Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay about the resurrection of Christ
Essays on the resurrection
An essay about the resurrection of Christ
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay about the resurrection of Christ
The Proof of the Resurrection of Jesus Christ The founders of the greatest religions of the present day not only differed in what they taught or where they were born, but out of all of them Jesus of Nazareth stands out as the only one who has an empty tomb. The resurrection of Jesus not only is what differentiates Christianity from the rest, but what gives our preaching and our faith meaning for without it what we consider truth is purposeless and our savior is incompetent. Our whole cause falls apart if we do not believe it, know it, proclaim it, and defend it as an incontrovertible fact. The heart of Christianity should therefore be examined through the biblical perspective, the circumstantial evidence from which one can infer what happened, …show more content…
Jesus promised his resurrection before he was even dead when he said, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19). The fact that it was not an event that happened on the spot but was rather planned and that if one would doubt the promise of the resurrection one would also have to doubt the other promises of Jesus like his death on the cross, institutes that the resurrection is reasonable. Likewise, the resurrection was included in the earliest creed of the church as 1 Corinthians 15:4b said “...that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the Scriptures.” As part of the earliest creed established shortly after, the resurrection is an incorruptible truth that could not have formed into a legend and a wide accepted fact by the church in all of the places that it …show more content…
The idea that the resurrection was a conspiracy led by the proclamation of the 12 disciples and the apostles is inconceivable when considering that they spent three years helping the needy and with their “false” proclamation they would have sent many to hell. The character of the disciples is one of truth and of helping, not of conspiracies and of damaging, and therefore they would not have proclaimed the resurrection unless it was true and it would help people recognize their true savior. Moreover, a drastic change in a strict culture with rigid laws from having the day of worship being on a Sabbath as it had been for many centuries, which we know the disciples followed, to being on a Sunday could only be possible because of the resurrection of Jesus. The event of the resurrection is the only incident that happened on a Sunday drastic enough that could have change the day of worship established by the law to the day when our true savior and lord conquered
The article Reasonable Doubt by Alice Camille presents reasons for defending the actions of Thomas, the apostle of Jesus Christ, and relates the factors that not only made Thomas doubt his faith, but the testimonies of the resurrection witnessed by Thomas himself. The article also discusses evidence demanded by Thomas to prove that Jesus had risen from the dead.
The New King James Bible explains, "And with great power the apostles gave witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And great grace was upon them all ... For since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man ... If there is a natural body, there is also a spiritual body" (Acts 4:33 and 1 Corinthians 15:21 and 44). Paul explains that Jesus died for our sins and was resurrected. Since Jesus was physically buried, then Jesus ' resurrection would represent Him physically rising from the dead. Moreover, Paul explains that we will be resurrected like Jesus because God created humanity. Humanity cannot be physically resurrected because the human body is perishable. However, the spiritual body is imperishable and will live for eternity. Therefore, our physical bodies will be resurrected into an imperishable spirit. The significance of the passage is to demonstrate the historical event that Jesus ' disciples taught the physical resurrection of Jesus and also humanity will be
Luckily, none of the above is true. Because Jesus died on the cross and was raised to life three days later. Believers are forgiven from their sin and are given a new life. As Christians, our belief is not in vain because the resurrections is an actual event. Christ is not dead and our faith is not useless.
In fact, understood this way, Christianity even places a distinction between the martyrdom of apostles and the martyrdom of Christians today. “Modern martyrs die for what they sincerely believe to be true, but their knowledge comes secondhand from others.”4 Even those who are killed for their Christianity in current times don 't demonstrate the truth of Christianity, rather the sincerity of their beliefs. The apostles ' martyrdom alone can be used as evidence in support of the resurrection of Jesus, and therefore, the truth of
...rdance with the scriptures, and that he was buried, and that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures”.
In the Enlightenment period David Strauss developed a radical new approach to the resurrection of Jesus, explaining it was a “subjective conception in the mind” of the disciples (McGrath, 2001, 399). Strauss’ theory suggests the disciples did not witness a life physically restored but saw a projection of Jesus living in the presence from their memories (Luke 24.39-49). As a result of this, he referred to the Biblical account of resurrection as “a reflection of the gospel writers’ social conditioning and cultural outlook” (McGrath, 2001, 399). Therefore, the apostle Matthew can be viewed as the authority figure in which Luke and Mark took the concept of resurrection from because they were socially conditioned to believe the apostles account of resurrection (Luke 24.6). Thus providing evidence for the two-source hypothesis in the synoptic problem: Matthew was the original source Luke and Mark used when writing their
Bodily Resurrection 1 Corinthians 15: 42-54. & nbsp ; & nbsp ; & nbsp ; & nbsp ; & nbs One of the most significant issues concerning nearly all religions. Christianity among them, concerns the fate of men following their death. Believing in an inevitable resurrection of the body among the faithful, Paul, a. principle founder of Christianity, asserted his beliefs on the nature of bodily. resurrection in 1 Corinthians 15: 42-54.
With the resurrection Jesus proves that He is God. There is no history of any other religious leader that resurrected from the death. By Jesus doing this it validates his miracles He performed and the word He shared with the world. After the resurrection Jesus visited His disciples and this moment changed human history. The disciples were filled with the Holy Spirit of God. They performed miracles and shared the good news. This movement was so powerful that even a roman that persecuted Christians became a believer of Jesus. His conviction about the resurrection was live changing to him and humanity.
From the women we learn that Jesus rose on the first day of the week. From the other disciples, we learn that Jesus rose on the third day. If the resurrection of Jesus was nothing but a hoax or urban legend, there would not be an identifiable starting point. This is not the case for the resurrection. We know the location he was buried and the time span in which it happened.
The first evidence for Jesus’ resurrection: the stone was rolled away and the tomb was empty. .John (20:1) reports that Mary Magdalene came early to the tomb “and saw the stone taken away from the tomb.” This was a large, round stone placed in a groove in front of the tomb to secure it from grave robbers. It would have taken several strong men to
"1 Corinthians 15:12 But If It Is Preached That Christ Has Been Raised from the Dead, How Can Some of You Say That There Is No Resurrection of the Dead?" 1 Corinthians 15:12 But If It Is Preached That Christ Has Been Raised from the Dead, How Can Some of You Say That There Is No Resurrection of the Dead? N.p., n.d. Web. 05 May 2014.
In this paper, I will examine Jesus’ resurrection from the dead because, according to many scholars, there is no other event in the life of Jesus that is as significant. In order to better comprehend the magnitude of this event, I will begin by looking at what can be discerned from the Resurrection of Jesus. Then, I will explore the two different kinds of resurrection testimony that there are: the confessional tradition and narrative tradition. For the confessional tradition, I will look at a few examples including St. Paul’s confession in First Corinthians which is composed of four parts: Jesus’ death, the question of the empty tomb, the third day, and the witnesses. For the narrative tradition, I will briefly examine the two sources of information
These three tests when applied to the Bible show it as the most historically reliable text known to man, thus the events found upon the pages of the Bible are actual historically proven events. In light of these facts, there are still many theories other than that of the Biblical account. Three of them include the "Visionary" theory, the theft theory, and the wrong tomb theory. The first theory is that of Strauss, that the appearances of Jesus after His death on the cross were "visions generated by the imaginations of the disciples (Ramsey 48)." This may be the easiest of all the theories to discredit. First of all, it does not take into account the inability of the disciples to grasp this idea that Christ was alive and to recognize Him for who He was (Ramsey 48).
(Robinson 1). Jesus, however, died on the first day of the crucifixion which happened when he
The first evidence of the resurrection is the burial of Christ. Out of all of the evidences, Jesus’ burial in the