Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The significance of Corporate Social Responsibility
Nature and concept of corporate social responsibility
Arguments for and against the concept of corporate social responsibility
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The significance of Corporate Social Responsibility
3. How can privacy be protected? (500 words)
In terms of government intelligence, in the information age greatest threats to privacy have been the result of technology and business practices related to e-commerce, marketing and information databases, and not the result of government intrusions (Hoffman, Novak & Peralta, 1997). Nevertheless “all things considered, the increasing and overlapping information sharing by governments and businesses about formerly confidential or private activities generates concerns about potential violations of individual’s privacy rights” (Mace, 2008 cited in Gal, Kantor & Lesk, 2008, p.41).
It is essential to know about what privacy means for the intelligence community (IC). The IC is interested in breaching the privacy of the “bad guys”, however the issue is how to do that without breaching the privacy of others. Figure 3 lists the three main areas related to privacy protection: accuracy, access and accountability (Landwehr, 2006 cited in Wacks, 2010, p.46).
Figure 3 – The three A’s
Source: (Landwehr, 2006 cited in Wacks, 2010, p.46)
In addition, a human right and fairly generous right to privacy are acknowledged in most international instruments such as Article 12 of the UN Declaration of Human Rights, Article 17 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) (Wacks, 2010). There are ‘The Madrid Privacy Declaration’ which “is a substantial document that reaffirms international instruments for privacy protection, identifies new challenges, and call for concrete actions” (The Public Voice, n.d.) (see Appendix 1); and OECD Principles (see Appendix 2).
Nevertheless, there is no perfect system. In the face of technolo...
... middle of paper ...
...acturers, along with information and advice about how best to safeguard personal information, are essential elements of strategy for privacy protection. As a result, the technological methods like ‘Privacy Bird’ and Platform for Privacy Preferences Project (P3P) are emerging, which allows you to configure your personal privacy preferences (Wacks, 2010, p.135).
Despite existing laws and privacy enhancing technological methods, the US is progressively taking full advantage of its dominant position not just as the home of companies like Facebook, Google and Twitter but also acknowledging jurisdiction on all websites registered in the US. Therefore, countries such Brazil, Iran, Russia, India and China “are now challenging United States hegemony of the Internet and even calling for the creation of a new governing body to oversee Internet policy” (Brooke, 2012, p.245).
Edward Snowden is America’s most recent controversial figure. People can’t decide if he is their hero or traitor. Nevertheless, his leaks on the U.S. government surveillance program, PRISM, demand an explanation. Many American citizens have been enraged by the thought of the government tracing their telecommunication systems. According to factbrowser.com 54% of internet users would rather have more online privacy, even at the risk of security (Facts Tagged with Privacy). They say it is an infringement on their privacy rights of the constitution. However, some of them don’t mind; they believe it will help thwart the acts of terrorists. Both sides make a good point, but the inevitable future is one where the government is adapting as technology is changing. In order for us to continue living in the new digital decade, we must accept the government’s ability to surveil us.
The personal connection Americans have with their phones, tablets, and computers; and the rising popularity of online shopping and social websites due to the massive influence the social media has on Americans, it is clear why this generation is called the Information Age, also known as Digital Age. With the Internet being a huge part of our lives, more and more personal data is being made available, because of our ever-increasing dependence and use of the Internet on our phones, tablets, and computers. Some corporations such as Google, Amazon, and Facebook; governments, and other third parties have been tracking our internet use and acquiring data in order to provide personalized services and advertisements for consumers. Many American such as Nicholas Carr who wrote the article “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty, With Real Dangers,” Anil Dagar who wrote the article “Internet, Economy and Privacy,” and Grace Nasri who wrote the article “Why Consumers are Increasingly Willing to Trade Data for Personalization,” believe that the continuing loss of personal privacy may lead us as a society to devalue the concept of privacy and see privacy as outdated and unimportant. Privacy is dead and corporations, governments, and third parties murdered it for their personal gain not for the interest of the public as they claim. There are more disadvantages than advantages on letting corporations, governments, and third parties track and acquire data to personalized services and advertisements for us.
Swire, Peter P., and Kenesa Ahmad, eds. Privacy and Surveillance with New Technologies. New York: International Debate education Association, 2012. Print.
Most people concerned about the privacy implications of government surveillance aren’t arguing for no[sic] surveillance and absolute privacy. They’d be fine giving up some privacy as long as appropriate controls, limitations, oversight and accountability mechanisms were in place. ”(“5 Myths about Privacy”). The fight for privacy rights is by no means a recent conflict.
The world erupted in outrage following revelations by Edward Snowden regarding the extent of surveillance perform by the National Security Agency. Privacy becomes one of the hottest topic of 2013 and was chosen by the world’s most popular online dictionary, Dictionary.com, as the Word of the Year. However, the government is not the only one that conduct data gathering and surveillance. Employers often monitor their employees, and businesses collect data on theirs customer. The morality of these practices is a topic that generates heated debate.
Marshall, Patrick. “Privacy Under Attack.” CQ Researcher. 15 Jun. 2001. <http://0-library.cqpress.com.sculib.scu.edu/cqresearcher/search.php>. (requires access to SCU library online databases)
Solove, D. J., Marc R. and Paul M. S., 2006. Privacy, Information, and Technology. Aspen Publishers.
Perhaps the founder of Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, said it best when he claimed that privacy is no longer a “social norm.” Virtually everyone has a smart phone and everyone has social media. We continue to disclose private information willingly and the private information we’re not disclosing willingly is being extracted from our accounts anyway. Technology certainly makes these things possible. However, there is an urgent need to make laws and regulations to protect against the stuff we’re not personally disclosing. It’s unsettling to think we are living in 1984 in the 21st century.
Privacy is a central concept which is closely tied to personal space, territory and other social behavior. We must understand privacy well because it serves a larger purpose. It helps to design a better built environment. Irwin Altman defined privacy as "selective control over another's access to our physical body, our groups, or our environment" (Altman, 1975). His framework of privacy revolves on management of information about oneself and at
Privacy is the most fundamental right of human beings. They argue that privacy goes to the root of what it means to be a person because much like our mind, our confidential information that one has privilege to can be control to some extent. Privacy concerns have been classified into improper acquisition, improper use and privacy invasion. The insecure sense of being watched, it seems e-commerce and e-government services has become more pervasive than any past epoch of the nation history. The state avocation and private monopoly are collecting data on commonalities and end user, they claim that is to better serve them. The question that remains, however, whether these data collection is in the actual service of the people or just a means of social control where the state or corporation is in fact the ultimate beneficiary. In the released
The Internet has allowed people to express ideas and communicate with each other around the world. Those that are against the government’s interference and monitoring of the Internet believe that they are entitled to privacy and the freedom of self-expression. The Clinton Administration wanted to enable a way to trace potential threats to the United States Government by accessing confidential information, tapping into conversations through the Internet and phone calls. “While privacy faces threats from both private and government intrusions, the existing motley patchwork of privacy laws and practices fails to provide comprehensive protection. Instead, it causes confusion that fuels a sense of distrust and ske...
With technology becoming a huge part in society, privacy and security are even more important and in more danger. The Department of Informational Sciences article on privacy is being challenged as well as the popular source, “Technology Is Invading Our Privacy”; each explores how our privacy is in fact decreasing. The Department of Informational Technology delves into the fundamentals of privacy, “Privacy can be defined as an individual condition of life characterized by exclusion from publicity.” It also states that there are many laws that help protect civilians from losing their constitutional right to privacy to the best of their abilities, including: The Privacy Act of 1974, and Guidelines for the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flow of Personal Data of 1980. However, clearly these rules and guidelines are outdated compared to how far our technology has come from 1974. In fact, the amount of innovation and inventions with technology from then is absolutely incredible, and filled with things that couldn't even be imagined 42 years ago. The facts of the Department of Informational Technology are consistent with the article “Technology is Invading our Privacy”. This article gives examples of the issues that arise when the law is not up to date with the advancements of our society. This article reports that the Pew Internet and American Life Project found that “as of May 2013, 91% of American adults own some sort of cell phone...As February 2012, 61% of American adults own a laptop. All three study results showed an increase in ownership over the previous years.” (Pew Internet and American Life Project). One explanation of this finding is that more people are susceptible to intrusive nature of technology. The very device itself is constantly collecting data of what the consumer is going including location tracking, online activity, and personal information entered into the device.
By the expression “Right to Privacy” is meant the aptitude of an individual or group to detach them or information about themselves and thereby reveal them selectively. Privacy is sometimes related to anonymity, the wish to live one’s life with minimum degree of interference. In the expanded form it includes a right against interference with one’s private life, family and home life, attack on his/her honour and reputation ; being placed in a flash light , the disclosure of irrelevant and embracing facts relating to his/her private life; spying , prying , watching and be setting and interference with his/her correspondence. The private pursuits of a person which encompasses his right to be free from intrusion or publicity. It means to be out of the
As the power imbalance caused by mass surveillance makes people have no idea about what and how their private information will be used, they will be in danger in a way that their private data are being at risk of secondary use and disclosure. Shawn B. Spencer, a Climenko/Thayer Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School, in “SECURITY VS. PRIVACY: reframing the debate,” defines the term of secondary use by saying that people’s private information created or collected through surveillance for one purpose is easily used for another without their consent. It means that this information may be collected for the purpose of terrorism, but used for personal gain or corporate profit. David Price, the professor of Anthropology in the Department of Society
When information becomes irrelevant, inadequate, or excessive, the individual has an actual expectation of privacy over such information, because the accuracy of the information is already impaired. While it is acknowledged that under the third-party doctrine, there is no legitimate expectation of privacy as to information voluntarily offered to a third party, the proponent submits that the extent that privacy is relinquished under the doctrine is only as regards the accurate meaning of the information at the time it was published. When this accuracy or meaning has changed by the passage of time or the change of circumstances, the expectation of privacy is restored, because such change is no longer with the consent of the person concerned. Besides, legal scholars have acknowledged that the third-party doctrine is too sweeping a doctrine to determine the existence of an expectation of privacy, the restriction or standard proposed above is a fitting way to limit the doctrine and protect individual privacy