Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pro choice vs pro life abortion
Pro choice vs pro life abortion
Pro life versus pro choice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Pro choice vs pro life abortion
The controversial topic of abortion has been around for many centuries. However, the debate between pro life and pro choice really began after the 1973 Roe v. Wade case. Jane Roe was an unmarried woman who wanted to end her pregnancy safely and legally. Previously to this time abortions were deemed unethical and illegal, only to be performed if the mother-to-be’s life was at risk or if she had been raped. The Supreme Court looked at plenty of cases and drew on decades worth of case law about, not only abortion, but fundamental human rights as well. Times were changing drastically, and there was a nationwide push to get rid of laws that had been in place since before the turn of the century. The Supreme Court finally reached a decision, recognizing “that a woman’s right to make her own decisions about her pregnancy deserves …show more content…
the highest level of constitutional protection”. Meaning that The Supreme Court recognized the constitutional right to privacy also encompassed the right to terminate a pregnancy. Jane Roe was granted her abortion and the debate between pro choice and pro life had officially taken off (“Roe v. Wade: Its History and Impact” 1). Abortion rights in the United States have been a controversial topic for many years, and has become even more prevalent in recent years.
As stated above, abortion has been declared to be a fundamental right by the Supreme Court. Despite Roe v. Wade’s claims, many states are closing down abortion clinics, such as Planned Parenthood, because their leaders believe abortion is wrong. Only thirteen states have been supportive of abortion. States also make it hard for minors to get an abortion because states have varying laws that require either parental notification and/or parental consent. While some states require parental consent from only one parent, others require both parents to consent to the minor’s abortion. Along with states making it difficult for women to get an abortion, birth control is also hard for women to get their hands on. While condoms are readily available to men and are quite cheap, women’s birth control, whether it be a pill or a shot, costs a lot of money and health care doesn’t cover it. However, with ObamaCare, more women are getting birth control at zero copay. In 2013, women saved almost $1.4 billion in out-of-pocket
costs. Pro choice, as defined by Merriam Webster Dictionary, is the belief that pregnant women should have the right to choose to have an abortion. Pro choice advocates believe that life begins when the fetus exits the womb and is able to survive outside the womb. Surviving outside the womb means that the baby has brain activity, a beating heart, and has taken its first breath. Some believe that human life doesn’t begin until the baby has a developed mind, which happens around one to three years of age. Pro choice advocates and doctors state that the concept of personhood at conception is a religious view and many scientists and doctors have different views as to when a fetus is actually a person. Scientists have also discovered that fertilization happens after twenty-four hours, this means that emergency contraceptives, such as Plan B, are not killing a fetus because the fetus has yet to develop. Pro choice advocates support access to affordable and reliable contraceptives. Abortion is also one of the safest medical procedures performed today. Laws trying to prevent abortions from happening are not actually stopping abortions, they are just making abortion unsafe for women. When states try to prevent abortion by closing down abortion clinics, they are condoning the practice of ‘back alley’ abortions, ‘coat hanger’ abortions, and unsafe practices by trained professionals that now no longer have access to the tools and antiseptics they once had available to them. The decision to have an abortion should be made by a woman, not a politician, because it’s her body, and women should have control over their bodies. While many people support abortion, in the U.S. government it is the Democratic Party that fights for the right to an abortion. The platform that the Democratic Party runs on in regard to abortion, supports abortion on demand. It also calls for the repeal of the Hyde Amendment. The Hyde Amendment restricts the use of federal funds for abortions. The Democratic Party platform also supports government funding of abortion providers, which includes Planned Parenthood. Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton also supports abortion. She states that an unborn child doesn’t have constitutional rights. She endorses Roe v. Wade and stands with Planned Parenthood. Clinton wants to stop the Republican defunding of the organization, which restricts women’s access to health care services, such as cancer screenings, contraception, and safe, legal abortion. She will also protect and build upon President Obama’s Affordable Care Act, which bans insurance companies from discriminating against women and guarantees more than 55 million women access to preventive care. As the First Lady, Clinton supported Medicaid funding for abortion, she said that reproductive health was “crucial in advancing the cause of women,” stated that “government has no place in the personal decision a women makes about whether to bring a child into the world,” and, at the UN 4th Conference of Women, stated that “it is a violation of human rights when women are denied the right to plan their own families.” When Clinton was the Senator of New York, she introduced a bill to guarantee that women in the military had access to emergency contraceptives because women are often victims of sexual assault in the military. Tim Kaine, a U.S. Senator and Hillary Clinton’s running mate, is also a supporter of women’s right to an abortion. Kaine opposes the efforts made by Republicans to weaken Roe v. Wade. He believes that access to contraceptives should not be the decision of a for-profit company and opposes the Supreme Court’s decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby. Kaine also cosponsored the Protecting Women’s Health from Corporate Interference Act in order to restore the contraceptive coverage requirement guaranteed by Obama’s Affordable Care Act. In 2015, Kaine voted against the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act. If passed, the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act would have protected unborn children who are capable of feeling pain from abortion. In 2015, he also co-sponsored S-217, also known as the Women’s Health Protection Act of 2015. S-217 would nullify all state limits on abortion. Pro life, as defined by thefreedictionary.com, is advocating the legal protection of human embryos and fetuses, especially by favoring the outlawing of abortion on the ground that it is the taking of a human life. Among the reasons why pro-lifers believe abortion should be illegal is the idea that Roe v. Wade was wrong. In 1973, the Supreme Court had a 7-2 decision that women have the fundamental right to terminate their abortion as they see fit. However, later Supreme Court justices have declared that in that time the Supreme Court had overstepped their bounds because abortion was an issue for legislators not judges. Therefore, the original 7-2 vote should be deemed inaccurate. To add to the list of reasons why it should be illegal, people argue that fetuses fall under the 14th amendment, which states that no person should be “deprived of life” without recourse to the due process of the law. That statement is where a lot of debate falls about when life begins or ends. Most pro-lifers agree that life begins at conception, or when there is a distinct heartbeat. This debate also is present when the statement of abortion being murder is brought up. Many argue that fetuses are also protected due to the federal act “Unborn Victims of Violence.” This specific act states that unborn children are considered to be human beings and that imposes penalties on anyone who would do the child harm with the exception of abortion. Pro-lifers argue that if this law protects unborn children from strangers doing harm, why would it allow a mother to kill her own child (“10 Reasons Why Abortion Should be Illegal” 1). Another argument they bring up is this is the modern day eugenics. The Nazis are notorious for bringing eugenics to a whole new light, and “exterminating” those who were deemed less than perfect. Nowadays with all the tests soon-to-be mothers are given, you can even identify possible diseases with a child, some pro-lifers argue that mothers are getting abortions only when they find out their child would be born with an illness. One of the biggest reasons pro-lifers are against abortion is because of adoption. You could make the argument that every child that is killed through abortion could be a child for a family out there who can’t have one of their own. Although this is a very valid point, pro-choicers can point out that there are on any given day an average of 415,000 children in foster care (“Foster Care” 1). And although that seems relatively small, on average there at thirty-six couples waiting for every one child adopted (Riler, Keith “Thirty-Six Couples Wait for Every One Baby who is Adopted”). The Republican Party has been quite evident in their views of abortion. They have stated that unborn children have fundamental individual rights and that they do, in fact, fall under the Fourteenth Amendment. They refuse to fund any organization that performs or advocate abortions as well. They support the President's idea of increasing tax incentives and bonuses “to states that place older children in permanent family homes.” The Republican Party has said they want to double abstinence funding to show teens that abstinence is the only true 100% effective contraceptive. That funding would also go to funding the courses that would teach the harmful side effects from having unprotected sex, such as STIs and out of wedlock pregnancies. Although they do oppose abortion they do not want nor intend to inflict punishment on those women who have turned to abortion. Their main goal is to make sure the necessary materials and support is readily available for women experiencing issues during their pregnancy. Donald Trump specifically has been very vocal that his stance is pro-life. Abortions should only be performed in absolute cases such as rape, incest, or the mother's life is at risk. When asked if he would defund Planned Parenthood he stated, “I wouldn't fund it if they have abortion going on. Now, you hear all different numbers. They say it's 3%, other people say it's 85%. That's a big difference. So I'd certainly look into it.” Although Trump has made his stance on abortions quite clear, in 1999 he openly said he was pro-choice. When confronted about this switch in stance he stated, “I've evolved on many issues over the years. And you know who else has? Ronald Reagan evolved on many issues.” he goes on to state that he always hated the idea of abortion, and that a friend of his was going to have an abortion, but didn’t, and now that child is “a total superstar, a great, great child. And I saw that. And I saw other instances.” (Donald Trump on Abortion 1)
The laws surrounding Abortion, particularly the efforts to ban abortion and overturn Roe Vs. Wade are one of the most significant social problems we are facing in 2017. Roe v. wade is a landmark decision that was made by the United States Supreme Court on the issue of abortion back in 1973. Abortion has been a prevalent social problem throughout history and continues to be very much a part of the social and political debate today. In fact, abortion has been one of the biggest controversies of all time. Both sides of the argument, pro-choice and pro-life, have many valid points to back their opinion and that is partly why this continues to be such a big debate. The other part is that it is very much a political issue. I stand firmly on the
Abortion is a very controversial and sensitive topic in today’s society. Two different sides to this argument is pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life proponents believe in the right to life for unborn fetuses saying that abortion should be considered murder regardless of how far along in the pregnancy the woman is. Pro-choice advocates people who believe the woman carrying the fetus should be able to make her own decision on aborting the fetus.
Pro life vs. pro choice is a very sensitive subject to argue among a crowd. A large number of advantages and disadvantages leave individuals in an uproar while explaining their stance. Views on religion, myths, and unfit mothers show different arguments to each opposing side. Alternatives to abortion and the future aspects have shown many different pieces about pro life and pro choice. To start, pro life arguments will be stated along with the writer’s opinions. Finally, the writer’s opinions on the subject following pro choice disputes. This provides a clear understanding between the two opposing topics.
Pro choice vs pro life has divided people for numerous reasons. Abortion is expected to date back to the 1800s, it is now seen as taboo and inhumane to some. Fact of the matter, whether abortion is wrong or not it is the fight for giving a woman a natural right to her own body. For decades, legislators that are full of man have created laws and regulations on abortion. Abortion ideally ought to be pro choice for women everywhere for the victims' own protection, expanding young girls life opportunities, and individual freedom.
Controversy and arguments that were setbacks in the ongoing battle for women’s rights, specifically the right to an abortion, were put to slight a rest with the landmark verdict of Roe v. Wade. The revolution in reproductive rights caused by Roe v. Wade evolved from a spark in the hearts of women everywhere. When women claimed their rights as humans, that was when the face of women’s equality in all aspects started to change. The case of Roe v. Wade was the official legalization of a woman’s constitutional right to get an abortion in the United States, but the aftermath of any case is what makes or breaks the future laws and regulations. Through all of the restrictions, regulations, and loopholes, Roe v. Wade’s verdict stuck and continued to
The Roe v. Wade case, brought before the U.S. Supreme Court in 1973, resulted in the Court’s determination that women have the constitutional right to have an abortion prior to when the fetus is viable, meaning when it can survive on its own outside the woman’s womb. Since this decision was handed down, Roe v. Wade has been the subject of a constant, divisive public and political debate regarding its moral, ethical and constitutional merits. The plaintiff, Norma McCorvey, who represented all women who are pregnant in the case, used the alias “Jane Roe.” The defendant was the county of Dallas, Texas. Roe’s claim charged that the abortion law in Texas was in violation of the constitutional rights of her and all other pregnant women. The Supreme
Pro-choice versus pro-life argues over the issue of what should be the right stance when dealing with the life of an unborn child. From the perspective of a person who is pro-choice, they believe that “individuals have unlimited autonomy with respect to their own reproductive systems, just as long as they don’t violate the independence of others.” Pro-choice also argues that the government should not have the right to decide whether a woman should exterminate her pregnancy or not. From their viewpoint, they believe that what should be legal in the eyes of the government is contraception use, celibacy, abstinence, and abortion for the first two trimesters of pregnancy. On the stance of pro-life, they argue that the government has a right
The debate of abortion continues to be a controversial problem in society and has been around for many decades. According to Jone Lewis, “In the United States, abortion laws began to appear in the 1820’s, forbidding abortion after the fourth month of pregnancy” (1). This indicates that the abortion controversy has been debated far back into American history. Beginning in the 1900’s, legalized abortion became a major controversy. In 1965, all fifty states in the United States banned abortion; however, that was only the beginning of the controversy that still rages today (Lewis 1). After abortion was officially banned in the United States, groups such as the National Abortion Rights Action League worked hard on a plan to once again legalize abortion in the United States (Lewis 1). It wasn’t until 1970 when the case of Roe (for abortion) v. Wade (against abortion) was brought...
No other element of the Women’s Rights Movement has generated as much controversy as the debate over reproductive rights. As the movement gained momentum so did the demand for birth control, sex education, family planning and the repeal of all abortion laws. On January 22, 1973 the Supreme Court handed down the Roe v. Wade decision which declared abortion "fundamental right.” The ruling recognized the right of the individual “to be free from unwanted governmental intrusion into matters so fundamentally affecting a person as the right of a woman to decide whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” (US Supreme Court, 1973) This federal-level ruling took effect, legalizing abortion for all women nationwide.
Abortion may be one of the most controversial topics in America today. Abortion is defined as “the termination of a pregnancy after, accompanied by, resulting in, or closely followed by the death of the embryo or fetus” (cite dictionary). There are really only two sides on people’s opinion on abortion; pro-life which means abortion should be outlawed and pro-choice which means a woman should be able to decide whether she wants to keep her baby. Thousands of protests and riots have begun due to the fact pro-life activists believe abortion should become illegal. Both sides bring valid points to support their decision that could sway any person’s thoughts. The Roe v. Wade law has allowed abortion to be legal in the U.S since 1973 (Chittom & Newton, 2015). The law “gives women total control over first trimester abortions and grants state legislative control over second and third trimester abortions” (Chittom & Newton, 2015). Ever since the law was put in place, millions of people have tried to overturn it and still
How has abortion been modernized to fit today 's standards? In the article “Is ‘pro-choice’ really what we mean to say?” Written by Ellison, and Marvin Mahan. They talk about How Harrison had such a huge impact of the way women think of abortion today. Stating that women are the primary caregivers so they should have more of a choice than anyone. Ellison quotes Haisons quote “who shall control the power to reproduce the species?” And continues by making note “Only women can get pregnant”. The authors also gives several statistics to make their arguments valid. They have found three strong reasons why abortion isn 't such a bad thing, especially for a feminist. First if a woman is desperate enough she will go ahead with it anyway, it 's good there are safe medical procedures today instead of a dark alleyway. Second the authors know and point out that there is understanding sometimes the unborn child would have a destructive or dangerous life and the responsible act would to not bring that into the world. And lastly they talk about respect for human life. This means increasing moral seriousness
In the second part of the twentieth century, women’s rights once again gained a lot of momentum. The women’s liberation movement was born out of women civil right activists who were tired of waiting for legislative change for women’s rights. Even though women are being recognized more in society, they still face difficult issues. Sexism –especially in the workforce –is becoming a major issue, birth control pills are still not popular, and abortions are frowned upon in society. The case Roe v. Wade is about a woman with the fake name of Jane Roe who wanted an abortion but the state of Texas would not let her unless her life was in danger. She sued the district attorney of Dallas County saying that it violated the right to privacy under the 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th, and 14th Amendments. Usually, some arguments for being against abortions are because it is like killing a life, religious reasons, and less chance of future pregnancies. Some arguments that approve abortion are the rights of privacy and the mother to make her own decision. I decided to pick the landmark case Roe v. Wade because there are many ways to argue for and against abortions, so I wanted to give it an overarching view before I personally pick a side. Roe v. Wade is a significant case because it shows how rights in the Constitution do not have to be explicitly mentioned for it to implement and the change in abortion laws that affect women.
How would you feel if someone decided that you should never get a chance at life? That
In 1973, in what has become a landmark ruling for women’s rights, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of a woman’s right to an abortion. Ever since, individual states have adopted, altered, and/or mutilated the edict to fit their agendas – Texas included. However, the decision made by the justices in Roe v. Wade didn’t set clear cut, inarguable demarcation lines, which has allowed the fiery debate to consume the nation. Rather than establishing a legal ruling of what life is, or is not, the Supreme Court has remained silent on the issue.
The Roe versus Wade case gave women the right to an abortion in 1973. This caused the country to divide into two sides: pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life are for persons who believe a mother figure does not have a right to take their child 's life away under any circumstances. Pro-choice are for persons who believe it is solely the mother 's decision whether or not she wants to keep or abort her unborn child. It was clear that the government supported a woman 's right to an abortion by the Roe versus Wade verdict. Und...