Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Powers of president in america
Powers of president in america
Checks and balances in America
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Powers of president in america
America, land of the free and home of the brave. The center of democracy and freedom. At least that is what America thinks. However, with this being the first of its kind, it is relatively weak and can be infiltrated. While better than the Articles of Confederation, the United States first government, this government can still let cruel and oppressive leaders to tyrannize this nation. While our government is fairly safe, we still can be oppressed by unfair elections, the excess legislative power, and the lack of laws protecting minorities. One of the government’s biggest issues is the electoral college. First off every ten years, the districts are drawn by the legislative branch of each state. These are the districts the Representatives …show more content…
are elected for. The districts have to have fairly the same population, but that doesn’t mean it cannot be corrupted. District can be drawn so that either Democrats or Republicans can have the majority of votes in the states, despite what the majority party is in the state. This is called gerrymandering, named after Governor Gerry drawing a district in the shape of a salamander (www.loc.gov). Another issue with the electoral college is that it creates swing states. These are states that sometimes go Democrat and sometimes go Republican. Unlike California or Texas, these are the states that choose who is president. The states that are loyal a party don’t even matter to the nomination. Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Wisconsin, Virginia, and Colorado are the states that decide the president. This is totally unfair to the rest of the country who the candidates can ignore the rest of the country and focus on these states when running. This could also cause a sort of bribery with candidates for these states. Another problem that make the electoral college is how distorted the electoral college. Contrary to popular belief, Wyoming residents have more power than Californians. It takes three Californian votes to outweigh a citizen of Wyoming’s vote. These facts outweigh democracy and distort the votes (www.fairvote.org). Another thing that tears apart our democracy is the power that the Legislative Branch has.
Their checks and balances are totally unfair for the other branches, specifically the Executive Branch. For example, while the president can veto laws, the Congress can override this veto (Document A). This basically takes away the president’s check of the Legislative Branch, making it unfair for the President. It would have been much more fair if the Judicial Branch could override a veto. This is so because then the check for the Legislative would be intact, but the President would also be in check. Another potentially dangerous part of this is the ability the President and Congress have together. If the President managed to fill Congress with his cronies, then they could completely change the Constitution entirely (Article V, Constitution). This would make the Judicial Branch ineffective and lead to an oligarchy, or a government controlled by a specific group of people entirely with no power limitations. And while oligarchies can be effective and good for the economy, this can easily lead to oppression of the rich and then lead to tyranny. Finally, unlike the president, a congressman or woman does not have a limit to the amount of terms that they can serve. This gives them a long time to influence the House of Representatives or the Senate and can lead to tyranny from the few, or the …show more content…
Congress. The final and perhaps most interesting of the arguments is the existence of tyranny in this country all ready.
While slavery was abolished many years ago, the white population, specifically in the South, still tyrannize other races. Not only African Americans, oh no. Mexicans, Asians, Muslims, and even women are still tyrannize by white, Protestant, males. A great example of this is the infamous Donald Trump. This highly racist businessman who is running for President has many great quotes, but here is a few. “I will build a great wall - and no one builds walls better than me...”, “Our great African American President hasn't exactly had a positive impact on the thugs who are so happily and openly destroying Baltimore!”, and "If I were running 'The View,' I'd fire Rosie O'Donnell. I mean, I'd look her right in that fat, ugly face of hers, I'd say, 'Rosie, you're fired.'" These all show that certain politicians are extremely racist and, most alarmingly, Trump looks like he will the Republican presidency. But don’t worry, there are twelve Smiths running for president (www.fec.gov). Literally anyone can run for president, and they can win if they were born in the USA, are a citizen, and are 35. While racial integration has improved, it still is far from perfect, so other races will still be tyrannize by, well, who knows. If only there were more laws protecting other races and if people treated everyone equally. But until then, tyranny will still exist for certain
people in the USA. In conclusion, not only does the Constitution not protect against tyranny, it allows it to exist for minorities all across the US. The government is not bad, it just is unfair for the voters of certain states, the Executive Branch, and minorities. Tyranny is here already so who is to say it will not spread.
In May of 1787, 55 white wealthy males drifted into Philadelphia to work on the Constitution.
As the President of the United States, a president have powers that other members of the government do not. Presidential power can be defined in numerous ways. Political scientists Richard Neustadt and William Howell give different views on what is presidential power. These polarized views of presidential powers can be used to compare and contrast the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
In document C says, ¨The constant aim is to divide and arrange the powers in a manner that they may be a check on one another.¨ This tells that the constitution is written so that the three branches of government are constantly checked by one another because a law is unfair, biased, or unconstitutional. This also makes it to where the branches of government can't make whatever law they want allowing them to have complete power to do whatever they please thus preventing tyranny. If the branches couldn't check each other they would be able to easily pass laws that only benefit themselves and they could make laws that would put people in harm's way, being able to check each other and putting that in the constitution was a very insightful task. Being able to check each other prevented any one branch from gaining and holding complete control over the
Being African American has never been easy. At birth, we are born with a target on our backs for simply being a different color and whites are born privileged. One would think that when slavery was abolished that the target would be removed but that isn’t so. King states in his article that “…white supremacy saturated public culture...”
Can you imagine president controlling your life? The constitution use three different forms to make a group or a person from getting too much power on his hands. The are three types of power that each contusion have in order to keep power equal. One of them is Legislative Branch Congress “Can approve Presidential nominations”(Document C). It’s a example how governments try to keep power equal.
The formal definition of checks and balances is a system that allows each branch of government the ability to counterbalance the influences of the other branches in order to prevent the concentration of power in only one branch, becoming a tyrant. James Madison wrote in Federalist Paper No. 51 that “the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that each may be a check on the other that the private interest of every individual may be a sentinel over the public rights.” For example, Congress passed a bill that would require federal and state gov...
The Evolution of the Power of the Presidency The views of the presidency by the first sixteen presidents varied widely but all of their actions set precedents for their successors to use, expand, or even curtail the power of the office. Some believed in the Whig theory of strict adherence to the constitution, while others believed the president was the steward of the people with a loose interpretation of it. The power of the office expanded through the years, however it only expanded as far as the public and congress allowed. George Washington was the first President of the United States of America and realizing this he acted carefully and deliberately, aware of the need to build an executive structure that could accommodate future presidents.
Since the election of President Barrack Obama in 2008, many people have started to believe that America is beyond racial inequalities - this is not the reality. Rather, we, as a society, chose to see only what we want to see. Discrimination is still rampant in our nation. Michelle Alexander explains that since the Jim Crow laws were abolished, new forms of racial caste systems have taken their place. Our society and criminal justice system claim to be colorblind, but this is not the actuality. Michelle Alexander explains:
In this paper four subjects on the Electoral College will be addressed. These four subjects are: What is the Electoral College? Why did the founding fathers create the Electoral College? What are some major criticisms of the Electoral College? Should we keep it? Before these questions are addressed it should be noted that many people were not aware of the existence of the Electoral College, perhaps even the Author of this paper.
When the Framers were drafting the presidential selection procedure of the Constitution in 1787, they presented an artful compromise to the issue of direct election. With the new country spanning thousands of miles along the Atlantic coast and barely connected by transportation or communication, it was impractical if not impossible to distribute information widely enough for every citizen to make an informed choice (Kimberling). In a direct election, this lack of knowledge about candidates living in other states would inevitably result in citizens voting for the candidate they knew the most about. Because the larger states have considerable more voters, presidents would be elected not for their political beliefs, but for their place of residence. Given the inability to spread information extensively, the Framers compromised by adopting the idea of representation. The people up and down the country would vote for local delegates with whom they were familiar with. These electors would then elect a president “pre-eminent for ability and virtue” (Hamilton 333). By devising the Electoral College, the Framers ensured th...
Richard E. Neustadt, the author of Presidential Power, addresses the politics of leadership and how the citizens of the United States rate the performance of the president's term. We measure his leadership by saying that he is either "weak or "strong" and Neustadt argues that we have the right to do so, because his office has become the focal point of politics and policy in our political system.
The single-member district election system is the most common and best-known electoral system currently in use in America. It is used to elect the U.S. House Representatives, as well as many state and local legislatures. Under single member district systems, an area is divided into a number of geographically defined voting districts, each represented by a single elected official. Voters can only vote for their district’s representative, with the individual receiving the most votes winning election. This method of electing representatives is better than any alternative solution in various ways. Four compelling reasons to support the single-member district election system include the fact that single-member districts give each voter a single, easily identifiable district member; the way single-member district voting helps protect against overreaching party influence; that single-member districts ensure geographic representation; and finally, that single-member districts are the best way to maximize representatives’ accountability.
When the constitution of the United States was formed, the framers specifically designed the American Government structure to have checks and balances and democracy. To avoid autocracy the President was give power to preside over the executive branch of the government and as commander –in –chief, in which a clause was put into place to give the president the power to appeal any sudden attacks against America, without waiting for a vote from congress. While the president presides over the executive branch there has been ongoing debate over the role of the president in regards to foreign policy. Should foreign policy issues be an executive function by the president or should congress play a much greater role? With the sluggishness of our democracy, foreign policy issues most times need quicker response compared to how domestic policy is decided in the United States. Many believe to maintain openness and democracy both the president and congress need to agree on how the United States handles issue abroad. Although the president has been given much power, his or her power and decisions are sometimes limited based on decisions by congress and challenged and shaped by various bureaucracies throughout the government system. I shall discuss the Presidents role and the role of governmental bureaucracies (Department of Defense, Department of State and the National Security Council) that work together and sometimes not together to shape and implement American foreign Policy.
Centuries ago, there were no laws that contradicted slavery. Many white people owned slaves and they were treated poorly. Then once the slaves realized this wasn't right, they decided to escape and if they got caught, it would be the end for them. After that, many people started protesting about human rights and the rights every human should have because they are simply human. It came with no inhumane treatment towards anybody, nobody couldn’t have slaves, and many other things that the white people were mad about. After many events that took place, there were still discrimination and racism. People still think that this situation should still not be here anymore because we are advancing in so
The US is supposedly the most free, democratic, fair and just country. However, at the core is a h...