Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Prison management systems
Interrogation methods and if they should be allowed
Interrogation methods and if they should be allowed
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Prison management systems
Prison Conditions in Egypt
Egypt: a country with a population of over 69 000 000 people, home to
some of the worlds most fascinating structures (like the Pyramid's and
The Great Sphinx), and a main contributor to a good deal of the
world's trade industry (most notably petroleum products and cotton
textiles) [1]. One would expect such an affluent country to be a
nation thriving on high integrity and proper treatment of its
citizens. This is anything but the case. In what has been referred to
as "appalling", "life-threatening" and a "filthy system", the prison
conditions in Egypt and the procedures that accompany it are testament
to a true human rights violation and are in dangerous need of
improvement. From the moment an accused person is arrested until their
last dying breath in prison, Egypt's attention to such an important
aspect of the legal system is a dismal display of a governments
disregard for the lives of its citizens. Throughout the course of this
essay, the main factors that lead to this human rights violation will
be explored (i.e. the process of arrest, interrogation, and living
conditions). On top of that, possible solutions to the problems will
be presented to the reader in an attempt to bring light onto the grim
situation that is the prison system in Egypt. This essay is not an
attempt to put down the Egyptian government for its total lack of
careful treatment to those in prisons; it is intended to open eyes to
a problem that appears to get less than enough attention. Whether or
not the people in these prisons are guilty and worthy of poor
treatment is a completely separate subject. What is to be defined is
that ...
... middle of paper ...
...002.
[12] Sick, Gary. Prison Conditions in Egypt: A Filthy System. United
States of America: Human Rights Watch, 1993. Pg 65.
[13] Canada's School Net. Prisons: Life in Prisons.
http://www.acjnet.org/youthfaq/jaillife.html. 1998.
[14] Sick, Gary. Prison Conditions in Egypt: A Filthy System. United
States of America: Human Rights Watch, 1993. Pg 65.
[15] Sick, Gary. Prison Conditions in Egypt: A Filthy System. United
States of America: Human Rights Watch, 1993. Pg 73.
[16] Sick, Gary. Prison Conditions in Egypt: A Filthy System. United
States of America: Human Rights Watch, 1993. Pg 73-91
[17] Amnesty International Report 2002. Egypt.
http://web.amnesty.org/web/ar2002.nsf/mde/egypt!Open. 2002.
[18] Amnesty International Report 2002. Egypt.
http://web.amnesty.org/web/ar2002.nsf/mde/egypt!Open. 2002.
The conditions of prisons were a bit dreadful. In some prisons, prisoners had their feet fasten together by iron bars and had chains around their necks. Most prisoner cells had very little furniture and bedding, prisoners had to sleep on the floor or unless had their friends supply them with furniture and bedding. Most cells did not have a toilet, prisoners were given buckets. A prisoner was giving a small loaf of bread unless they had money to buy more food but that was a bit expensive. Even children were allowed in prisons. Some prison...
In Stephen Chapman’s essay, “The Prisoner’s Dilemma”, he questions whether the Western world’s idea of punishment for criminals is as humane as its citizens would like to believe or would Westerners be better off adopting the Eastern Islamic laws for crime and punishment. The author believes that the current prison systems in the Western world are not working for many reasons and introduces the idea of following the Koranic laws. Chapman’s “The Prisoner’s Dilemma” is persuasive because of his supporting evidence on the negative inhumane impact from the Western form of criminal punishment and his strong influential testament to the actions used by Eastern Islamic societies for crimes committed.
The eponymous building-The Yacoubian Building- is an art deco apartment block, and all Egyptians live - from the rich to the poor who live on its top floor. In the recent past, Egypt has been rogue by a series of demonstration and violation of human rights. Contemporary Egypt seems to have regress from its original state to the present torn down state. Egypt therefore, is marred by a myriad number of problems. The realism and the forthrightness of the film captures the frustrations and disappointments of the Egyptian people, illuminates the government injustices and corruption, as well as criticizes the Islamism program and false religious piety. The Yacoubian Building film, which is a metaphor for Egypt, gives us a little insight on what exactly happens—homosexuality, political Islam, terrorism, torture, social inequality, political corruption and religious hypocrisy.
For decades, prison has been signified as an unspeakably horrifying place for those who have done harm to our society. Nevertheless, in today 's society, shows like Wentworth, orange is the new black and prison break illustrate prison in an entertaining way. A way that is so detached from reality. However, in the article "Norway 's Ideal Prison," by Piers Hernu, he clearly reveals and gives us a vivid picture of what prison life is like in Bastoy, the home of Norway only prison. On the other hand, "The Prisoners Dilemma," by Stephan Chapman argues how in Islamic countries criminals are being cruelly handled and how flawed the American penal system is and needs to be adjusted. Even though there are many similarities in both articles on what
The “pains of imprisonment” can be divided into five main conditions that attack the inmate’s personality and his feeling of self-worth. The deprivations are as follows: The deprivation of liberty, of goods and services, of heterosexual relationships, autonomy and of security.
The purpose of this paper is to examine life on death row. The information obtained in order to write this paper came from one article. In reading the article it is very clear to see the obvious one-sided bias of the author, who is apparently adamantly against the current status of death rows across the United States of America. Unfortunately, no research could be found to illustrate other views or opinions of life on death row. The author of this article used many opinions, first hand accounts and experiences of prisoners living on death row to illustrate his/her ideas. However, there is an obvious bias of those currently living on death row against their living conditions and treatment. It can be assumed that few people would want to be somewhere or enjoy being somewhere when they knew that they would eventually be executed. It is can also be assumed that very few people would find awaiting executing a happy or fulfilling experience. It is interesting to note that while searching the Internet for information on the death penalty an abundance of web sites were found that belonged to prisoners on death row. All of whom claimed that they were wrongly accused, framed for, and innocent of the crimes that they were convicted of committing.
Stickrath, Thomas J., and Gregory A. Bucholtz. "Supermaximum Security Prisons Are Necessary." Supermax Prisons: Beyond the Rock. Lanham, MD: American Correctional Facility, 2003. Rpt. in America's Prisons. Ed. Clare Hanrahan. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 25 Feb. 2014.
Please refer to my below emails, which have been sent to & received my NOMS in recent months. I would firstly like to thank your organisation for seeing that my step-father: Stephen Chambers- Prisoner Number: A6333DK received the books in question. Secondly, I am sincerely grateful that I have seen evidence of accountability in the Prison system from NOMS; I must admit I had felt that I had reached a brick wall that was not penetrable. Unfortunately however, I am saddened to say, that despite my previous emails of concern; the problems at Wandsworth Prison are more worrying that I had previously thought.
Freedom in any society is a condition that is directly correlated to the compliance of society’s rules, regulations, and laws. This right afforded to citizens under the constitution is surrendered by those who choose to disregard and trample on the set of standards and behavior needed for a society to maintain order and avoid anarchy. When loss of freedom is the tool used to punish this segment of society, prisons become the instrumentality used to carry out the various freedom restrictions under the law for each individual. Citizens who find themselves incarcerated in prison will be exposed to an entirely different environment than those in free society. In addition, there is a psychological impact on those being reintroduced into society after having completed long-term sentences, an impact many believe contribute to the high recidivism rates in the United States. The criminal justice system with all of its connected inner workings may not address all of the concerns inside and out of our current prison system, but just as we have improved on our prisons from the past, we will continue to improve and implement new techniques and design precise programs in our future prisons.
The prison system in the United States was not always like it is today. It took mistakes and changes in order to get it to the point it is at. Some people think that prisons should still be being changed while others feel that they are fine the way they are. It is hard to make an argument for one side or the other if one does not know about the history of prisons as well as the differences between prisons structures and differences in prison management. Knowledge of private prisons is also needed to make this difficult decision.
Rights of Prisoners While lawful incarceration deprives prisoners of most of America's Constitutional rights, they do maintain a few constitutional rights. Federal courts, while hesitant to impede the internal administration of prisons, will interfere to rectify violations of the constitutional rights that prisoners are still entitled to. A prison guideline that oversteps a prisoner’s constitutional rights is lawful only if it is reasonably related to the safety of the inmates or the rehabilitation of that prisoner. The Supreme Court has acknowledged four significant factors in determining the rationality of a prison guideline. Courts should contemplate whether there is a lawful, sensible association between the guideline and the reasonable interest advanced to justify it, whether different means for exercising the proclaimed right continue to exist, whether accommodation of the proclaimed right will unfavorably disturb guards, other inmates, and distribution of prison properties generally, and whether there is a noticeable substitute to the guideline that fully accommodated the prisoner’s right that would not cause a problem to the prison, guards or other inmates, as well as hinder the offenders rehabilitation process.
Lappin, H. G., & Greene, J. (2006). Are prisons just? In C. Hanrahan (Ed.), Opposing Viewpoints: America’s prisons (pp. 51-98). Detroit: Bonnie Szumski.
When reviewing the international human right laws we see that it is put in place to protect the prisoner’s capabilities working in the private prison systems. With the advance degree of the rise in population of prisoners incarcerated every year, the more rapidly they are exploited in their labor capabilities. Where there are three different areas prisoners may work :) in the institution where the prisoner is incarcerated which is called a private prison, a private subdivision which is involved with the prison industries, and, private subdivisions that are engaged with the work release program. Over the years prison labor has been a matter of interest and concern with the (ILO) International Labor Organization, yet the international law is not advancing to the degree that it needs too on this specific subject. (Fenwick, C. 2005). In argument of this we need recognize how the prison labor is being used for profit beyond what it should and needs to be addressed if we have any regard to how we treat the incarcerated. Yes...
Shelden, R. G. (1999). The Prison Industrial Complex. Retrieved November 16, 2013, from www.populist.com: http://www.populist.com/99.11.prison.html
Incarceration has not always been the main form of “punishment” when it comes to doing an injustice to society. In fact, in the early 1600’s common forms of punishments for doing wrong in society included social rejection, corporal punishment, forced labor etc. (“Prison History.”). It had not been until the 18th century where it had been determined that incarceration could actually be a form of punishment correlating with a set amount of time in which an individual had to serve dependent on the severity of his actions. The logic behind incarceration is to restrict a person of his liberty as retribution for the crime he has committed (Prison History.”) Prisons that were created in the 18th century gained their recognition because of their high goals in perfecting society. But, the truth is as people were focusing on perfecting society prisons soon became overcrowded, dirty, and most of all dangerous. By the late 19th century many more people had become aware of the poor prison conditions which had led to a “reformatory” movement. The reformatory movement was put into place as a means of rehabilitation for inmates (“Prison History.”) Prisons would now offer programs to reform inmates into model citizens by offering counseling, education, and opportunities to gain skills needed for working in a civilian world. However, with the growing amount of inmates each year prisons are still becoming overcrowded. Because prisons are so overcrowded there are not enough resources being spent on achieving the rehabilitation of inmates and reintegrating them into society in order for them to survive in the civilian world once released from prison (“Prison History.”)