Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Procter and gamble history summary
Influence of organizational culture on innovation
Influence of organizational culture on innovation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Procter and gamble history summary
Proctor and Gamble (P&G) was formed by William Procter, a candle maker and James Gamble, a soap maker. William and James joined forces and created P&G, a Fortune 500 company in 1837. Proctor and Gamble’s headers are located in Cincinnati, Ohio. P&G manufactures a wide variety of consumer goods which include beauty products, household products, and health and wellness products. P&G has an extensive history of providing a value-driven and ethical workplace culture. Product globalization posed threatening issues to their success during the early nineteen-nineties. Company leadership determined that it was necessary to change the workplace product development model in order to remain highly competitive in the global market. P&G already had a reputation of treating employees fair, including being one of the first companies to introduce profit sharing, employee stock ownership, and proactive employee retention and preferred internal promotions. The company also had a reputation for being innovative in product research and development by utilizing the latest technologies and focusing on the consumer demands. However, the business was structured by brands and the information and technology associated with them were individually organized which created silos of information. The information wasn’t openly shared across brands because of a fostered internal competition between them as well as protecting information from competitors.
The new products at P&G were not meeting projected sales goals that were set. They had been focusing on incremental innovations with existing products and not innovative new products. Company leaders began to realize that maintaining current innovation/creation product goals were not going to be product...
... middle of paper ...
...g process. This risk-taking allowed creative opportunities to flourish and created an environment where innovation can flourish. The prospect for the employees to develop standards, guidelines, and priorities seemed to instill a greater confidence to move forward to create more abilities for solid research and development of quality products. This is a positive example how innovation, such as allowing for experimentation and creativity to develop from the bottom up in an organization can have a great impact on a company. It can be challenging as a manager to trust that all employees are focused and motivated to succeed in a cooperative environment, but the results can also be powerful. It can also be challenging to guide the creative process without attempting to lead, but if employees are motivated to work to their strengths, it can be a win-win situation for all.
...resent diversity within the labor force and “each of them will also have networks of professional associates whose knowledge they can tap in order to solve problems and accomplish tasks. Needless-to-say, diverse people will have diverse networks and provide your company with a vast and diverse meta-network at your disposal” (p.1). In short, in supporting of creativity, innovators essentially need the backing from top leaders, and without that support, many initiatives may break down or die on the vine (Harvard). For any idea to be successful, it is vital that it is aligned with company strategy; there is more likely to occur naturally when top executives involve and take the lead with a idea or creativity initiative and this is a main reason why management commitment is a key factor in the accomplishment of any idea or innovation process (Baumgarther, 2010).
Based on the case, Lawson Cosmetics has an unresolved issue. They cannot decide on whether they should take the new branding initiative global, which is brought up by Gupta. Lawson is obviously a multinational company. In my opinion, they should develop major elements to market locally, and regionally and globally at the same time with a consistent brand image, but they need to adapt its brand to different markets by different ways carefully.
Constant innovationthis company's growth is driven by their constant innovation. Constant innovation is the key to their enterprises future. When they signed the tobacco settlement agreement in 1988 it fundamentally changed the way cigarettes are advertised, promoted, and sold in the US. This impacts every aspect of Philip Morris USA's marketing practices. While they are complying with this agreement they are also being responsible by marketing to adult smokers. They also have policies and practices in place to address all issues with their primary stakeholders along with their secondary stakeholders such as the general public, public health communities, parents, community leaders, decision makers, and the government (Altria, 2008).
The Procter and Gamble Company. (2013, November 17). Company Strategy. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from http://www.pginvestor.com: http://www.pginvestor.com/GenPage.aspx?IID=4004124&GKP=208821
Although Lafley has had success, the underlying problem remains. How will Lafley return P&G to its rightful place in Corporate America? P&G's solution to its problems is through product line extensions, expansion into non-premium brands, as well as acquisitions, licensing, reinforcing market orientation through consumer focus, and outsourcing. This recommendation was based on following items;
Proctor & Gamble will introduce the new Bounty Toilet Paper during the first week of December 1999. This brand of toilet paper will take the already established idea used with Bounty Paper Towels, and modify to the toilet paper world. Bounty has always stressed the idea of taking the least amount of the product, but still getting the job done while at same time consisting of a strong durability. Never before has such attributes of durability and effectiveness been used in a toilet paper brand, therefore P&G hopes to establish Bounty Toilet Paper as a leader in the industry.
Rite Aid Corporation which ranks as the third largest retail drugstore chain in the United states, control about 2,380 drugstores in 28 states across professionals pharmacy service, a full selection of health and personal care products, an assortment of general products in the nation and in the District of Columbia ( Rite Aid, 2007 ). Rite Aid has a great management team to help them with their success their team includes Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Special Advisor, Corporate Strategy ,Chief Operating Officer ,Chief Administrative Officer ,Executive Vice President – Pharmacy, Executive Vice President, Store Operations ,Executive Vice President and General Counsel( Rite Aid, 2007). Differentiate between management and leadership is very different for example, response to its huge losses, Rite Aid has said it expects to spend more than $94 million to reassess and restate its financial results for 1998 and 1999( ). Furthermore, that includes rerunning mainframe-based accounting systems and paying IT people overtime to work with internal and external accountants and auditors during the process. Still, Rite Aid does not plan to replace its combination homegrown Computer Corp. accounting system
McShane, Steven, and Mary Ann Von Glinow. Chapter 8: Decision Making and Creativity. PRIMIS MNO 6202: Managing Organizations. 2004. The 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' of the 'Secondary' Reprint of the book.
...re chances of growth and development for the company which is clearly understood through the research done on the Ansoff’s matrix. P&G is much ahead of its competitors and has also won many honors in terms of offering quality and innovative products. The company’s products are also sold by wide variety of retailers around the world and also through many e stores that sells the product online. Finally the company has also got more expansion opportunities which is clearly understood through the Yips model of Internationalization. As the company continues to acquire international brands over the years and succeeds in offering quality and innovative based products to the people all over the world it tend to give a much better completion to its competitors and of course get a wider market share making its competitors give a tough time in the industry.
By investing more in market research than any other company, conducting thousands of research studies and investing millions in consumer understanding every year, P&G has made a success out of articulating unspecified consumer wants and needs translating them into products. Not only is their a successful transition from idea to product, but P&G has also demonstrated global success in branding these products into household names with the logistics and distribution capabilities to translate it into meeting consumer and retailers needs satisfactorily. By translating these characteristics into continuously improving efficiency and productivity, P&G can give the best brand value to the Indian market by building relationships with consumers,businesses and retailers, making Oral B the toothbrush household name in India.
Relationships have been in place with two main groups in Singapore long before Proctor and Gamble ever decided to build a plant. The Economic Development Board and A*Star’s Institute for Materials Research and Engineering are the two main groups they have been involved with. Since Proctor and Gamble built these relationships before building a plant in Singapore they have thus established a strategic alliance with Singapore. The Economic Development Board and A*Star’s Institute for Materials Research and Engineering have come together with Proctor and Gamble to share resources and complete a project. Proctor and Gamble benefit from setting up a strategic alliance with A*Star by getting the privilege of looking at IMRE’s innovative research (Moneycontrol.com, 2008). In return for this preferential treatment, P&G shares its new innovations with A*Star’s IMRE (Moneycontrol.com, 2008).
Before Lafley took over for Jager, P&G was stretched to the max, haplessly wasting away resources and opportunities with an overcomplicated business strategy. P&G was raising prices on their best selling brands to cover for missed sales and high production costs for new brands that failed to be a successful [Lafley, 2003]. They had hired too many employees and were involved in several investments that were unprofitable. P&G had not had a hit product since the launch of ALWAYS feminine products in the 1980’s and each additional product flop only stretched their recourses thinner and thinner. Costs were high and moral low with employees not afraid to voice their lacking confidence with P&G’s leadership and direction. Subsidiaries were blaming corporate for their missed earnings and visa versa [Lafley, 2003]. Strategies between the brands at P&G clashed and each were out to safe guard their own interests. The prices of their consumer products were too high while the company failed to deliver customer satisfaction. These factors distracted them from what had originally made them successful – being an industry leader in innovation (Markels, 2006).
Procter & Gamble are responsible for producing a good percentage of the world’s best-known brands of household needs, health care, personal care, and baby care. Consisting of 25 brands, each an annual revenue of $1 billion, and an additional 15 brands that pull in $500 million annually, Procter & Gamble overall makes $84 billion each year through both brick-and-mortar stores and online stores in 180 nations. As Procter & Gamble’s products are virtually all convenience-related, distribution market coverage is widely used by the firm. Their products are carried amongst supermarkets, drug stores, and other similar franchises. Because of limited space on store shelves, not all products can be available at the same time. As a result, Procter & Gamble’s products compete for space not just with other rival firm brands but also the store brands themselves. Ways that Procter & Gamble rectified this issue is (as an example) making a distribution agreement(s) with companies
P&G’s purpose is to provide branded products and services of superior quality and value that improve the lives of the world’s consumers. P&G values their employees through leadership, ownership, integrity, passion for winning, and trust. P&G entices and recruits best people in the world, builds their organization by promoting and rewarding from within, and believes that their employees will always be the most important asset. P&G has many principles such as (1) showing respect to all individuals, (2) valuing differences, (3) inspiring and enabling employees to achieve high expectations, standards, and challenging goals, (4) valuing personal mastery, (5) believing that all individuals can and want to contribute to their fullest potential, (6)
In 2011 PepsiCo announced the launch of their Social Vending System. This system featured a full touch interactive screen. A consumer can select a beverage and enter the reciepent's name, mobile number, and personalized message and gift it with a video. PepsiCo uses technology to their advantage for global implementation.The company uses media sites in multiple was as advertisement and marketing tools.