system. Even when a decision is made our government doesn’t take the best coarse of action when trying to follow through on the
One of the most repetitive and controversial topics discussed in the criminal justice system, is the death penalty. Capital punishment has been a part of our nation’s history since the creation of our constitution. In fact, as of January 1st, 2016, 2,943 inmates were awaiting their fate on death row (Death Penalty Information Center). Throughout my life, I have always been a strong advocate for the death penalty. During the majority of my undergraduate degree, I was a fierce supporter of capital punishment when discussing the topic in classes. However, throughout many criminal justice courses, I found myself in the minority, regarding the abolishment of the death penalty. While debating this topic, I would always find myself sympathetic to the victims and their families, as one should be, wanting those who were responsible for heinous crimes to
Eaton, Judy, Tony Christensen. “Closure and its myths: Victims’ families, the death penalty, and the closure argument.” International Review of Victimology, Vol 20(3).Sep, 2014. : pp. 327-343.
In the United States, lethal injection began in 1982 and is legal in thirty seven of the thirty eight states that have the death penalty (Litton 2004). The first state to legalize and use the death penalty was in Texas (Romanelli 2011). Some people believe the death penalty is a violation of the eighth amendment which states “excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishments inflicted.” (U.S. Constitution. Amend VIII). From the time period of 2001-2006, 189 of the 191 executions that happened were by lethal injection (Litton 2004). The reason lethal injection was chosen by some states is because it is cheaper and more humane. The person who is being executed is allowed to have family or friends watch their death. Visitors are never turned away without the warden’s say (California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation 2013). The process of lethal injection is fairly short (Litton 2004). When a person is killed by the electric chair they can feel the pain until they die, but when the lethal injection process is used they cannot feel it, therefore, it is more humane. Although there are downfalls, lethal injection is the most ethical and humane for of capital punishment.
Proponents of the death penalty are right to argue that capital punishment does provide a sense of “closure” to those who are faced with the tragedy of losing a loved one due to homicide, but they exaggerate when they claim that this is the only means by which murderers receive just punishment for their crimes. Advocates of the death penalty fail to recognize that there are alternative methods – such as psychotherapy – that are able to replace the barbaric method of the death penalty.
The death penalty has been an issue of debate for several years. Whether or not we should murder murderer’s and basically commit the same crime that they are being killed for committing. People against the death penalty say that we should not use it because of that very reason. They also make claims that innocent people who were wrongly convicted could be killed. Other claims include it not working as a deterrent, it being morally wrong, and that it discriminates. Some even claim that it is cruel and unusual punishment. I would like to shed light on the issue and inform everyone as to why we should keep the death penalty and possibly even use it more than we do now.
One might say that it helps the families to come to terms with what happened if they know that the killer of their loved one got their fair punishment by dying too. They know that that person can never get out of prison anymore and hurt someone else. But, some families could maybe deal better with the situation if they talk with the murderer and forgive him. They could have the view that violence is not the right response to violence. For that part, I believe everyone has a different view on what would help them grief. Important is, that the affected family members feel that it is fair what happened to the convicted, so that they don’t have to suffer even
In the article entitled “Death Penalty May Not Bring Peace to Victims’ Families” published in Psychology Today (October 19, 2016), a research done by professor Scott Vollum from the University of Minnesota shows that only 2.5% of co-victims achieved closure and 20.1% co-victims said that the execution of the criminal did not help them heal instead it made them feel empty since it did not bring back the victim. The time of which co-victims should wait for the conviction and execution, prolongs their grief and pain and the publicity of the death-penalty makes them relive traumatic events. Lula Redmond a therapist from Florida states that close relative of the murder victims does not experience relief after the execution. It does not fill the
In the case of homicide, the family members of the victim are often distraught and are in need of some form of closure before they are able to move on. The death penalty forms this type of closure. It is a reasonable response for a family member to want the criminal’s life to be taken, since he or she took the life of someone they loved. Although it is important for the family of the victim to feel closure, it is also important the surrounding society receives a sense of closure. The thought of murder makes many people very uneasy. The thought of a murderer walking the streets of their community puts them over the edge. The way courts can minimize the crime rate and maximize the safety of society is by appropriately sentencing criminals to the death penalty. The death penalty provides a concrete punishment to criminals that deserve just that.
However, on the other hand, to execute death penalty is also costly. In the article, “Death Penalty Is Too Expensive for States, Study Find”, Warren Richey mentioned about the cost of death penalty. For example, in the article, he said “New York spent $170 million over nine years on capital cases before repealing the death penalty. No executions were carried out there. New Jersey spent $253 million over 25 years with no executions.” He also menti...
If a criminal is sentenced to life in jail, then the cost of their imprisonment would be many times this. In the USA, the average cost per prisoner annually in jail is $29,000. The cost of the drugs used for the lethal injection is believed to be $86.08. This is far less than the cost of keeping a prisoner in jail, and would save the government money that could be used to try and make the community a better and safer place. Secondly, many believe that capital punishment is right because of the justice given to the victim’s family.